Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 04:56 PM Oct 2014

Ebola: I'm dumbfounded...

Okay, forget Ebola just for one moment if you can. Let's talk about communicable diseases of the generic variety here in the United States: so what do we have here? Colds, various flus, childhood diseases, parasitic worms, head lice, you know, all the stuff you deal with on a daily basis if you work in an office, eat in a restaurant, go to school, associate with friends, ride public transportation, shop. Except for absolute pathological recluses, this is virtually everyone in the US of A. None of us enjoy getting any of these diseases or the conditions which are manifest after their contraction, but they certainly are widespread. Vaccines have helped in many respects, unless you're an anti-Vaxxer, but then what can you say? Your children pay the penalties, you get to pontificate as to what an ethical purist you are while your kid has whooping cough in the other room. But I digress.

So…why are these viruses and bacteria so prevalent? Bad hand washing, food preparation, toilet habits certainly contribute as do interpersonal behaviors such as affection and affection-leading-to-sex. Droplets everywhere! Pathogens galore!

So again, in theory we can trace who these people work with, who they cavort with, and who they may contact in a store. But what if…the infected, symptomatic individual takes a bus, is standing and holding a pole, and sneezes on the pole and associated structures? The next person at the next stop reaches over, grabs the pole and is now infected by any definition. How is that going to be tracked? It isn't…and if the person who is next infected is, say, a daycare worker, who cannot afford to miss a day from work due to a low-grade fever, then maybe four or five or ten people may then be infected. And so it goes. Just hypothesizing.

So this is within the realm of possibility. To deny that it is is, IMHO, foolish. Yes, this particular disease is harder to 'catch' in some respects, but just as easy in others. The jury is out.

80 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ebola: I'm dumbfounded... (Original Post) PCIntern Oct 2014 OP
You're right. The only rational solution is to just stay under the bed (please take extra underwear) PSPS Oct 2014 #1
That was NOT the point of the post. PCIntern Oct 2014 #3
I certainly don't get the point of your post. BillZBubb Oct 2014 #77
It requires an all-out approach. Octafish Oct 2014 #2
Well said, my dear PCIntern. I can't add anything but K&R. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Oct 2014 #4
Viruses and bacteria are so prevalent because there are billions of them everywhere... Avalux Oct 2014 #5
Did I not just say that it is harder PCIntern Oct 2014 #7
You said 'harder to catch in some respects, but just as easy in others'. Demit Oct 2014 #27
Yes: PCIntern Oct 2014 #28
Ebola is not transmitted the same as a cold or the flu. Avalux Oct 2014 #60
Spittle >>>>> into somebody else's eyes/mouth/nose just sufficient to kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #73
That is direct personal contact, still not the same as a cold or the flu. n/t Avalux Oct 2014 #74
I never said it was the same as colds of flu, which are aerosolized and kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #76
My apologies.... Avalux Oct 2014 #80
It's also not healthy to live in a sterile environment. Marrah_G Oct 2014 #9
THAT is the POST OF THE YEAR! PCIntern Oct 2014 #30
Hehe- thanks Marrah_G Oct 2014 #31
With that in mind... PCIntern Oct 2014 #32
Ebola is highly infectious because it takes only 1-10 virus particles kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #72
Which jury are you serving on? Boomer Oct 2014 #6
Does every post have to be a dissertation? PCIntern Oct 2014 #8
Where are you going with this? Boomer Oct 2014 #10
All right... PCIntern Oct 2014 #12
I have no idea why 1dogleft Oct 2014 #33
I have been here ten years... PCIntern Oct 2014 #34
It wasn't reasonable to bring up JFK Texasgal Oct 2014 #36
I completely understood your OP. cwydro Oct 2014 #13
Thank you. I'm truly appreciative. PCIntern Oct 2014 #14
they are exposed by any definition, but not infected magical thyme Oct 2014 #11
Absolutely…BUT PCIntern Oct 2014 #15
I live in Maine, so for the moment I feel lucky. magical thyme Oct 2014 #16
Stephen King Territory! PCIntern Oct 2014 #18
I thought about Ebola while getting my nails done the other day ecstatic Oct 2014 #17
Try being a dentist… PCIntern Oct 2014 #20
Only the hysterical people. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2014 #57
You're right…I'm the one splattered with people's blood and secretions. PCIntern Oct 2014 #59
So where are your hysterical posts on HepC? Barack_America Oct 2014 #61
One will kill you in a very ugly way up to 90% of the time seveneyes Oct 2014 #19
Do you know the lifespan of the Ebola virus outside a host? Also..I wonder what chemicals... BlueJazz Oct 2014 #21
It would vary as to the ambient temperature, nature of the surface, PCIntern Oct 2014 #24
Ebola is easily killed by disinfectants that kill nonenveloped viruses. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #75
Also, I'm cutting the people who are minimizing the potential risks some slack ecstatic Oct 2014 #22
I understand and respect that... PCIntern Oct 2014 #23
True. Did you see this article? ecstatic Oct 2014 #25
I hadn't. I like that. PCIntern Oct 2014 #26
I saw that. 840high Oct 2014 #37
It's also training. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2014 #58
I think the danger is significant that it will spread here, yet I am not all that worried. Chemisse Oct 2014 #29
refraining from touching your eyes or nose is harder than you imagine magical thyme Oct 2014 #35
I've started carrying wipes in 840high Oct 2014 #38
I have my doubts about this stuff, too. ladyVet Oct 2014 #39
Well, that's how disease spreads PCIntern Oct 2014 #40
That's a normal way for a human to think. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2014 #53
"Colds, various flus, childhood diseases, parasitic worms, head lice" customerserviceguy Oct 2014 #41
This is fear-mongering. elias49 Oct 2014 #42
You are dead wrong... PCIntern Oct 2014 #43
We're all gonna die!!! (That better?) nt elias49 Oct 2014 #46
Nothing in between, right? PCIntern Oct 2014 #47
Read your own OP PC! elias49 Oct 2014 #48
What the hell are you talking about? PCIntern Oct 2014 #49
Just hypothesizing .. like you. elias49 Oct 2014 #50
Now you'll walk it back... PCIntern Oct 2014 #51
There are a lot of things at work Warpy Oct 2014 #44
that's very true, Warpy: PCIntern Oct 2014 #45
I've been wondering about the food-borne illnesses that seem to be Nay Oct 2014 #63
Interesting... PCIntern Oct 2014 #64
I didn't know that was one of its names, but yes, I am familiar with that Nay Oct 2014 #67
Often it is the utensil used to cut your salad was used for something else PCIntern Oct 2014 #70
"We got this. Nothing to see. Move along, people." valerief Oct 2014 #52
…and how dare you insolently question our methodology? PCIntern Oct 2014 #54
Well, America does have the best press conferences in the world, so I guess valerief Oct 2014 #55
if it gets bad enough, Americans will start wearing masks and gloves esp. on public transportation librechik Oct 2014 #56
read this ny times q&a; the virus does not spread readily unblock Oct 2014 #62
the earliest symptoms are fever and headache magical thyme Oct 2014 #65
i'm not saying it can never be spread to people who had no idea they came into contact with unblock Oct 2014 #68
If they are allowed in the hospital due to insurance problems OR PCIntern Oct 2014 #66
yes, but you're more likely to die from a bus accident trauma than from bus pole ebola. unblock Oct 2014 #69
that is certainly true at this time... PCIntern Oct 2014 #71
Are you saying if the are NOT allowed in the hospital? BillZBubb Oct 2014 #78
Quaranteed after "exhibiting flu like symptoms" of vomiting HockeyMom Oct 2014 #79

PSPS

(13,591 posts)
1. You're right. The only rational solution is to just stay under the bed (please take extra underwear)
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 05:02 PM
Oct 2014

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
2. It requires an all-out approach.
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 05:03 PM
Oct 2014

While medicine and government play a part in containing and stopping the ebola epidemic, so must each member of the community -- from washing hands, covering one's mouth when coughing or sneezing, getting news and information, and supporting efforts to treat those with illness. It's not "Satan Bug" bad, but that one may be out there.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
5. Viruses and bacteria are so prevalent because there are billions of them everywhere...
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 05:24 PM
Oct 2014

they were here before human beings, and they'll be here when we're gone. Most are not harmful, some are helpful, and some are bad for us. You have a lot of them living on your skin and inside your body right now.

While we can do things to cut back on infection rates, we will never get to a point where we can eradicate the ones that are spread very easily, like respiratory infections. Ebola is not a respiratory infection, sneezing and coughing are not cardinal signs, it's not spread that way - not airborne. It's not easy to catch.

So I'm a little confused by your last two sentences. How is Ebola easier to catch, and why is the jury still out?

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
7. Did I not just say that it is harder
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 05:32 PM
Oct 2014

To catch? Am I hallucinating? What jury am I on? That is not the question. The question is what will the verdict be? The circumstances will eventually provide the answer.

 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
27. You said 'harder to catch in some respects, but just as easy in others'.
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 07:22 PM
Oct 2014

That's what the poster was asking about. Maybe you should explain what you meant by it being 'just as easy' to catch.

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
28. Yes:
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 07:26 PM
Oct 2014

If I have it and sneeze into your mouth you could catch it. Same as you would a cold or the flu. Easy, right? the guy lifted his relative in her death throes and he caught it. Also easy. It's not like you have to go thru a 16 step transformation and be beamed down to Vulcan sideways to get it.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
60. Ebola is not transmitted the same as a cold or the flu.
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 11:16 AM
Oct 2014

You speak in contradictions, no? While what you say is possible, that being close enough to someone that mucous from a sneeze (which isn't a symptom) could end up in your mouth and infect you, it's not the same as a cold or the flu.

Direct personal contact with body fluids.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
73. Spittle >>>>> into somebody else's eyes/mouth/nose just sufficient to
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 01:01 PM
Oct 2014

contact the mucosa. That's all it takes. That's why the masks and goggles.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
76. I never said it was the same as colds of flu, which are aerosolized and
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 01:13 PM
Oct 2014

float about for prolonged periods.

The average person thinks direct personal contact means your body part actually touching their body part. THAY is why this always needs clarification.

I really can't stand people second guessing CDC and trying to minimize the seriousness of this situation. Unless you are a Phd epidemiologist specializing in reportable infectious diseases, you don't want to be trying to imply CDC is wrong. And if you are and do, you still need the published studies to back up your claims.

That last part isn't necessarily directed at you, but rather at the many armchair infectious disease experts that have popped up here on DU. Most of whom have zero formal education in biology, let alone this specialized field of expertise.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
80. My apologies....
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 03:18 PM
Oct 2014

Last edited Sun Oct 5, 2014, 03:49 PM - Edit history (1)

I got you confused with someone else in this thread, so my original post was incorrect. I thought you said something you didn't.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
31. Hehe- thanks
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 07:29 PM
Oct 2014

I noticed when my kids were growing up that the kids who got sick the most were the ones that never ever got dirty, rarely played outside, etc. Their pediatrician agreed. Said kids being outside and being exposed to the elements, trees, dirt, etc was good for them.

Except for bad viruses that can be lethal of course ( just in case anyone thought I was talking about ebola)

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
72. Ebola is highly infectious because it takes only 1-10 virus particles
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 12:59 PM
Oct 2014

to cause infection. This is clearly defined and understood scientific terminology that epidemiologists and virologists use. Nothing vague or uncertain about it.

And then, depending on how fast you start supportive care and how high quality that supportive care is, you may or may not be one of the 70% who die of it.

We are fortunate that Ebola is a "fragile" virus in the environment, meaning it dies quickly. Unless it is safe inside a deposit of proteinaceous debris (commonly known as bodily fluid), in which case survival is highly variable and could be a week. And it survives VERY well in cold/freezing temperatures. So sloppy cleaning/disinfection of the environment could leave infectious virus particles around on surfaces.

"Easier to catch" is just a vague term with no scientific meaning.

Boomer

(4,168 posts)
6. Which jury are you serving on?
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 05:28 PM
Oct 2014

I'm still trying to figure out what point you're trying to make.

Life is hard?

Shit happens?

The sky is falling?

Yes, it's possible that we'll have small outbreaks of ebola all over the U.S. and that our eroded health system will not handle them as well as it should. Once we've gotten everyone's attention, though, containment and eradication are quite achievable.

I'm much more concerned how an easily communicable disease would test our under-funded, under-staffed public health systems and hospitals. We've dodged the bullet on SARS and flu so far, so hopefully ebola will jar people into action.

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
8. Does every post have to be a dissertation?
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 05:36 PM
Oct 2014

I made a series of statements which were self-limiting. Please take it as it reads. If I wanted to say that The Black Death was upon us I would have.

Boomer

(4,168 posts)
10. Where are you going with this?
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 05:42 PM
Oct 2014

A post doesn't have to be a dissertation to have a point. I can't figure out what your point was in starting this thread.

Just random comments about ebola? Feel free to ramble, but don't be surprised that people are replying with "wut?".

I'm not trying to be snarky. As someone fascinated by ebola for a host of different reasons, I'll read just about anything touching on that topic, but I didn't grasp what this thread is supposed to be about.

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
12. All right...
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 05:56 PM
Oct 2014

step back a bit:

See, the other day I posted that I thought that it was more than a little ironic that all of this was taking place in Dallas for a variety of reasons AND I was pretty sure a priori that the so-called public health folk were going to screw this up in the short and possibly the long term. And I was excoriated at first for my opinion, people insulting me and praising the wonderful Dallas Presby System and then it turned out that my skepticism was well-founded.

And then there were all these posts arguing about the virulence of the disease and very few people here understand the nature of transmission of viral illness despite their backgrounds or experience. That's OK in and of itself: this is a lay message board. So what I was saying was, forget Ebola for a minute, let's look at common diseases and how they're transmitted and then I allowed the reader to extrapolate. You know, the phrase "very unlikely" does not apply when you have millions of individuals and quintillions of viral particles. I drew no conclusions in the post. I have some thoughts but they're just that: thoughts. Doesn't really matter what you or I think, it is only what the viral particle does that matters. People who want to argue can feel free to argue with it. Good luck.

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
34. I have been here ten years...
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 08:24 PM
Oct 2014

I just took a break for a few weeks because I didn't get it either and I'd been thru the primary wars here numerous times and being called all kinds of names and crap but recently my integrity was impugned and I knew if I kept defending myself I would say something that would get me banned. I had a few hidden posts which I almost never had. But I'm back and will not counterpunch with negativity. Thanks for the sentiment!

Texasgal

(17,045 posts)
36. It wasn't reasonable to bring up JFK
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 08:54 PM
Oct 2014

or the S&h debacle.

That's were it got silly to be honest. Just an FYI.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
11. they are exposed by any definition, but not infected
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 05:45 PM
Oct 2014

They are innoculated if the pathogen finds entry into their system.

They are not infected until it begins to replicate.

Ebola is apparently pretty fragile outside a large droplet, and not truly airborne, so less transmissible than flu or colds.

Time will tell how effective tracing will be.

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
15. Absolutely…BUT
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 06:25 PM
Oct 2014

to quote the great Mr. Eastwood: Do you feel lucky?

e.g.: grab that doorknob that that guy from Liberia who just sneezed into his hand used ten seconds ago. No?

As clinicians, we used to lecture young people about sexual relations with high-risk individuals even WITH condoms and/or rubber dams. Same schtick.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
16. I live in Maine, so for the moment I feel lucky.
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 06:27 PM
Oct 2014

It's highly unlikely that I will be exposed, innoculated or infected by Duncan. As close to zero probability as you can get.

Right now, certain healthcare workers and cohorts of Duncan are probably praying to whatever gods or goddesses they may or may not believe in for a nice dose of good luck.

ecstatic

(32,685 posts)
17. I thought about Ebola while getting my nails done the other day
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 06:30 PM
Oct 2014

I thought about how the beauty service industry would be affected by an outbreak. A nail tech is exposed to hundreds of customers and in turn, exposes hundreds of customers to whatever s/he has.

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
20. Try being a dentist…
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 06:32 PM
Oct 2014

really not an issue for me. By that time, I'll be out of business: no one would set foot in a dentist's office

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
57. Only the hysterical people.
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 11:02 AM
Oct 2014

I'd be fine setting foot in a dentist's office, you guys always use proper gloves, face shields, etc.

Waiting rooms are the germier spots, no?

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
21. Do you know the lifespan of the Ebola virus outside a host? Also..I wonder what chemicals...
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 06:35 PM
Oct 2014

...used in those sanitary wipes CAN'T kill it.

Just curious. Like your OP

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
24. It would vary as to the ambient temperature, nature of the surface,
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 06:48 PM
Oct 2014

and the medium. Vomit in front of a doorstep might be problematic…then again, if you read some of the posts here, maybe not.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
75. Ebola is easily killed by disinfectants that kill nonenveloped viruses.
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 01:07 PM
Oct 2014

But the proteinaceous debris is the bugaboo. All the disinfectant in the world doesn't help if your surfaces aren't free of dried specks of crud.

In my cat hospital the rule is: clean and clean and clean, until the surface is spotless. And then clean one last time to disinfect. We use a quaternary ammonium spray - Roccal-D. In rare instances we follow up with a bleach wipe (cats with dermatophytosis or FIP).

ecstatic

(32,685 posts)
22. Also, I'm cutting the people who are minimizing the potential risks some slack
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 06:42 PM
Oct 2014

because I figure it's a coping mechanism. Maybe some people are unable to find a middle ground between denial/trivializing the threat and outright panic mode. Over the past week, we've seen multiple systems fail and important protocols broken--and we're each processing the information in different ways.

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
23. I understand and respect that...
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 06:47 PM
Oct 2014

now when it happens to your sister, you will be cutting much less slack.

See, this is the problem, we are all too remote…this is happening to someone else somewhere else. It was further…now its closer. Objects in the mirror are closer than they appear….

ecstatic

(32,685 posts)
25. True. Did you see this article?
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 06:54 PM
Oct 2014
Doctor dons Ebola protection suit to protest ‘asleep at the wheel’ CDC

Two days after a man in Texas was diagnosed with Ebola, a Missouri doctor Thursday morning showed up at Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport dressed in protective gear to protest what he called mismanagement of the crisis by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Dr. Gil Mobley checked in and cleared airport security wearing a mask, goggles, gloves, boots and a hooded white jumpsuit emblazoned on the back with the words, “CDC is lying!”

“If they’re not lying, they are grossly incompetent,” said Mobley, a microbiologist and emergency trauma physician from Springfield, Mo.
Mobley said the CDC is “sugar-coating” the risk of the virus spreading in the United States.

http://www.ajc.com/news/news/doctor-boards-flight-in-ebola-protection-suit-to-p/nhZk8/

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
26. I hadn't. I like that.
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 07:02 PM
Oct 2014

what amazed me here once again were the number of knee-jerk apologists for those completely screwing up this operation. Why I get surprised every time I don't know: I'm like Charlie Brown with Lucy and the Football.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
58. It's also training.
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 11:08 AM
Oct 2014

Nobody wants to see their doctor or nurse panicking. That just makes things a lot worse on the patient and family.

So you go into healthcare, you're taught to be cognizant of the risks as they come, but not to freak out, even when faced head on with nasty emergencies and dangerous situations. You panic, and you're halfway to becoming a victim yourself. A cool head lets you walk your way calmly through protective checklists without leaving out steps and winding up exposing yourself unnecessarily.

Chemisse

(30,809 posts)
29. I think the danger is significant that it will spread here, yet I am not all that worried.
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 07:27 PM
Oct 2014

Because I think we can control whether or not we get infected.

If we adopt a few OCD-like habits, we could ward it off.

Like when you grab that pole on the subway or bus, and (potentially) get someone's Ebola-ridden snot on your hand, you can refrain from touching your eyes or nose until you have washed your hands. Perhaps you can carry wet wipes around until you can get to a sink. Or you could wear disposable gloves.

In Japan, people regularly wear face masks in public to prevent the spread of infections. Maybe safety glasses could be added to that. So if someone sneezes toward you, the mucous droplets won't get in your mouth and eyes.

So lots of hand-washing and some sensible protective gear could halt its casual spread. Then you just have to worry about the people you live and work with.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
35. refraining from touching your eyes or nose is harder than you imagine
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 08:36 PM
Oct 2014

I can't believe how many times a day I catch myself in the lab trying to adjust my glasses or trying to scratch and itch.

Maybe carry wipes with you and wipe down your hands immediately after releasing the pole on the bus, then fold the wipe inward so any snots or whatever are inside the wipe and discard immediately.

ladyVet

(1,587 posts)
39. I have my doubts about this stuff, too.
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 09:49 PM
Oct 2014

Maybe I'm not understanding it, or not remembering the stories right, but doesn't it seem odd that we bring some infected people here to treat them, and the next thing you know, we have the first case of some random person coming into the country with Ebola?

Remember how the Bush administration was all hysterical about bird flu? Going to kill us all, any minute now.

I need a tin foil hat. I can put ribbons and flowers on it. Maybe I'll start a fashion trend! Not that I'm going to panic, but it's foolish to just accept what the government says at face value. I've seen how they handle infectious disease, like when AIDS started going around in the 70s.

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
40. Well, that's how disease spreads
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 10:05 PM
Oct 2014

AFAIC, it's like someone who practices unprotected sex exclaiming that they somehow got pregnant.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
53. That's a normal way for a human to think.
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 10:46 AM
Oct 2014

We always try to make patterns even where there are none.

Maybe I'm not understanding it, or not remembering the stories right, but doesn't it seem odd that we bring some infected people here to treat them, and the next thing you know, we have the first case of some random person coming into the country with Ebola?


The only real connections there are that A) ebola exists, and B) people who went where it was spreading came here.

The guy who brought it to the US on his own wasn't connected with the doctors who were brought back, nor did he fly in the same planes, use the same ambulances, etc.

Do I accept what 'the government' says at face value? No, of course not. But I do accept what the actual people who spend their lives studying ebola or similar hemorrhagic diseases say, and what they write down in papers that end up being on places like PubMed or CDC websites as being the best available info we've got for now.

So it's fine to be overly cautious, but don't panic in advance. Don't hang out with people who seem to have the flu, wash your hands a lot, don't touch your eyes, mouth or nose if you can avoid it. Skip public bathrooms if you can. Use gloves and other protective gear when you are going to come in contact with bodily fluids other than your own, especially if you don't know where they come from.

And those are all good advice even without worrying about ebola.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
41. "Colds, various flus, childhood diseases, parasitic worms, head lice"
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 10:36 PM
Oct 2014

Don't cause about half of the people who acquire them to die. If you can't distinguish that, then there is no sense talking to you.

This is radically different, and the folks in the mushy middle who decide the weekend before an election which party scares them the least will surely make a determination about which party is more concerned about this, and which party simply doesn't want to hurt the feelings of unfortunate people of Third World countries.

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
42. This is fear-mongering.
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 10:47 PM
Oct 2014

Why persist with this? How many more OPs before you're satisfied that everyone is alarmed/
Things like "...when your sister gets it..." are just bull-shit.
This is right-wing talk radio stuff.

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
43. You are dead wrong...
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 11:29 PM
Oct 2014

if precautions aren't taken and they are sloppy like they're being someone's sister is gonna get it. I went thru your kind of dismissal during the GRID/AIDS crisis and people listened to folks like you. And they died. So you wanna play games with others' lives, you go right ahead - I'm not going to just accept your knowitallism. Accuse me of being a RWer, will you? I've been here for ten offing years through a lot of misinformation and surety wherein the people had to retrench. Posters like you were all over me the other day when I said that the hospital was fucking up and guess what…they did fuck up. "The GREAT Texas System…BS on that crap. This is life and death.

You know, before Y2K there were deniers…and then when people spent months and years to adapt the systems so that they would work on 1/1/00, people like you said, Toldja nothing would happen. Brilliant…just brilliant.

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
47. Nothing in between, right?
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 08:54 AM
Oct 2014

Yup, the world is black and white to folks like you. No subtlety, no thought process required, no reasonableness of decision-making, no science. Why, I recall someone saying once: You're either with us or against us.

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
48. Read your own OP PC!
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 09:15 AM
Oct 2014

You have "what ifs" "hypotheticals" "Maybes" You can do that with anything: what if you were driving down the hiway..in a driving rain...and let's say your tires aren't the greatest...and suppose you start hydroplaning...and if you were right next to an 18-wheeler...you know where Im going with this.
Bottom line is that I believe no-one wants to die prematurely. Doctors, nurses, biologists, etc...I believe American health professionals are doing/will do everything in their power to control/eliminate the threat of an ebola epidemic in the US. To post about worst-case scenarios does no-one any good. Don't you thing the folks on these boards are smart enough to take precautions? But I draw the line at not leaving my home.
By the way...yo r reply to my first post was priceless. "You're DEAD wrong" Hahaha! Cute.



PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
49. What the hell are you talking about?
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 09:34 AM
Oct 2014

I was pointing out how disease spreads - the mechanism. Nowhere did I say anything about not living ones life. I am an American Health Care Professional and I know EXACTLY how sloppily everything is treated. But you just want to twist and disrupt…and you are disrupting poorly. Like anyone would really care what you think. Bad attempt at hijack. Bye.

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
50. Just hypothesizing .. like you.
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 09:40 AM
Oct 2014

And hardly disrupting. Unless disagreeing with you is 'disrupting'

Warpy

(111,245 posts)
44. There are a lot of things at work
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 02:48 AM
Oct 2014

First, too many people don't buy the germ theory of disease. You can't see them, your hands look perfectly clean, why take the time to wash?

Second, and really important, is short staffing in every business out there, whether they sell food, shoes, or health care.

Other contributors are not wanting to put your hands in water when it's cold, not wanting to be splashed, having hands rough and chapped from too many times in water, and for some people, just not caring, especially since wages have fallen so low.

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
45. that's very true, Warpy:
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 05:59 AM
Oct 2014

I wash my hands over 150 times daily as part of my work. I use a moderately-priced commercial soap and my hands are very very soft since I don't do manual labor much anymore like carpentry, electrical, or plumbing. I wear a glove when I play tennis. I'm never chapped or scaly. Yes it takes time to wash hands but I do something while I do it: talk to someone, think about something which needs to be done, or just come up with necessary witty retorts for the naysayers at DU. I get sick maybe once every two to three years, usually a cold, rarely the flu - although my resistance is probably better than most due to exposure over decades - and of course I use latex gloves. If people realized how easy it is to transfer bacteria, they would diminish the times that they do what they do like leave a bathroom having touched the door handle after they've washed, or eaten something which is questionable. Interestingly, eating of the floor is not the worst thing you can do, not that it's that great of course. I'd rather eat off a floor and risk some bird parasite than touch the E coli. laden fixtures in public rest rooms after I've washed. I'm sure people are going to be rolling their eyes, but think about this: you know what you call "stomach flu"? That is oral-fecal and not your-fecal. Someone else's and I mean fecal, not just the bacteria. Yummy salad bar, right?

And that's just the food-borne illnesses…people should know what else is out there these days. Things are a bit different than they were 30 years ago.

Nay

(12,051 posts)
63. I've been wondering about the food-borne illnesses that seem to be
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 11:23 AM
Oct 2014

everywhere as well. Why? In the last year, I have had THREE possible food poisoning/contact poisoning episodes, and I am a fairly paranoid person about hand washing, food prep., etc. All 3 times I was on vacation in the States. All 3 times I had eaten 'notorious' foods -- fish, eggs, eggs.(Twice in restaurants, once I had prepared the eggs myself.) In a couple of hours the violent diarrhea and extreme nausea started. After the bowel emptied somewhat, I was seized by vomiting which continued until I was completely empty at both ends. (Yes, it is possible to vomit and have diarrhea at exactly the same time I had to throw away the pants.). After every orifice had stopped erupting, I felt nearly normal except for chills, aches and a headache. The whole process took about 6-8 hours. The next day I feel fine.

I am 63 and cannot remember the last time I had such episodes -- maybe 2 or 3 in the whole rest of my life? And now I have 3 in the span of 9 months? I don't have a compromised immune system. What has changed in the last 30 years, in your opinion, that is making this sort of thing so much more common? Lax regs on restaurants, grocery stores, egg factories? No inspectors? Truly, I'm just about to give up traveling because I'm getting sick nearly every time. It's enough of a hassle to travel when you're diabetic, I don't need to throw up/shit for a whole day, too.

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
64. Interesting...
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 11:33 AM
Oct 2014

did you ever hear about "Sauce Bearnaise Effect"? Look it up on Wiki if you haven't…

The only place I ever got food poisoning in Philly was, and no lie, The Four Seasons Hotel at a New Years Eve Party. Could be your resistance is down and you aren't handling low-level food poisoning as well as you used to. There was a luncheonette in Town here where the food was always a little 'off'. Some people would eat the tuna salad and get sick, others would not. They finally closed. A friend of mine ran into John and Yoko there when they were hosting The Mike Douglas Show years ago. He was sitting on a stool at the counter and asked the guy to his right to pass the ketchup and WOW!

Nay

(12,051 posts)
67. I didn't know that was one of its names, but yes, I am familiar with that
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 11:49 AM
Oct 2014

effect. I have a friend who got very sick after eating chicken -- he never ate it again. I don't seem to have that reaction, though. I'm still eating eggs and fish. It's true that right after puking my guts out, I don't feel like eating another egg or a 2nd piece of fish right away, but in a few days I'm over it. It's just about to put me off traveling, though!!

As far as my resistance being down, I don't think so. I have a grandson in grade school who brings home all sorts of viruses. His parents get sick, but I haven't been sick with a cold or flu for several years now despite exposure.

It's a mystery.

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
70. Often it is the utensil used to cut your salad was used for something else
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 11:53 AM
Oct 2014

having worked in restaurant/school cafeteria kitchens from the age of 12(!) (required in my school if you were on scholarship) til I was 26. Reminds me of the old Berton Rouche book Eleven Blue Men. You just never know...

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
54. …and how dare you insolently question our methodology?
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 10:51 AM
Oct 2014

Doesn't it make all the sense in the world that even if there are many cases it doesn't constitute an outbreak? I mean, what is the matter with everyone?

valerief

(53,235 posts)
55. Well, America does have the best press conferences in the world, so I guess
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 10:58 AM
Oct 2014

if they're good at that, they must be good at everything else. We don't let facts get in the way of confidence.

"We're number 1 in bravado! We're number 1 in bravado!"

librechik

(30,674 posts)
56. if it gets bad enough, Americans will start wearing masks and gloves esp. on public transportation
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 11:00 AM
Oct 2014

Grocery stores offer antiseptic wipes before grabbing the cart handle--we'll all have to become more aware. It's probably we should do the same for flu season.

unblock

(52,196 posts)
62. read this ny times q&a; the virus does not spread readily
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 11:21 AM
Oct 2014

Q

Can I get Ebola from public transportation? As in, if a passenger coughed into their hand and then held onto the pole, and then another passenger held onto that pole and inadvertently wiped their eye?

A
The answer is no. Someone with Ebola is really, really sick. They’re seeking hospital care. It is unlikely they are riding the bus. They are not going to work. The virus is spread by bodily fluid contact: by blood, by vomit. When it’s being spread by sweat or urine, you’re practically at the dead body stage. So it’s not transmitted the way that colds could be, by touching a pole in a subway or bus.

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/10/03/ebola-ask-well-spread-public-transit/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

----

you're only really contagious when you're in the actively very, very sick stage, not at all likely to take a bus in the first place.

while passing the disease along via a surface such as metal is theoretically possible, in practice it just doesn't happen that way. by far the vast majority of transmissions have been to people in direct care of someone who is actively very sick with ebola, i.e., in the bleeding and vomiting stage.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
65. the earliest symptoms are fever and headache
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 11:33 AM
Oct 2014

It is somewhat contagious at that point. The sicker the patient, the higher the viral load. It is highest when they are dead.

Blood and vomit are only 2 of the body fluids that carry it. Mucus, sweat, urine and feces are 4 more.

The mucus and sweat viral loads are low because those membranes and glands aren't directly attacked. The feces load is high because it directly attacks the liver. the urine load I expect would also be high because iirc it also directly attacks the kidneys.

It is fragile and does not survive long outside the body, but in a large droplet can survive for hours at RT, longer in colder temps. However UV from the sun light will destroy it, but note that UV light does not pass through glass so count out window light.

And it only takes 1 to 10 virions to infect. Initially it directly infects your monocytes and macrophages. They are an intrinsic part of your "innate" or "nonspecific" immune system, so it is knocking out your first immune response right from the get go. Later on, it also directly attacks your lymphs, causing a massive die off of your specific immune response. They do rebound somewhat if you can survive long enough. Treatment without the experimental antibody drugs consists of keeping people alive long enough to develop an antibody response.

unblock

(52,196 posts)
68. i'm not saying it can never be spread to people who had no idea they came into contact with
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 11:52 AM
Oct 2014

bodily fluids of an actively sick ebola patient, e.g., touch a tiny droplet on a bus pole.

what i'm saying is that in practice is doesn't really spread this way, for a variety of reasons, none of which are absolute, but collectively they make such scenarios highly improbable.

it's similar to improbably transmissions of other illnesses, for instance, it's possible to get hiv from kissing. however, as long as that disease has been around, only a tiny number of cases have happened that way (hiv isn't spread through saliva, so the already infected person has to have bleeding gums or open sores and you probably have to french kiss to transfer any blood and you're not likely to french kiss someone with bleeding gums or open sores, and even if you did, it's still not 100% likely to transmit to disease itself.)


yes such things are possible but keep it in context. you're far, far more likely to die from getting in an accident and dying because you're standing in a bus just holding a pole than from getting ebola from that pole.

PCIntern

(25,532 posts)
66. If they are allowed in the hospital due to insurance problems OR
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 11:35 AM
Oct 2014

maybe they just didn't go. Now I am not saying it is GOING to happen, but it CAN happen. That is what we have to be careful of.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
79. Quaranteed after "exhibiting flu like symptoms" of vomiting
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 03:16 PM
Oct 2014

What? Vomiting is a sympton of the flu? No, it isn't. Misinformation. Vomiting and diarrhea are symptoms of a NOROVIRUS, commonly referred to as the Stomach Flu. It's not the same as the "flu" which you get vax against. There is no vax for norovius, which is also very contagious, but not spread with coughing and sneezing, because you DON'T cough and sneeze with that. Hell, people can vomit in public from being DRUNK. Ebola?????? I have heard other people post that they MUST get their yearly flu shot so they don't vomit in public and others think Ebola! lol Not going to help with stomach flu, people. lol

Media, and probably the CDC, spreading fear and misinformation with hidden agendas. Panic keeps people watching 24 hour news shows, and promotes flu shots.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ebola: I'm dumbfounded.....