Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 11:09 PM Oct 2014

Spanish nurse reported in as soon as her temp rose; they sent her away. The threshold is TOO HIGH

For the 2nd time in a week, a potentially exposed person reported in with mild symptoms and was sent on their way. For the 2nd time, that person was left to walk around for days potentially infecting others.

"She had alerted them to a slight fever on 30 September, said Antonio Alemany from the regional government of Madrid, and checked into a hospital in Alcorcón with a high fever on Sunday. Ebola protocol was immediately activated at the hospital and initial and secondary tests were both positive for the virus."
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/06/nurse-spain-tests-positive-ebola

The problem is with the fucking criteria. The temperature threshold is 101.5F -- and it is too effing high.

Duncan's was only 100.1 when the ED doctor followed the criteria and sent him home.

How many symptomatic people are they going to let loose before they figure out that the problem is the guidelines?!?!
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Spanish nurse reported in as soon as her temp rose; they sent her away. The threshold is TOO HIGH (Original Post) magical thyme Oct 2014 OP
OH GEEZE! elleng Oct 2014 #1
Unreal...n/t haikugal Oct 2014 #2
Regardless of the temperature... Agschmid Oct 2014 #3
the point is that the official guidelines that have been sent out use 101.5F as the threshold temp magical thyme Oct 2014 #4
That's nutz RobertEarl Oct 2014 #5
This needs to change now; ebola is not fcking around. n/t eShirl Oct 2014 #11
... grasswire Oct 2014 #6
I've been working on my protocol, because the sr techs around me are so lax where I work magical thyme Oct 2014 #7
100.1 isn't technically febrile in most hospitals. Barack_America Oct 2014 #8
I'm referring to CDC criteria, not what a hospital considers a fever magical thyme Oct 2014 #10
Also, if the CDC is wrong about the temperature, ecstatic Oct 2014 #9
the guidelines are not outdated; they're based on this epidemic for US doctors. magical thyme Oct 2014 #12
If you lower the threshold too much, you get a lot of false postives Ex Lurker Oct 2014 #13
Better a hundred false positives than a real case that is sent back into the population. n/t pnwmom Oct 2014 #14
So why should the cutoff for Ebola be almost a full degree higher than that? It shouldn't. pnwmom Oct 2014 #15
Then fever should not be a criteria for exposed patients. magical thyme Oct 2014 #18
if these 2 positives were out of 100 other positives that were caught immediately, then maybe magical thyme Oct 2014 #20
Grhhh...... LeftInTX Oct 2014 #16
There's nothing that says they 'sent her away'; she was on vacation on Sept 30th muriel_volestrangler Oct 2014 #17
I think the "real factor" needs to be exposure/risk. IdaBriggs Oct 2014 #19

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
3. Regardless of the temperature...
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 11:16 PM
Oct 2014

both of these folks should have been considered high risk. These are both pretty significant failures IMO.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
4. the point is that the official guidelines that have been sent out use 101.5F as the threshold temp
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 11:18 PM
Oct 2014

below that, docs and an infected nurse, are told not to worry yet, even with known Ebola exposure.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
5. That's nutz
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 11:21 PM
Oct 2014

It's like they are too busy, or something?

Poor lady. The system has failed her.

Who is next?

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
6. ...
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 11:24 PM
Oct 2014
Health authorities on Monday said that health professionals treating Ebola patients in Spain always followed protocols outlined by the World Health Organisation. The nurse would have entered García Viejo’s room just twice, said Alemany, and would have been wearing protective equipment on both occasions. “We don’t know yet what failed,” said Alemany. “We’re investigating the mechanism of infection.”
 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
7. I've been working on my protocol, because the sr techs around me are so lax where I work
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 11:29 PM
Oct 2014

I've been increasingly careless over the years.

I cannot believe how many times in one day I found myself unconsciously starting to adjust my glasses or reaching to scratch an itch.

And as soon as you remind yourself keep your hands away from your face, your eyes and nose start itching nonstop.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
10. I'm referring to CDC criteria, not what a hospital considers a fever
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 11:35 PM
Oct 2014

Duncan's was only 100.1 when he first reported to the ED.

The CDC's criteria say 1. travel to Liberia and 2. temp of 101.5F or higher and 3. one other

Following the 101.5F threshold has now turned 2 infected people loose within a week, delaying their treatment and potentially infecting others.

The criteria are not working.

ecstatic

(32,740 posts)
9. Also, if the CDC is wrong about the temperature,
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 11:31 PM
Oct 2014

what else are they wrong about? The guidelines are outdated. Period.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
12. the guidelines are not outdated; they're based on this epidemic for US doctors.
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 11:38 PM
Oct 2014

the threshold is too high.

They've made for a couple dozen 1-2 day false alarms with neg tests, but they've released 2 infected people.

Ex Lurker

(3,816 posts)
13. If you lower the threshold too much, you get a lot of false postives
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 01:33 AM
Oct 2014

body temperature fluctuates throughout the day. According to WebMD, the cutoff point for a fever is 100.4.

pnwmom

(109,000 posts)
15. So why should the cutoff for Ebola be almost a full degree higher than that? It shouldn't.
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 01:36 AM
Oct 2014

Lots of serious illnesses begin with a lower fever that then rises. This is probably the case with Ebola, too.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
18. Then fever should not be a criteria for exposed patients.
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 08:26 AM
Oct 2014

Because neither of the first 2 cases diagnosed outside of Africa met the threshold criteria.

Or any even slight temperature elevation of exposed patients should at least lead to temporary isolation and evaluation. Jeebus, we have totally non-sick people in our ED all the time, and even do extensive testing if they keep coming back, up to and including a recent spinal tap/CSF for somebody with normal CBC and CMP because of a headache and fever. But we won't isolate and monitor a potential Ebola case?!?!

"El Mundo reported that it was the nurse who asked to be tested for Ebola, having to insist repeatedly on being tested before it was done on Monday."
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/07/ebola-crisis-substandard-equipment-nurse-positive-spain

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
20. if these 2 positives were out of 100 other positives that were caught immediately, then maybe
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 08:37 AM
Oct 2014

maybe.

But these are the only 2 positives diagnosed outside of Africa, and both were sent away because they didn't meet the threshold criteria.

The criteria isn't working.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,385 posts)
17. There's nothing that says they 'sent her away'; she was on vacation on Sept 30th
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 04:30 AM
Oct 2014
The patient, who is married with no children, was on holiday when she began showing symptoms, said Alemany.

The Spanish nurse went on vacation the day after the priest died but checked in Sunday to a public hospital in the working class Madrid suburb of Alcorcon with a fever and was placed in isolation.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/spanish-nurse-suspected-catching-ebola-hospital-patient-infected-173001840.html

Antonio Alemany, a health official from the regional government of Madrid, told the news conference that the nurse went on vacation a day after Father García Viejo died. She got in touch with a medical center on Sept. 30 after feeling feverish, but had been leading “a normal life” while on vacation, he added, without giving details on her whereabouts during that period.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/07/world/europe/spain-reports-first-case-of-ebola-contracted-outside-west-africa.html?_r=0

The wording used everywhere never says she went into a hospital. It sounds like she phone or emailed, and told them she had a slight fever. She's a nurse; she knew she had helped treat 2 Ebola patients. It was her diagnosis.
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
19. I think the "real factor" needs to be exposure/risk.
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 08:34 AM
Oct 2014

People's bodies fight/react differently sometimes. My husband's body temperature runs "low" usually, so when he gets a fever of 99.5, for HIM that is high....

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Spanish nurse reported in...