Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

PorridgeGun

(80 posts)
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 02:48 PM Oct 2014

Think again: Brown, Wilson, and Ferguson.

Too many people are jumping to one side of this issue before the facts are in, and I suspect most of you are going to end up on the wrong side.

Namely, what are you going to do if the evidence shows that MB assaulted the cop first? Prints in the car? Pictures of serious facial injuries? Voice/video recordings?

If the pictures and prints support DW's story that Mike Brown assaulted the him while he was still in the car (presumably on the presumption that the convenience store clerk incident had just caught up with him) he cannot and should not be indicted. He would be correct under those circumstances to assume that whatever MB did after that, he constituted a serious threat, justifying deadly force.

It doesn't matter if he was shot in the back (as some "eyewitnesses" have incorrectly alleged), front, or side. Once someone has attempted to kill a peace officer, all bets are off.

76 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Think again: Brown, Wilson, and Ferguson. (Original Post) PorridgeGun Oct 2014 OP
Sure, If there was any such evidence it would have been made public weeks ago. notrightatall Oct 2014 #1
I disagree. PorridgeGun Oct 2014 #6
If there is evidence that proves the shooting was justified, I would accept it. arcane1 Oct 2014 #19
My "Bet" is on "diphit racist loonie" notrightatall Oct 2014 #29
Maybe we should discuss his recent "commendation". notrightatall Oct 2014 #32
A 'police report' would have been made available. Where is it? blm Oct 2014 #55
According to the county pintobean Oct 2014 #64
Wow..... BronxBoy Oct 2014 #66
Are you of the misguided opinion that these issues Jackpine Radical Oct 2014 #2
What a stupid post. bravenak Oct 2014 #3
I'm willing to admit I could be wrong. PorridgeGun Oct 2014 #13
Google Darren Wilson standing over Mr. Brown's body. bravenak Oct 2014 #15
They're usually more likely to circle the wagons than to stop the bleeding. nt pinboy3niner Oct 2014 #20
copland notrightatall Oct 2014 #35
You are wrong.... BronxBoy Oct 2014 #67
Wow..... BronxBoy Oct 2014 #69
Have you any evidence, news stories or real eye witness upaloopa Oct 2014 #4
We still aint seen hide nor hair of that police report either. bravenak Oct 2014 #5
Trash thread, ignore poster alcibiades_mystery Oct 2014 #7
What a load of baloney. BillZBubb Oct 2014 #8
I thought of posting a refutation of your post ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2014 #9
You said it! marym625 Oct 2014 #11
+2 pinboy3niner Oct 2014 #12
+3 Blue_Tires Oct 2014 #16
I'm wondering what exactly you disagree with. PorridgeGun Oct 2014 #18
Even if he did attack, did that require him being fucking TARGET PRACTICE? nt Dreamer Tatum Oct 2014 #21
Well, beyond ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2014 #25
I don't wantto speak for 1StrongBlackman but scarystuffyo Oct 2014 #44
Yes, b/c cops wanting to apprehend someone tell 2 guys to get on the fucking sidewalk. Demit Oct 2014 #49
+ another Scuba Oct 2014 #31
How long does it take to produce this evidence? It's been two months already. arcane1 Oct 2014 #10
I'm not taking the side of the cop. PorridgeGun Oct 2014 #26
Nobody is making any fucking judgment. whether he murdered the kid is what trials are for, get it? Solomon Oct 2014 #45
You are not presenting anyone's side. Or much of anything. Your post is full of Ifs. merrily Oct 2014 #58
Hands up, don't shoot. JaneyVee Oct 2014 #14
Too soon. It's 100. pintobean Oct 2014 #17
LOL right? tkmorris Oct 2014 #27
I agree partially. mr_liberal Oct 2014 #22
Even if Brown DID attack I find it impossible that he needed his brain blown out. Dreamer Tatum Oct 2014 #24
I think if you just got attaked at your car and mr_liberal Oct 2014 #40
Someone here once posted a theory that new posters who use 'liberal' Dreamer Tatum Oct 2014 #41
I see that theory posted every once in a while. pintobean Oct 2014 #47
I don't know if I've ever posted that, but I've thought that many merrily Oct 2014 #62
Has even theft of cigars been proven? merrily Oct 2014 #59
You do know.... BronxBoy Oct 2014 #70
oh god. do they send you guys here in pairs? notadmblnd Oct 2014 #34
Glad I wasn't the only one thinking that. n/t JimDandy Oct 2014 #43
Question ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2014 #37
Thank you.... n/t BronxBoy Oct 2014 #71
Nope! The police still need to follow the law, even when other people don't Taitertots Oct 2014 #23
Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2014 #38
Well... Some people are violent criminals masquerading as public servants Taitertots Oct 2014 #46
I was kidding ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2014 #48
If you really believe this then you have to admit they would have never mentioned dilby Oct 2014 #28
What part of "he had his hands in the air" is it that you don't understand? notadmblnd Oct 2014 #30
And this is a large part of the problem Egnever Oct 2014 #33
This gets my vote for most ridiculous pot of the day. MohRokTah Oct 2014 #36
Not being a jurist, my idle speculation is both irrelevant and benign. LanternWaste Oct 2014 #39
Simple, why didn't they release that info before so people could factor it into how they felt. Hoyt Oct 2014 #42
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2014 #50
unrec Mr PGun panader0 Oct 2014 #51
It does matter if he was shot in the back at some distance and if brown surrendered before aikoaiko Oct 2014 #52
I'm sorry, but if such evidence existed, it probably would've been outed a long time ago. nt AverageJoe90 Oct 2014 #53
If evidence comes forward that shows MB assaulted the cop... Dr. Strange Oct 2014 #54
This may be the most bogus OP I've seen on a political board in 10 years. merrily Oct 2014 #56
and what are you going to do if the evidence shows the opposite.... spanone Oct 2014 #57
Disappear back into the blogsphere, without comment ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2014 #60
with his porridge...... BronxBoy Oct 2014 #72
Start a thread about our misjudging George Zimmerman. nt pinboy3niner Oct 2014 #61
Why not? merrily Oct 2014 #63
Looks like a problem I'm not going to have to worry about. PorridgeGun Oct 2014 #76
What I have a hard time comprehending... malokvale77 Oct 2014 #65
Kewl. Story. Bro! Rex Oct 2014 #68
Put you on Ignore valerief Oct 2014 #73
I suspect that's a wasted ignore ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2014 #74
Ha, true that. nt valerief Oct 2014 #75
 

notrightatall

(410 posts)
1. Sure, If there was any such evidence it would have been made public weeks ago.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 02:53 PM
Oct 2014

To drag it out at this late date would make it appear concocted.

 

PorridgeGun

(80 posts)
6. I disagree.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:01 PM
Oct 2014

I think the reason the PD and Union are keeping quiet and waiting is because they've got an ace in the hole. Maybe they're full of shit and just trying to forestall a complete collapse in public confidence (I'll gladly admit I'm wrong if they are) but people need to reckon with the possibility that the cop isn't just a dipshit racist loonie and acted within the bounds of reason.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
19. If there is evidence that proves the shooting was justified, I would accept it.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:19 PM
Oct 2014

But I'm not holding my breath either.

blm

(114,458 posts)
55. A 'police report' would have been made available. Where is it?
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 04:43 PM
Oct 2014

You think they kept the 'police report' from Eric Holder?

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
64. According to the county
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 05:35 PM
Oct 2014

the feds have everything they have, and vice versa. There has to be police reports.

BronxBoy

(2,287 posts)
66. Wow.....
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 06:04 PM
Oct 2014

You are obviously new to this game

First thing that happens in any questionable shooting of a Black person is to dig into that person's background for something...anything that disparages that person so that any bullshit excuse for shotting said person is accepted by the (White) masses.

It's happened so damn often, I think it's part of procedure. Google Dorismond in NYC and see how many folks wanted Giulani disbarred for digging into to his criminal records.

Nope...if they had the info, we would have saw it....Why do you think we saw the video tape from the store.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
3. What a stupid post.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 02:54 PM
Oct 2014

I said it first.

What if none of your fake what ifs make any sense? We saw PHOTOS of the shooter standing near the body. No blood. No facial injuries visible. Did you forget we have google?

 

PorridgeGun

(80 posts)
13. I'm willing to admit I could be wrong.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:12 PM
Oct 2014

No joke: if its all a charade to put off the announcement of an injustice until they think the weather is less favourable for civil disobedience then they should be given all the more for their trouble. I just don't think so. I suspect if Wilson were really guilty they'd hang him out to dry and try to stop the bleeding with "isolated example of a bad apple" type talk.

BronxBoy

(2,287 posts)
67. You are wrong....
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 06:06 PM
Oct 2014

Google is your friend....go take a look at ANY highly questionable police shootings and pay attention to the sequence of events....Trotting out the victims background along with any info that might remotely justify the shooting is par for the course

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
4. Have you any evidence, news stories or real eye witness
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 02:54 PM
Oct 2014

reports to support what you just said might be the case? Of course you don't. You are ignoring everything known about the case and relying on fantasy what if bull shit!

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
5. We still aint seen hide nor hair of that police report either.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 02:59 PM
Oct 2014

If all this fantasy evidence exists,why not release it?
And, wtf is this anyway?

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
8. What a load of baloney.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:03 PM
Oct 2014

First, your "what ifs" are preposterous. We've already seen the alleged pictures of the severely wounded policeman. They were FAKES. The supposed Wilson defense put forth by "Josie" or whoever has been proven to be a FRAUD.

Second, if the cop wasn't in danger after a scuffle ended, he has no right to execute the person.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
9. I thought of posting a refutation of your post ...
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:04 PM
Oct 2014

then I got here:

It doesn't matter if he was shot in the back (as some "eyewitnesses" have incorrectly alleged), front, or side. Once someone has attempted to kill a peace officer, all bets are off.


And realized that with that patently incorrect statement, you telegraphed any response would be fruitless.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
11. You said it!
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:08 PM
Oct 2014

And, by the way, the statement that he was shot while his back was to Wilson is not refuted. The autopsy stated that the shot(s) in the arm could have come from behind.

Unbelievable post! All bets are off when out of harms way my ass! Guess the cops tasering an 8 year old were justified. Smdh.

 

Blue_Tires

(57,596 posts)
16. +3
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:15 PM
Oct 2014

Lot of low-post accounts saying outrageous bullshit this week...

I'd play if they actually had the brainpower to get some fresh material this time...

Admins need to get their asses in gear

 

PorridgeGun

(80 posts)
18. I'm wondering what exactly you disagree with.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:18 PM
Oct 2014

Someone who attacks a police officer is demonstrating a level of desperation that requires action. Granted the ferguson PD might be completely full of shit, but if they're not, and MB did assume the cop was coming at him to apprehend him for the convenience shop thing and took the initiative, its hard to see how lethal force is not justified.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
25. Well, beyond ...
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:23 PM
Oct 2014

all the "What ifs", this: ...

It doesn't matter if he was shot in the back (as some "eyewitnesses" have incorrectly alleged), front, or side. Once someone has attempted to kill a peace officer, all bets are off.


My educational and employment background tells me you do not know what you are talking about.

 

scarystuffyo

(733 posts)
44. I don't wantto speak for 1StrongBlackman but
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:52 PM
Oct 2014

I think he means once someone surrenders then all bets are not off

He could have tried to strangle , punch , kill

BUT once the officer (any officer) has distance and a sidearm drawn if the person surrenders then the use of
lethal force stops

 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
49. Yes, b/c cops wanting to apprehend someone tell 2 guys to get on the fucking sidewalk.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 04:26 PM
Oct 2014

I mean everyone knows that's just shrewd police work. And suspects always 'take the initiative' and run towards a cop who is coming to apprehend him, instead of running away. By jingo, I believe you've uncovered what really happened, with your clever forensic reasoning!

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
10. How long does it take to produce this evidence? It's been two months already.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:04 PM
Oct 2014

Are you not equally guilty of "jumping to one side of this issue before the facts are in"?

 

PorridgeGun

(80 posts)
26. I'm not taking the side of the cop.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:25 PM
Oct 2014

What I resent is the suggestion that anyone who wants to see all the evidence before making a judgement is a troll/racist/bigot etc. Wilson deserves to have his side considered too and if he's telling the truth he should have a great deal of evidence to black him up.

Solomon

(12,640 posts)
45. Nobody is making any fucking judgment. whether he murdered the kid is what trials are for, get it?
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:54 PM
Oct 2014

If he has a defense let him present it at trial. What don't people get about that? Arresting Brown is not a judgment of guilt. He needs to justify what he did. That can only happen at a trial. Not by pretending what if.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
58. You are not presenting anyone's side. Or much of anything. Your post is full of Ifs.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 05:01 PM
Oct 2014

While saying nothing at all, it implies that some evidence is out there that justifies shooting a kid. Maybe that posting style is why you've been called names-if you have.

 

mr_liberal

(1,017 posts)
22. I agree partially.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:21 PM
Oct 2014

I think it will probably be ruled a justified shooting because of the fight at the car AND because MB moved/charged at the cop when he was told to freeze.

I don't think its a justified shooting just because of the fight at the car, so if the officer had shot him while he was running away or after MB gave up with his hands up then I think it would be at least manslaughter and probably murder.

What I think happened is after the fight at the car (where MB shoved the cop back into the car, went for his guy, and punched him in the face), that MB ran and cop chased him and told him to freeze. I think MB stopped and turned around, and that should have ended it. But I think after that, for some crazy reason, he didnt remain still he moved at the cop and thats why the cop shot him.

I believe the report about there not being enough evidence for the grand jury charge the cop. I think thats because they have witnesses, fingerprints, wounds that are consistent with what I said above.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,985 posts)
24. Even if Brown DID attack I find it impossible that he needed his brain blown out.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:23 PM
Oct 2014

Give me a break. There is no world in which that kid deserved to be put down like an animal.

 

mr_liberal

(1,017 posts)
40. I think if you just got attaked at your car and
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:43 PM
Oct 2014

the attacker went for your gun and then charges at you after told to freeze that its understandable what the cop did. Its what cops are taught to do.

It does seem like overkill when you think of MB just having stole some cigars, and that maybe a more restrained experienced cop would have handled it differently, but that wont be the question before the jury. The question is, is what the cop did legal? And I don't know what all the evidence is, but from what I know so far I can see a jury saying it was.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,985 posts)
41. Someone here once posted a theory that new posters who use 'liberal'
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:46 PM
Oct 2014

or other left-identifying things in their screen names are almost always trolls.

Hm.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
62. I don't know if I've ever posted that, but I've thought that many
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 05:09 PM
Oct 2014

who use liberal as all or part of the screen name don't usually post anything like I would expect liberal to post. There's always an exception or two, so you have to go by the content of the post.

BronxBoy

(2,287 posts)
70. You do know....
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 06:11 PM
Oct 2014

that the whole stealing cigars thing has been open to a whole of of interpretation. Funny how you wnat us to give credence to the what-ifs of Officer Wilson but Mike Brown was stealing Cigars and he charged the officer.

Out of all the raw video and witness statements I have heard so far, no one says he charged the officer....quite a few said he had his hands up in the air and was shot for nothing

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
34. oh god. do they send you guys here in pairs?
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:30 PM
Oct 2014

is there some new info about to be released and you came here to get the meme out ahead of it?

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
37. Question ...
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:36 PM
Oct 2014

If I grab you and you pull away, even slapping my hand as you pull away ... would you classify that as a fight?

That IS the statement of the one eye witness that saw the initial interaction.

What I think happened is after the fight at the car (where MB shoved the cop back into the car, went for his guy, and punched him in the face), that MB ran and cop chased him and told him to freeze. I think MB stopped and turned around, and that should have ended it. But I think after that, for some crazy reason, he didnt remain still he moved at the cop and thats why the cop shot him.


Now that contradicts the statements of ALL of the eye witnesses to the ENTIRE incident.

I believe the report about there not being enough evidence for the grand jury charge the cop. I think thats because they have witnesses, fingerprints, wounds that are consistent with what I said above.


I disagree ... I think the GJ not having enough evidence to indict is because the Prosecutor ... the guy that refused to issue a charge ... tanked the presentation.
 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
23. Nope! The police still need to follow the law, even when other people don't
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:23 PM
Oct 2014

There is never a situation where "all bets are off".

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
48. I was kidding ...
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 04:24 PM
Oct 2014

But I agree.

As an aside, many years ago, I read a report comparing the psychological profiles of cops and crimes (controlling for IQ and mental illness diagnosis, I believe) ... I was amazed at how similar the profiles were.

dilby

(2,273 posts)
28. If you really believe this then you have to admit they would have never mentioned
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:26 PM
Oct 2014

the robbery. After all need to keep everything hush, hush to build a case. And if the peace officer is too much of a pussy to handle an unarmed man without shooting him with his hands in the air maybe he should find a new job.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
30. What part of "he had his hands in the air" is it that you don't understand?
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:28 PM
Oct 2014

assaulting a police officer doesn't justify execution. Especially if he was surrendering when so viciously murdered.

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
33. And this is a large part of the problem
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:29 PM
Oct 2014

The idea that deadly force is justified in anything other than extreme cases where the officer is under direct threat of losing his life or serious injury is just wrong headed. A suspect running away or even holding a weapon that is not pointed at the officer or in the case of a knife not within striking distance should never be shot ever.

A cop getting punched in the face does not excuse deadly force ever IMHO.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
36. This gets my vote for most ridiculous pot of the day.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:33 PM
Oct 2014

Ignore is a great feature when bullshit like this gets thrown out there.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
39. Not being a jurist, my idle speculation is both irrelevant and benign.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:42 PM
Oct 2014

"what are you going to do if the evidence shows that MB assaulted the cop first?"

Not being a jurist, a judge or an editorialist on a major paper, my idle speculation (like yours) is both irrelevant and benign. Hence, should it come to pass that the police officer acted in the manner you hope, I will do nothing... as will you.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
42. Simple, why didn't they release that info before so people could factor it into how they felt.
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 03:47 PM
Oct 2014

Personally, I think Wilson could have handled Brown without shooting him a bunch of times, even if Brown was "charging" him (which I doubt).

If the reports of how many shots were fired and hit Brown are anywhere near accurate, Wilson fired wildly endangering people in the neighborhood. Shows how he felt about the folks that live there.

Does your user name indicate partiality toward gunz and the callousness that usually goes with them, or is it in reference to this Urban Dictionary entry (warning for those prudish) -- http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=pump%20action%20porridge%20gun

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
50. LOL ...
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 04:27 PM
Oct 2014
Does your user name indicate partiality toward gunz and the callousness that usually goes with them, or is it in reference to this Urban Dictionary entry (warning for those prudish) -- http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=pump%20action%20porridge%20gun


I suspect the latter.

aikoaiko

(34,213 posts)
52. It does matter if he was shot in the back at some distance and if brown surrendered before
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 04:34 PM
Oct 2014

the fatal shots.

An assault on the officer in the car may be mitigating, but thats not the same as justification.

Dr. Strange

(26,058 posts)
54. If evidence comes forward that shows MB assaulted the cop...
Wed Oct 8, 2014, 04:40 PM
Oct 2014

then I will criticize the cop mildly and will cease to view Brown as a victim.

Along the same lines, if I win $12,554,782,832 in the lottery tomorrow, I shall live extravagantly and ride pink unicorns to work.

I suspect neither of these will happen.

 

PorridgeGun

(80 posts)
76. Looks like a problem I'm not going to have to worry about.
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 09:10 PM
Oct 2014

Reserving judgement pending the production of physical evidence is never a bad thing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Think again: Brown, Wilso...