Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhen a politician answers with, "I am not a scientist," the follow-up should be:
Last edited Fri Oct 10, 2014, 02:17 PM - Edit history (1)
Is that a recusal?
Maybe abstention?
--imm
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When a politician answers with, "I am not a scientist," the follow-up should be: (Original Post)
immoderate
Oct 2014
OP
Ilsa
(64,026 posts)1. Nice! And, "Yes, that's why we listen to scientists about
Scientific things, and doctors about medical things, and lawyers about legal stuff. So stop arguing with the experts!"
immoderate
(20,885 posts)2. Yes. I also considered, "And you have no informed opinion?" but ...
A true weasel can have dinner on that one.
--imm
wyldwolf
(43,891 posts)3. ... then STFU.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)4. No denying...
That one is GOOD!
--imm
Nay
(12,051 posts)6. Beat me to it! nt
TBA
(893 posts)5. I ask the following...
If 99 out of 100 cardiac physicians told me I needed a bypass would my response be... "Well, I'm not a heart specialist so I don't know if I need surgery"? I think not.
