General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAbortion: Not easy, not sorry
...
For a small segment of womenand the number is small, by any reasonably scientific accountabortion is indeed a tragedy, a trauma with long-lasting reverberations. But I want to tell a different story, the more common yet strangely hidden one, which is that I don't feel guilty and tortured about my abortion. Or rather, my abortions. There, I said it.
"Abortion. We need to talk about it," Pollitt beseeches in Pro. "We need to talk about it differently. Not as something we all agree is a bad thing about which we shake our heads sadly and then debate its precise degree of badness, preening ourselves on our judiciousness and moral seriousness as we argue about this or that restriction on this or that kind of woman. We need to talk about ending a pregnancy as a common, even normal, event in the reproductive lives of women."
...
How normal? Nearly one in three American women will have terminated a pregnancy by age 45, and six in 10 abortions are performed on women who are already mothers. They're notwe're not"other." Those numbers are from Pro, and when I call it "revelatory," I want to add, oddly so. You can't live in the abortion-is-murder culture for all of your adult life and not have it affect you, even if you're pro-choice. So while I already knew much of the basic information Pollitt imparts, I'd "forgotten" some facts, and lost track of how the facts informed my pro-choice convictions.
...
In an interview with ELLE last month, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that she thought that the country would "wake up" and realize that the state-by-state restrictions on abortion were untenable and that we "can never go back" to the situation before Roe, when abortions were only "for women who can afford to travel to a neighboring state." Yet it seems to me that we have gone back to that time; right now poor women are in effect being denied abortions because they can't afford them, or can't afford the gas to get to a clinic that is hundreds of miles awayor can't afford all that and to stay overnight in a hotel to comply with a 24-hour waiting period.
Much more at link, a great read: http://www.elle.com/life-love/society-career/the-abortion-choice
I've heard it here on DU: "We don't have to *pretend* abortion is a good thing". I'm not pretending, it *IS* a good thing. Women have to control their fertility for 30-40 years. That is an awfully long time not to make mistakes, to not have any failure in process or judgement. Abortion allows us to decide the direction, to allow our education, careers and health to go the way that is best for ourselves. Abortion allows us to decide to become parents when we are ready to be good parents.
Abortion is a moral and positive choice that liberates women, saves lives, and protects families.
The Notorious RBG is correct. We need to wake up. We're losing our rights.
Solly Mack
(90,758 posts)BallardWA
(97 posts)heaven knows where I would be now were it not for my right to choose.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)RebelOne
(30,947 posts)You and MILLIONS of others!
shenmue
(38,506 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)SunSeeker
(51,522 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)as a single parent. I also would have been expelled from my "wonderful" Christian college had I ended up showing a pregnancy and as a poor student I could not afford that.
As to sorrow. I remember walking out into the campus and setting in the dark to cry that night but after that I keep the knowledge that I and my other children would be much worse off had I not taken that route. No regrets.
As to speaking about it. My children know and my sister. Other than that you guys are it. I actually only think about it when the issue of abortion comes up.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)I trust women and their doctors to do what's best for their health, themselves and their families.
And I want the option to always be there for all women.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)Right on, as ever.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)where abortions will always be available, but won't quite be needed nearly as much as they are now, simply because of things getting much better for women as a whole. Good post, PeaceNikki.
Paper Roses
(7,471 posts)It is personal and private. This decision should have nothing to do with politics, religion, money, or any other reason. PERSONAL! Nothing else!
yurbud
(39,405 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)spanone
(135,795 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,594 posts)Raine1967
(11,589 posts)It may be uncomfortable for some people to acknowledge this simple statement, but I speak for myself when I say: TOTALLY AGREED.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)The biggest problem with defending a woman's right to choose control over her body is the lack of coherent, visible opposition to the re-establishment of police-enforced prohibition.
The GOP WILL NOT compromise. We work best by understanding this.
calimary
(81,127 posts)Exactly, Eleanors38! That's the basic "it." BRAVA!!!! Nailed it!!!
The GOP WILL NOT compromise. We work best by understanding this.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)I don't lay awake at night regretting that choice. I am not ashamed or embarrassed that I ended that pregnancy. I had no trouble getting pregnant with my husband and having two healthy yet crazy boys 8 years later.
If I was in that situation again I would make the same choice. I did not want to a be a single mother at 19. I didn't not want to be forever linked to the father if he was not meant to be in my future.
And I don't care who has a problem with that, no one is going to live my life but me.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Heather MC
(8,084 posts)Kath1
(4,309 posts)I didn't realize how "pro-choice" I was until I had a pregnancy scare in college. I didn't "agonize" over anything. I just thought I need to terminate this ASAP! That woke me up to what choice really means. I agree - we have to live our own lives.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)Then there I was faced with the choice. Neither choice was easy. But I am glad I was free to decide. I didn't tell my parents, or any family members.
I eventually told my super religious mother years later. But then I said, be honest you are glad I didn't have it aren't you? She said Yeah.
Being raised by an uber religious mother left me with the feeling at that time that pregnancy was the worst thing a young girl could do. My father use to say, it's harder to raise girls than boys because girls can get pregnant.
So of course when I got pregnant I did not bother seeking comfort and guidence from my parents, I knew they would be overly emotional, stupid, and tell all my damn business. But I also knew they would be no help if I kept the kid, and my mother would be spiteful and kick me out of her house.
I often wonder how many girls decide to abort because they know their very religious families would treat them like shit?
Kath1
(4,309 posts)I would have had the same situation with my very intolerant Catholic parents. There would have been absolutely no comfort or guidance. Abortion was the first thing that came to my mind. Had I actually been pregnant, I have no doubt I would have terminated it. My guess is that a lot of girls have abortions just because of the reactions they would get from their religious parents. And I think that really sucks.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)Winning. Of course when asked How will they know they are in heaven if they were terminated before their brains fully developed?
Response .....*Crickets*
LOL
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)are 10 times more likely to commit suicide.
Lifesitenews is spreading that bullshit. It's their way of pretending they care about women.
And it's 100% BS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_and_mental_health
Ineeda
(3,626 posts)tells tales of illegal abortions that would curl hair. She dealt with the aftermath, back in the day. Truly. Coat hangers, knitting needles and all! The truth is that women will always need abortions and will often find desperate ways to get one or attempt one themselves. It makes me weep. (I've had one illegal and one legal. Legal is better.)
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)It's the best choice sometimes and serves to help people create a better life for themselves.
I think we shouldn't underestimate the value it has for men. A friend was recently talking about how her son was sad that his 17 yr. old girlfriend had an abortion. I told her that he was lucky that she made that decision because having child support to pay would be very limiting.
niyad
(113,079 posts)Thespian2
(2,741 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)No one told me that my antibiotic would render my BC useless. (1978)
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Kath1
(4,309 posts)'78 was the year I thought I was pregnant at age 20. I would have done the same.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)How many of us can actually be honest about having had one?
I can talk about it here but very few people irl know what happened to me.
Last year my friend's teenage daughter thought she was pregnant and we were trying to find a way to get her across the state if she decided to have the procedure. She lives in a small southern town and was terrified that her boyfriend would publicize it on Facebook if she broke up with him.
Yes, the latest generation of women is SO lucky.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)And I'd do it again.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I live in Tennessee where the proponents of Amendment 1 are running their ads every ten minutes.
This Years Most Outrageous Anti-Abortion Strategy
Tennessee out-crazies all the other states with its proposed constitutional amendment.
By Dahlia Lithwick
Thats right. Tennessee is trying to amend its constitution to never protect abortion, ever, under any circumstance. And how did the state get here? In 2000, the Tennessee Supreme Court ruled in a case called Planned Parenthood v. Sundquist that the Tennessee constitution affords even more protection than the U.S. Constitution to Tennesseans seeking abortions. The court determined that a womans right to terminate her pregnancy is a vital part of ... the Tennessee Constitution, and it held that Tennessee could only pass very narrow restrictions on abortion as a result. As part of that decision, the court struck down several laws passed in 1998 by the Tennessee legislature, including a measure requiring hospitalization for second-trimester abortions, an informed consent provision, and a two-day waiting period. Republicans in the state legislature immediately reacted by attempting to amend the state constitution. Those proposed amendments failed to pass the state legislature until 2011. Now its on the November ballot.
Advertisement
Dont be confused by references to rape and incest and the life of the mother in the language of the proposed amendment. As Eleanor Clift writes, [T]he second sentence is craftily written to leave the impression that exemptions are either in place, or could easily be put in place. But the proposed wording would in fact allow the state to regulate all those interests out of existence. There is no question that this measure goes far beyond the proposed personhood language in other states to ensure that legislatures could pass any future legislation, including regulations that could ban abortions even to save mothers lives or to protect incest victims. It would allow laws that criminalize harm to a fetus or even ban access to methods of birth control deemed to be abortifacients.
*
The insidious beauty of Amendment 1 is that it operates as a Trojan horse to permit any and all future regulation. And as one local blogger notes, the fact that state legislators wont disclose which kinds of measures they seek to pass establishes that this is precisely the point. As Stacey Campfield, a Tennessee senator from the 7th District (Knox County) told the Family Action Council of Tennessee: After [Amendment 1] passes, I have several ideas but for fear of those ideas being used to help defeat Amendment 1, I will refrain from talking about those at this time. I doubt there are any ideas I would oppose that would restrict abortion in Tennessee.
This referendum has implications that go far beyond the state borders. As all the states surrounding Tennessee passed more and more anti-choice legislation in recent years, Tennessee came to be the state that neighboring women turned to to obtain services denied to them in Alabama, Mississippi, and Kentucky. This meant that by 2010, 1 out of every 4 abortions in the state was sought by an out-of-state patient. Terrell (director of Choices, a Memphis reproductive health clinic that provides abortion services) explains it this way: If Amendment 1 passes, the state of Tennessee would quickly join her Southern sisters in passing the kind of extreme regulations that make access to abortion impossible. This is, of course, the goal of the amendments drafters and supporters.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2014/10/tennessee_anti_abortion_amendment_1_voters_will_decide_whether_legislature.html
Time to revisit the idea of an organized abortion underground.
Kath1
(4,309 posts)I would gladly do the same!
roody
(10,849 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)I'm frankly sick of the narrative otherwise.
And I'm glad you could choose the path best for you.
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)funnily enough, the only instances in which I've heard the predominant narrative is from those who couldn't possibly know one way or another. which is to say: men.
marym625
(17,997 posts)I made the mistake of telling a cousin/friend who then shared it with her mother. My aunt then shared it with the rest of the family. Coming from an Irish Catholic family, that's a great deal of people. And as my aunt shared it, she was sure to add how her daughter was "pure." Something I laughed out loud at but kept the truth to myself.
I am lucky I have such a great mom. She got on the phone with her sister and ripped her a new one. She emphasized the fact that entire generation kept the secret from my aunt's kids that she was actually married a year after they thought, she being pregnant when she married and was too ashamed to be truthful.
What I was ashamed of and what took many years to deal with was I became pregnant from a rape. Now I am ashamed of that shame. I didn't even tell my parents until I was about 18 or 19.
Kath1
(4,309 posts)Always!
Freddie
(9,257 posts)2 people know, my boyfriend (now husband) and my college best friend, who took me to the clinic. Didn't tell bf until long after the fact, as we were a new couple and I didn't want to complicate things. When I finally told him, he wished I had told him them but that I did the right thing. We were 20. Now many years married, 2 kids and 2 grandkids.
My daughter is a nurse and fiercely pro-choice too, and I've never told her. When faced with an unexpected pregnancy of her own, she made the other choice and had my beautiful granddaughter, married the guy and they just had a planned-for baby boy.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)It is not a good thing, in my view. But it's sometimes necessary, and should always be the woman's choice. That is all.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)choose when and whether she becomes a parent as a good thing.
When coupled with the "but I support choice" it's exactly the type of soft support that has allowed so many states to restrict access.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I consider choice an important issue, and key to our fight against misogyny and patriarchy.
That doesn't change my personal feelings about the nature of the procedure. I can't simply decide that I think it's good to do that. But I can recognize the importance of placing that decision in the hands in which it belongs, and I will not judge women who choose to do it.
That's my position and I don't care if you consider it "sad and pathetic."
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)procedure' at all.
Doing so is a sign of soft support whether you realize it or not. I find it highly suspect that one would truly fully support something that they believe to be bad. That just doesn't make sense.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)There are many things in this world I find distasteful, but it recognize that they represent the "least bad" decision. That's called complex thinking. Not to mention, despite my personal beliefs, I recognize that people must be able to control,their own bodies.
As to why I injected my personal feelings? You did it in your OP. You are making a value judgment about the value of abortion itself. That's a personal feeling. I don't happen to agree with it, but I never the less recognize not only the importance of having it available when necessary, but leaving the decision as to when it is necessary to the woman involved, and the advice of those she wishes to involve.
But I do have a personal history with this procedure that I do not wish to discuss right now. May
If you can't accept my support on the issue without insisting that I think it's a good thing, then that's too bad. I will keep supporting pro-choice candidates without thinking abortion is "good."
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)I stand by my statement that support like yours is soft. Anything short of fully supporting access without adding to the stigma (which you do, by the way of indicating it's bad) is soft support which adds to the culture allowing restrictive legislation to continue at record pace.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I DO think Abortion, in general, is a terrible, if sometimes necessary thing. I can't suddenly change my feelings on that because you think it makes me a "soft supporter." You'll just have to live with my support of a woman's right to make that decision even if I don't agree with her decision.
Frankly, this conversation leaves me flabergasted. I had no idea that my position could possibly be controversial.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)The massive decline in access to abortion, TRAP laws, wait periods and "personhood amendments".
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/26/abortion-clinic-closures_n_3804529.html
Your support is soft. If you cannot, during this time of massive need, possibly see, acknowledge or speak of the good things associated with abortion and access to it adds to women's lives and society as a whole, you're soft. If you think it's "terrible", you're really soft. Again, I have a really hard time believing you would fight for access to something that is "terrible". Even if you did, you embolden those who pass anti-choice legislation. "See? Even pro-choicers think it's terrible!!11!!"
And you should step aside while those of us who can fight for it for you, ourselves and future generations.
If you go around talking out of both sides of your mouth saying it's bad and terrible but are really pro-choice, I find it odd that you have not been called out on that before. But you can't say that hasn't happened anymore.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)So do we have a purity test now? You can only be pro-choice if you're really pro abortion and think it's a societal good?
That's silly. WTF difference does it make if I don't approve of your choices, so long as I strongly support your right to make them?
I support the rights of people to make all kinds of choices I don't approve of.
And yes, I do think that sometimes the abortion is the right choice for a woman. That doesn't mean I think it's a "good" (that being a subjective judgment) choice, but sometimes it's the best choice.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)not being nice to you on the internet, I correct my previous accusations of calling you soft. If you'd do that, you're not even that. You're an adversary.
How fucked up is it that you ignore all of the data about what is happening and focus on your feelings? That's the 'difference it makes'. Soft support like yours emboldens those efforts to restrict. It's the whole point of the article in the OP - ending the stigma. And you are hung up on perpetuating it.
Yes, step aside.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I'm a pro-choice voter. I will continue to vote for pro-choice candidates (for me anti-choice means you don't get my vote), whether or not you want me in your little club.
No. I won't step aside. I will speak my mind.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Kath1
(4,309 posts)"Abortion is a moral and positive choice that liberates women, saves lives, and protects families." Couldn't say it any better. That is the botton line and the TRUTH!
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)I usually say I'm "pro choice," since many people seem to get offended when I use the term "pro abortion," but I think that's silly. I don't have to use the term "pro choice" for any other medical procedure, such as blood transfusions or flu shots. I can just say blood transfusions and flu shots are great and I'm glad they're available. "Blood transfusions should be safe, legal, and rare." Fuck all that.
That said, I think we do poorly when we use strawman arguments against anti-abortion/pro-life individuals. People who are against abortion usually hold that opinion because they view it as baby killing, and not because they want to control women or punish "sluts" or anything like that.
I'm a little bit drunk, so I hope this post makes sense.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)About the politicians, which regardless of their view about the procedure, very much intends to control women and their bodies. The rest are free to have their own moral beliefs but not free to impose them on others.
If a woman can't control what happens with her body, she can't control her life. Her life is NOT her own. EFF that! If you can't control your life, you are NOT free. Control your lives, women! Your life is yours and nobody elses. When I was about 25, (divorced, with one adorable child) I knew I didn't want to have more children. I went to my OB/GYN and asked for a tubal and he said no. That burned me to a crisp. What right did that Dr have to tell me I couldn't have a tubal? It was my body, my life. I went to a different GYN and he said the same thing. I don't know if GYNs still do that, but they shouldn't. I did have a safe legal abortion and never looked back. Not one iota of a tinge of guilt. Never told anyone, as it wasn't anyone's business but my own. I just became resigned to taking those damn BC pills, whether I liked it or not. Thanks for the OP. PeaceNikki.
Kath1
(4,309 posts)Exactly! Thank you.
I took my daughter to Planned Prenthood for birth control when she turned 16. It was partially for precaution but mainly because I wanted to make it clear to her that her decisions should be her own - not mine, not some politician's, not some priest's -her own. I always told her if she ever needed an abortion I would support her 100%.
I'm glad you were able to have a SAFE and LEGAL abortion. The is ABSOLUTELY NO NEED to feel any guilt or look back. It is our right that so many have worked so hard and sacrificed for.
Peace, ReRe!
marym625
(17,997 posts)Excellent post! Thank you!
PDJane
(10,103 posts)The world is getting to be a place that I'm not too happy to live in. It has become an oligarchry, with a very few controlling both wealth and choices. We've elected people who can be bought, and people who 'believe'...and that has been a huge mistake.
I had hoped that we would not, in the 21st century be battling this pro-religion, anti-science, pro-fascists take on life.
PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)And I would have, don't get me wrong! I knew at about age 10 that I would never want kids so I was always super careful or just plain abstinent. I was too scared to get a tubal, too. So, I'm 50 and done with my periods. It all worked out.
mountain grammy
(26,598 posts)except for the pregnant woman and her doctor, we will reach real freedom and equality. Men are allowed to take care of their medical needs in complete privacy while women are relegated to "abortion clinics," publicizing our private medical business. As long as we allow men to make medical decisions for women, we will never be equal.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Like Canada. They did that over 25 years ago.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/115253
duhneece
(4,110 posts)I'm now. I told both my children as they grew up that I am and was pro-choice.
Recently a woman at our senior center said she was glad that my mother was not pro-choice ...I looked at her and said loudly, " My mother WAS pro-choice; she chose to have me. My children know that I CHOSE to carry them as I was ready, and wanted them with every fiber of my being."
I told my story on stage at a local monologues play. It gets easier to tell...
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Ending the stigma and sharing the truth about abortion and how normal and even natural it is to make decisions which change the course of our life is important. I wish it weren't even an issue and fully integrated into womens reproductive healthcare without restriction or stigma.
In the meantime, we'll keep fighting and sharing the truth.
duhneece
(4,110 posts)Thank you for your thank you! It took many years to go 'so public.'
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)None of them seemed distraught over it. It was a pain in the ass, like a root canal. Needless to say, I wasn't friends with any fundies.
lark
(23,065 posts)Thank you for your honesty and for sharing. Me and most of the young women in our circle of friends had abortions when we were in our late teens, because no doctors in our redneck northern FL town would prescribe birth control pills to unmarried teens and we were not ready to start raising a family as we were still in high school and college. I shudder to think what my life would have been like if I had a baby a few months after I turned 18. I probably would have gotten married to someone I didn't love because if I didn't, my folks would have sent me to those one of those horrible christian homes for wayward girls, where you got beat for not following the fundamentalist Southern Baptist way.
Out of the 5 young women, one had the abortion because the baby had died but she couldn't tell her parents so went to NY and nearly died. Her abortion was no more legitimate than mine or the others. Making decisions about our own bodies and lives should be every woman's right.
Over 10 years later, I was in a good place to start a family and was blessed with two children. With my first intended pregnancy I was told I was losing the baby so many times, and the only way to keep it was to stay in bed until I stabilized. I quit a great new job I was going to start, because I couldn't go to Japan for training, and stayed in bed for 3 months. Finally, I stabilized and had a beautiful son as a result. But once again, this was my decision.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)I repeat what I said upthread.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025684730#post63
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Thank you, PeaceNikki.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)kmlisle
(276 posts)Imagine the night of a full moon in the Florida Keys in the Spring. Seven miles out the coral polyps that build the reefs surrounding the Keys are flooding the waters with eggs and sperm. The water are cloudy with literally billions of eggs and sperm.
Now imagine if every one of these eggs are fertilized and grow to maturity instead of the tiny majority that actually make it. This would be a disaster that would destroy that entire ecosystem. Nature, if we observe her, is telling us by what we see happening all around us that choice for humans is important and that, to disagree with Monty Python, every sperm is not sacred to be preserved at all cost. Because that cost will destroy life on earth.
The message I get from this simple fact is that choice is actually a necessary sacred act to insure that life can flourish on Earth. Of course I am a pagan humanist - not a christian!