Another leak about Michael Brown. This time from his toxicology report:

[Are_grits_groceries]

@GottaLaff: OFFS! RT @BuzzFeedAndrew: C’mon now 😑😐 h/t @JonathanDBrown

From WaPo

Hallucinations? Seriously?
Was he mainlining THC?

[bravenak]

1. Bullshit!!!!

I have never had hallucinations even once!!! And i have smoooooked! I can't imagine that he got better weed than I.

[djean111]

2. Hey, this worked for Zimmy........

[Kali]

3. sounds like whoever wrote that is the one having hallucinations.

[JaneyVee]

4. I'm 5'5 121lb female, I smoke ultra hi-grade medical marijuana every night after work...

I have never hallucinated from thc. EVER.

[hifiguy]

5. This will all be whitewashed,

swept under the rug, and ignored. Until the Ferguson cops gun down another black kid who was doing nothing.

It is best not to put the foxes in charge of the inquiry into mysterious chicken disappearances.

[nc4bo]

6. Still does not explain why Mr. Police errr Peace Officer blew his

Brains out, now does it?!

I have this awful feeling that this verdict will not be a satisfactory one for the town of Ferguson.

[Are_grits_groceries]

7. They will probably play "Reefer Madness"

for the grand jury next.

[jwirr]

8. Where are these leaks coming from? And more important are they legit?

[Arkansas Granny]

9. Oh, good grief. Hallucinations!?! From smoking weed?!? Do they realize that "Reefer Madness" is

*not* a documentary?

I have never experienced hallucinations, nor do I know anyone else who has ever experienced hallucinations from smoking. This is ridiculous.

[spanone]

10. what a crock. wonder who's leaking this shit?

[Feral Child]

11. The hyperbole is consistent

with attempts to justify a No Bill finding.

Like all RW lies, it need only convince other RWers to underscore their racism.

I'm beginning to suspect that the Punishment Caste is looking forward to the backlash.


Alas, Babylon...

[City Lights]

12. Wha?

Musta been some strong shit, or this is bullshit.

[Mass]

13. The post sources ??? F*ck anonymous sources.

Not identifying a source (except in case of real danger) should be illegal, because it prevents the reader to make an informed opinion about the truthfulness of the source.

And it is not only in this story. It is everywhere.

[WinkyDink]

14. OMG, the lies keep coming.

[lame54]

15. So he just imagined those bullets going into his body

[elias49]

16. A 10 minute search of the Washington Post finds no such story.

Hmmm. Should I bother digging deeper?
Nah

[Mass]

17. This is the article

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/new-evidence-supports-officers-account-of-shooting-in-ferguson/2014/10/22/cf38c7b4-5964-11e4-bd61-346aee66ba29_story.html

but of course, as all pieces of modern journalism, there is no reflection about the veracity of the sources (that are carefully anonymous), and no way to know what their goal and motivations is when leaking this.

[elias49]

18. Aha! Thanks. nt

[tonedevil]

19. Look about 17 paragraphs down...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/new-evidence-supports-officers-account-of-shooting-in-ferguson/2014/10/22/cf38c7b4-5964-11e4-bd61-346aee66ba29_story.html?hpid=z1

[jmowreader]

20. This is news how?

Last I checked, Marijuana Smoking is not a capital offense and last I checked, it was pretty popular. Unless he liked mixing PCP with his weed (which is doubtful here; if the guy was dusted they would have reported it) he wasn't hallucinating.