General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsfreshwest
(53,661 posts)They're spending $1.6 million in Oregon this year to defeat labeling. It's unknown how that will turn out, but rural turnout is said to be very high.
They're also spending $4.7 million in Colorado and the outcome is uncertain.
They've spent $27.5 million this year alone to influence voters.
They spent $70 million in WA and CA to defeat a popular initiative with 3 weeks of intense media buying.
Numbers from link:
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2014/10/03/here-we-go-again-monsanto-spends-millions-defeat-states-gmo-labeling-effort
A lot of money. How much money do they expect to make in return it leaves one to wonder...
And this isn't even the Koch money being used. How about that...
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)GMOs have done a lot more good than bad for the environment, according the vast majority of scientific studies.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)of the poison or our government which has been funded by the manufacturer ... and your environment must look like this ...
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Every major health organization in the world has tested GMOs and deemed them safe.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)The bans weren't based on their scientific communities. The bans have been based on politics. The anti-science fear mongering has been working well on many people.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)real science based on scientific facts ...
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)and I wonder if you laugh at those to don't believe the climate change studies. Hmmm...
pbmus
(12,422 posts)a growing smaller as we speak, contingent of paid off politicians holding back the true science revealing the facts about GMOs.....
ag_dude
(562 posts)...unless you are lacking on actual facts.
There are literally hundreds of studies that have been done by universities and foreign governments.
You'd have to think that just about everybody who could possibly do a study is bought off to believe what you just said.
GMOs have been around for nearly 20 years now. Can you cite an example of a location they have done the kind of damage you alluded to in your image?
Archae
(46,317 posts)pbmus
(12,422 posts)pbmus
(12,422 posts)ag_dude
(562 posts)You just posted a propaganda poster that doesn't cite a single source while arguing against a herbicide that has been tested for decades in the United States.
GMOs have been around for nearly 20 years now. Can you cite an example of a location they have done the kind of damage you alluded to in your original image or are just using scaremonger type tactics?
pbmus
(12,422 posts)ag_dude
(562 posts)...that linking to a political piece that doesnt actually list the actual study isn't a source?
pbmus
(12,422 posts)ag_dude
(562 posts)Of course, the actual studies don't make the alarmist claims of the political bull shit but still, that's a HUGE step for an anti-GMO'er.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)LOL
pbmus
(12,422 posts)I want some ....