Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 03:00 PM Nov 2014

After listening to Obama's statement on the midterms, it seems like this is the situation he wanted

all along.

Even when he had both chambers of Congress at the start of his presidency, he talked and made proposals as if Democrats were in the minority, and was far quicker to criticize the progressive wing of the Democratic Party than Republicans.

If that sounds crazy, consider how Andrew Cuomo is governing in New York. The Working Families Party gave him their endorsement in part by getting him to promise to work to elect a Democratic majority state senate.

Think about that: a third party had to bargain to get a Democratic governor to work for a fully democratic state legislature. Shouldn't that be automatic?

And he didn't even keep that promise that shouldn't have been necessary in the first place.

Instead, Cuomo has worked with Republicans and adopted some of the policies wholesale, like privatization of K-12 public education (Obama has as well).

On ebola, he is literally following the Republican playbook.

That seems to be the DLC way. A lot of what Bill Clinton got done during his administration were neoliberal policies, most of which Republicans could love.

Obama and Mitch McConnell have already had a love fest on trade deals that average Americans across the political spectrum loathe.

The DLCers seem to be embarrassed when their own party controls the legislature because they can't pretend the Republicans are forcing them to enact policies that hurt average Americans.

So they do as little as possible, this time helped by Republican obstruction, until the Republicans regain the majority.

And then they have the perfect illusion of checks and balances, and excuse to "compromise," which is really capitulation to the corporate agenda.

I don't think Obama is going to become "Dr. No," and wield the veto pen, nor do I think Democrats in the Senate will be one-tenth or even one one-hundredth the obstruction Republicans have been.

Instead, a few will put up token opposition, definitely sincere from a very few, but the rest will relax, knowing that the natural order has been restored.

274 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After listening to Obama's statement on the midterms, it seems like this is the situation he wanted (Original Post) yurbud Nov 2014 OP
You can see this in how "both" parties are willingly framing the voters' "message" this time out villager Nov 2014 #1
if the public sweeps in a wave of Democrats, the message is "we must compromise with GOP" yurbud Nov 2014 #6
Not wanting the shit sandwich = begging for unicorns! villager Nov 2014 #7
the DLCers should wake up with a unicorn head in their bed. yurbud Nov 2014 #17
"It's not personal -- it's business." villager Nov 2014 #20
Indeed. woo me with science Nov 2014 #114
Haha! whatchamacallit Nov 2014 #26
Plusses! maddiemom Nov 2014 #83
LOL! Le Taz Hot Nov 2014 #210
ROFL! woo me with science Nov 2014 #256
heh. SammyWinstonJack Nov 2014 #127
+1 Marr Nov 2014 #43
And yet so many idiots yell at us Millennials for not voting. Odin2005 Nov 2014 #101
Just consider if all the left leaning non-voters voted swilton Nov 2014 #149
Isn't that the sad truth? nt laundry_queen Nov 2014 #157
you gotta be kidding!!! ollie4 Nov 2014 #153
Milennials are fairly low information on economics. geek tragedy Nov 2014 #196
I disagree about not voting.. Feron Nov 2014 #246
yep. You can choose between gay bashing or gay hugging. yurbud Nov 2014 #253
BINGO! Odin2005 Nov 2014 #254
This: CrispyQ Nov 2014 #2
+1. nt bemildred Nov 2014 #5
Absolutely. TPP, Keystone XL, Chained CPI... Marr Nov 2014 #45
Exactly! And I think THEY know that the people are finally catching on which is why sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #249
The oligarchs know people are catching on, woo me with science Nov 2014 #255
Andrew, not Chris Cuomo vi5 Nov 2014 #3
it's hard to disagree with that. yurbud Nov 2014 #4
I see lots of posts urging Obama to use his veto pen. Maedhros Nov 2014 #22
Oh yea? Tommy2Tone Nov 2014 #95
So far, he's only used it twice. Maedhros Nov 2014 #145
Can we hold you to that prediction? BlindTiresias Nov 2014 #167
Sure thing LiberalLovinLug Nov 2014 #178
Obama won't veto, because he doesn't want to be overridden Demeter Nov 2014 #191
Dems and Repubs provide cover for each other. CJCRANE Nov 2014 #8
yep. I heard on the radio Obama is finally going to ask for congressional approval for Syrian actio yurbud Nov 2014 #18
If You Think the Parties are The Same, Why are You Here? AndyTiedye Nov 2014 #74
I didn't say they're the same. CJCRANE Nov 2014 #87
People always side with whoever they pick as the good cop of the show. L0oniX Nov 2014 #226
the Democratic Party has a progressive wing and progressive history yurbud Nov 2014 #263
+10000 The longer and more closely you watch the game, woo me with science Nov 2014 #147
Sad to say...but, I got that same feeling from watching his Presser.. KoKo Nov 2014 #9
After watching the Pres, I've concluded he's a space alien that wants to sell us off to Rigel IV. Drunken Irishman Nov 2014 #10
I expect to be shipped to the soylent green factory any day now. Ykcutnek Nov 2014 #11
After watching the President, I've concluded that... greatauntoftriplets Nov 2014 #12
Yup. Drunken Irishman Nov 2014 #13
born in Kenya JI7 Nov 2014 #19
No shit Capt. Obvious Nov 2014 #31
+1 sheshe2 Nov 2014 #54
Ya think? Bobbie Jo Nov 2014 #59
Well... sendero Nov 2014 #78
+1 MissDeeds Nov 2014 #181
Move? IronLionZion Nov 2014 #183
No.. sendero Nov 2014 #184
Love it or leave it, eh? Heard that before. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #205
+1 uponit7771 Nov 2014 #143
Yeah, those who think the President wanted this.. see nothing but Cha Nov 2014 #179
Tell me, Cha... Scootaloo Nov 2014 #192
Well, Cha, I'm a dog person. greatauntoftriplets Nov 2014 #218
They are probably some of the same people that didn't lift a finger to vote Stellar Nov 2014 #241
+1000 CakeGrrl Nov 2014 #262
Right, if you don't believe in the goodness and purity of PBO zeemike Nov 2014 #63
You seem to think he's an evil asshole. Drunken Irishman Nov 2014 #65
See what I mean...the dichotomy again zeemike Nov 2014 #70
This message was self-deleted by its author Drunken Irishman Nov 2014 #72
What's described in the OP is pretty dickish and I associate dickish with being an asshole... Drunken Irishman Nov 2014 #73
Well you associate wrong. zeemike Nov 2014 #80
Nothing I said is wrong. Drunken Irishman Nov 2014 #85
Only if you see in black and white. zeemike Nov 2014 #92
Just stop it. Drunken Irishman Nov 2014 #96
Well what is clear here to you are your own words zeemike Nov 2014 #109
LOL Drunken Irishman Nov 2014 #111
The OP has always seemed to trash President Obama. I'm not surprised at all.. he would come Cha Nov 2014 #119
except when it's time for bipartisanship... yurbud Nov 2014 #250
I'm convinced that after 2008 they kidnapped the real Obama and replaced him... Odin2005 Nov 2014 #104
in my corporate experience, they offer the new CEO a very stark choice. magical thyme Nov 2014 #197
The reptilian agenda wins out again? L0oniX Nov 2014 #228
It is good to see clear, honest statements of what is being done to us. woo me with science Nov 2014 #14
They train the respective bases of each party to hate one another. Maedhros Nov 2014 #24
+1000000 Separate news networks, separate radio stations, separate call-in lines woo me with science Nov 2014 #32
So many are allowing their emotions to be played like a fiddle. Maedhros Nov 2014 #52
Yes..and, we hoped for better with the "freedom" the Internet Promised... KoKo Nov 2014 #234
a third of the country is convinced they are one lottery ticket away from being a have yurbud Nov 2014 #47
That's part of the disinformation being used to manipulate them. [n/t] Maedhros Nov 2014 #48
the reality is that most of those people are a few missed paychecks away from living in their car frylock Nov 2014 #115
+1 One Third of Americans One Paycheck Away From Homelessness woo me with science Nov 2014 #180
If their car isn't repo'd first. nt adirondacker Nov 2014 #258
lottery ticket = snake oil medicine show L0oniX Nov 2014 #229
Yes! Just an updated version of "You'll get pie in the sky when you die." RufusTFirefly Nov 2014 #242
+1 leftstreet Nov 2014 #121
My last boss was very rightwing. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #208
It's important to realize that Republican voters are being fed the same type of horse shit Maedhros Nov 2014 #245
+100000! The goal is to distract us from this fundamental truth. Literally, at all costs. RufusTFirefly Nov 2014 #240
+1 zeemike Nov 2014 #67
Well said. nt mother earth Nov 2014 #84
Republicans are depending on the media to help them put pressure on Obama. kentuck Nov 2014 #15
He has the veto pen, not the media vi5 Nov 2014 #16
I guess we will... kentuck Nov 2014 #23
This is where the rubber meets the road. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #211
Wanna bet he gives the store away.....in the name of 'bipartisanshit and compromise'? SammyWinstonJack Nov 2014 #128
Suckers bet vi5 Nov 2014 #150
I'm afraid you're right MissDeeds Nov 2014 #186
I don't think he will cheezmaka Nov 2014 #159
Astonished at your naivete Android3.14 Nov 2014 #55
I must be having a nightmare cause I landed at Faux News (nt) sunnystarr Nov 2014 #120
No, this is just another episode of As The Stomach Churns. Major Hogwash Nov 2014 #171
Besides, it's that episode they've already shown 100 or so times. greatauntoftriplets Nov 2014 #209
They depend on our trust in a system that doesn't exist anymore. woo me with science Nov 2014 #21
No Shit ... pbmus Nov 2014 #68
This corporate coup is spread worldwide now, and since b4 bu$h at that... Amonester Nov 2014 #155
heck, they were relieved in '10 when Brown won and ended the Supermajority: MisterP Nov 2014 #25
they talked as if they never had it: "We gotta get some Republican votes" for this or that... yurbud Nov 2014 #61
We Never Did Have a Working Supermajority AndyTiedye Nov 2014 #69
wouldn't you think the most corrupt would also be most vulnerable to strong-arming? yurbud Nov 2014 #89
They Are, But they are Being Strongarmed By… AndyTiedye Nov 2014 #99
Then all of that legislation should have had funding tied to it Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #213
the DSCC gave, what $52M to retiring Senators? and they can only get corpo money with corpo ideals MisterP Nov 2014 #75
Your first two paragraphs are insane. JoePhilly Nov 2014 #27
+1 breath of sanity flamingdem Nov 2014 #33
Sadly ... JoePhilly Nov 2014 #42
I think the Dems had a super majority for 70 days, not 2 yrs...due to blue dog dems randys1 Nov 2014 #88
Actually, that includes the 5 or so blue dogs JoePhilly Nov 2014 #90
Worse than I thought... randys1 Nov 2014 #100
It was even worse than that. SunSeeker Nov 2014 #175
Actually, it was only 24 working days of a filibuster proof Senate majority. nt SunSeeker Nov 2014 #174
Did they need or use a supermajority to pass Health Care Reform? yurbud Nov 2014 #265
I'm betting you don't know the actually sequence of events ... JoePhilly Nov 2014 #269
I was actually asking a question yurbud Nov 2014 #271
yes, breath of sanity indeed nt steve2470 Nov 2014 #124
It will only get worse Andy823 Nov 2014 #35
yup ... DU's Combustible Hair Club is now in session. JoePhilly Nov 2014 #38
Guns? did i hear GUNS WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA randys1 Nov 2014 #102
Love that picture Andy823 Nov 2014 #126
Hair on fire club for men Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2014 #140
Lovin' attacks from the "left" that are flamingdem Nov 2014 #66
It think there is a contest Andy823 Nov 2014 #125
Just like Ted Cruz flamingdem Nov 2014 #131
this is pretty much what it is and they feel like the world agrees with them JI7 Nov 2014 #177
+1 ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2014 #36
+100. nt chowder66 Nov 2014 #37
who said he hated the country? I don't think feeling for the country motivates very many in DC yurbud Nov 2014 #49
I was just reading between the lines ... JoePhilly Nov 2014 #51
good and evil also have little meaning in Washington. There is what you get paid to do yurbud Nov 2014 #56
Clearly we're doomed. JoePhilly Nov 2014 #91
"Sometimes I can't believe the nonsense that gets posted around here." Number23 Nov 2014 #129
LOL Amonester Nov 2014 #156
+1 nt steve2470 Nov 2014 #163
I think they want total destruction. JoePhilly Nov 2014 #188
Yep, a Canadian recently said it well... stevenleser Nov 2014 #268
This thread should have been changed.... cheezmaka Nov 2014 #161
The stuff after the first two paragraphs wasn't meritorious either nt geek tragedy Nov 2014 #195
I liked the ebola line tucked into the middle all by itself. JoePhilly Nov 2014 #198
Especially since Obama smacked Cuomo down on that. geek tragedy Nov 2014 #199
If you take each Democratic candidate on their own ... JoePhilly Nov 2014 #200
'hates this country'. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #215
I'm just reading between the lines ... JoePhilly Nov 2014 #216
Yep, no anti-Obama smear is too ridiculous to get widespread support here. stevenleser Nov 2014 #267
Obama shares a wide swath of ideological real estate with Republicans. pa28 Nov 2014 #28
The next couple of years will be very interesting. I think we will know Autumn Nov 2014 #29
No fuckin' shit. Jackpine Radical Nov 2014 #30
+1 Dont call me Shirley Nov 2014 #40
Which is why it's so important that our hatred for each other be stoked... woo me with science Nov 2014 #117
The Wait jalan48 Nov 2014 #34
The parties have fully merged. They don't want us to know. So they keep up the dog & pony show Dont call me Shirley Nov 2014 #39
Simplest and clearest summary I have seen yet. woo me with science Nov 2014 #53
Thank you. Dont call me Shirley Nov 2014 #60
Nothing much changes when control of the government switches hands. Maedhros Nov 2014 #146
You think that the Republicans can keep a lid on all of the crazy they unleashed in 2009? 6000eliot Nov 2014 #41
I don't think they are crazy, just thoughtlessly obedient to their corporate masters. yurbud Nov 2014 #58
"they do as little as possible, this time helped by Republican obstruction, until Zorra Nov 2014 #44
And the Republicans rigged it... ReRe Nov 2014 #220
This important thread has now been tagged "doubleplusungood" woo me with science Nov 2014 #46
sometimes they can do a whole sockpuppet thread, seemingly not realizing that no real people are yurbud Nov 2014 #50
Indeed. woo me with science Nov 2014 #57
+100 G_j Nov 2014 #76
all I know is I wasn't juror #1, lol magical thyme Nov 2014 #94
Thank you for posting this. :) woo me with science Nov 2014 #107
LMFAO ...best jury evah L0oniX Nov 2014 #230
wait, which post was the alert for? yurbud Nov 2014 #260
#46 magical thyme Nov 2014 #261
+1 Enthusiast Nov 2014 #187
Which is why Hillary needs to be kept far far away from the White House. (nt) w4rma Nov 2014 #62
+100000000 woo me with science Nov 2014 #135
Obama won, and got what he wanted? ProSense Nov 2014 #64
Hehehehehe, welcome back ProSense! Iliyah Nov 2014 #93
He reacted with glee AgingAmerican Nov 2014 #71
oh please DonCoquixote Nov 2014 #82
Apparently you missed his post election statements AgingAmerican Nov 2014 #86
and if he said Mopey DonCoquixote Nov 2014 #112
Oh boo hoo.. You sound like the WHPC.. they were upset that Pres Obama wasn't all down and dejected Cha Nov 2014 #118
++++++++++ to infinity and beyond (nt) sunnystarr Nov 2014 #123
Really, sunnystar! So sad for the posters on here and the WHPC Jackals who demand Pres Obama act Cha Nov 2014 #166
Nobody on here wants 'sad and dejected'. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #217
Hmm. When we're not miserable.. flamingdem Nov 2014 #132
I'm always looking for silver linings, flamingdem and I think the President and his TEAM are on Cha Nov 2014 #168
As always, Cha is right on, groovy and far out. mimi85 Nov 2014 #139
Mahalo mims! Thanks to the amazing tweets posted on Cha Nov 2014 #169
You hit another one out of the park Cha Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2014 #142
Muchas Gracias, Yo Mama! Cha Nov 2014 #170
+1 uponit7771 Nov 2014 #144
Mahalo, uponit! Cha Nov 2014 #172
The past is prologue AgingAmerican Nov 2014 #176
"He reacted with glee" is a lie, a flat out ODS falsehood. nt geek tragedy Nov 2014 #194
Watch his post election news conference AgingAmerican Nov 2014 #248
Ugh.... Skidmore Nov 2014 #77
Did any of the losers say "We should have done a better job for the people"? jtuck004 Nov 2014 #79
+1 ...however "better job" may mean sucking up to the rich (people) for campaign money. L0oniX Nov 2014 #231
The best we can hope for AgingAmerican Nov 2014 #81
Cuomo = Obama blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #97
DLCers are Republican infiltrators and need to be all kicked out. Odin2005 Nov 2014 #98
The Dem party needs to embrace (go back to) FDR, progressive, populist principles L0oniX Nov 2014 #233
that's how the game is played alrighty stupidicus Nov 2014 #103
Well, now I'm depressed. redheaddem Nov 2014 #105
IMO the good news is that people *are* waking up. woo me with science Nov 2014 #108
Well said. zeemike Nov 2014 #110
I really, really hope Bernie runs. woo me with science Nov 2014 #116
A revolution is the right word. zeemike Nov 2014 #134
We now have a largely post-partisan, post-democratic, corporate government in this country. woo me with science Nov 2014 #106
yep. I would like to hear our DLC/Third Way friends tell us why so much trade, foreign... yurbud Nov 2014 #264
I think this is the most important thread on DU right now, woo me with science Nov 2014 #113
And people in California have woken up - they just do NOT know what truedelphi Nov 2014 #122
They are constantly refining the system, aren't they. woo me with science Nov 2014 #130
"it seems like" is the key phrase here AtomicKitten Nov 2014 #133
In 2008, Obama went straight to work rescuing the Republican Party. His work is done. And only whereisjustice Nov 2014 #136
nonsense. DCBob Nov 2014 #137
You're right, it sounds crazy. ucrdem Nov 2014 #138
ALL the money is on Wall Street or buried offshore SleeplessinSoCal Nov 2014 #141
Precisely. DeSwiss Nov 2014 #148
Repubs don't like governing, and now they have to. alfredo Nov 2014 #151
K & R Thespian2 Nov 2014 #152
He may veto some or all, since he's not running again. Amonester Nov 2014 #158
At times I get the sinking feeling kacekwl Nov 2014 #154
That's your stomach..... DeSwiss Nov 2014 #203
The abject cowardice with which they all approached having the big majority was appalling. PeteSelman Nov 2014 #160
^^^THIS^^^ When they were a big majority they were like a deer in the headlights. L0oniX Nov 2014 #239
It's not cowardice. We are a sham democracy now. The parties are working together. woo me with science Nov 2014 #252
In 81 Reagan from the beginning let lose on the Democrats for "Thwarting the will of the people" Douglas Carpenter Nov 2014 #162
This is the situation Obama wanted? Really??? lexington filly Nov 2014 #164
Pragmatism is taking whatever situation you get, and turning it to your advantage bhikkhu Nov 2014 #165
I have to disagree with that, the POTUS needed the Dems to control Congress Rex Nov 2014 #173
That socialist is gonna git yer guns! IronLionZion Nov 2014 #182
Sorry, I'm not buying the multi-dimensional chess game thing, anymore. Paladin Nov 2014 #185
You noticed that, too? Demeter Nov 2014 #189
K&R. I get the exact same impression. Enthusiast Nov 2014 #190
Idiotic ODS drivel. No, Obama did not want those whose only goal is to derail his presidency geek tragedy Nov 2014 #193
Well Done, geek! "told him to stay away.." except in PA, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Cha Nov 2014 #201
BINGO! B Calm Nov 2014 #202
"Democrats ran away from him and told him to stay away" I wonder why. L0oniX Nov 2014 #238
What fucking nonsense. giftedgirl77 Nov 2014 #204
And people like this Bobbie Jo Nov 2014 #221
Seriously, it gets crazier every damn day. giftedgirl77 Nov 2014 #222
LMFAO L0oniX Nov 2014 #235
I agree MissDeeds Nov 2014 #206
Agreed. That was my first conclusion. Obama will betray liberals most horribly. EEO Nov 2014 #207
Of course.... Hotler Nov 2014 #212
You picked up on the foreshadowing in this novella. nt NorthCarolina Nov 2014 #214
+1 Sort of like reading a series of books by the same bad novelist. woo me with science Nov 2014 #223
Pretty much, it's all scripted OR or one heck of a coincidence that the 1% always end up with a win. NorthCarolina Nov 2014 #236
Bingo. Sadly. Myrina Nov 2014 #219
Agree. grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #224
"Obama's" TPA and XL will get passed now maybe even SS CPI will get back on the table. L0oniX Nov 2014 #225
The game is rigged. Fearless Nov 2014 #227
Here comes the Haterade. True Blue Door Nov 2014 #232
Well Done, True Blue Door! The Conspiracy Theories are so pathetic.. but, I think this one Cha Nov 2014 #237
the "hater" talking point was lazy and stupid when the Bushies used it. yurbud Nov 2014 #259
I'm a little confused. What did you want Obama to say? Moonwalk Nov 2014 #243
kick woo me with science Nov 2014 #244
I love me some president obama, but i will be the first to tell you okieinpain Nov 2014 #247
kick woo me with science Nov 2014 #251
this clearly struck a nerve considering not just rec's and views, but DLC/Third Way/Blue Dog whining yurbud Nov 2014 #257
The facts are simply not with you. stevenleser Nov 2014 #270
so Obama ISN'T pushing GOP K-12 privatization agenda, isn't pursuing the same foreign policy, & TPP? yurbud Nov 2014 #272
If you ignore the several dozen points in the piece I posted, why should I address any of yours? nt stevenleser Nov 2014 #273
which post? yurbud Nov 2014 #274
kick woo me with science Nov 2014 #266
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
1. You can see this in how "both" parties are willingly framing the voters' "message" this time out
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 03:07 PM
Nov 2014

A depressed turnout in red states elects Republican Senators, and the media and "two" parties ram a message down our throats that this means a right turn in all things, and nothing should be done to impede it.

Where instead, as you noted, an actual wave election like 2008 -- where a Democratic President and Congress had a clear agenda they were elected to pursue -- is also taken as a signal to cave in to, and compromise with, Republicans.

The fix, is clearly in.

The question for us all is how to survive long enough until it isn't.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
6. if the public sweeps in a wave of Democrats, the message is "we must compromise with GOP"
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 03:21 PM
Nov 2014

If Republicans sweep in, the message is "we must do it 100% the GOP way."

You can get half a shit sandwich or the whole thing, but you're eating shit either way you slice it.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
101. And yet so many idiots yell at us Millennials for not voting.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 06:07 PM
Nov 2014

The Democrats give us a few social issue crumbs, but otherwise do not differ from the Republicans in anything that matters. As Eugene Debs famously said a century ago, both "parties" are really a single Capitalist party. The Dems are the Big Capitalists and the Republicans are the Small Capitalists.

 

swilton

(5,069 posts)
149. Just consider if all the left leaning non-voters voted
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 10:48 PM
Nov 2014

and (typically) the only candidates on the ballot were the blue dog Democrats.....

It would be the GOP's dream agenda

 

ollie4

(59 posts)
153. you gotta be kidding!!!
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 11:10 PM
Nov 2014

The Democratic Party does not differ from Repubicans in anything that matters? Are you serious?

So....here is a partial list of things that you think don't matter:

1) minimum wage hike....reps oppose, dems are for....you yawn and say it doesn't matter....
2) Affordable Care Act....reps oppose, dems are for....you yawn and say it doesn't matter....
3-1000) take your pick...there are hundreds of issues reps are different from dems....but you...out of dogmatic semi-religious faith in yawning....think there isn't any difference.

Gees.....you really can't tell a difference? Then you aren't a Democrat!

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
196. Milennials are fairly low information on economics.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 09:15 AM
Nov 2014

They want low taxes, small government, but also government with more services.

Love the ACA, hate Obamacare.

Etc.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/07/millennials-economics-voting-clueless-kids-these-days/374427/

Generation Xbox is fairly clueless on this sort of thing

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
253. yep. You can choose between gay bashing or gay hugging.
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 04:37 PM
Nov 2014

But every foreign, economic, and other policy that actually costs money is already decided.

CrispyQ

(36,457 posts)
2. This:
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 03:11 PM
Nov 2014
The DLCers seem to be embarrassed when their own party controls the legislature because they can't pretend the Republicans are forcing them to enact policies that hurt average Americans.


I think the Prez & the republican congress will be very productive. Note I did not say they would make progress, just that they would be productive.

The system isn't broken. The system is fixed.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
249. Exactly! And I think THEY know that the people are finally catching on which is why
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 03:37 PM
Nov 2014

they are so desperately trying to 'play the victim', claiming a 'purge', when that is exactly what they have been doing to Liberal Dems for the past several decades. Purging Liberals, trying to attract more moderate Conservatives, not understanding the fact that, as someone famous once said, paraphrasing: Republicans won't vote for Republican lite when they can vote for the real thing.

I think the Third Way actually believed that they could be the bridge between the far Right and Democrats. I don't know what made them think that Democrats would ever accept far Right policies, such as attacks on good Social Programs and/or the Public School system etc. But clearly they thought they were brilliant and the 'left' was dispensible, because they really thought the country was 'Conservative'. Turns out they were wrong but still can't accept their total failure apparently.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
255. The oligarchs know people are catching on,
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 05:03 PM
Nov 2014

which is why they plan for us to have a Republican president for awhile starting in 2016.

We will lose the single positive effect of having an aggressively corporate Third Way Democratic administration in office:

People were finally waking up to the fact that we are an oligarchy....that both sides are really working for the same predatory corporate agenda. We were building urgency that electing Democrats is not enough...that we need fundamental change and corporate money and power out of the system.

But all that awareness among Democrats is going to go down the toilet if we let them run Hillary and get a Republican elected. Obama's wars and TPP and TISA and new austerity will put things over the top, as the Third Way planned, and we will have a Republican president again in 2016.

Then the Third Way will be able to change back into their "passionate-but-conveniently-ineffectual-liberal" costumes. They will wail along with us about those evil Republicans, and we can all feel warm and fuzzy about our party again.

Oh, we'll still be an oligarchy lurching into fascism, but the important thing is that Dems will be consistently SAYING the right things again, and looking like the firebrand populist party we need them to be.

And the people will be reassured that we really do still have a Democracy, we can stop all this silly talk about oligarchy and needing fundamental change and such, and we can all go home and watch "Hunger Games" and grouse because our only problem will be that we need to get Republicans out of office and put the Third Way Democrats back.


We have to find a way to build bipartisan momentum for corporate money out of elections/government...or we will soon be back in the old game of merely hoping for a corporate Democrat again next time.
 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
3. Andrew, not Chris Cuomo
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 03:14 PM
Nov 2014

But other than that, I agree 100%.

The next 2 years, including the inevitable Hillary campaign are going to be the final nails in the coffin of the Democratic party as we know it. The slow death we've been experiencing the past 5-10 years will become a much more rapid decline.

The only positive thing to come from this will be the creative ways in which the Obama apologists and "clap louder" crowd will have to come up with to spin his inevitable capitulations to the Republicans.

It's about to become very black and white. He can veto legislation or not. No more "Well, he'd like to do this, but without a 90 seat Democratic majority what are his options?" No more excuse.

If shitty legislation is passed (which it hopefully only can be with Repubs peeling off 4 Democrats which sadly shouldn't be that hard) and he vetoes it then we can only assume he is o.k. with that legislation and we'll finally know where he actually stands without having to read between the lines.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
22. I see lots of posts urging Obama to use his veto pen.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:11 PM
Nov 2014

They make me chuckle. Why would he want to do that? He wants everyone to play nice together. Vetos aren't nice.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
191. Obama won't veto, because he doesn't want to be overridden
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 08:55 AM
Nov 2014

It would be the ultimate embarrassment.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
8. Dems and Repubs provide cover for each other.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 03:30 PM
Nov 2014

The 1%ers wanted more troops in Iraq and for that they need a Republican Congress. I could see it in advance.

Senate Dems stalled the CIA Torture Report release over minor quibbles...and whaddya know... the Repubs are in charge now, so it'll get kicked into the long grass.

The Keystone Pipeline is now on the table etc. etc.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
18. yep. I heard on the radio Obama is finally going to ask for congressional approval for Syrian actio
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:02 PM
Nov 2014

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
87. I didn't say they're the same.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:42 PM
Nov 2014

I'm here because I'm trying to make sense of what's going on in the world by seeing what other people think and offering my own opinion.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
263. the Democratic Party has a progressive wing and progressive history
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 08:25 PM
Nov 2014

that is being trumped by bought politicians in our own party.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
147. +10000 The longer and more closely you watch the game,
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 10:38 PM
Nov 2014

the more obvious it becomes.

I've watched quite a few people's eyes open to the con game once they realize they can predict the outcome of any political battle in which the One Percent have an important stake. The One Percent always win. Always. It doesn't always appear that way at first, because the con game and the spin are slick. But the overall movement is always in a direction that favors the oligarchs.

Case in point: the whole budget ceiling crisis con. The corporate spin was that the president "saved" Social Security. Now that's an absurdly audacious spin to *begin* with, given that the president was the one who put SS on the table in the first place. But even beyond that,

When you look at the entire process and how it unfolded, what you see are two parties working together to orchestrate a process in which the only possible outcomes were (1) more austerity than even Paul Ryan wanted initially or (2) even more austerity than that.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
9. Sad to say...but, I got that same feeling from watching his Presser..
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 03:32 PM
Nov 2014

Thank you for the post. I found his answers to reporters questions disturbing many times.

And had same reaction to how he seemed to be relieved to be working with a Repub controlled House & Senate.

And, the rest of your observations makes sense in retrospect after 6 years of watching PBO in "action or inaction."


 

Ykcutnek

(1,305 posts)
11. I expect to be shipped to the soylent green factory any day now.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 03:36 PM
Nov 2014

Or enslaved to build a new Great Pyramid that welcomes the antichrist.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
78. Well...
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:32 PM
Nov 2014

.. the dogs (apologists for Obama) are about to get their day. He will either veto odious legislation or he won't. If he doesn't, y'all can hold your breath until you turn blue, it won't convince any rational person that Obama ever intended to keep the promises he made before he took office.

I'll bet he crawls into the corner like a whipped puppy, but I'd be happy to be wrong.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
179. Yeah, those who think the President wanted this.. see nothing but
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 03:44 AM
Nov 2014

evil in President Obama, if they think that. And, look how many recs are buying into this shite.

It's the non-reality bunch.. they think the worst so it is the WORST.. you Better Believe IT. And that's how they deal with issues.. nothing new. But, it apparently makes them feel all superior to refer to us as "dogs" and President Obama as a "whipped puppy".

They're acting just like the White House Jackal Press Corp that thought the President would come all out like "a whipped puppy" and they could piss all over him.. mad as hell when that Didn't Happen..

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
192. Tell me, Cha...
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 08:57 AM
Nov 2014

Do you think the president is going to bust his ass to resist the shit the Republicans are going to be doing? Or are we going to be hearing hte word "compromise" like a mantra from the guy for the next two years?

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
241. They are probably some of the same people that didn't lift a finger to vote
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 12:59 PM
Nov 2014

for his democratic party or didn't come out at all to vote, or ALL voted for the Republic0ns. Now I can see why the 'big lost'....makes since.

CakeGrrl

(10,611 posts)
262. +1000
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 07:42 PM
Nov 2014

It's very telling how many people leapt to rec this thread signing onto the President as the architect (or puppet or complicit enabler) of some evil master plan.

Any claims that they have really wanted to support him if only he proved his progressive bona fides are bullshit.

The REAL problems?

* A media bought and paid for to keep people ignorant.

* Ignorant and/or complacent masses who are either clueless about how the branches of government function, or simply don't understand the malignant destructiveness of this GOP.

What a stupid, stupid theory laid out in this OP.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
63. Right, if you don't believe in the goodness and purity of PBO
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:19 PM
Nov 2014

then you believe in space aliens.

The world is a dichotomy and you must be one or the other...in keeping with the spirit of with us or against us

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
65. You seem to think he's an evil asshole.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:22 PM
Nov 2014

Which is probably less likely than there ever being space aliens.

Response to zeemike (Reply #70)

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
73. What's described in the OP is pretty dickish and I associate dickish with being an asshole...
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:29 PM
Nov 2014

And most assholes are fairly evil. Derp.

The OP made Obama this menacing evil genius who is cackling at the results so he can continue wrecking America. Fuck that. lol

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
80. Well you associate wrong.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:34 PM
Nov 2014

nice guys can sell you out just like assholes can if the price is right.
And I think the price is right.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
96. Just stop it.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:54 PM
Nov 2014

When someone paints the picture of a person trying to destroy this country, they're essentially saying that person is a bad man.

Stop with the bullshitting here, okay? It's clear the OP thinks Obama is bad enough, evil enough, to fuck over America. A good person doesn't do that. I mean, seriously, at least the GOP can admit they hate Obama.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
109. Well what is clear here to you are your own words
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 06:54 PM
Nov 2014

They are not my words and I don't think the OP says that ether, but I will let him defend himself or herself.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
111. LOL
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 07:18 PM
Nov 2014

The OP just said Obama WANTED the Republicans to win so he could fuck over the country. If that isn't the definition of being bad I don't know what is.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
119. The OP has always seemed to trash President Obama. I'm not surprised at all.. he would come
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 08:45 PM
Nov 2014

up with some scenario where the President is this evil sociopath who is rubbing his hands together in glee because it is bad for America.. and, he now has to deal with not one but both these fascist a$$holes.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
250. except when it's time for bipartisanship...
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 10:55 PM
Nov 2014

but only bipartisanship that helps the rich.

You can't be bipartisanly anti-war or anti-surveillance or anti-Federal Reserve.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
104. I'm convinced that after 2008 they kidnapped the real Obama and replaced him...
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 06:11 PM
Nov 2014

...with a right-wing clone.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
197. in my corporate experience, they offer the new CEO a very stark choice.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 09:15 AM
Nov 2014

Do what we tell you or we'll see to it that you'll be lucky to get a job flipping burgers.

Only this is at the highest level, where the choice is do what we tell you or

I mean this literally. Of course, I don't know for a fact that this happened. But nothing would surprise me, and with a history of bumping off Presidents and popular candidates who didn't do as they were told, I'd be surprised if it didn't happen.

You sell out to protect somebody you love. And then you get used to it. That is your new life; you make the best of it. And lots of money makes it easier to make the best of it.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
14. It is good to see clear, honest statements of what is being done to us.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 03:50 PM
Nov 2014

This corporate coup succeeds by convincing citizens that their own party is still working for them and that it's just the other side's fault.

Until we catch up to the fact that they own both parties, and the Red vs. Blue is a con game, they'll continue to keep us occupied with these sham elections instead of uniting against and for policies rather than teams.
 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
24. They train the respective bases of each party to hate one another.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:14 PM
Nov 2014

Yet both perceive that government is not working in their interests.

What could be wrought if we stopped with the hating? The real divide in this country is not Republican v. Democrat, or Liberal v. Conservative, but instead Haves vs. Have Nots. At some point we've got to fight the real enemy.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
32. +1000000 Separate news networks, separate radio stations, separate call-in lines
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:33 PM
Nov 2014

for community discussions. Amd the steady stream of Two Minutes Hate on discussion boards like this. If someone who molests a child in Oklahoma happens to be a Republican, you can be sure we will hear about it here....and if that person turns out to have been a Democrat, you know it will lead at Free Republic.

It's sick, and it's orchestrated.

We are managed like circus animals.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
234. Yes..and, we hoped for better with the "freedom" the Internet Promised...
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 12:17 PM
Nov 2014


It's sick, and it's orchestrated.

We are managed like circus animals.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
47. a third of the country is convinced they are one lottery ticket away from being a have
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:57 PM
Nov 2014

so they vote against their own best interests.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
115. the reality is that most of those people are a few missed paychecks away from living in their car
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 08:05 PM
Nov 2014

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
242. Yes! Just an updated version of "You'll get pie in the sky when you die."
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 01:00 PM
Nov 2014

In the mean time, don't be so uppity.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
208. My last boss was very rightwing.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 10:00 AM
Nov 2014

And I'm a socialist. Yet we got along well, and often agreed on things that were bad for the country, or things that were good for it.

Our debates were sometimes heated, but we could respect each other, we both knew each wanted the best place for the next generation to grow up in, and we also both believed that what needed to be done needed to be based on actual evidence, facts, and evaluated and re-evaluated as new evidence came in.

The other 'base' is not composed of evil villains, no matter how often they end up electing people who screw us all over.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
245. It's important to realize that Republican voters are being fed the same type of horse shit
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 02:17 PM
Nov 2014

as Democratic voters, just with the rhetoric tailored to fit.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
240. +100000! The goal is to distract us from this fundamental truth. Literally, at all costs.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 12:47 PM
Nov 2014

And it's definitely working.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
67. +1
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:24 PM
Nov 2014

But when you tell us the emperor has no close on be prepared to be set upon with great furry.
Many people do not want to see a naked emperor.

kentuck

(111,079 posts)
15. Republicans are depending on the media to help them put pressure on Obama.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 03:51 PM
Nov 2014

Stand your ground, Mr President!

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
16. He has the veto pen, not the media
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:00 PM
Nov 2014

It's all in his hands at this point.

We'll finally get a good look into what he does and does not want to get signed in to law, won't we.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
211. This is where the rubber meets the road.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 10:05 AM
Nov 2014

And we see whether 'bipartisanship' or 'principle' is to be the defining feature of that legacy.

SammyWinstonJack

(44,130 posts)
128. Wanna bet he gives the store away.....in the name of 'bipartisanshit and compromise'?
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 09:30 PM
Nov 2014

No need for the veto pen, then.

He doesn't like too be perceived as the bad guy.

 

MissDeeds

(7,499 posts)
186. I'm afraid you're right
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 08:21 AM
Nov 2014

He hasn't shown much inclination to stand his ground and fight, which makes me wonder...maybe he doesn't fight because he agrees with the opposition. I wish we had the president we thought we were voting for.

cheezmaka

(737 posts)
159. I don't think he will
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 12:02 AM
Nov 2014

I believe he'll only compromise to a point. Not like the cowardly Dems who threw him under the bus. Repugs will get a little only if they give a little. Otherwise out comes the Veto pen. I'll be watching CNN with a bag of "popcorn" when that happens...

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
21. They depend on our trust in a system that doesn't exist anymore.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:07 PM
Nov 2014


This corporate coup depends on Americans' believing that elections and the political process function the same way that they used to.

We are raised and propagandized to still believe that elections are important contests between two different teams with different visions, one of which we desperately want to win.

And they depend on us to believe that our politicians believe in and have loyalty to party as fervently as we are conditioned to do.

But the truth is that both parties are now owned largely by the same huge corporate interests. And they function more as tools now to keep us divided and manipulate our loyalties to ensure that the corporate agenda they both share can continue and be strengthened, no matter who is elected.

It's rude awakening to realize that the goal of politicians may not be the goal we thought it was....that their loyalty isn't to party or the principles we are told they share.....but to the corporate agenda that both corporate-purchased parties are aggressively pursuing.

This administration has steadily advanced a corporate agenda since Day One. That's how politics works now. No matter which party is elected, we keep getting the same overall direction of austerity, TPP, TISA, mass surveillance, "Kill Lists," indefinite detention, secret laws, secret courts, corporate education, drilling, fracking, new wars in Syria and Iraq, a TRILLION dollar ramping up of nuclear weapons when our president is signing ANOTHER round of food stamp cuts and a farm bill based on "pension smoothing." Not a single major banker in the mortgage collapse/theft held accountable, journalists and whistleblowers under assault, mass propaganda machines...It goes on and on and on.

This wasn't a loss for corporate Democrats. We saw the Third Way vote suppression clearly, from the revolting "Accept Defeat" emails from the DCCC to the relentless online campaigns to insult and alienate the Democratic base.

This is just the next, planned step of the takeover. Up next: Corporate Democrats will run HRC only if the PTB have already decided that it's time for a Republican next.

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
155. This corporate coup is spread worldwide now, and since b4 bu$h at that...
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 11:32 PM
Nov 2014

Obama can't undo it all alone by himself: he does not have that superpower, it's as simple as that.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
25. heck, they were relieved in '10 when Brown won and ended the Supermajority:
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:19 PM
Nov 2014

their reasoning was that now nobody wasn't expecting the Senate to do anything anymore (and they could focus on just rolling in hundreds)

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
61. they talked as if they never had it: "We gotta get some Republican votes" for this or that...
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:13 PM
Nov 2014

People do not care about process or bipartisanship, they care about results and whether they help or hurt them.

I could not give one flying fuck if they passed legislation and got it to Obama's desk without one single Republican vote, and Dems should have been working around the clock to pass the most sweeping, popular, irreversible legislation they could while they had that supermajority, which would have led to keeping and expanding it instead of losing it.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
89. wouldn't you think the most corrupt would also be most vulnerable to strong-arming?
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:45 PM
Nov 2014

they've got bodies buried somewhere that probably have a finger or two sticking up out of the ground.

AndyTiedye

(23,500 posts)
99. They Are, But they are Being Strongarmed By…
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 06:05 PM
Nov 2014

People like him:

[font color=gray]Grover Norquist[/font]

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
213. Then all of that legislation should have had funding tied to it
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 10:09 AM
Nov 2014

so it could be enacted by reconciliation, and have had 10 years to get popular enough to be unkillable.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
75. the DSCC gave, what $52M to retiring Senators? and they can only get corpo money with corpo ideals
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:30 PM
Nov 2014

sweeping, popular, irreversible legislation is for Commies (or Naderites or Abstentionits or whatever they're blaming next)

it's the WalMart of parties (and the party of WalMart)--electoral exploitation in poli-sci terms

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
27. Your first two paragraphs are insane.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:27 PM
Nov 2014

Here's what you wrote in paragraph one in reference to President Obama.

Even when he had both chambers of Congress at the start of his presidency, he talked and made proposals as if Democrats were in the minority, and was far quicker to criticize the progressive wing of the Democratic Party than Republicans.


And to back this up ... the evidence you provided ... is about something some one else did.

If that sounds crazy, consider how Andrew Cuomo is governing in New York. The Working Families Party gave him their endorsement in part by getting him to promise to work to elect a Democratic majority state senate.


If Obama didn't want a Dem majority, why the hell would he have worked so hard to get one back in 2009?

If he hated this country half as much as some of you seem to think, all he had to do in 2009 was sit back and do nothing. Let the country tank, and then call for and end to Social Security and the American people would have handed it over HAPPILY.

Sometimes I can't believe the nonsense that gets posted around here.

President Obama wanted the GOP to control congress.




JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
42. Sadly ...
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:52 PM
Nov 2014

... there is a huge build up of crazy in this thread ... and based on it ... Obama has already killed Social Security, Medicare, passed the TPP, and turned the Keystone pipeline into a fracking amusement park.

He should be executing immigrants at the border by the week-end.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
90. Actually, that includes the 5 or so blue dogs
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:46 PM
Nov 2014

... and the shit Liberman.

Even with them, about 70-75 days.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
175. It was even worse than that.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 02:16 AM
Nov 2014

The Democrats had a super majority for a total of 24 working days. On top of that, the period of Super Majority was split into one 11-day period and one 13-day period. Given the glacial pace that business takes place in the Senate, this was way too little time for the Democrats pass any meaningful legislation, let alone get bills through committees and past all the obstructionistic tactics the Republicans were using to block legislation.

Further, these Super Majorities count Joe Lieberman as a Democrat even though he was by this time an Independent. Even though he was Liberal on some legislation, he was very conservative on other issues and opposed many of the key pieces of legislation the Democrats and Obama wanted to pass. For example, he was adamantly opposed to “Single Payer” health care and vowed to support a Republican Filibuster if it ever came to the floor.

Summary:

1. 1/07 – 12/08 – 51-49 – Ordinary Majority.
2. 1/09 – 7/14/09 – 59-41 – Ordinary Majority. (Coleman/Franklin Recount.)
3. 7/09 – 8/09 – 60-40 – Technical Super Majority, but since Kennedy is unable to vote, the Democrats can’t overcome a filibuster
4. 8/09 – 9/09 – 59-40 – Ordinary Majority. (Kennedy dies)
5. 9/09 – 10/09 – 60-40 – Super Majority for 11 working days.
6. 1/10 – 2/10 – 60-40 – Super Majority for 13 working days

Total Time of the Democratic Super Majority: 24 Working days.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
265. Did they need or use a supermajority to pass Health Care Reform?
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 10:47 PM
Nov 2014

When they really wanted to get things done, they figured out how to work around Republican obstruction.

If they had done that more often, and if Obama had gone to the limits of his presidential powers for us the way he has for the wealthy with his drone assassinations, military actions, and trade deals, there might be fewer new Republicans in Congress.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
269. I'm betting you don't know the actually sequence of events ...
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 10:21 AM
Nov 2014

... which caused the ACA to become law.

Do you even know the date on which it became law?

I'm betting no.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
35. It will only get worse
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:43 PM
Nov 2014

The anti Obama, doom and gloom, posters seem to be out in full force the last couple of days, and it also seems that there are more new posters who have jumped on the band wagon to help them promote this kind of "insanity". They have set their hair on fire, once again, and are accusing the president of all kinds of things that have not happened. Of course they won't "wait" to see what happens, nope they have to come up with all kinds of BS, like this OP, to rally the "troops". They love to stir the shit and will keep on doing so as long as they keep getting the "gang" to support them. The next two years will be so much fun for them, on conspiracy theory after another will be spewed in order to keep their followers depressed and discouraged.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
38. yup ... DU's Combustible Hair Club is now in session.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:46 PM
Nov 2014

Obama is absolutely, positively, without question, about to do *something* that is the most awfullest worst thing that he's ever done.

And he's going to do it .... ANY SECOND!!!

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
126. Love that picture
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 09:06 PM
Nov 2014

I read one post today that said he was going to destroy the party. It's all his fault you know, whatever the problem it's his fault.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
66. Lovin' attacks from the "left" that are
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:23 PM
Nov 2014

More noxious than attacks from the right .. And even less sincere

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
125. It think there is a contest
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 09:04 PM
Nov 2014

See who can make the most outrageous bashing posts of the day. Not sure what the winner gets, but the more the post the better chance of winning.

JI7

(89,247 posts)
177. this is pretty much what it is and they feel like the world agrees with them
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 02:24 AM
Nov 2014

if they get a lot of recs .

the thing with the internet is that it has allowed certain types most people try to avoid in person to a way to be heard . and while these types are small in number the interet allows them to come together and agree with each other and convince themselves they are right.

if anything goes against it they just use a conspiracy theory to explain it.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
36. +1 ...
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:43 PM
Nov 2014
If he hated this country half as much as some of you seem to think, all he had to do in 2009 was sit back and do nothing. Let the country tank, and then call for and end to Social Security and the American people would have handed it over HAPPILY.


But, by doing that ... he wouldn't have had another term to finish the job!

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
51. I was just reading between the lines ...
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:02 PM
Nov 2014

... its a very popular DU pastime.

You just take what some one said, and then find the "true" meaning hiding within.

Like in Obama's case ... if one reads between the lines ... clearly he saying that he hoped the GOP would gain majorities so that he could carry out his evil plan.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
56. good and evil also have little meaning in Washington. There is what you get paid to do
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:05 PM
Nov 2014

and things you don't do at all.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
129. "Sometimes I can't believe the nonsense that gets posted around here."
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 09:31 PM
Nov 2014

I can't believe the nonsense that gets REC'D around here. And that some people support with such gusto and glee that they just keep kicking and over again.

The Washington Post talked about how blase Obama was about the Dems defeat. So of course, on DU that means he was super de-dooper thrilled that the Republicans have taken over both houses of Congress. Now he and his best friend Ted Cruz can complete their evil plans for total destruction!!

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
156. LOL
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 11:44 PM
Nov 2014

Obama has the superpower to stop all the corpofascism that is spreadout all over the world since before bu$h was even born, and magically put all these Capitalist polluters in jail tomorrow morning, after breakfast.

Everyone knows that he hates the world as it is and wants to fix it!

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
188. I think they want total destruction.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 08:29 AM
Nov 2014

Then, they will rise out of the ashes and save the world.

At least that's how they see it playing out.

cheezmaka

(737 posts)
161. This thread should have been changed....
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 12:19 AM
Nov 2014

It should be changed to "Democrats in certain states (paid or not) wanted a GOP Congress"... LOL

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
198. I liked the ebola line tucked into the middle all by itself.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 09:16 AM
Nov 2014

Who is he referring to when he says "he" followed the republican model on ebola? Obama or Cuomo?

I guess he meant Cuomo, which makes *perfect* sense in an attack on President Obama.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
199. Especially since Obama smacked Cuomo down on that.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 09:17 AM
Nov 2014

But, remember, to a certain crowd every Democrat is as bad as the worst Democrat they can think of.

And they then pretend that they're the base of the party.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
200. If you take each Democratic candidate on their own ...
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 09:21 AM
Nov 2014

... its just too complicated. I mean, its much easier to see them an abstraction, not as a unique person.

Much easier to see them an abstract bad dem running in the same abstract US State, against the same abstract opponent.

In that model, you just run Dennis K. in every election, and you've solved the problem.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
215. 'hates this country'.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 10:14 AM
Nov 2014

Nobody out there involved in American politics 'hates this country'.

They all just want it to be 'as they want it'. That goes for you, for me, for the OP, for every single voter, every single politician, every single billionaire. And what's good for the 1% (as a whole, not every individual) is not necessarily good for you and me. But that doesn't mean anyone 'hates this country'.

Or even 'wants it to tank'. (Unless, of course, they can make money while it's tanking, and then be set to make more money again when it rebounds - we see that all the time in the stock market boom and bust cycle, housing boom and bust cycle, and every other boom and bust cycle. They're opportunities for the rich to get richer.)

You don't have to believe the President to be 'evil' to posit that his goals are not 100% identical to your own.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
267. Yep, no anti-Obama smear is too ridiculous to get widespread support here.
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 10:16 AM
Nov 2014

The nonsense, and support of it, is pathetic.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
28. Obama shares a wide swath of ideological real estate with Republicans.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:28 PM
Nov 2014

TPP fast track will likely have no major obstacles now. He said himself he agreed with Mitt Romney on the fate of Social Security and he had plenty of glowing comments about Keystone XL and natural gas development (AKA fracking) yesterday.

Maybe he sees Republican control of congress as a way to "get shit done" in the final two years of his term. Not quite what we all envisioned on election night 2008 but there you are.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
30. No fuckin' shit.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:29 PM
Nov 2014

Weirdly, to the extent that there is any possibility of blocking any of the Corporate Agenda (e.g. TPP), it would be by means of a Teabagger-Progressive alliance against the combined corporate wings of their respective parties.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
117. Which is why it's so important that our hatred for each other be stoked...
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 08:14 PM
Nov 2014

These guys are professionals, for sure.

jalan48

(13,859 posts)
34. The Wait
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:39 PM
Nov 2014

Sounds like the only thing Obama is upset about is having to wait until January to "get to work" with the Republicans.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
53. Simplest and clearest summary I have seen yet.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:04 PM
Nov 2014

I really think we have entered a largely post-democratic, post-partisan era of politics in America....all the carefully orchestrated theater and propaganda for the masses notwithstanding.
 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
146. Nothing much changes when control of the government switches hands.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 10:35 PM
Nov 2014

We have had the same policies for the last 35 years, uninterrupted.

6000eliot

(5,643 posts)
41. You think that the Republicans can keep a lid on all of the crazy they unleashed in 2009?
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:50 PM
Nov 2014

I think they will get very little done and be mirror images of the last Congress and Senate.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
58. I don't think they are crazy, just thoughtlessly obedient to their corporate masters.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:09 PM
Nov 2014

so you might be surprised how much they get done (all of it bad).

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
44. "they do as little as possible, this time helped by Republican obstruction, until
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:54 PM
Nov 2014

the Republicans regain the majority".

Yep.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
220. And the Republicans rigged it...
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 10:37 AM
Nov 2014

... with a little help from their Turd Way Corporate "Democrats."

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
46. This important thread has now been tagged "doubleplusungood"
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 04:56 PM
Nov 2014

and is being worked by the corporate brigade.

I am proud of DU for not engaging them. They are mostly having to answer one another to try to create illusions of consensus.

Watch the patterns.

Ignore the 3rd Way shills with extreme prejudice
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025767160



It's time to teach, teach, teach. The real political game is not the one they tell us it is.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
50. sometimes they can do a whole sockpuppet thread, seemingly not realizing that no real people are
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:00 PM
Nov 2014

taking them seriously.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
57. Indeed.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:06 PM
Nov 2014

Also note tactics like the vertical line of "+1" to draw attention to PR posts and create illusion of consensus.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
94. all I know is I wasn't juror #1, lol
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:49 PM
Nov 2014

Citing the "kooks and crackpots" clause in the DU TOS.

Democratic Underground is an online community for politically liberal people who understand the importance of working within the system to elect more Democrats and fewer Republicans to all levels of political office. Teabaggers, Neo-cons, Dittoheads, Paulites, Freepers, Birthers, and right-wingers in general are not welcome here. Neither are certain extreme-fringe left-wingers, including advocates of violent political/social change, hard-line communists, terrorist-apologists, America-haters, kooks, crackpots, LaRouchies, and the like.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Nov 6, 2014, 03:29 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Anti-3rd way has been tolerated at DU for quite some time.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

So much for that, you kook and crackpot!

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
135. +100000000
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 09:50 PM
Nov 2014

Or from a run for the White House.

IMO, if corporate Dems run Hillary, it will be because the PTB have decided that it's time for a Republican.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
64. Obama won, and got what he wanted?
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:21 PM
Nov 2014
Daily Kos will not enable those who enable Third Way
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/05/1260388/-Third-Way-s-congressional-enablers

Senators

Mark Udall (Colorado) - lost
Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) - won
Kay Hagan (North Carolina) - lost
Chris Coons (Delaware) - won

I suppose President Obama has always been a Trojan Horse, right?

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
93. Hehehehehe, welcome back ProSense!
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:48 PM
Nov 2014

Whats new with another Obama hate thread. I guess when he spoke he should have starting crying and whining and stomped his foot like a true GOPer. He's the President of the United States of America who has class. Dems lost and he again needs to work with Congress.

And no BOTH PARTIES ARE NOT ALIKE. And no, I can give a rats arse about the third way crap. Heard Nader on 90.7 here in Los Angeles on Wednesday and he sounded just like the Democratic Party who has NEVER geared away from the important social issues. Surprised me. He said the Democratic Party to date needs to focus on what they stand for.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
82. oh please
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:35 PM
Nov 2014

Glee?

But oh let me guess, Hillary wept, not ready to make Grand bargains herself...

The one silver lining of 2016 is that a lot of Boomers are going to see Hillary do the sort of stuff they accused Obama of doing.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
86. Apparently you missed his post election statements
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:41 PM
Nov 2014

""It doesn't make me mopey," he said of the election during a news conference in the East Room of the White House. "It energizes me because it means that this democracy's working!""

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/obama-strikes-upbeat-tone-gloomy-election-26725002

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
112. and if he said Mopey
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 07:26 PM
Nov 2014

he would get accused of being a debbie downer.

Like I said, even though I am on Social Security, it will be fine to see Clinton do what only a baby boomer pres could get done, and by that I mean decimate the safety net like her Husband did.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
118. Oh boo hoo.. You sound like the WHPC.. they were upset that Pres Obama wasn't all down and dejected
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 08:31 PM
Nov 2014
BWD @theonlyadult
Follow
BUT OBAMA YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO CRY!!!!!!
10:55 AM - 5 Nov 2014 18 Retweets 13 favorites


TheObamaDiary.com @TheObamaDiary
Follow
WHPC getting really angry now about the President not being downbeat
11:06 AM - 5 Nov 2014 76 Retweets 52 favorites

sfpelosi @sfpelosi
Follow
PBO so cool he doesn't even eyeroll Q about why he didn't work harder to bond with GOP who vowed INAUGURATION NIGHT to make him a 1 termer.
10:27 AM - 5 Nov 2014 103 Retweets 50 favorites


TheObamaDiary.com @TheObamaDiary
Follow
Now Jim Acosta is losing his mind over the President being so upbeat.

The President is totally trolling them.

Epic


10:59 AM - 5 Nov 2014 109 Retweets 73 favorites

http://theobamadiary.com/2014/11/05/chat-away-460/

TheObamaDiary.com @TheObamaDiary
Follow
Ed Henry: "You're doubling down on the same policies and approach!"

The ones that got him elected President twice, Ed?

10:36 AM - 5 Nov 2014 76 Retweets 40 favorites

Kevin Grüssing @KevDGrussing
Follow
Obama pissing off Beltway Press by not falling flat on face and coming into this presser bloodied.
I LOVE YOU @BarackObama.
Never change...

10:45 AM - 5 Nov 2014 136 Retweets 109 favorites

Nerdy Wonka @NerdyWonka
Follow
The media expected President Barack Obama to come out all depressed and President Obama is giving them all his unique brand of the finger.
10:05 AM - 5 Nov 2014 201 Retweets 168 favorites

Jon Favreau @jonfavs
Follow
I'm proud of my president, and grateful for him.
11:10 AM - 5 Nov 2014 265 Retweets 366 favorites

http://theobamadiary.com/2014/11/05/the-press-conference-a-tweet-or-two/

You know Nothing if you think this is what the President wanted.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
166. Really, sunnystar! So sad for the posters on here and the WHPC Jackals who demand Pres Obama act
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 01:17 AM
Nov 2014

all sad and dejected.. They're all rude and disrespectful on a continual basis.. but especially today when they thought they "gotcha"! Rofl

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
217. Nobody on here wants 'sad and dejected'.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 10:21 AM
Nov 2014

They want defiant and steadfast on a Democratic agenda. Not back to 'bipartisanship', which we had ample evidence doesn't work.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
132. Hmm. When we're not miserable..
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 09:34 PM
Nov 2014

which might be often.. the next couple of years could be pretty fun!

Cha

(297,154 posts)
168. I'm always looking for silver linings, flamingdem and I think the President and his TEAM are on
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 01:28 AM
Nov 2014

this. These people who take President Obama's good mood for "this is what he wanted all the time"... don't know a thing about Obama. But, that doesn't stop them from ugly speculation like they got it all figured out. It suits their continuous agenda.. that Obama's bad but they refuse to acknowledge all the good that's happened the last 6 years.

Mahalo flamingdem

mimi85

(1,805 posts)
139. As always, Cha is right on, groovy and far out.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 10:11 PM
Nov 2014

And has this former hippie chick's utmost respect!

Cha

(297,154 posts)
169. Mahalo mims! Thanks to the amazing tweets posted on
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 01:32 AM
Nov 2014

the O diary.. from peeps who know this President and are so intelligent, eloquent, and Funny!

backatcha!

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
79. Did any of the losers say "We should have done a better job for the people"?
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:34 PM
Nov 2014

Otherwise you probably have a pretty good analysis there.

This is a bit like watching Thunderdome, with the characters inside fighting for their life and all the wretched people on the outside, lives unchanged, fighting for every scrap. And when it is over, nothing has changed for them, just the players inside.

Because it is all about the contest. Not the people.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
81. The best we can hope for
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 05:35 PM
Nov 2014

...are typos in the GOP legislation that will inevitably come across his desk.

 

stupidicus

(2,570 posts)
103. that's how the game is played alrighty
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 06:10 PM
Nov 2014

we dogs won't be getting any bones in the near future, and will be lucky if we ain't screwed in several ways in the spirit of bipartisanship.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
108. IMO the good news is that people *are* waking up.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 06:52 PM
Nov 2014

We all do it in our own time. There's great woe over the low voting turnout, but I choose to take it as a sign that people are realizing that the game is rigged...and that's a good thing (not the low turnout itself, but the awareness...).

People just don't know yet what to *do* about it. But becoming aware of it is an important step.

The propaganda machine tries very hard to make the conversation all about Obama himself or Obama haters, or "timid" Dems, or lazy voters....ANYTHING to keep the conversation away from the real groundbreaking realization we all need to come to, which is that the parties are purchased and working together now for corporate interests.

Once sufficient numbers of us realize that....can see through the propaganda and realize that the game has changed and the goals of our politicians aren't what they keep telling us they are....we can start uniting to rally around policies rather than parties and rid ourselves of this con game.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
116. I really, really hope Bernie runs.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 08:09 PM
Nov 2014

I have no illusions that the corporate PTB won't take him down, but we need his voice out there for as long as we can possibly sustain it. Maybe we really can build a revolution, and I so appreciate his use of that word, because it really is what's needed. A revolution in awareness about how this government works anymore.

I would like to see him run as a Dem with the message that we need to rescue the entire nation, government, and political system, INCLUDING the Democratic Party, from the corporate corruption that has infiltrated it and is subverting it for corporate ends.

I don't know if it's possible for any Independent to have a chance to be heard the way both corporate parties have rigged the system. But I also worry that, in running as a Dem, he won't have the freedom to be as honest as this country desperately needs him to be about how deep and thorough and bipartisan the corruption really is.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
134. A revolution is the right word.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 09:49 PM
Nov 2014

And it need not be a bloody one if we listen to the peacemakers instead of the hate makers.

I am not exactly sure how that can happen but I know it can and must or we will go the way of Rome.
But this I am sure of, it has to be from the bottom up, and we may have to go through some painful times before enough people wake up to the facts that we are a dysfunctional country.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
106. We now have a largely post-partisan, post-democratic, corporate government in this country.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 06:16 PM
Nov 2014

And the success of those who orchestrated the coup depends on our not noticing the change. We are not to notice that the parties are owned by the same people and are now working together.

Post-partisan. Post-democratic, all the theater to the contrary notwithstanding.

They depend on us to continue to believe (and propagandize the hell out of us to believe) that we are still working within the old system, when the parties really DID care about beating each other and were not working behind the scenes toward the same objectives.

The game has changed and isn't what they tell us it is. Time to rally around policies, not parties.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
264. yep. I would like to hear our DLC/Third Way friends tell us why so much trade, foreign...
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 08:32 PM
Nov 2014

and economic policies don't change substantially regardless of which party controls the White House and/or Congress.

Particularly on trade, Americans across the political spectrum don't like the deals, but both parties will support them to the death.

Likewise, few average people supported the Wall Street bail out, and Obama's poll numbers would have shot through the roof if he built gallows on Wall Street instead of letting them continue to call the shots. Instead, his handling of Wall Street was little different from Bush's at least in terms of lack of criminal prosecutions.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
113. I think this is the most important thread on DU right now,
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 07:29 PM
Nov 2014

Last edited Thu Nov 6, 2014, 08:12 PM - Edit history (1)

in tandem with Taibbi's new piece, which illustrates the corruption so clearly:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025776332
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025776300

This thread is so important not because of the observation about Obama personally, but because of the clear message about how the entire structure of politics has changed in this country: that the parties are working together and we'd better start realizing that and responding accordingly.

The game they are playing is not the game we are told they are playing.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
122. And people in California have woken up - they just do NOT know what
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 08:57 PM
Nov 2014

The friggin' fuck to do about it.

Only twenty nine percent of all California's REGISTERED voters showed up or voted absentee in this election.

One Big Reason - we only have two candidates on the ballot for every single position except state superintendant. Nowhere to put in a wise ass protest vote for Mickey Mouse.

All this is due to some new "codefication of the ballot."

I had heard about this, back in 2011 or 2012 when it occurred, but I thought it meant the top two of each party. (Back in 2008, for the govrnor's slot, we had to choose between over 155 people running as Democrats in California. Which is rather exteme. But now the pendulum has swung the other way.)

If you don't like the Blue Dawgie, Social security-destroying Congress critter who insults every progressive he ever meets, all you can do is either leave the space for that position blank, or vote Republican (hardly a choice for msot progressives I know)

Only the slot of State Superintendant allows you to vote for something/someone else.

And there was not a single Green or Libertarian on the ballot, due to how the One Big Money Party in California has totally destroyed any indie thinking, poltiical wise.

So the party as defined by one Di Feinstein will rule over all of us, in perpetual tyranny, until she and her hsusband have encaptured every damn historic mural off of every damn Post Office building in the world!

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
130. They are constantly refining the system, aren't they.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 09:32 PM
Nov 2014


I didn't realize that about California. Very slimy.

Nobody ever questioned the remarkable bipartisanship the two corporate parties showed after Ross Perot's surprising success (compared to previous independent runs) in restructuring the system to make sure that never happened again.

whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
136. In 2008, Obama went straight to work rescuing the Republican Party. His work is done. And only
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 09:57 PM
Nov 2014

the 3rd way Republican shills trolling this site seem to think the loses are due to Obama not being modera -err- fuck that, hard right enough.

After 2010, it was clear that one engine had failed and the Party was losing altitude. Not satisfied with the slow rate of decent, the 3rd way grabbed the controls and piloted the Democratic Party into a nose dive.

Now they are sifting through the wreckage trying to tell us they should get another chance at the controls.

Don't be fooled by pleas to save their sorry asses.

The damage is done. Fuck em.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
138. You're right, it sounds crazy.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 10:04 PM
Nov 2014


p.s. Obama and McConnell have had no such love fest as of yet. Obama held a post-election press conference yesterday and was mercilessly taunted with McConnell's alleged victory and he simply answered diplomatically and thoughtfully. You're really running it out with the sinister conspiracy here.

SleeplessinSoCal

(9,110 posts)
141. ALL the money is on Wall Street or buried offshore
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 10:20 PM
Nov 2014

How do we compete with Citizens United? The only time I've seen Obama truly angry was at the SotU address, directed to the SCOTUS. He knew then what he would be up against in an already rigged to the wealthy system we call Capitalism.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
148. Precisely.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 10:38 PM
Nov 2014
- I was wondering if anyone else had figured it out. I suppose there is hope......

K&R


For emergency fainting only:




''The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation. These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from from ordinary hypocrisy: they are deliberate exercises in doublethink.''

~George Orwell, 1984

Thespian2

(2,741 posts)
152. K & R
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 10:56 PM
Nov 2014

Immigration
Keystone Pipeline
TPP
Student Debt
Income Inequality
Women's Rights
Judges in Federal Courts
Freedom for LGBT people

and on and on...

What will Obama do to solve the many problems facing America? My prediction...NOTHING worthwhile.

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
158. He may veto some or all, since he's not running again.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 12:01 AM
Nov 2014

Why not organize and tell him (write, petition, march) he better (or, more diplomatically, should) use it?

kacekwl

(7,016 posts)
154. At times I get the sinking feeling
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 11:25 PM
Nov 2014

that they (both parties) are in cahoots and this is just a cruel game they are playing with us. Then I come to my senses and really get scarred.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
203. That's your stomach.....
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 09:32 AM
Nov 2014

...reacting to the quick change in altitude. That happens upon Awakening. Like in an elevator when one rises too quickly above the crowds below. The sensation of experiencing Truth and Reality can be very disorienting, even stomach churning.

- But buck up, because it's only temporary until the SRHTF! And I can't wait until Joni Ernst shoots her first Senator in chambers!!!




Welcome to DU. You got here just in time......


If You Really Think It Matters Which Party Controls the Senate, Answer These Questions

PeteSelman

(1,508 posts)
160. The abject cowardice with which they all approached having the big majority was appalling.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 12:04 AM
Nov 2014

And the President was the first in line to capitulate. We'll never have an opportunity like that again. They could have put Reaganism to rest forever and instead they preserved it for all time.

You've hit the nail on the head with this.

Watch as we get Keystone, TPP, lower taxes for corporate scum and worse.

But also watch for the Republicans to start doing all the things they were against because they knew those things would help the country but they didn't want the President to get credit. Now THEY will take the credit.

They're awfully good at bragging about things they've done and "we" suck at it.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
239. ^^^THIS^^^ When they were a big majority they were like a deer in the headlights.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 12:25 PM
Nov 2014

It's bad enough that there is a lot of spinelessness but even when you have a huge majority? What a waste.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
252. It's not cowardice. We are a sham democracy now. The parties are working together.
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 03:53 PM
Nov 2014

It's an important distinction.

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
162. In 81 Reagan from the beginning let lose on the Democrats for "Thwarting the will of the people"
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 12:20 AM
Nov 2014

Obama wins by a comparable "mandate for change" - and what happened?

bhikkhu

(10,715 posts)
165. Pragmatism is taking whatever situation you get, and turning it to your advantage
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 01:07 AM
Nov 2014

The president has a good set of priorities, and II think it is most in his nature but to try to find a positive way through the mess the country handed him.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
173. I have to disagree with that, the POTUS needed the Dems to control Congress
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 01:43 AM
Nov 2014

so the last two years they would DO SOME WORK and not be held hostage by the GOP wackadoodles.

IronLionZion

(45,427 posts)
182. That socialist is gonna git yer guns!
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 08:09 AM
Nov 2014

Mandatory gay marriages and forced abortions for everyone, and we all have to report to FEMA camps as obamacare needs to implant chips in our brains for the NSA drones to track us more easily.



Oh yeah, repugs just love Obama's policies. Ask any of them about the Obama economic recession he caused before he even got elected. He's so delightfully nefarious, like a cartoon villain just waiting patiently for six years to pull off his mask and go full Mussolini.


Paladin

(28,252 posts)
185. Sorry, I'm not buying the multi-dimensional chess game thing, anymore.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 08:20 AM
Nov 2014

Obama has the situation he's stuck with, not the one he wanted. Same for the rest of us.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
189. You noticed that, too?
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 08:52 AM
Nov 2014

The complacency, the "it's everybody's fault but mine" attitude, the willingness to throw the 99% under the bus (since they don't contribute $$$$$$ to campaigns)

Add in the free pass given to the most massive bank fraud in global history....

If that isn't corruption, nothing is.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
193. Idiotic ODS drivel. No, Obama did not want those whose only goal is to derail his presidency
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 09:05 AM
Nov 2014

to control both houses of Congress.

He did not want Mitch McConnell having absolute power over each and every appointment of federal judges.

He does not want more votes on repealing the ACA.

He does not want Senate hearings on Benghazi.

What you listened to was a president who took a vicarious ass kicking trying to polish a turd.

The reason Obama didn't hit the campaign trail was because Democrats ran away from him and told him to stay away.



Cha

(297,154 posts)
201. Well Done, geek! "told him to stay away.." except in PA, Connecticut, Rhode Island,
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 09:21 AM
Nov 2014

Michigan(Gary Peters).. and the two campaigns that lost(Maryland & Florida).. maybe there's more I can't think of them right now, if there are.

"Idiotic ODS drivel. No, Obama did not want those whose only goal is to derail his presidency to control both houses of Congress.

He did not want Mitch McConnell having absolute power over each and every appointment of federal judges.

He does not want more votes on repealing the ACA.

He does not want Senate hearings on Benghazi."


Thanks for laying all that out... it highlights the gibberish & poppycock of the OP exponentially.

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
204. What fucking nonsense.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 09:34 AM
Nov 2014

The fact that you took the time to write such idiotic drivel speaks volumes about what you think of President Obama's character & intentions. This is a disgusting OP.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
221. And people like this
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 10:55 AM
Nov 2014

continue to wonder why they're not taken seriously.

Faux News has nothing on this bunch.

EEO

(1,620 posts)
207. Agreed. That was my first conclusion. Obama will betray liberals most horribly.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 10:00 AM
Nov 2014

His concessions to conservatives will be far worse than in the past.

Hotler

(11,416 posts)
212. Of course....
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 10:05 AM
Nov 2014

"Even when he had both chambers of Congress at the start of his presidency, he talked and made proposals as if Democrats were in the minority,"

If I remember correctly President Obama said "Now is not the time to point fingers."

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
223. +1 Sort of like reading a series of books by the same bad novelist.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 11:16 AM
Nov 2014

The plot is always the same.

Hope to hell the country is finally waking up to the truth. Politics does not work the way it used to. We have two corporate parties working against us.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
236. Pretty much, it's all scripted OR or one heck of a coincidence that the 1% always end up with a win.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 12:19 PM
Nov 2014

Probably a bit too much of a coincidence IMO for there not to be some level of orchestration of events, including elections, going on.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
225. "Obama's" TPA and XL will get passed now maybe even SS CPI will get back on the table.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 11:51 AM
Nov 2014

All according to the plan?

True Blue Door

(2,969 posts)
232. Here comes the Haterade.
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 12:15 PM
Nov 2014

It's all a fiendish Obama plot. He passed Obamacare just so he could repeal it later. He passed a massive stimulus package with a Democratic Congress just so he could strangle the republic to death with obstructive GOP Congresses later.

Your thinking, if it can be called that, is ludicrous and reprehensible. You're just trying to pass the buck for responsibility away from our Party in general, which (a)campaigned for shit, and (b)didn't turn out at the polls.

I'm not trying to blame the left, or the center, or the President, or any other distant group or political figure. I blame me, and I blame you, because we're here and we have the audacity to claim responsibility for changing America.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
237. Well Done, True Blue Door! The Conspiracy Theories are so pathetic.. but, I think this one
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 12:20 PM
Nov 2014

must have materialized from for too long and too tight.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
259. the "hater" talking point was lazy and stupid when the Bushies used it.
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 06:00 PM
Nov 2014

It's an insult to DU'ers intelligence to use it here.

Moonwalk

(2,322 posts)
243. I'm a little confused. What did you want Obama to say?
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 01:04 PM
Nov 2014

"Hey, you stupid voters, you think this repuke congress is gonna bully me? Think again! I'm gonna veto every bill they pass and piss on every page before I do!"



Granted, that would have been satisfying. But hardly...politic. And not Obama's style. So. What *did* you want to hear from him? What might he have said within this speech to assure you that he not going to do what you think he's going to do?

okieinpain

(9,397 posts)
247. I love me some president obama, but i will be the first to tell you
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 02:46 PM
Nov 2014

he's a conservative dem. you think about it his grand parents come from kansas.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
257. this clearly struck a nerve considering not just rec's and views, but DLC/Third Way/Blue Dog whining
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 03:46 PM
Nov 2014

in response.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
272. so Obama ISN'T pushing GOP K-12 privatization agenda, isn't pursuing the same foreign policy, & TPP?
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 02:08 PM
Nov 2014

and he did actually send Wall Street bankers to prison and break the the banks into tiny pieces that aren't too big to fail?

Obama is better than a Republican, but the difference on a lot of issues is hard to see.

Also, you guys seem to be taking an all or nothing position: If Obama and Democrats in Congress are better in any measurable way from Republicans, we should be grateful for that, no matter how small the difference and how far to the right they move.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
273. If you ignore the several dozen points in the piece I posted, why should I address any of yours? nt
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 02:09 PM
Nov 2014
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»After listening to Obama'...