General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBreaking News: BLUE DOG Joe Manchin Has SUDDENLY Found His Spine!

This hybrid-fence-squatting weasel has suddenly found his balls........FU!!
TPM:
"That's bullshi . I'm not going to put up with that," Manchin told Politico when discussing the prospect of Democrats blocking the Republican agenda over the next two years.
Manchin didn't appear to be alone either. Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) also talked about the need to get something done.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/joe-manchin-block-gop-agenda-bs
It's always so precious when they find their voice just in time to help Republicans. God forbid they would have been standing up when Democrats had the Senate. After Manchin's 'bipartisan' background check bill got hammered I didn't see him calling out anyone, did you? Just the bothsidesbothsides song. Bipartisan is beautiful, especially when half of the 'bi' doesn't do a damned thing. The only group promising obstruction since the election has been Republicans and their tea party keepers. If he wants to use that newly-discovered spine, perhaps he should call them on THAT BS.
http://crooksandliars.com/2014/11/senator-joe-manchin-suddenly-finds-his
mindem
(1,580 posts)He will be switching parties next.
merrily
(45,251 posts)with Democrats obstructing Republicans? Sounds to me like every other Republican.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Warpy
(114,616 posts)the horse shit bills the Republicans want.
I would love to see him horribly frustrated.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)with a rusty pipe, sideways
merrily
(45,251 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)Cha
(319,082 posts)..they're full of Elephant Shite if they think the repubs want to get Anything done except make life better for Billionaires, Screw the Poor and Middle Class, and Fuck up the Planet even more than they already have.
NCarolinawoman
(2,825 posts)Keeping getting disappointed.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)Seriously - we need to be louder than the other side. And the bonus is - We Can Spell!
NCarolinawoman
(2,825 posts)and it's good to see you.
jillan
(39,451 posts)After this last election it feels good to have a place like DU to return to.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)He & McCaskill should be primaried.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)He can do no wrong.
Quit picking on Joe! Leave "Democrats" alone!
JI7
(93,617 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)n2doc
(47,953 posts)Count on it. Nunn and Grimes tried to run as republican lite, and got hammered.
Not saying a liberal would have done better. The Koch-aganda is strong.
JI7
(93,617 posts)Statewide many times
branford
(4,462 posts)Manchin has been involved in WV politics for some time, has been elected statewide on a number of occasions, and has more than proved his moderate credentials. Few West Virginians doubt his sincerity on key issues that matter to them like coal or firearms. Nevertheless, he would still have a tough election if he was running in 2014.
Nunn and Grimes did not have Manchin's history, and other more moderate Democrats like Pryor, Landrieu, and Begich, no less Udall and Hagan, became too closely associated with Obama and more liberal policies, many of which were not popular in their states.
I don't see how more liberal Democrats would have fared better in the states where we lost, and in any event, the Democrats choose these more conservative candidates in free and fair Democratic primaries.
DemocraticWing
(1,290 posts)Usually the worst things for America are bipartisan. The one time the parties can agree is to fuck the people over real good, mainly because if they both get in on the act, neither can blame the other for actual problems and can instead just sling mud.
NAFTA, DOMA, Patriot Act, No Child Left Behind, etc.
Despite saying all that, I'm also not shocked that Democrats are standing up for cooperation. Americans claim by huge margins that they want nothing more than to see Congress work together.
merrily
(45,251 posts)For the last four years, Republicans ignored Americans desire to break gridlock. Result? More Republicans in Congress than any time since 1928. They did not exactly get punished.
You're right: anything that gets passed on a bipartisan basis sucks I am not going to advocate for more sucky legislation just for the sake of bipartisanship.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)It's much harder to talk tough to mega-truck drivin', gun-totin', bullet sprayin', raging imbeciles.
branford
(4,462 posts)It's one of the reasons why we lost control of the Senate, even more seats in the House, and Republicans dominate a clear majority of statehouses and governorships. For instance, I'm sure your attitude is appreciated by (previously) loyal, blue collar, union, "mega-truck drivin', gun-totin', bullet sprayin'" Democrats in states like GA, CO, AR, KS and LA.
Take a look at the recent elections in WV, including the Senate win by Republican Capito. WV is very conservative state which relies on coal. Democrats like Elizabeth Warren, or even President Obama, are an endangered species. Simply, Joe Manchin represents the positions of his constituents, similar to those of conservative Democratic Governor Tomblin.
If elected leaders like Manchin and Tomblin advocated all the positions demanded by many here in WV, it would result in the end of their political careers, and mean the election of even more Republicans. Despite your apparent disgust, Manchin is, by a long margin, the lesser of two evils.
Welcome to reality. Senators like Manchin are the only electable Democrats in many states and districts, and just barely. Thankfully, he supports national Democrats on far more issues then he opposes. Other conservative Democrats were decimated in the last election, so we're now more purely liberal, but decidedly in the minority. How exactly does this situation advance any aspect of a more liberal agenda?
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)And when the choice is lesser of two evils, I definitely support the lesser evil.
I was just commenting on where that kind of posturing might come from. Really common attitude among liberal-haters.
Anyway, thanks for the reply. Lot of good info there.
branford
(4,462 posts)I'm just continually astonished and disappointed about the constant complaining about more moderate and conservative Democrats and the denigration of other Americans, many of whom are (or were) loyal Democrats, particularly from the South and rural Midwest. It often appears that some bigotry is considered acceptable on DU. Our "big tent" seems to be getting smaller and far less inviting.
After reading many of the posts recently throughout the forum, it seems many believe that the problem with Democrats is that, as a party, we're not liberal enough and need to essentially enforce what amounts to purity tests. If we just had more Elizabeth Warrens or Bernie Sanders (who's not even a Democrat!!!), our Party would dominate politics and usher in a liberal utopia. What's utter nonsense.
I'm not sure if some members are just in a state of denial due to the election, but much of America is actually quite conservative, and the majority of Americans are not easily categorized, and are best described as "moderate" simply because they hold a range of opinions, both liberal and conservative. Frankly, someone like Joe Manchin is probably far more representative of most Americans than either politicians like Ted Cruz or Elizabeth Warren. In the event of a real conservative purge, and we became a party of Elizabeth Warrens, all that would result is that we would become a regional party in the permanent minority.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)So could their constituents.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)GOPers are doing this
1. EFF the few Americans who get subsidies for health care cause they don't deserve it BUT major corporations who basically hide their millions/billions deserves subsidies (millions) - Walmart, et al.,
2. Further tax cuts for the greedy, i.e. Kansas, WI, FL, Maine, to name a few
3. No minimum wage cause it hurts corporations who are people, workers are not
4. Depression cause its not gonna hurt the rich
et al.,
C Moon
(13,643 posts)stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)And Obama will sign a lot of it.
Vinca
(53,994 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)He's mad it's not 50-50 so he can threaten to jump and get everything he wants.
Let him jump. 52 or 53 or 54 GOPers doesn't really matter.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)election. You run as a republican under the disquise of being a democrat, you are going to lose!
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)Sissy.
alarimer
(17,146 posts)It can't be anything good.
I don't see why something is better than nothing, in this case.
CanonRay
(16,171 posts)With "friends like him" etc, etc.
JustAnotherGen
(38,054 posts)Who won't be getting anything done except fighting amongst themselves for the next two years.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)brought to us by our conservadems, asking if Manchin should be the Democratic nominee for 2016.
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)And just who are "our conservadems?"
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)And if you've been here this long and don't know who the conservadems are there is no way I can help you.
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)See, if you do you will get alerted on. Cute, aint it?
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)Just weary of the petty, PA factionalizing that goes on here nonstop.
"our conservadems." What a load.....
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)Yuck....
But from the looks of that thread, I see ONE guy doing the rah rah for Machin. One.
This is why I ask for clarification, all too often shit gets misrepresented and exaggerated.
Blanket statements like "our conservadems" are meant to be derogatory, so if you insist on using this kind of passive aggressive tactic, be prepared to get called on it at some point.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)It is 100% aggressive.
And I will continue to vehemently, aggressively oppose those on this board that try to make progressive and liberal dirty words while advocating for the party to move to the right to "attract more conservative voters" to replace those on that they've alienated on the left.
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)Except, no one is doing that here.
Those sort of exaggerations chip away at one's credibility, and btw...you're talking to a proud, dyed in the wool LIBERAL from way back.
No, it's PA to the core.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Go ahead, search for the poster that consistently puts quotes around "progressive" and then look at those that agree with his posts.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)someone is doing that right here in this thread.
kentuck
(115,407 posts)Would be my advice. But we can criticize to our hearts content...
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)If it is right wing ideology it shouldn't get done.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)
deutsey
(20,166 posts)who defends Michael Corleone because Michael has some pretty ugly dirt on him.
vi5
(13,305 posts)Isn't that what the very wise people on here are always telling us?
BS.
pampango
(24,692 posts)branford
(4,462 posts)In the real world, the perfect is not the enemy of the good. Manchin still votes with the Democrats the majority of the time and supported Reid as majority leader. A Republican would have been far worse for the state and nation.
Simply, Manchin represents his more conservative constituency in West Viginia. I've seen no evidence to suggest a more liberal or progressive Democrat could prevail in the state at this time, as evidenced by Capito's clear Senate win, and the actual Democrats in West Virginia believed him the best choice in their primary.
spanone
(141,628 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)i agree!
MFM008
(20,042 posts)is if he steals one from a medical school.