General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsto the Hillary Supporters
If someone other than Hillary wins the primary....will you support them?Or will this be another PUMA election?
A simple yes or no question
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)different?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)for her.
I hate puma in 2008 and hate it now.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)I will vote for her if she is the nominee, I just won't donate money, time and effort to getting her elected. She will get exactly what she has earned - my vote because I am forced to vote for her as the Democratic nominee.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)elected, either. My vote, at this point, if she is the nominee and I absolutely must pick between her and a Republican, will be all that she gets.
I HOPE there is at least someone else to challenge her that can drag the political conversation to the left, because Hillary hasn't impressed me.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)There *has* to be someone other than Hillary. We don't need dynastic politics - look what happened with Bush 2.0. My goodness, imagine Jeb as 3.0?
Franken, O'Malley, Sanders, all of them should throw their hat in the ring and allow a national conversation about something other than corporate candidate A and corporate candidate B.
If not, we should just go ahead and pick the corporation we support and hope they are more benevolent than the vultures picking apart our democracy.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Too soon to tell who runs.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)We'll see where the rock meets the ocean later this year.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,468 posts)Yes---this looks like shit stirring.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,468 posts)Response to backwoodsbob (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)here we go.
And before you bother...I support EW
boston bean
(36,223 posts)Or do you only really get offended if someone mentions sexism?
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)so how could I be ageist ?
boston bean
(36,223 posts)the ageist suggestion, only the sexist one.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)who try to tell me to shut up and take HRC without a primary
boston bean
(36,223 posts)backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)The word games will get you nowhere
boston bean
(36,223 posts)backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)will you support her?
boston bean
(36,223 posts)WTF, I haven't seen one person on this board say they wouldn't support EW if she was nominated.
I have seen many say that they won't vote for Hillary if she is the nominee.
See how and why I think you got it backwards, bob?
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)and i will support HRC if she is our nominee.
See how easy that was?
boston bean
(36,223 posts)where is your question to the EW supporters who state they won't support Hillary under any circumstances. That seems to be more the reality of the matter.
Or were you just trying to make Hillary supporters look bad?
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)We EW supporters have been clear where we stand....we stand with the 99%
HRC stands with the 1%
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Unless you consider all of this 1% issues..
Strongly Favors topic 1:
Abortion is a woman's unrestricted right
(+5 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 2:
Legally require hiring women & minorities
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Favors topic 3:
Comfortable with same-sex marriage
(+5 points on Social scale)
No opinion on topic 4:
Keep God in the public sphere
(0 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 5:
Expand ObamaCare
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Opposes topic 6:
Privatize Social Security
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Opposes topic 7:
Vouchers for school choice
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Opposes topic 8:
No 'rights' to clean air and water
(+5 points on Social scale)
Opposes topic 9:
Stricter punishment reduces crime
(+2 points on Social scale)
Strongly Opposes topic 10:
Absolute right to gun ownership
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Strongly Favors topic 11:
Higher taxes on the wealthy
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Favors topic 12:
Pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens
(+2 points on Social scale)
Opposes topic 13:
Support & expand free trade
(-3 points on Economic scale)
Opposes topic 14:
Maintain US sovereignty from UN
(-3 points on Economic scale)
No opinion on topic 15:
Expand the military
(0 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 16:
More enforcement of the right to vote
(+5 points on Social scale)
Favors topic 17:
Stay out of Iran
(+2 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 18:
Prioritize green energy
(-5 points on Economic scale)
Opposes topic 19:
Never legalize marijuana
(+2 points on Social scale)
Strongly Favors topic 20:
Stimulus better than market-led recovery
(-5 points on Economic scale)
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"we stand with the 99%,. HRC stands with the 1%..."
That would be an accurate example of the "PUMA" crap you mentioned in your OP.
(insert distinction without a difference below to validate bias)
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)is sit home and sulk because my preferred candidate didn't win. I'm not that egotistical, narcissistic, or selfish, and I do live in the real world of political realities.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)Sitting home and not voting only helps republicans win. Those who make such a claim seem to have another agenda than making sure our country is headed in the right direction. If we lose the WH in 2016, a republican will once again be putting justices on the SC, and that is by far the worst scenario for this country.
Response to backwoodsbob (Reply #10)
Name removed Message auto-removed
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Primary...is a poser and a left leaning independent by default....
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Those left-leaning Independents are fickle voters at best, and because of it, they're not taken seriously by either Party.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Think they should tell us loyal Democrats what to do meanwhile berating us for our Party loyalty.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)like your usual attacks.
I may vote for 4 or 6 Democrats in my area, but not for another one or two, because I am
a democrat and not a party sheep.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)So it's fine for people who hate Hillary to be the equivalents of PUMAs?
boston bean
(36,223 posts)are the ones screaming (basically) Party Unity My Ass. I aint voting for Hillary under any circumstance, screw the party! LOL....
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Pretend Democrats...who amuse me because though calling themselves one.....have no idea how Democracy works
If cannot commit to voting for whoever wins our Primary.....you are an Independent by default and definition....
boston bean
(36,223 posts)if so, this is off the charts unhinged. I have not one inkling of what it is you think I've done or said. Although I'm pretty sure you got me all wrong. But continue on blissfully....
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Did you not just claim you wont vote for our candidate if it turns out to be Hillary?
boston bean
(36,223 posts)You got it all wrong.
Jessum Chrissum.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)boston bean
(36,223 posts)You read it wrong, apologize and move on.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)boston bean
(36,223 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Have been misconstrued...
boston bean
(36,223 posts)fadedrose
(10,044 posts)Try to get it straight . . .Gees, she's got that big Hillary sign on all her posts....
"okay I take it back" isn't quite as good as an apology. BB has been and is a loyal Hillary supporter, and deserves to hear "I'm sorry."
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)It seemed odd coming from you - still not sure what you meant - but I was safely assuming I was reading it wrong.
boston bean
(36,223 posts)ie, wtf does he mean Hillary supporters claiming not to vote for EW if she is the nominee. It's non existent. It doesn't even make sense. Do you see Hillary supporters saying they won't vote for EW if she is the nominee? His whole preface is half assed backwards.
On this site now, it was many of the Obama primary supporters in 2008 who are now PUMA... ie, I won't vote for Hillary if she is the nominee, screw the party.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)you just put BB on ignore .....for saying she would support whoever wins the primary.
You seriously need to calm down and take that chip off your shoulder...You just put one of your best allies on ignore for agreeing with you
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)What i said was still the truth....if you cannot stand up for the party electorates decision....you are not really one of us..
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)You blasted one of your best allies for agreeing with you.
You have went completely off the rails.
You seriously need to calm down.....docs have meds that can help you with your anger management
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Alone.....someone else did too...
So how about you answer one bob....You a Democrat or Independent?
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)I will support our candidate
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)No matter who we elect? No caveats?
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)I will be in 100%...I will knock doors for her...I will have her poster on my lawn.
If HRC wins the primary i will bust my ass to see her as the president.....I will do my damndest to stop her from winning the primary but if she wins I will be behind her 100%.
Will you do the same if she isn't our primary winner?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and I knocked on doors and made phone calls....
Marr
(20,317 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)My sense is the folks who hate Obama most are at the front of the "I'll never vote for Hillary" line.
Rex
(65,616 posts)I see lots of dodging the question, easy enough - of course I will vote for whoever wins the primary.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)If HRC wins the primary i will vote for her....It's funny how the HRC cheerleaders can't say the same if she loses
dsc
(52,166 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)general election?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Agree with you wholeheartedly ....
moriah
(8,311 posts)And as I said in my response, I will vote for the nominee. I also donated as much as I could to Obama's campaign after he was declared the winner of the primary in 2008. I didn't donate anything to Hillary except my time.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)just like I did in 08. I voted for Hillary in my primary. Hoped she'd be the nominee didn't get mad. Thought Obama was a great choice. Volunteered in 08 and 12 to help in my small way.
wyldwolf
(43,868 posts)backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)are you still beating your husband?
GP6971
(31,193 posts)gwheezie
(3,580 posts)I'm just wondering since you asked your question at 1235 and then indicated people aren't answering fast enough. Do you think we should ask this question daily? Weekly?hourly?
wyldwolf
(43,868 posts)But what he's actually done is show himself to be another whiny purist who doesn't know history - not even recent history.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)if she runs and becomes the nominee. I think she'd do a fine job as president. I would also vote for omalley, Biden, gillebrand, dean, gore, Webb, sanders and whoever else the dems may nominate. I would have a hard time with Cuomo. But I could do it if I had to.
still_one
(92,317 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Thats what separates Democrats from the posers...
baldguy
(36,649 posts)MineralMan
(146,324 posts)I will vote for, campaign for, and support whoever is the nominee of the Democratic Party. Odds are that it will be Hillary Clinton.
I never expect an ideal candidate for President. My standards are higher for the legislators from my state and national districts. Presidents are a different breed of cat altogether. They have to get elected on a nationwide basis. My state only has 10 electoral votes, so it's a minor player. OTOH, I have two Senators, one Congressional representative and two state legislators on my ballot, along with a host of other local elected officials.
For President, I support the nominee of the Democratic Party. Period.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)The 2016 election is no time for purism.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Control-Z
(15,682 posts)I've never heard of that. If you can tell me what it is I might have an answer for you.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Some number of Clinton supporters went a little... batshit psycho. They started screaming about black people and how Democrats hated women and all this other trash. They declared for McCain / Palin, went screaming into the wilderness. Basically revealed that at least some of Clinton's support comes from right-wing flaming turdbags who can't stand the thought of black people having authority.
Not all. And I don't think it reflects on Clinton herself. But still, it was a little fucked-up.
"PUMA" stands for "party unity my ass," or, officially, People United Means Action, the PAC these peopel came up with.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)the nomination and then the presidency
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)Not like in 2008.
But most like 2004. ...
You know the one wher Bill and Hillary while publicly supported him, stabbed the then Dem nominee in the back.....and eventually helped keep him out of another 2008 run by joigning an ugly RW bashing campain. ...all of that right before midterms in Nov 2006????
baldguy
(36,649 posts)In order to ensure that Republicans are defeated. Can the Hillary haters say the same? I doubt it. They're the ones saying "I hate Hillary & can't vote for her", calling for purges & litmus tests against anyone who isn't sufficiently liberal - by their own definition, of course.
40 yrs ago that sort of behavior was called "rat-fucking".
moriah
(8,311 posts)How many have said they will NOT vote for Hillary if she's nominated?
More than a few, there have been threads solely dedicated to that prospect.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)I voted for Hillary for my NY Senator. I did NOT vote for Hillary in Primary with Obama. Whoever is the DEM nominee, I will vote for. I do not want a REPUBLICAN President. End of story.
Pisces
(5,601 posts)likely she will need my money. She has big donors lined up.