Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 07:59 PM Nov 2014

Dem anger flares over pregnant lawmaker

A meeting of House Democrats flared up on Tuesday over the increasingly thorny issue of whether a pregnant member should be allowed to vote from afar in the party's leadership elections this week.

Democratic leaders, including Rep. Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), have denied a request from Rep. Tammy Duckworth (Ill.), who lost both of her legs in the Iraq War, to waive the Democratic rule barring proxy votes. Duckworth, 46, is in the last stages of a pregnancy and her doctor won't allow her to travel back to Washington to vote in person.

The denial has angered a number of Democrats, who aired their discontent during Tuesday's caucus meeting in the Capitol, after members reelected Pelosi and her top lieutenants as leaders in the next Congress.

“A lot of people felt that Tammy's patriotism and sacrifice to this country warrants special consideration. And I'm one of those people who think it's hard to make an argument that it does not require special consideration,” Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) said afterward. “She's given parts of her body for her country, and if it came to a vote, I would vote to give her a proxy.”

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/dem-anger-flares-over-pregnant-lawmaker/ar-BBevImE?ocid=mailsignout


I support Rep. Pelosi, but in this instance, she is very very wrong.

110 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dem anger flares over pregnant lawmaker (Original Post) philosslayer Nov 2014 OP
Pelosi and Hoyer need to be replaced, but I understand why they need to do this. Renew Deal Nov 2014 #1
it's a freaking caucus vote, not even a vote on legislation CreekDog Nov 2014 #84
This is crazy. bravenak Nov 2014 #2
Maybe if she gave birth on the House floor Aerows Nov 2014 #32
Catch 22. That would require traveling to the House. merrily Nov 2014 #68
While I personally believe she should have been permitted a proxy vote SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #3
True which makes me wonder Ravenna44 Nov 2014 #11
it is my impression that it is her injuries that make it necessary for her to stay home. mopinko Nov 2014 #19
I'm presuming she's high risk because of her age rather than her injuries. SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #21
I think both of her legs are gone below her knees AngryAmish Nov 2014 #45
One leg at the hip, one below the knee SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #46
Her injuries likely make her pregnancy higher risk. LeftyMom Nov 2014 #56
Yes Sgent Nov 2014 #81
I don't believe Congress is bound by the ADA SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #95
Hey,Ms.Pelosi, Wellstone ruled Nov 2014 #4
In the story, it says they voted her and her yeoman6987 Nov 2014 #5
she's already back in belzabubba333 Nov 2014 #10
How could anyone argue that this makes sense? NaturalHigh Nov 2014 #6
I'm unfamiliar Action_Patrol Nov 2014 #8
Pelosi does not want Duckworth to vote. It's political. ARMYofONE Nov 2014 #17
Most things are. Action_Patrol Nov 2014 #18
She's disenfranching a disabled Dem combat veteran obeying doctor's orders so she (Pelosi) can win. merrily Nov 2014 #74
Sam sad as it is, Action_Patrol Nov 2014 #91
Nope and repeating yourself doesn't make it so, either. merrily Nov 2014 #93
What are you talking about? Action_Patrol Nov 2014 #99
I could also say the same to your response Action_Patrol Nov 2014 #100
Your bumper-stickers are neither edifying nor eye-opening. LanternWaste Nov 2014 #102
Please go on... Action_Patrol Nov 2014 #104
Yeah it is. Jamastiene Nov 2014 #94
Is that Pelosi's fault? demwing Nov 2014 #98
It wasn't about the minority leadership position. It's about a Committee appointment. ARMYofONE Nov 2014 #106
This message was self-deleted by its author Recursion Nov 2014 #25
It's not necessarily about her. Renew Deal Nov 2014 #37
You do realize if she was given special consideration, it would be sexist, right? justiceischeap Nov 2014 #7
You're kidding, right? It's a MEDICAL reason. WinkyDink Nov 2014 #12
Nobody gets an out for any Action_Patrol Nov 2014 #15
This isn't legislation. Scootaloo Nov 2014 #39
Hence my reply above. Action_Patrol Nov 2014 #40
Actually, you vetoed legislation. So, when would you allow a pregnant woman acting on merrily Nov 2014 #73
Where do you draw the line for any medical condition? Action_Patrol Nov 2014 #90
I am not at all sure there are zero proxy votes. I don't think you are, either. merrily Nov 2014 #92
I know I work on the Hill and have never heard of Action_Patrol Nov 2014 #103
IIRC, Kennedy did on occasion. Granted, that was the Senate. merrily Nov 2014 #70
Prohibition against proxy voting justiceischeap Nov 2014 #97
NO! Doctor's orders, ffs. It's sexist to make an exception for certain medical merrily Nov 2014 #71
Too bad there is nothing in existance whistler162 Nov 2014 #9
Same thing I was thinking Yupster Nov 2014 #13
Someday....sigh. whistler162 Nov 2014 #23
One would hope that 2naSalit Nov 2014 #14
I would settle for the later half whistler162 Nov 2014 #24
Indeed. 2naSalit Nov 2014 #26
oh sure hfojvt Nov 2014 #61
How many times to date has an exception been made for a man for one medical reason or another? WillowTree Nov 2014 #16
None. There's no proxy votes. Action_Patrol Nov 2014 #20
Bullshit Aerows Nov 2014 #30
Do you have a citation for that? SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #31
Nice profanity. Action_Patrol Nov 2014 #36
It is also my understanding from my short time on Capital Hill and law school many moons ago, branford Nov 2014 #79
Oof. Don't give them any ideas Action_Patrol Nov 2014 #89
Has there ever been a proxy vote? Raine1967 Nov 2014 #22
Giving birth isn't a valid damn reason Aerows Nov 2014 #29
She's not giving birth SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #33
I love me some Tammy, too, but I've never seen it happen. MADem Nov 2014 #66
For Dem caucus votes there have been no exceptions made, for any reason, for 4 decades. nt pinboy3niner Nov 2014 #72
So what? Change should come when circumstances warrant. branford Nov 2014 #80
Story says, his vote would not have mattered merrily Nov 2014 #88
In the Senate, yes. The House has different rules. progressoid Nov 2014 #105
Now that is a pile of shit. Aerows Nov 2014 #27
Archaic GeorgeGist Nov 2014 #28
I really don't see why the big prohibition on proxy voting bluestateguy Nov 2014 #34
Let's put the shoe Ink Man Nov 2014 #35
Ain't a vote a vote regardless of where you are? I don't get it. Owl Nov 2014 #38
Let Tammy vote! Dont call me Shirley Nov 2014 #41
I wonder yellowwoodII Nov 2014 #42
You might want to talk to the Armenians about that "something" that was a long time ago. MADem Nov 2014 #48
WTF ? JI7 Nov 2014 #51
Today in LM Explains California Politics: The Armenian Genocide is a Big Damn Deal. LeftyMom Nov 2014 #57
That was pretty righteous. I contemplated taking the poster to school, but you did a much MADem Nov 2014 #62
I Democratic party is the party of progress perhaps... Kalidurga Nov 2014 #43
Nancy is losing it. RandySF Nov 2014 #44
"Losing it?" "Snapping at the press?" MADem Nov 2014 #50
Is Nancy being sexist by denying her vote? RandySF Nov 2014 #76
What does your subject line even MEAN? MADem Nov 2014 #78
I say put Tammy at the fancy new Bethesda medical center, in a beautiful new suite MADem Nov 2014 #47
+1000 n/t librechik Nov 2014 #49
Tiny flaw in that plan Man from Pickens Nov 2014 #52
Well... pinboy3niner Nov 2014 #53
GAAAH--stupid me, of course she is! I will correct! MADem Nov 2014 #63
Excellent plan--except she probably wants to stick with her OB pinboy3niner Nov 2014 #54
I was operated on there, too--twice! No -- three times! MADem Nov 2014 #65
Three times here, too pinboy3niner Nov 2014 #82
Good for them--and better for you! MADem Nov 2014 #110
Her doctor says she can't travel. LeftyMom Nov 2014 #59
Maybe he'd let her go in a bus outfitted as an ambulance. Maybe he could "go with" MADem Nov 2014 #60
If she's high risk she's not going anywhere, let alone on a two day ambulance ride. LeftyMom Nov 2014 #69
I'm not talking about a crappy ambulance. I'm talking about the AF1 of ambulances! MADem Nov 2014 #77
I'll second all that! lonestarnot Nov 2014 #64
Don't agree with Nancy.. it's glaringly evident that Tammy Duckworth is incapable of flying back Cha Nov 2014 #55
Sorry Cha. If she isn't present on the floor, she cannot vote. longship Nov 2014 #83
Well.. I guess it's a no brainer then.. stay home and keep your Cha Nov 2014 #86
Victories are sweet. longship Nov 2014 #87
Give that woman a damn proxy due to totality of circumstance. Who else is or has been, ever, lonestarnot Nov 2014 #58
IIRC, Kennedy was allowed to vote "from afar" when his health prevented travel. merrily Nov 2014 #67
Sexism sucks, no matter where it's found. merrily Nov 2014 #75
My God, when their sense of fairness is afraid to let a disabled war veteran participate CreekDog Nov 2014 #85
I figured it out: schedule a field hearing, go to her. LeftyMom Nov 2014 #107
great idea CreekDog Nov 2014 #109
I am sure there have been sick men, or men with family obligations who didn't get a waiver on point Nov 2014 #96
Very, very, very...... daleanime Nov 2014 #101
Jon Stewart dished out a pile of shit for Pelosi last nite and she deserved every bit of it. jillan Nov 2014 #108

Renew Deal

(85,125 posts)
1. Pelosi and Hoyer need to be replaced, but I understand why they need to do this.
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 08:04 PM
Nov 2014

Tammy is special and important. She deserves special consideration, but it doesn't have to be approved.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
84. it's a freaking caucus vote, not even a vote on legislation
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 04:21 AM
Nov 2014

the leadership made a ridiculous decision and an un-progressive one at that.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
2. This is crazy.
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 08:04 PM
Nov 2014

I do not understand our politicians in congress. Pelosi needs to reconsider her position on this issue. We needs her votes and she needs to be able to have her baby in a comfortable location.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
32. Maybe if she gave birth on the House floor
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 09:59 PM
Nov 2014

some of the Representatives would take a different look at birth control.



It's insanity.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
68. Catch 22. That would require traveling to the House.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 03:00 AM
Nov 2014

Yes, it's insane. And very unfair, IMO.

SickOfTheOnePct

(8,710 posts)
3. While I personally believe she should have been permitted a proxy vote
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 08:08 PM
Nov 2014

Rep. Thompson's reasoning makes no sense. She isn't asking for an accommodation based on her war injuries, she's asking for an accommodation based on her pregnancy.

 

Ravenna44

(40 posts)
11. True which makes me wonder
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 08:38 PM
Nov 2014

-- surely a similar situation has come up many times before. For example:

- a legislator laid up in a hospital

- a legislator unable to travel due to storm conditions in her home region

- (slightly different and less compelling) a legislator unwilling to travel because of a family emergency.

It's not an issue of pregnancy. It's a question of, is it right to block elected officials from representing the people who elected them, when they are unable to travel through no fault of their own?

I vote no.

mopinko

(73,722 posts)
19. it is my impression that it is her injuries that make it necessary for her to stay home.
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 09:12 PM
Nov 2014

i presume she is considered a high risk pregnancy due to her injuries. most women these days arent forbidden to travel like they used to be.
i can see where she would need to be with her own ob team.

SickOfTheOnePct

(8,710 posts)
21. I'm presuming she's high risk because of her age rather than her injuries.
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 09:18 PM
Nov 2014

Air travel isn't advised after the 36th week of pregnancy for non-high risk, and she must be close to, if not past, that point.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
45. I think both of her legs are gone below her knees
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 11:20 PM
Nov 2014

Thanks, Bush, you mfer.

Anyway, extra weight plus looser ligaments means more opportunity for pressure ulcers on her stumps.

God, this is so fucked up. Fuck you Bush. And anyone who will not let her vote deserves to ... fuck them.

SickOfTheOnePct

(8,710 posts)
46. One leg at the hip, one below the knee
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 11:25 PM
Nov 2014

If the caucus rules are that there are no proxy votes, then there are no proxy votes, period. If they want to change the rules for everyone, they can, but they can't make exceptions because then everyone will want to be the next "exception".

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
56. Her injuries likely make her pregnancy higher risk.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:07 AM
Nov 2014

And pregnancy is a medical issue, and should be accommodated even if one isn't a parapalegic war hero.

Is congress exempt from employment law? In any other workplace she'd be asking for a reasonable accommodation and it would be required under federal law.

Sgent

(5,858 posts)
81. Yes
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 03:52 AM
Nov 2014

congress is exempt from employment laws.

Beyond that, congress doesn't allow for absentee voting, regardless of medical condition. Its as true for an 80 yo senator in a hospital bed as it is for an expectant mother who is unable to travel due to medical complications.

SickOfTheOnePct

(8,710 posts)
95. I don't believe Congress is bound by the ADA
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 06:20 AM
Nov 2014

They are many federal laws to which they are not bound, this may be one of them.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
4. Hey,Ms.Pelosi,
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 08:09 PM
Nov 2014

You just shot yourself in the foot on this issue. Your chances of being Leader are getting Slim to none and Slim left town. Never thought our Party would be this lame.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
6. How could anyone argue that this makes sense?
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 08:20 PM
Nov 2014

Is it really a big deal to allow her to participate and cast her vote from a different location?

Action_Patrol

(845 posts)
8. I'm unfamiliar
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 08:24 PM
Nov 2014

With voting that's inter-party related. I know proxy votes for legislation aren't allowed. I'm guessing it is related. Doesn't make much sense if it's just for leadership positions.

 

ARMYofONE

(69 posts)
17. Pelosi does not want Duckworth to vote. It's political.
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 09:06 PM
Nov 2014

Although I see the slippery slope concern, the real reason that Pelosi does not want to let Duckworth vote by proxy, is because Duckworth intends to support Frank Pallone for top spot on the Energy and Commerce Committee, and Pelosi wants it to go to Anna Eshoo. In short, this is a purely political move by Pelosi.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
74. She's disenfranching a disabled Dem combat veteran obeying doctor's orders so she (Pelosi) can win.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 03:08 AM
Nov 2014

That's not a common scenario or "politics as usual."

Action_Patrol

(845 posts)
100. I could also say the same to your response
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 08:15 AM
Nov 2014

If nobody is allowed to do a proxy vote, it doesn't matter who or what you are.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
102. Your bumper-stickers are neither edifying nor eye-opening.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 09:41 AM
Nov 2014

Your bumper-stickers are neither edifying nor eye-opening.

Jamastiene

(38,206 posts)
94. Yeah it is.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 05:51 AM
Nov 2014

That's how they do things and why so many of us are disgusted at it and want to see positive change.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
98. Is that Pelosi's fault?
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 07:27 AM
Nov 2014

or is it the existing rules?

BTW, pelosi ran unopposed, she was going to win with our without Duckworth.

 

ARMYofONE

(69 posts)
106. It wasn't about the minority leadership position. It's about a Committee appointment.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 01:52 PM
Nov 2014

Pelosi wants to reward her close friend, Anna Eshoo, with the Energy and Commerce Committee position. Duckworth wants the spot to go to Frank Pallone, who has seniority over Eshoo. Essentially, Pelosi is breaking with tradition in appointing her friend over Pallone and many in the caucus do not like it. Duckworth is one of those, and Pelosi does not want her voting.

Response to NaturalHigh (Reply #6)

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
7. You do realize if she was given special consideration, it would be sexist, right?
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 08:22 PM
Nov 2014

It would also open up proxy votes to anyone and everyone who felt they had a reason for special consideration.

I think they made the right decision, no matter how badly the vote is needed.

Action_Patrol

(845 posts)
15. Nobody gets an out for any
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 09:05 PM
Nov 2014

Medical condition for votes pertaining to legislation. You are either present or your vote isn't cast.
A lot of times upon returning, a member will put an item into the congressional record that says 'I was absent on (insert day and time) for (insert reason) f I were present during (insert legislation) I would have voted (yay/nay)'

It doesn't affect the vote but puts their thoughts and feelings on the record.

Action_Patrol

(845 posts)
40. Hence my reply above.
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 10:54 PM
Nov 2014

I said this seemed to not make sense when you are talking about pure caucus votes

merrily

(45,251 posts)
73. Actually, you vetoed legislation. So, when would you allow a pregnant woman acting on
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 03:06 AM
Nov 2014

doctor's orders to vote by proxy?

Action_Patrol

(845 posts)
90. Where do you draw the line for any medical condition?
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 05:47 AM
Nov 2014

If there are zero proxy votes I guess the answer is zero

merrily

(45,251 posts)
92. I am not at all sure there are zero proxy votes. I don't think you are, either.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 05:50 AM
Nov 2014

But, why did you post your objection was about caucuses?

Action_Patrol

(845 posts)
103. I know I work on the Hill and have never heard of
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 09:41 AM
Nov 2014

Or seen a proxy vote.

My objection to caucus votes was simply due to inclusiveness. If you want an honest poll of your party for leadership, being present doesn't seem to be a factor I would consider. There's no duress or pressure on the voter.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
97. Prohibition against proxy voting
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 06:55 AM
Nov 2014
http://clerk.house.gov/legislative/house-rules.pdf

Page 17 of PDF

(f) A vote by a member of a committee or subcommittee with respect to any measure or matter may not be cast by proxy.


If Pelosi made an exception for Duckworth based on her medical condition, a medical condition specific only to women, that would in fact be sexist.

I will reiterate that I think Pelosi was right in denying Duckworth a proxy vote. First, it's against the rules and second, if she makes this exception, where does it stop?

One of the reasons proxy voting was abolished was to prevent House members from basically "phoning it in." It made them have to be present at their jobs. We complain about how little our government works and then complain that Pelosi didn't bend one of the rules that ensures politicians are actually present.

I know Duckworth isn't trying to get out of his job, I get that she has a medical condition but it still was the right thing to do because no one wants to set the precedent that this would have set.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
71. NO! Doctor's orders, ffs. It's sexist to make an exception for certain medical
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 03:04 AM
Nov 2014

reasons but not the ones that affect only women.

 

whistler162

(11,155 posts)
9. Too bad there is nothing in existance
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 08:24 PM
Nov 2014

that will allow a live image tyoe picture to go between two places nearly instantly,. Maybe with sound.

Someone really needs to invent that sort of thing.

Yupster

(14,308 posts)
13. Same thing I was thinking
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 08:39 PM
Nov 2014

I know a guy, Angelo Skype who's been tinkering in his basement lately.

I'll ask him if he has any ideas.

2naSalit

(102,743 posts)
14. One would hope that
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 08:58 PM
Nov 2014

with all the technological advances of our time... the interwebs, landing a craft on a moving comet....

Congress needs to get hip to the 21st century!

WillowTree

(5,350 posts)
16. How many times to date has an exception been made for a man for one medical reason or another?
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 09:05 PM
Nov 2014
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
30. Bullshit
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 09:54 PM
Nov 2014

The only time it is prohibited is if the member of Congress is present. In clear and present medical situations, it is permitted.

If giving birth to a child doesn't count as an inability to be present, then I don't know what in the hell does.

SickOfTheOnePct

(8,710 posts)
31. Do you have a citation for that?
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 09:59 PM
Nov 2014

Because Nancy Pelosi says that it isn't permitted in the House or in the Democratic caucus, and I assume she knows what she's talking about.

Action_Patrol

(845 posts)
36. Nice profanity.
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 10:11 PM
Nov 2014

I've been here at the Capitol for nearly two decades. Please provide proof as I've never heard of such a thing. Otherwise when Byrd, Kennedy and Inouye were sick and in the hospital then surely this mystical proxy vote would have been used, correct?

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
79. It is also my understanding from my short time on Capital Hill and law school many moons ago,
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 03:27 AM
Nov 2014

that a legislator must actually be present in the relevant chamber to vote on legislation. It's easy to understand the reasons for such an uncompromising rule.

However, the rules and procedures for internal caucus votes and other "non-official" matters like the one at issue, are set entirely by the members, and there is nothing legally that would have prevented an accommodation for Rep. Duckworth.

Since there is no dispute that Rep. Duckworth cannot travel due to pregnancy related complications on her doctor's instructions, besides the fact that she is a disabled veteran, I see no reason other than malice or crass politics for her not to be allowed a proxy vote.

If I were a Republican, I would be discussing Minority Leader Pelosi's and all the Democrat's "War on Women" before every television camera I could find.

Raine1967

(11,676 posts)
22. Has there ever been a proxy vote?
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 09:24 PM
Nov 2014

I know it is a medical reason, but I actually feel like letting this happen in a slippery slope.

People need to be there for a vote. That is how the very basic rules of government are. I know this is hard core stuff, but Ted Kennedy missed a vote on the stimulus that I am very sure we all know he would have voted for.

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29184644/ns/politics-capitol_hill/t/ted-kennedy-miss-final-stimulus-vote/#.VGvweMaiX8s

We can discuss if this is sexist, but I don't think this is sexist at all. People need to be present to vote. I appreciate that Rep. Duckworth wanted to vote in absentia, but I don't know if that has ever been allowed before.






SickOfTheOnePct

(8,710 posts)
33. She's not giving birth
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 10:00 PM
Nov 2014

And no, it's apparently not a valid reason, since proxy votes aren't permitted.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
66. I love me some Tammy, too, but I've never seen it happen.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:55 AM
Nov 2014

They used to strap old Strom into a wheelchair and drag him over from Walter Reed to vote, then bring him home. But he turned up and pushed his bony digit into the "Whatever the Dems Don't Want" button, reliably. He had staffers who were likely hired for their ability to lift an old dude strapped in a wheelchair...

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
72. For Dem caucus votes there have been no exceptions made, for any reason, for 4 decades. nt
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 03:06 AM
Nov 2014
 

branford

(4,462 posts)
80. So what? Change should come when circumstances warrant.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 03:34 AM
Nov 2014

Blacks, women and those who didn't own significant tracts of land also once could not vote. We realized the folly of such rules, and corrected them, even going as far as amending the Constitution. I hardly think changing the Democratic caucus leadership proxy voting rules will lead to the dissolution of the Republic or anarchy. However, permitting a small and reasonable accommodation to a pregnant disabled veteran with a legitimate and proven medical issue might just demonstrate the Democrats are sincere in their "War on Women" rhetoric.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
88. Story says, his vote would not have mattered
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 05:02 AM
Nov 2014

Near the very end, I think the Senate did quietly let him vote by phone or proxy or some method that allowed him to stay home.

I don't know why it's a slippery slope. If people can hear the debate if they wish, why not? Usually, they are not even in the room until the vote is called. In 2014, with skype everything else, what is so sacred about being under one roof, if there is a medical reason not to be?

If Pelosi had allowed it, would you have faulted her for so doing?

progressoid

(53,171 posts)
105. In the Senate, yes. The House has different rules.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 10:44 AM
Nov 2014

Senator Tim Johnson voted by proxy


While absent from the chamber, Johnson is not allowed to vote on the Senate floor or even to vote to move a bill out of the Senate Appropriations Committee, on which he sits. But he is allowed to vote "by proxy" on amendments to committee bills.

Johnson approved the use of his proxy - as senators often do - when the committee considered a war spending bill Thursday. It turned out that his vote was only needed once, on an amendment to boost Medicaid funding. Johnson supported the amendment.


 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
27. Now that is a pile of shit.
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 09:48 PM
Nov 2014

Duckworth has given more to her country than most, and she is doing the best for her child.

If the Democratic Party and Pelosi can't get on board and honour her wishes to bear her child while participating in the Legislative process, then they can all piss off.

Wrong, just flat out WRONG.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
34. I really don't see why the big prohibition on proxy voting
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 10:02 PM
Nov 2014

Don't we want members of Congress to vote on bills, procedural matters and the leadership of their party?

It's no different than a voter voting absentee in an election.

As long as a proxy vote is not abused or overused, I don't see what the problem would be.

 

Ink Man

(171 posts)
35. Let's put the shoe
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 10:06 PM
Nov 2014

on the other foot.

If the GOP leadership said no to a proxy vote this place would go nuts.

If it's the rule then follow it. I pray for her and for a healthy baby.

yellowwoodII

(616 posts)
42. I wonder
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 10:57 PM
Nov 2014

I wonder if Sen. Kirk got to vote after his stroke?
At 46, her pregnancy would be considered high risk.
I've never liked Pelosi since she wanted to censure Turkey over something they did in about 1915. It was a long time ago.
Just what we need--to alienate another Middle Eastern country that we need as an ally.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
48. You might want to talk to the Armenians about that "something" that was a long time ago.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 01:02 AM
Nov 2014

It wasn't just a piddling little thing, and it is the DENIAL of it that is problematic.

JI7

(93,596 posts)
51. WTF ?
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 01:12 AM
Nov 2014

"I've never liked Pelosi since she wanted to censure Turkey over something they did in about 1915. It was a long time ago."

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
57. Today in LM Explains California Politics: The Armenian Genocide is a Big Damn Deal.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:19 AM
Nov 2014

There are a lot of Armenian-Americans in the central valley in particular. They vote. This is really fucking important to them.

I swear, it's the closest thing to a bipartisan issue you'll find in CA. EVERY politician running for any post above school board puts out a statement on the genocide and rejecting revisionism and calling on Turkey admit what happened.

Let me put it this way: if Germany's official position on WWII was that they didn't know what happened to all those Jews but maybe they starved to death or moved away because times were hard, would the US call on them to admit their role? Even though they run the Eurozone and are rich as Croesus and make cars which are quite lovely as long as they're under warranty? OF COURSE WE WOULD.

And we're not in danger of falling out with Turkey. We make all the best military hardware and their border backs up to an actual fucking warzone. Also their good relationship with us the only thing keeping the Kurds from carving off their own country, which Turkey doesn't want because they'd lose a chunk. If they got too huffy with us we'd stop telling the Kurds to wait for that inevitability a bit longer.

Oh wait, that turned into LM Explains CA Politics and Geopolitics. Lucky you, now you understand two things.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
62. That was pretty righteous. I contemplated taking the poster to school, but you did a much
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:42 AM
Nov 2014

better job than I ever could have.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
43. I Democratic party is the party of progress perhaps...
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 10:58 PM
Nov 2014

they should also be more flexible when it comes to the way things have been traditionally done.

RandySF

(84,146 posts)
44. Nancy is losing it.
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 11:16 PM
Nov 2014

Between this, her snapping at the press and saying money would have solved the 2014 election, she's looking way too insular, and this is what happens after a long tenure in leadership.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
50. "Losing it?" "Snapping at the press?"
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 01:06 AM
Nov 2014

You are probably not INTENDING to sound sexist, but you're sounding really, really sexist.

How dare Nancy point out that she is treated DIFFERENTLY than male Congressional leaders? She should just "hush up" and "keep sweet," and not get all "uppity" and such. No "snapping" there, Nance...in fact, she should have told Luke the Dook Russert that he had a point about old ladies in Congress!


in the extreme for anyone who doesn't take my point.

RandySF

(84,146 posts)
76. Is Nancy being sexist by denying her vote?
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 03:09 AM
Nov 2014

Let's just keep Reid and Pelosi is leadership so they can get even more insulated from what's really happening in the country and the party. And Nancy can keep doing the same parties telling the same crowds that all we need to win is shell out more to the DCCC, no matter how many millions they raised and spent. All the while, the Republicans keep kicking the shit out of us at the state level taking over chamber after chamber keep drawing and redrawing the Congressional district. Keep whistling past that graveyard and accuse everyone who thinks differently of being a sexist.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
78. What does your subject line even MEAN?
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 03:15 AM
Nov 2014

You're going to have to explain that because it makes no damn sense.

There are no proxies allowed. That has nothing to do with gender. Pelosi wants to change that; I don't think she will succeed, but it's her opinion and she's a right to it.

I think your language appeared sexist because of the WORDS THAT YOU USED, not because of Republicans or graveyards or any of that other chaff you're tossing out to try to distract from the WORDS that you TYPED in your POST.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
47. I say put Tammy at the fancy new Bethesda medical center, in a beautiful new suite
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 01:01 AM
Nov 2014

Last edited Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:44 AM - Edit history (1)

paid for by the taxpayers, where her aides can come by with documents for her to sign and her chief of staff can brief her privately and comfortably. When she needs to vote, wheel her bed to a fully equipped ambulance, and wheel her into the House of Representatives IN HER BED, let her vote, and then wheel her out.

You do know that for YEARS---yes, YEARS--Strom Thurmond had a suite at Walter Reed on Georgia Avenue. I used to see the doddering old so and so being wheeled here and there when I was getting treated there. He LIVED at Walter Reed--he wasn't a patient, he was a resident. They wheeled him round in a wheelchair when he needed to vote...

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
52. Tiny flaw in that plan
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 01:43 AM
Nov 2014

Wheeling her into the Senate wouldn't do a heck of a lot of good since she's a member of the House.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
63. GAAAH--stupid me, of course she is! I will correct!
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:43 AM
Nov 2014

Need to go to bed! I was focused on Sen-ah-tuh Strom in his wheelchair being wheeled down that ramp into the well!

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
54. Excellent plan--except she probably wants to stick with her OB
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:01 AM
Nov 2014

Nobody would expect her to give up her doctor to do this, especially at this point in her pregnancy.

Other than that, I like it. I had a few surgeries at the old NNMC myself, spending a week or two with a room in the tower each time, and I know it's an easy drive from there down to the Capitol.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
65. I was operated on there, too--twice! No -- three times!
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:52 AM
Nov 2014

Twice as a kid in the dark ages, when all that is "old" was shiny and new, and once towards the end of my career. They didn't kill me, so that's a recommendation!

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
82. Three times here, too
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 03:53 AM
Nov 2014

I relocated from CA to the D.C. area for treatment at Bethesda on the advice of the Navy docs there who had been doing a followup study on combat facial injuries and the experimental bone grafts the Army did. They had predicted my graft would fail, and they were right. So over the course of 2 years or so they did one op to remove the graft, one failed attempt to replace it, and a final one that was successful.

I lucked out in having excellent surgeons there (as well as in the Army).

MADem

(135,425 posts)
110. Good for them--and better for you!
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 01:28 AM
Nov 2014

I got really good docs too--all went well except at the last op a Congressman stole my pain meds (really--and he didn't need 'em, either--O and the RADM running the joint at the time had a discussion about that because my pain management wasn't adequately managed; I didn't blame the guy doing the work, if someone steals your drugs AND your delivery system, what are ya gonna do? My stoic nature was put to the test during that evolution!) but he ended up in jail. Hope the bastard enjoyed that morphine pump! Hope he enjoyed jail even more!

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
59. Her doctor says she can't travel.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:35 AM
Nov 2014

It's not a matter of where she'd stay when she gets to DC. She can't go.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
60. Maybe he'd let her go in a bus outfitted as an ambulance. Maybe he could "go with"
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:39 AM
Nov 2014

and help get her settled.

I think the proxy request is a non-starter.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
69. If she's high risk she's not going anywhere, let alone on a two day ambulance ride.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 03:01 AM
Nov 2014

The very notion is irresponsible.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
77. I'm not talking about a crappy ambulance. I'm talking about the AF1 of ambulances!
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 03:10 AM
Nov 2014

Hell, maybe Obama could make a trip to the area and bring her on home on AF1. It's a flying hospital after all.

That's IF she wanted to vote. Maybe she just wants a leave of absence.

There's nothing happening in the House where one vote is going to matter. And it's a poor precedent to try and set. There are times when a Republican in the hospital, or stuck in traffic, or whatever, might work to our benefit. I don't think it's a good idea to try and change this up.

If she feels she can be there, great, if not...well, we shall have to make do.

Cha

(319,023 posts)
55. Don't agree with Nancy.. it's glaringly evident that Tammy Duckworth is incapable of flying back
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:05 AM
Nov 2014

due to the birth of her baby.

I don't see why anyone shouldn't be able vote if it were physically impossible to be there.. like now.

longship

(40,416 posts)
83. Sorry Cha. If she isn't present on the floor, she cannot vote.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 04:01 AM
Nov 2014

As much as I love Tammy Duckworth, a proxie vote in this case would set a precedence, one which has been in place since... Forever.

Now one could argue the point, but that would entail taking in all sides of the issue. I am sure that the Democratic caucus did that.

I have no problem with Pelosi's announcement.

And I hope Tammy has a beautiful child.

Best regards

Cha

(319,023 posts)
86. Well.. I guess it's a no brainer then.. stay home and keep your
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 04:24 AM
Nov 2014

baby and yourself safe!

Best regards to you longship.. We got a victory today!

longship

(40,416 posts)
87. Victories are sweet.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 05:01 AM
Nov 2014

And I <heart> Tammy Duckworth.

She rolled three sixes on the charisma dice. Sorry for the Dungeons and Dragons allusion.

 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
58. Give that woman a damn proxy due to totality of circumstance. Who else is or has been, ever,
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:24 AM
Nov 2014

similarly situated? Hard pressed to think of anyone.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
67. IIRC, Kennedy was allowed to vote "from afar" when his health prevented travel.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:58 AM
Nov 2014

I understand that he was dying (and in the Senate) and pregnancy is usually a joyful occasion--assuming nothing unfortunate happens to you or the baby because you travel against doctor's orders, but a health issue is a health issue.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
85. My God, when their sense of fairness is afraid to let a disabled war veteran participate
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 04:24 AM
Nov 2014

Last edited Wed Nov 19, 2014, 04:23 PM - Edit history (1)

in this circumstance, they're missing the forest for the trees.

take the lumps and let her vote in this caucus decision.

take the lumps standing up for a recognized war veteran and pregnant woman.

can this party do anything politically expedient?

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
109. great idea
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 04:22 PM
Nov 2014

not sure the folks at the top understand that theater is not always a bad thing, that it can be used to do good things, that it can be done honestly and finally

--that it can actually be used to help them, not simply used against them.

i sincerely believe much of the leadership thinks that political theater is something that can only be used by the other side.

on point

(2,506 posts)
96. I am sure there have been sick men, or men with family obligations who didn't get a waiver
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 06:34 AM
Nov 2014

So I think I support this decision in not making an exception for Tammy because they would need to make exceptions for everyone all the time.

Does this mean in the modern world perhaps they ought to think about changing the rule? That maybe needed. But it is the rule now.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
108. Jon Stewart dished out a pile of shit for Pelosi last nite and she deserved every bit of it.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 04:05 PM
Nov 2014
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dem anger flares over pre...