Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking on GEMSNBComcast (Original Post) malaise Nov 2014 OP
Is there a link to this story? (I don't have cable TV.) - nt KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #1
You can watch live online here ... Mika Nov 2014 #4
Thanks for link. Bookmarking for later use. (Right now, they seem to be KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #8
That wouldn't be a wise move. People will think the fix is in. Comrade Grumpy Nov 2014 #2
Did you expect any differently? darkangel218 Nov 2014 #7
I'll wait and see what the grand jury does. Comrade Grumpy Nov 2014 #18
I hope he will get indicted, but i doubt it will happen. darkangel218 Nov 2014 #19
I think the fix is in BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #13
I had heard it would take at least 60 days- and even then, much could be redacted.... bettyellen Nov 2014 #3
Kinda like DU juries Brother Buzz Nov 2014 #5
No. DU juries give explanations at times darkangel218 Nov 2014 #6
No, the results remain among the jurors and alerter if their is no 'conviction' Brother Buzz Nov 2014 #10
Okay, you're right. darkangel218 Nov 2014 #11
Which means the evidence shows that Wilson is guilty as fuck but will get off anyway. nt ChisolmTrailDem Nov 2014 #9
Yah, something like that. darkangel218 Nov 2014 #12
Ferguson and communities across this country are going to erupt MoonRiver Nov 2014 #14
MuCulloch says he will get a court order to reveal evidence, if no indictment. KMOD Nov 2014 #15
Bloomberg news report: pinboy3niner Nov 2014 #16
This really means they won't release Wilson's testimony, doesn't it? aquart Nov 2014 #20
I'm not a conspiracy theorist by any stretch of the imagination. Ykcutnek Nov 2014 #17
Well you are a conspiracy theorist on this issue. morningfog Nov 2014 #21
 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
8. Thanks for link. Bookmarking for later use. (Right now, they seem to be
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 02:16 PM
Nov 2014

yapping about Marion Barry and Bill Cosby.)

Is there a link to this specific story\headline as posted in the OP?

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
18. I'll wait and see what the grand jury does.
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 03:07 PM
Nov 2014

I just voted in a DU poll that I thought he'd be indicted for manslaughter. Maybe that's wishful thinking. We'll see.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
3. I had heard it would take at least 60 days- and even then, much could be redacted....
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 02:09 PM
Nov 2014

and that they could use the excuse of protecting witnesses to do some heavy editing of what is released.

Brother Buzz

(36,457 posts)
10. No, the results remain among the jurors and alerter if their is no 'conviction'
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 02:19 PM
Nov 2014

That is, unless, like grand juries, there is a leak.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
14. Ferguson and communities across this country are going to erupt
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 02:27 PM
Nov 2014

if that happens. Still holding out a shred of hope for at least a misdemeanor indictment.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
15. MuCulloch says he will get a court order to reveal evidence, if no indictment.
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 02:43 PM
Nov 2014
If there is an indictment, only that document will be revealed. But if there is not, McCulloch has said he will take the rare step of obtaining a court order to reveal virtually all the evidence that was considered. Judge Carolyn Whittington has agreed to grant the request, said Paul Fox, the court administrator.

If there is such a distribution, it might occur immediately. The names of some witnesses and graphic photos of the crime scene and autopsy are expected to be left out.


http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/michael-brown-grand-jury-to-reconvene-monday/article_50f64d32-d355-5386-86ec-2b58c23508e6.html

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
16. Bloomberg news report:
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 02:46 PM
Nov 2014
What Happened in Ferguson? Prosecutor's Pledge to Release Evidence Tempered by Court Review
By Tim Bross Nov 23, 2014 9:33 AM PT

Evidence before the Missouri grand jury reviewing the Ferguson police shooting won’t be released unless approved by a judge, a court spokesman said after local prosecutors pledged to do so if no indictment is forthcoming.

Paul Fox, director of judicial administration for St. Louis County, denied a press report that a state judge had pre-approved the release of grand jury evidence in the event no charges are brought in the August shooting of Michael Brown, an unarmed 18-year-old, by police officer Darren Wilson.

If an indictment is handed up by the 12-member grand jury meeting in the St. Louis suburb of Clayton, Judge Carolyn Whittington will review requests to disclose grand jury evidence, Fox said.

“If the grand jury returns a no true bill, the judge anticipates the court will receive requests for grand jury records,” Fox said. “Some of those requests will require the court to analyze the need for maintaining secrecy of the records with the need for public disclosure.”

...


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-11-23/ferguson-grand-jury-shooting-evidence-may-not-be-released.html

aquart

(69,014 posts)
20. This really means they won't release Wilson's testimony, doesn't it?
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 03:13 PM
Nov 2014

That must be some bullshit craptastic explanation he gave.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking on GEMSNBComcast