Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBreaking on GEMSNBComcast
Grand Jury not to release evidence if no indictment - what the fucking fuck????
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
21 replies, 1865 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking on GEMSNBComcast (Original Post)
malaise
Nov 2014
OP
I had heard it would take at least 60 days- and even then, much could be redacted....
bettyellen
Nov 2014
#3
No, the results remain among the jurors and alerter if their is no 'conviction'
Brother Buzz
Nov 2014
#10
Which means the evidence shows that Wilson is guilty as fuck but will get off anyway. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Nov 2014
#9
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)1. Is there a link to this story? (I don't have cable TV.) - nt
Mika
(17,751 posts)4. You can watch live online here ...
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)8. Thanks for link. Bookmarking for later use. (Right now, they seem to be
yapping about Marion Barry and Bill Cosby.)
Is there a link to this specific story\headline as posted in the OP?
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)2. That wouldn't be a wise move. People will think the fix is in.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)7. Did you expect any differently?
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)18. I'll wait and see what the grand jury does.
I just voted in a DU poll that I thought he'd be indicted for manslaughter. Maybe that's wishful thinking. We'll see.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)19. I hope he will get indicted, but i doubt it will happen.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)13. I think the fix is in
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)3. I had heard it would take at least 60 days- and even then, much could be redacted....
and that they could use the excuse of protecting witnesses to do some heavy editing of what is released.
Brother Buzz
(36,457 posts)5. Kinda like DU juries
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)6. No. DU juries give explanations at times
Brother Buzz
(36,457 posts)10. No, the results remain among the jurors and alerter if their is no 'conviction'
That is, unless, like grand juries, there is a leak.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)11. Okay, you're right.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)9. Which means the evidence shows that Wilson is guilty as fuck but will get off anyway. nt
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)12. Yah, something like that.
It seems to be the norm with internal investigations.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)14. Ferguson and communities across this country are going to erupt
if that happens. Still holding out a shred of hope for at least a misdemeanor indictment.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)15. MuCulloch says he will get a court order to reveal evidence, if no indictment.
If there is an indictment, only that document will be revealed. But if there is not, McCulloch has said he will take the rare step of obtaining a court order to reveal virtually all the evidence that was considered. Judge Carolyn Whittington has agreed to grant the request, said Paul Fox, the court administrator.
If there is such a distribution, it might occur immediately. The names of some witnesses and graphic photos of the crime scene and autopsy are expected to be left out.
If there is such a distribution, it might occur immediately. The names of some witnesses and graphic photos of the crime scene and autopsy are expected to be left out.
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/michael-brown-grand-jury-to-reconvene-monday/article_50f64d32-d355-5386-86ec-2b58c23508e6.html
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)16. Bloomberg news report:
What Happened in Ferguson? Prosecutor's Pledge to Release Evidence Tempered by Court Review
By Tim Bross Nov 23, 2014 9:33 AM PT
Evidence before the Missouri grand jury reviewing the Ferguson police shooting wont be released unless approved by a judge, a court spokesman said after local prosecutors pledged to do so if no indictment is forthcoming.
Paul Fox, director of judicial administration for St. Louis County, denied a press report that a state judge had pre-approved the release of grand jury evidence in the event no charges are brought in the August shooting of Michael Brown, an unarmed 18-year-old, by police officer Darren Wilson.
If an indictment is handed up by the 12-member grand jury meeting in the St. Louis suburb of Clayton, Judge Carolyn Whittington will review requests to disclose grand jury evidence, Fox said.
If the grand jury returns a no true bill, the judge anticipates the court will receive requests for grand jury records, Fox said. Some of those requests will require the court to analyze the need for maintaining secrecy of the records with the need for public disclosure.
...
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-11-23/ferguson-grand-jury-shooting-evidence-may-not-be-released.html
By Tim Bross Nov 23, 2014 9:33 AM PT
Evidence before the Missouri grand jury reviewing the Ferguson police shooting wont be released unless approved by a judge, a court spokesman said after local prosecutors pledged to do so if no indictment is forthcoming.
Paul Fox, director of judicial administration for St. Louis County, denied a press report that a state judge had pre-approved the release of grand jury evidence in the event no charges are brought in the August shooting of Michael Brown, an unarmed 18-year-old, by police officer Darren Wilson.
If an indictment is handed up by the 12-member grand jury meeting in the St. Louis suburb of Clayton, Judge Carolyn Whittington will review requests to disclose grand jury evidence, Fox said.
If the grand jury returns a no true bill, the judge anticipates the court will receive requests for grand jury records, Fox said. Some of those requests will require the court to analyze the need for maintaining secrecy of the records with the need for public disclosure.
...
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-11-23/ferguson-grand-jury-shooting-evidence-may-not-be-released.html
aquart
(69,014 posts)20. This really means they won't release Wilson's testimony, doesn't it?
That must be some bullshit craptastic explanation he gave.
Ykcutnek
(1,305 posts)17. I'm not a conspiracy theorist by any stretch of the imagination.
But the fix is in.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)21. Well you are a conspiracy theorist on this issue.