Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Bortman33

(102 posts)
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:07 AM Dec 2014

The alerting and jury system at DU sucks and could use

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by cyberswede (a host of the General Discussion forum).

a real overhaul. Some people base their alerts on shallow, non-researched, gut based opinions and/or their own personal biases and many jurors, in turn, base their votes on shallow, factious, non-researched, and/or biased decision making. Follow my story below and you'll see exactly what I mean. Or hell, just alert on me and get me banned from DU for life.

I had a comment alerted on and juroryed with the results being a 4-3 "Hide" because of two things:

1) The display of the copyrighted term "Vaginal Vampire", Registration # TX7-576-293 and;
2) A picture that depicts a gop mascot called a "GOP Rape-UgliCONasaurous", as presented at the end of this thread along with some other picentaties of real life “Vaginal Vampires” and “VagHags.” (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Picentary)

Here is the statement by the alerter:

“"Vaginal Vampire" Need I say more?”

Here are the explanations by two of the four jurors who voted to hide my comment and also did what really should be a requirement to be on a jury, they made the effort to explain their votes (the remaining two of four offered no explanation):

1) Explanation: “I admit I don't get the posters intent. However there no time rape is suitable as an element of humor.”
2) Explanation: “HOF needs to take a break. Hide.”

Let’s first discuss the explanations of the two jurors who voted to hide my comment before we analyze the alerter’s short and sanctimonious reason for the alert.

1) This juror starts out with an honest statement, “I don’t understand the poster’s intent” but then immediately moves to a conclusion that “the poster is trying to make rape funny.” Let’s see, by employing some very basic logic skills, one might ask, if you don’t understand it, how can you possibly think that this was an attempt to make the subject of rape humorous? Did you find the web-site “VaginalVampire.com” to be a “Comedy” site? Or did you even view the site before you voted? If you did view the site you might have seen how it points out that “Vaginal Vampires” are constantly working on “the defining down of the violent crime of rape” which, by no stretch of the imagination, could be viewed as anything but drop dead serious. It’s too bad you couldn’t ask my daughter, son or wife how fucking serious I am about the crime of rape and the gop’s “War on Women.” Since you can’t, you could go to VaginalVampire.com and read the first page, then come back with your tail between your legs and apologize about how wrong your interpretation of the picentary I posted was.
2) This juror’s reasoning for hiding my comment really threw me for a loop. What the fuck is “HOF” I asked myself? After 15 minutes searching and reading 50 different Google hits and coming up empty, I went back and searched on DU. Well what do you know, I was a member of a secret and hidden sub-group on DU called “House of Feminism.” As a man who has spent the last 30 years of his life in the construction industry, to end up a verbally assaulted victim of a misogynist who voted to have me hidden for a picentary on a blog, is something I never ever saw coming. Yo, all you at HOF, if you really exist, don’t hesitate to ask for support or add me to you secret group if it any way supports the “War on” the “War on Women.”
The obvious conclusions here, based on the jurors’ own explanations, is that we are dealing with shallow, biased, under researched, and uninformed people who are showing piss poor reasoning and research skills when given the power of being on a jury.

Here are the “Leave It Alone” vote explanations:

1) Explanation: “This is in reference to how the GOP thinks. I don't see a problem with it.”
2) Explanation: “Did you look up the site? "Vaginal Vampire" is a term used to rip RWers who are attempting to control women.
Plus... why the alert now, 3 weeks later? Just curious...”
3) Explanation: “I mostly got a lot of html garbage. What's upsetting about Vaginal Vampire, btw? I confess I have no idea what it is supposed to mean. In fact, I didn't understand the whole post.”

Quite a contrast in the explanations between the “Hide” and “Leave It” jurors. To the “Leave It” group let me just say Thank You for those who researched and understood the point I was making or didn’t understand it yet didn’t vote a “Hide” on something because they lacked information needed to make that decision. Either choice is to be commended and all jurors that left an explanation on their vote deserve a slap on the back for going the extra mile. My thanks to all five of you.

Here are my votes and responses from my four forays into jury duty:

1) Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE (0-7 Leave It)
Explanation: You can never lose with too much debate but you do lose when one artificially shuts it down.
2) Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT (7-0 Hide)
Explanation: yea, looks like a spam bot. hide and delete the poster.
3) Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE (4-3 Leave It)
Explanation: Sticks and stones, now let's get after the real problems we face from the real asses that are destroying everything that liberals and progressives stand for!
4) Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE (4-3 Leave It)
Explanation: I'm not big on censoring anyone, because when someone is as decrepit as lucky presents himself here, he would be allowed to continue posting without this record of evidence to his stupidity being available for others to see. Or, who knows, maybe he just did a terrible Onion parody. I'm hoping for the parody because it would be a shame to think someone this callus had escaped from faux noise!

Now let’s review the alerter's alert:

Yes, you do need to say more, like what offends you about the copyrighted term “Vaginal Vampire” for a start? Is it a disgusting group of words? You bet it is. Read the goddamn definition and then try to come up with a more vile and contemptible word or group of words to describe the peoples that want to control and subjugate the lives of all women and children.

The only thing that comes to my mind is the VVS, which is the acronym for the “Values Voter Summit”, or as I would call it, the “Vaginal Vampire Symposium.” Though symposium neatly backs into the VVS acronym, the correct term to use when referencing a group of two or more “Vaginal Vampires”, “VagHags”, or a combination of the two, would be a “Vaggle.”

Here are a couple more terms that you can also alert on, but you might want to find out what they mean first. I have put links to their “Urban Dictionary” definitions for you to easily locate them so that you can be informed ahead of your next shallow alert. Because the “Urban Dictionary” is awash in juvenile, misogynist, and rancid definitions you should note that the following list of words are only referencing the #1 definition at each link. Feel free to give each a thumbs up if you like them, but even if you don’t, be sure to give a thumbs down to the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th word definitions thereby doing your small part to counter the misogynist asses that came up with them. By the way alerter, you may find the use of the term “VagVamp” more to your liking. Also, my apologies to my LGBT friends for the play off the old term “FagHag” in the number two link and definition below.

1) “VagVamp” http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=VagVamp
2) “VagHag” http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=VagHag
3) “Vaggle” http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Vaggle
4) and of course “VaginalVampire” http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Vaginal+Vampire

A quick bit of history on our choice for and the construction of a definition for the term “Vaginal Vampire.”

Back in the Winter of 2011, shortly after the CONservatives and rethugliCONs had taken over the US House and many state houses, they began their verbal and legislative attacks on aid to the poor, the ADA, food stamps, and any other social program in site. Their “War on Women”, depicted through their attacks on abortion rights and contraception, came roaring back with a vengeance. My wife, a degreed English teacher, my daughter, a senior in college majoring in English and journalism, and myself, were sitting in the living room discussing the catastrophe that this group of sociopaths were trying to unleash on society.

During that discussion, the point was made how CONservatives and rethugliCONs seem to thrive electorally by going after the weakest and least represented members of society. Someone mentioned how they sounded like vampires of lore who preyed on and controlled young women and drank the blood of the young and the outcasts of society, the people that no one would ever miss. From that discussion coupled with a few toddies, the term “Vaginal Vampire” was born because it seemed to best fit the rhetoric and activities of that right wing “War on Women” movement. What I thought was the really great part of the term “Vaginal Vampire” was the fact that no CONservative or rethugliCON would ever try to co-op it. As a matter of fact, I didn’t believe then, and don’t believe now, that you will ever, not even in a million years, hear a CONservative or rethugliCON utter the word “Vagina”, much less “Vaginal Vampire.”

From there we spent a few days honing the final definition and in January of 2011, my daughter, with input from my wife and myself, created the web-site, VaginalVampire.com. Unfortunately, we are all caught up in the ongoing race of life that makes it next to impossible to grow and update the site. Any one interested in helping to improve, up date, or expand it, send me a note. Another great idea would be an app that had an assortment of different fang types so that it would be easy for users to mark and exchange pictures of the “Vaginal Vampires” and “VagHags” amongst us so they can no longer hide in their long shadows of deceit and propaganda.

When my daughter went back for her final semester in her Div III, she found the time to post a partial definition of “Vaginal Vampire” at the Urban Dictionary. Growth at the location has been strictly through word of mouth and my occasional postings on comments at different blogs.

From there we applied to the US copyright office for a copyright and received that copyright registration in June of 2012.

And finally, we are quite proud that “Vaginal Vampire” has become the most reprehensible definition of the most vile and despicable creatures in our political process and on the “Urban Dictionary.” Two of the most beautiful, caring, and intelligent women I know put a great deal of time and energy into the construction of this definition. I take it as a personal insult to them when someone just brushes it aside with a vapid statement like “Vaginal Vampire, need I say more!”

Here is the full, unabridged, and copyrighted definition of "Vaginal Vampire", which is also located at VaginalVampire.com:

Vaginal Vampire – (VagVamp – slang, link, label)

Any person, group of people, or organization that through their speech, writings, and/or actions are implicitly attempting to control, direct, and/or subjugate a woman’s inherent rights to the control of her body, her mind, her sexuality, and medical choices made between her and her doctor. Most of these Vaginal Vampire attacks are veiled in authoritarian religious dogma and conservative political rhetoric in an attempt to steal and control the power of the Womb and/ or Woman. This is accomplished through the demonizing of birth control, abortion, Planned Parenthood, the dumbing down and/or elimination of sexual education, the defining down of the violent crime of rape, the propagation of abstinence only, and the theft of a women’s rights of equality. The tactics employed to accomplish these goals run the gamut from intimidation, fear, propaganda, terror, violence, and murder/assassination.

As with imaginary vampires, these Vaginal Vampires gain their power, wealth, notoriety, and prestige among their peers and the media by employing deceit, propaganda, and out right lies to suck the lifeblood from women who are making their own religious, moral, and heart wrenching decisions based on their individual medical and health circumstances.

VagVamp’s consider no measure of action to be too vile or contemptible, not even terrorism or murder, to attain their most reprehensible ends. It also appears that those most concerned with a woman’s womb are way at the back of the pack in the caring and support after that child is born. This manifests itself in their unrelenting promotion of the cutting of early child health care, pre-natal care, head start, education, Planned Parenthood, and food programs, just to mention a few.

And my commentary from the same site:

Definition Above, Commentary Below

As a man who will never ever be in the situation of having an abortion, it really seems that this might be better handled as a Women's issue for women to resolve.

Find below a link to a list of these Vaginal Vampire organizations, a link to their disgusting statements, and a link to proposed and enacted legislative bills.

Please don’t hesitate to define any of these sites with the VagVamp link in their comment or discussion sections or e-mail us info on a person, organization, statement, or bill that should be added to the list. We will forward them notification that they have been officially nominated as a Class FU Vaginal Vampire.

It is time to bring these f…ing slimy excuses for human beings into the light, one of the two sure methods of destroying their evil Vaginal Vampire souls. The most unfortunate component of this educational exercise is that too many people will wear the label of Vaginal Vampire with some sort of perverted pride.

(A person’s religious faith and beliefs can be sustenance to their own life if they choose, but that faith has to be theirs, not mine.)















23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The alerting and jury system at DU sucks and could use (Original Post) Bortman33 Dec 2014 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2014 #1
Deleting above post before it can be hidden. You can't call out cyber bullying on DU! nt ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2014 #3
That was a strange one. Downwinder Dec 2014 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2014 #11
Speaking of that, I've had that happen to me as well. AverageJoe90 Dec 2014 #15
Should have a right to confront your accuser. That used to be Downwinder Dec 2014 #16
The person who alerts a post should be identified in the alert itself. nt ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2014 #18
+ Downwinder Dec 2014 #20
Meta. Also, wtf? Hekate Dec 2014 #2
I'm with you shenmue Dec 2014 #4
another WTF? from me etherealtruth Dec 2014 #7
Seriously. That's a helluva lot of analysis... WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2014 #19
In before the hide...and just YUCK! JimDandy Dec 2014 #5
I do not know you. I do not know your hide. And no interest trying to figure this shit out. BUT seabeyond Dec 2014 #6
confused but, I think he/she may actually be For Feminism and for HoF. However, like you, I have no Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2014 #13
My eyes started bleeding a quarter of the way in... ScreamingMeemie Dec 2014 #23
I'm sorry, but where was the pile on? AverageJoe90 Dec 2014 #14
Wtf? zappaman Dec 2014 #8
Sorry that shit happened to you, btw. AverageJoe90 Dec 2014 #10
. ucrdem Dec 2014 #12
I rarely vote to hide. tavernier Dec 2014 #17
Locking. cyberswede Dec 2014 #21
I can't see the original post GitRDun Dec 2014 #22

Response to Bortman33 (Original post)

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
3. Deleting above post before it can be hidden. You can't call out cyber bullying on DU! nt
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:14 AM
Dec 2014

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
9. That was a strange one.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:21 AM
Dec 2014

Guess they should also have hidden all of your supporters.

Response to Downwinder (Reply #9)

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
15. Speaking of that, I've had that happen to me as well.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:25 AM
Dec 2014

And believe me, hasn't always been easy. I've ignored most of the worst offenders by now, though. Makes my experience a little better, for sure.

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
16. Should have a right to confront your accuser. That used to be
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:25 AM
Dec 2014

an American way.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
18. The person who alerts a post should be identified in the alert itself. nt
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:29 AM
Dec 2014

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
20. +
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:31 AM
Dec 2014

Hekate

(90,674 posts)
2. Meta. Also, wtf?
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:13 AM
Dec 2014

shenmue

(38,506 posts)
4. I'm with you
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:16 AM
Dec 2014

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
7. another WTF? from me
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:20 AM
Dec 2014

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
19. Seriously. That's a helluva lot of analysis...
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:30 AM
Dec 2014

for one stinkin' hide. Is nothing else going on in the world?

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
5. In before the hide...and just YUCK!
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:16 AM
Dec 2014
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
6. I do not know you. I do not know your hide. And no interest trying to figure this shit out. BUT
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:19 AM
Dec 2014

Hof is a feminist group on du. History of feminism. The juror that mouthed off about hof has no idea who alerted but was merely throwing a jab at our group. It is done often. It is stupid. You basically went along, without any more info than the juror had.

So while you gripe about the hide being unjust, maybe you ought to consider your pile on of a group on du without any knowledge as being a tad... Oh wtf? ... Equally unjust.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
13. confused but, I think he/she may actually be For Feminism and for HoF. However, like you, I have no
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:23 AM
Dec 2014

desire to try and figure out all this mess of an OP.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
23. My eyes started bleeding a quarter of the way in...
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:34 AM
Dec 2014

Also, HI!

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
14. I'm sorry, but where was the pile on?
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:24 AM
Dec 2014

2) This juror’s reasoning for hiding my comment really threw me for a loop. What the fuck is “HOF” I asked myself? After 15 minutes searching and reading 50 different Google hits and coming up empty, I went back and searched on DU. Well what do you know, I was a member of a secret and hidden sub-group on DU called “House of Feminism.” As a man who has spent the last 30 years of his life in the construction industry, to end up a verbally assaulted victim of a misogynist who voted to have me hidden for a picentary on a blog, is something I never ever saw coming. Yo, all you at HOF, if you really exist, don’t hesitate to ask for support or add me to you secret group if it any way supports the “War on” the “War on Women.”


In fact, hardly a pile on at all. I realize it was a huge wall of text, so maybe you just missed it on first glance, but that last sentence definitely clinched it for me.....

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
8. Wtf?
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:20 AM
Dec 2014

Thanks for the entertainment I suppose...

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
10. Sorry that shit happened to you, btw.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:21 AM
Dec 2014

Some folks just don't fuckin' get it.....and, btw, I've been the victim of a fair number of bogus hides(and hide attempts) myself, so I feel you, man.

You honestly seem like one of the good ones, so don't let a few bad hides done out of poor judgment on the alerters' part get you down! I haven't let it happen to me, either.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
12. .
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:22 AM
Dec 2014

"LOL"


"What she said"

tavernier

(12,388 posts)
17. I rarely vote to hide.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:27 AM
Dec 2014

I don't know why a spirited discussion is a bad thing, even if a troll is involved. My eyes don't bleed when I read an opinion that is opposite of mine. But I won't tolerate humiliating or insulting personal remarks.

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
21. Locking.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:33 AM
Dec 2014

See the Statement of Purpose for GD.

GitRDun

(1,846 posts)
22. I can't see the original post
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:34 AM
Dec 2014

I've served on many juries and a large majority of the time, my vote is with the majority opinion.

“"Vaginal Vampire" Need I say more?” strikes me at first blush as somewhat of a knee jerk negative reaction to your post. Looking at the actual post would tell me if it was proper. IMHO, if the term refers to anti-women RWers, and not something negative towards women, I would have voted to leave it.

The reason I used the term "knee jerk" is it seems to me whenever the topic is something that is both highly sensitive and relates to issues about feminism, rape culture, etc. the threads are littered with highly charged rhetoric.

I generally avoid these discussions. There always seems to be an emotional component that prevents a rational discussion. In the end, what I am saying is that possibly something in your post (or just the words Vaginal Vampire) were enough to set off an emotional response. That doesn't make it correct. That's just the world you are posting in.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The alerting and jury sys...