General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFed Delays Volcker Rule, Giving Wall Street Another Holiday Gift - HuffPo
Fed Delays Volcker Rule, Giving Wall Street Another Holiday GiftZach Carter - HuffPo
Posted: 12/18/2014 6:36 pm EST Updated: 12/18/2014 8:59 pm EST
<snip>
WASHINGTON -- Christmas came early for Wall Street this year. The Federal Reserve on Thursday granted banks an extra year to comply with a key provision of the Volcker Rule, a move that gives financial lobbyists more time to kill the new regulation before it goes into effect.
The Volcker Rule is a key element of the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law that bans banks from engaging in proprietary trading -- speculative deals that are designed only to benefit the bank itself, rather than its clients. Thursday's move by the Fed gives banks an additional year to unwind investments in private equity firms, hedge funds and specialty securities projects. The central bank also said it plans to extend the deadline by another 12 months next year, which would give Wall Street a two-year reprieve through the 2016 presidential election.
The Fed's delay comes less than a week after Congress granted Wall Street a reprieve from another reform that had been mandated by the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law. The measure, known as the swaps push-out rule had eliminated federal subsidies for trading in risky derivatives -- the complex contracts at the heart of the 2008 banking meltdown. Bank watchdogs say the Volcker Rule delay adds insult to injury.
"Swaps pushout was a club," said Marcus Stanley, policy director for Americans for Financial Reform. "This is a stiletto."
Big banks including Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have billions of dollars invested in private equity firms that they would have to sell at a loss based on current prices, according to a Bloomberg report from early December. Dodd-Frank gave banks four years to unwind their investments in speculative enterprises, setting a deadline of July 21, 2014. The Fed had previously extended that deadline by one year, and now plans to push it out to July 2017.
"The Street has had years of notice to unwind these investments, and it appears that their self-serving complaints have been accepted fairly uncritically without a real analysis for the basis of the claim," said Dennis Kelleher, president and CEO of Better Markets, a financial reform advocacy group. "If you can't get out of a trade in seven years, it's probably not the kind of trade you should be doing."
<snip>
More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/18/volcker-rule-federal-reserve_n_6351190.html
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Because its being dismantled & ripped to shreds by big banks, aka our government. Do you think Barney Frank realized this while they were working so hard to get it right? I don't. I think he believed in it & believed in people doing the right thing for the greater good. They spit on him with every rip into Dodd-Frank.
They are laughing at us.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)they only use the force of law -- with an emphasis on force -- to control the people. We are little more than economic units meant to serve the elite whether they reside in boardrooms or parliaments.
librechik
(30,957 posts)not the "not enough Democratic votes" problem. The problem where no amount of votes ever gets the elite to respond to our problems instead of their insatiable need for need for profit and power.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2014/10/18/vote-all-you-want-the-secret-government-won-change/jVSkXrENQlu8vNcBfMn9sL/story.html?event=event25
fredamae
(4,458 posts)xchrom
(108,903 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)I thought....Something is Up.
The Wall Street "Too Big to Fail...Too Big to Jail" are probably up to something again. They reached too far in their Crookery and are trying to avoid another meltdown. So.....Dodd Frank has to be not only delayed but taken out bit by bit to extend the the timing of the next crash. If there is a crash it will be on Obama's watch and Jeb will be the perfect one to sort it all out when he is elected. Or, perhaps they feel Hillary will also be a good person to hand the next disaster to.
TPP/TPIP and MORE....coming because "Free Trade" will be the next bargain when the Western World suffers through another Banking Disaster and Eurozone and the Rest finally get rid of their Social Programs, Pensions and the last of their workers Labor agreements. We are already well on our way here in the USA...we just have SS, Medicare and Medicaid left to dismantle.
Sorry for the Doom and Gloom..but, Diamon lobbying Congress smacked of Henry Paulson on bended knee begging Pelosi to help bail out the Banks. back in 2008.
Let's hope that this scenario doesn't repeat. But, I'm not going to bet on that...
dixiegrrrrl
(60,157 posts)Nov. 16th...the G-20 got together and signed an agreement, which is called
" Adequacy of Loss-Absorbing Capacity of Global Systemically Important Banks in Resolution,
In English, "Resolution" is now bank speak for bankruptcy.
That includes not only depositors, public and private, but the pension funds that are the target market for the latest bail-in play, called bail-inable bonds.
Bail in has been sold as avoiding future government bailouts and eliminating too big to fail (TBTF). But it actually institutionalizes TBTF, since the big banks are kept in business by expropriating the funds of their creditors.
Dec 12th: Congress passes the Budget bill, in which banks are allowed to stick their derivatives (bets) into FDIC insured accounts, banks become the priority for FDIC rescue funds.
But.....look at this chart,:US Deposits In Perspective: $25 Billion In Insurance, $9,283 Billion In Deposits; $297,514 Billion In Derivatives
?w=952
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-03-19/us-deposits-perspective-25-billion-insurance-9283-billion-deposits-297514-billion-de
Details, in plain English, at links.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Kermitt Gribble
(1,855 posts)that we didn't have to worry about the swaps push-out in the CRomnibus because the Volcker rule essentially provided the same protections?
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)given this kind of consideration? Never. That's when.
No taxation without representation.