Cops Would Be Liable Arresting Citizens For Recording Under Approved Conn. Bill

[Fire Walk With Me]

http://www.pixiq.com/article/connecticut-senate-approves-bill

April 21, 2012 @ 8:04PM

Senate Bill 245, which was introduced by Democratic Senator Eric Coleman and approved by a co-partisan margin of 42-11, must now go before the House.

The bill, which would go into effect on October 1, 2012, states the following:

This bill makes peace officers potentially liable for damages for interfering with a person taking a photograph, digital still, or video image of either the officer or a colleague performing his or her job duties. Under the bill, officers cannot be found liable if they reasonably believed that the interference was necessary to (1) lawfully enforce a criminal law or municipal ordinance; (2) protect public safety; (3) preserve the integrity of a crime scene or criminal investigation; (4) safeguard the privacy of a crime victim or other person; or (5) enforce Judicial Branch rules and policies that limit taking photographs, videotaping, or otherwise recording images in branch facilities.

Officers found liable of this offense are entitled, under existing law, to indemnification (repayment) from their state or municipal employer if they were acting within their scope of authority and the conduct was not willful, wanton, or reckless.

snip

“I do believe that the public has a right, if they’re not in the way of a police officer doing their job, of filming all they want,” he said.

[intaglio]

1. sounds good but ...

There is so much "wiggle room" that law enforcement will just ignore it.

Examples - "lawfully enforce a criminal law or municipal ordinance"; "protect public safety" and the killer "safeguard the privacy of a crime victim or other person" emphasis added.

[Meiko]

2. I agree

pretty vague huh?

[Selatius]

3. As it stands, "public safety" has been used as an excuse to flush out Zucotti Park of protesters.

I remain somewhat nervous about that word usage and the usage of "other person" in point four.

[AnotherMcIntosh]

4. "What the big print giveth, the small print taketh away."

Phrase originated by someone other than me.

[julian09]

5. Useless, too many holes to use as escape from enforcement especially 4 and 5.

If they are in public, seems they are fair game to be recorded or taped. They are seeking to eliminate evidence of abuse of power.