Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
Sat Dec 27, 2014, 12:57 AM Dec 2014

Guilty - woman took terminally ill neighbors dog & had him euthanized

http://m.wtae.com/news/verdict-in-for-woman-who-stole-and-euthanized-terminally-ill-mans-dog/30405450

"I'm thrilled to death. Got Christmas a day late," said Thor's owner, Mark Boehler. "Thank you people of the jury."

Gisele Paris testified that she found the dog named Thor in her Spring Hill neighborhood. She claimed she took the dog home, cleaned him up and dressed a wound, then took him to the Animal Rescue League. When no one claimed him, she took the dog back, she said.

Thor was not well and not eating, so she fed the dog a special diet of rice and chicken, Paris testified. She told jurors that the dog was deteriorating. Thor was euthanized by a veterinarian.

"No matter how misguided you think she is, she doesn't find herself in this position if she didn't care about a sick dog," said Paris' lawyer, Robert Mielnicki. "In the end, I don't think the jury was able to get over the fact that Gisele herself admitted that at least a period of time before the dog was euthanized, she sort of knew whose dog it was."

Prosecutors pointed out that Paris was told by police and vets that Thor belonged to someone else, but she still did not contact Boehler, who said he is terminally ill with esophageal cancer.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guilty - woman took terminally ill neighbors dog & had him euthanized (Original Post) Liberal_in_LA Dec 2014 OP
There are some real sick people in the world. Jesus Malverde Dec 2014 #1
Why did the vet sgree to do this? 840high Dec 2014 #2
The dog was clearly suffering Warpy Dec 2014 #3
the title doesn't read well. the owner had cancer , NOT the dog. maximillian1974 Dec 2014 #4
Dog did not have cancer. 840high Dec 2014 #5
Bizarre story - TBF Dec 2014 #6

Warpy

(111,141 posts)
3. The dog was clearly suffering
Sat Dec 27, 2014, 03:06 AM
Dec 2014

because diet doesn't cure cancer.

I'm just wondering why the original owner didn't have the cops just return the dog to him.

Whether or not the outcome would have been any different is not up for debate. With that kind of cancer, it was a matter of time.

TBF

(32,004 posts)
6. Bizarre story -
Sat Dec 27, 2014, 01:04 PM
Dec 2014

if the police and vets both knew the dog belonged to someone else why was this crazy lady allowed to keep and then euthanize him?

Very odd.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Guilty - woman took termi...