General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWas the 1980 film 'Blue Lagoon" child pornography?
Brooke Shields was only 14 years old in 1980. They said they used body doubles during the filming, but still the message to pedophiles was a big turn on.
Could the movie be made today?
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)It is telling, is it not, that far and away the best 2 flicks of the year were "kids movies".
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)JustAnotherGen
(38,109 posts)But didn't they do a remake a few years ago?
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)PCIntern
(28,582 posts)and was upset that you didn't know if the mother survived. I think the father was alive...but she was not moving in the boat at the end. Gave me nightmares...
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Pedophilia is attraction to prepubescent children.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Last edited Sat Dec 27, 2014, 04:08 PM - Edit history (1)
A HERETIC I AM
(24,903 posts)jakeXT
(10,575 posts)A Richard Prince exhibition has reopened at the Tate Modern museum in London without a photograph of Brooke Shields that drew the attention of the police, Bloomberg News reported. The Tate Modern was to show Mr. Princes exhibition Spiritual America as part of its program Pop Life: Art in a Material World but closed it from view after Scotland Yard warned that a photograph it included, taken of Ms. Shields in the nude when she was 10 years old, could violate obscenity laws. The picture, which was included in Spiritual America when it was shown at the Guggenheim Museum in 2007, was taken by Mr. Prince from another photograph made by Gary Gross in 1976 and authorized by Ms. Shieldss mother. In a statement, the Tate Modern said the photograph had been replaced with another of Ms. Shields as an adult, dressed in a bikini and leaning against a motorbike. The statement added that the change was made in consultation with the artist.
http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/richard-prince-exhibition-re-opens-after-brooke-shields-photo-is-replaced/?_r=0
Cirque du So-What
(29,885 posts)when she starred in Pretty Baby, which is an even more egregious example of child pornography.
dawg
(10,777 posts)I'm glad that it seems like they are less acceptable today than they were back then.
Mosby
(19,491 posts)GreenPartyVoter
(73,399 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)It was as if Hollywood was wearing their underwear on the outside of their clothes.
and they did a remake, did they not?
RoverSuswade
(641 posts)I doubt it could be made today. I bought the DVD re-release a few years ago and noticed the very explicit copulation scene between the 14-yr-old boy and the 39-yr old woman was taken out.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I remember a Brooke Shields scene at a younger age showing the result of what her body felt like after her first John.
I'm just saying
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)It's vaguely creepy enough when Tom Hanks has sex with Elizabeth Perkins in "Big", because the audience knows he's actually 12 in there.
My wife and I were just watching that again on HBO Go, and we were both like, "man, they could never make that today"
spanone
(142,059 posts)the backlash from the 60's is evil.
hexola
(4,835 posts)A similar thought I've had...
Rex
(65,616 posts)When has that ever stopped snuff films and pornos from making a buck or two?
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.