Oh noes! MSNBC, what have you done!

[procon]

Michael Steele, formerC hairman of the Republican National Committee, is subbing for Chris Matthews. What have they done with Luke Russert?

[JaneyVee]

1. Not much difference between Steele and Matthews anyway.

[kentuck]

2. They are putting their toe in the water...

...just to see what kind of rating a conservative might get?

[doc03]

3. You may be right. I can't stand Mattews anyway.

[Rhiannon12866]

4. I was wondering if anyone else was noticing, LOL

Michael Steele is often on as a "contributor," so I don't think we'll see much of a difference.

[valerief]

5. Does Luke have a son yet that's reporting for MSNBC? nt

[JHB]

11. Naw, the kid just writes his lines...

Oh, wait, he doesn't have a kid? Then the only other explanation would be...

[valerief]

12. Well, you know, since NBC bases their hires on DNA rather than talent, I just figured...

[csziggy]

6. My husband came in and said that Tweety had gotten a suntan!

I was watching re-runs of Castle since I detest Chris Matthews.

[bravenak]

7. Barely noticed the difference.

[AngryAmish]

8. Remember, msnbc is owned by Comcast, the sleaziest company in the US.

If you watch msnbc you should take a shower afterward.

[Fred Sanders]

9. Better than after watching Fox where you have to go through level 5 hazmat decontamination.

[AngryAmish]

10. and an irrigation...

[Proud Liberal Dem]

13. This is why

I can't take anybody who says that MSNBC is a "liberal Fox News" seriously

[Vinca]

14. I'm no fan of Michael Steele,but when I realized Tweety was off it was like getting another present.

[BumRushDaShow]

15. ^^THIS^^

In the old days, Smerconish used to sub for Tweety but I noticed a couple months ago that Smerconish has a show on CNN now (something that apparently happened last spring).

[jwirr]

16. That won't bother my schedule - I won't watch either of them.