Press Release: Status of HAAS v ROMNEY Racketeering litigation in 9th Circuit

[laserhaas]

PRESS RELEASE

STATUS – RICO Litigation – HAAS v ROMNEY #14-55784 Ninth Circuit

By Collateral Logistics, Inc., (“CLI”)
CEO Steven (“Laser”) Haas ([e-mail])
December 30, 2014

Los Angeles – Steven (“Laser”) Haas, did put forth On October 18, 2013, a cause of action in Los Angeles Central District Court (case #2:13-cv-7738) alleging Racketeering violations by Mitt Romney, Bain Capital, and plethora of apparent cronies/ cohorts and Goldman Sachs along with Paul Traub (attorney and former partner of Ponzi convicted Tom Petters and also law firm partner of Fraudster Marc Dreier).

Nature of Proceedings Current

After Romney lost the election in 2012, a hearing transpired in the Delaware Bankruptcy Court, by former Chief Justice Mary F. Walrath, of the eToys.com case (DE Bankr. 01-706). At that time, informed of homicides and corruption issues not previously addressed, the judge permanently banned Laser Haas from seeking grievance amends; which freed up the pursuer of justice from that jurisdiction.

When the racketeering case was filed in Los Angeles Central District, before Honorable Stephen V. Wilson, Ropes & Gray for Romney, Michael Glazer and Bain sought to be precluded by statute of limitations.

Additionally, Goldman Sachs, its Delaware counsel MNAT, an attorney partner thereof (Greg Werkheiser) along with eToys CEO Barry Gold sought to be precluded under a 130 year old case “Barton doctrine”.

His Honor Judge Wilson, stipulating he read all the filings granted both those requests, ruled Haas was frivolous and denied his appeal.

Though the 9th Circuit (case 14-55784) initially also rejected HAAS’s filings; it did grant permission to pay $505 filing fee and Ordered a Show of Cause Response as to why the case should not be closed.

Laser paid and filed a timely response, along with a Motion about Frauds on the Court and denial of due process. A subsequent ruling that the case is “insubstantial” compelled Laser Haas to file his “Request” for an entire court rehearing on “substantial” issues.

Currently, a decision on the “Request” is still pending.

Goldman Sachs Tapes Senate Hearing

Litigant Haas submitted a letter to the Senate’s “Goldman Sachs Tapes” Hearing that occurred on November 15, 2014. Senator’s Warren, Brown and Sanders were the primary recipients of that correspondence.

[br][hr][br]

This is a link to the PDF of the Press Release



http://petters-fraud.com/press_release_dec30_2014_haas_v_romney_status.pdf

[belzabubba333]

1. excellent thanks forkeeping us posted

[laserhaas]

2. U R Welcome! Please stay tuned.

There's a reason for the seasons;

and noteworthy items coming

[laserhaas]

3. Google Romney RICO or Romney fraud

If you Google him n RICO..this case shows up at he top

However

If you do his name and fraud...

Voter fraud issues loom large

Can you say retroactivity.....

[laserhaas]

4. Ha Ha, TnHall watching Mittmentum

As if we don't already have enough names for

Marooney

Pitten,s

MitTwit

RMoney


Rico boss

[QuestionableC]

5. K&R for the most important issue of this generation

[laserhaas]

6. Thanks 'QuestionableC'

Most don't care to know

What I Know!

[laserhaas]

7. Fire Dog Lake writes an eToys "infinity" commentary

Wish this had occurred last weekend; as it would have been talked about much during "toy" times. My fault (I guess) because I did a year end summary a week too late.

When we tried to trial Romney in Los Angeles federal court, it received over 2 million web views and more than 200,000 Facebooks, Twitter's etc. This is telltale of the desire of the people - that Wall Street fraudsters be held accountable.

But no one, not even this good piece by FDL, can tell the whole story, until a judge or fed agent does their job.

And therein lies my dilemma; how does one task fed authorities - to do the right thing;
when the ones doing the wrong things - are Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital

and POTUS wannabe - Mitt Romney?

See this morning's item by FDL titled "The Unending eToys.com Bankruptcy"
[br]

Though it technically went bankrupt in 2001, the online retail company eToys.com has weaved in and out of the news for over a decade. The news is never good and today is no different as a previous trustee in the bankruptcy case is making public accusations of impropriety and double dealing by those managing the eToys bankruptcy process. A process that, amazingly, only recently ended

.

If no one else does a thread on it,
I'll do one over the weekend.