General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary Will Be the Democratic Nominee for the Presidency in 2016
(Newb deliberately posting late at night so as to avoid eviscerative flaming. Just for the record. On the off-chance that some Whiteglove hasn't gotten me booted in the interim, I will kick this on the night of Secretary Clinton's acceptance speech at the convention. She has the money, the party establishment, and Bubba behind her. And although I'd love to teleport Sanders directly into the Oval Office, neither he nor Warren has the charisma that propelled Obama to Denver---and then DC---in 2008. Hillary Rodham Clinton will be the next President of the United States, like it or not.)
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)My poop will be smelly in the morning.
Like it or not.
Pretty much.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,852 posts)A healthy elimination should be practically odorless.
riversedge
(80,811 posts)decides to run. I do hope we have a primary. It would be good for the Dem. Party and the country to know her and others positions.
marmar
(79,741 posts)She comes across as stiff and pre-programmed a politician as there is.
Control-Z
(15,686 posts)Warren or Sanders would need that something extra, like President Obama had, to overcome Hillary's well established standing.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)She was Republican until late adulthood. She got elected to the senate after much cajoling by the Democrats.
she will not. 24 hours is an eternity in politics.
It is a long, long way to the nomination.
You may be right, you may be wrong... time will tell.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)makes it pretty obvious that even her supporters aren't real supportive of Clinton. if you have to attempt to browbeat people into accepting a not-yet-declared candidate, this early in the season... you're backing someone who can't win.
LuvNewcastle
(17,821 posts)joshcryer
(62,536 posts)We're a year away from the primaries. The next candidate must announce in 6 months, minimum. Period.
WhiteAndNerdy
(365 posts)joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Add it to your journal, I've done so with several predictions of this magnitude.
HRC will be the next Democratic Nominee for President.
Prophet 451
(9,796 posts)which she might not. Granted, I think she'll run but she could always decide against it. I think that, if she runs, she'll be the nominee. Whether she would win a general is where my Magic 8-Ball goes fuzzy.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Though I decline to predict that she will win the nomination at this point.
Gman
(24,780 posts)He gave a great keynote address at the convention. His star continued to rise after that. And at that time everybody knew Hillary was running in 08.
Nobody in the last 6 years has made any attempt to emerge as a leader and potential candidate to challenge Hillary. Everyone knows she's running in 16. It will be Hillary.
And she will win in November.
Autumn
(48,962 posts)her into the White House. Problem is she offers nothing to the people who need help the most.
She may win the nomination but the president will be a republican, more than likely Jeb
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Seems absurd.
Autumn
(48,962 posts)Hillary will win the nomination but she will not win the White House. It absurd to think that she will win.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)That seems absurd, even more so.
Autumn
(48,962 posts)republicans will show up in droves. Democrats? Not so much. Your question is absurd.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Unless the Republicans have a reasonably interesting woman candidate, it won't pass muster.
Autumn
(48,962 posts)joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Autumn
(48,962 posts)brand again.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Autumn
(48,962 posts)Democrats will go third party or stay home because they won't vote for Hillary I think this has been covered and I see no reason to keep answering your same old question framed in different ways.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)They will not.
The Democrats who vote third party are irrelevant.
Autumn
(48,962 posts)F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)And that will be a very sad day for liberals. I will do everything I can to help a more progressive candidate win that nomination, because I don't think she has a chance in the general. Right-wingers will turn out in droves, riled up against the eeeeviillll Hillary Clinton (note: sarcasm). Meanwhile, Dems will lose the entire youth vote, because she and Bill haven't helped do a thing for students. She'll get torn apart in the general, and I *guarantee* she will steadily pull to the right while saying some nice sounding lefty stuff, thereby re-alienating the huge numbers of Dems that aren't voting because they're tired of neo-liberal corporate shit.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)12/3/14
Until recently, the conventional wisdom among Beltway elites was that Hillary Clinton would waltz, or at least walk unassisted, to the Democratic nomination in 2016. Now that narrative has come under attack, amid mounting evidence that Hillarys most recent quest for power has already failed.
Consider, for example, the embarrassingly sparse crowd at Georgetown University on Wednesday, where Clinton delivered a lecture on Smart Power: Security Through Inclusive Leadership.
...This is precisely the demographic Hillary will have to turn out in large numbers to be successful in 2016. Anyone who thinks she can come close to inspiring the same amount of enthusiasm among people as Barack Obama is kidding themselves. In fact, Hillary has been struggling to draw crowds of all ages.
Gov. Deval Patrick (D., Mass.) has said the sense of inevitability surrounding Hillarys candidacy is off-putting to voters. The American people view inevitability as a sense of entitlement, Patrick said on Meet The Press, and prefer candidates who make an affirmative case for themselves. The American people wantand ought to wanttheir candidates to sweat for the job, to actually make a case for why they are the right person at the right time, he said.
Meanwhile, recent polling suggests Hillarys aura of inevitability is fading. She is only slightly ahead in matchups with potential GOP challengers with much lower name recognition.
...Financial Times columnist Edward Luce recently suggested that Hillary faces a rickety bridge to the White House, in part because Democrats have remarkably little new to say about the future of Americas middle classes. Hillarys close ties to Wall Street and big corporate donors, Luce argued, will likely hinder her ability to ignite the passion of liberal voters, potentially paving the way for a populist challenger such as Elizabeth Warren....
http://freebeacon.com/blog/hillary-clinton-will-never-be-president/
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Broward
(1,976 posts)joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Her position on the IWR vote was that Bush was a liar and a war criminal, which is why she will not and can not make any apologies for said vote.
marmar
(79,741 posts)Then I'm sure she'll demand that he face the International Criminal Court right?
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Warren? Hell, has Sanders?
No?
Clinton would be the most likely person to do so. Since, you know, the whole right wing conspiracy, and all.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)themselves are superfluous.
Is this what democracy looks like?
99Forever
(14,524 posts)I guess that pleases some people. It doesn't me.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)All you need is a candidate who wants to run (eliminates Warren) and voters who want to support him/her (eliminates Sanders).
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)If she picks a VP like Sarah Palin then she could suffer a loss in the general but with the many great prospects I doubt this would happen. I know many continues to bring up the IVR vote and for a same similar reason on the other side the no votes by Warren and Sanders in the ISIS resolution will hurt them. Rove has his group trying to discourage Hillary from running because he knows the GOP does not have a candidate which can win easily against Hillary. For those who say Hillary is nit liberal enough sure do not know the records if Hillary, Warren and Sanders, Hillary and Warren is rated in the same spot and Sanders claim to Socialist is too far left for me. I am Ready for Hillary.
Like it.
And, that being the case, until it is forced down my unwilling throat at the '16 Democratic Convention, I don't accept that prediction, and I'll work like hell to make sure it doesn't happen.
If it does, I'll probably choke, regurgitate, and move on.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)yortsed snacilbuper
(7,947 posts)I think she would be a good President.