General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSuggested New Year's Resolutions For The NRA
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by SYFROYH (a host of the General Discussion forum).
1. We will stop referring to ourselves as a civil rights organization that defends human rights. It is a sacrilege to people actually killed or harmed by civil and human rights abuses.
2. We will stop pointing at Chicago and saying gun laws dont work. We will admit the majority of Chicago crime guns are trafficked from states and counties with loose laws.
3. We will stop saying the government is going to take your guns to block federal laws. The confiscation we announced 7 years ago never happened.
4. We will stop blaming mental health problems for U.S. gun violence. We admit every country in the world has mental health problems but they dont have Newtowns and Virginia Techs.
5. We admit fighting universal background checks arms criminals and that armed criminals sells more guns to good guys. Ka-ching.
6. We acknowledge that outlaws dont have guns in the 28 EU countries, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, Japan and other countries with strict gun regulations. We also admit, grudgingly, they are not tyrannies.
7. We will stop our insulting comparison of guns to knives, hammers, cars and swimming poolsnone of which kill when used as directed. On the same day as the Sandy Hook massacre, 20 Chinese school children were attacked with a knife and none died.
8. We accept responsibility for the armed vigilante movement popularized by George Zimmerman and Michael Dunn. We admit carry laws are the biggest revenue infusion since Obama is going to take your guns.
9. We will stop defending sales to civilians of non-defensive weapons like TrackingPoints cant miss sniper rifle. We admit they are ready-made for insurrectionists, terrorists and hate groups.
10. We regret our work to help suspected domestic abusers keep their guns while under orders of protection. We admit this costs many womens lives and that our sleazy sales pitch to tell women to arm themselves too just makes things worse.
http://gunvictimsaction.org/blog/new-years-resolutions-for-the-nra-2015/
samsingh
(18,426 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)The NRA is the one right-wing extremist organization we are not supposed to talk about in GD, there are supporters of this extremist group in our very own gungeon and they get very angry when anyone criticizes guns in GD.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)race and violence in America....with 300 million guns in America it has reached a crisis stage...if guns are best for self-defence, what do you use to defend against guns....more guns?
Look out for the thread to be locked also, but I think discussing the agenda of the NRA should be in General Discussion.
hack89
(39,181 posts)we have cut our murder rate in half (along with all violent crime) and have experienced 20 years of steadily declining gun deaths.
The crisis stage was 20 years ago at the height of the crack cocaine epidemic.
lastlib
(28,277 posts)We could cut it by 95% if we could pass some sensible gun laws.
lastlib
(28,277 posts)declaring the NRA a terrorist organization (they meet all the definitions) and just go from there.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)what is your end state, full confiscation of guns?
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)So in that case, the over 4 million members are terrorists also?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Kind of sounds like some kind of fantasy to me, but maybe the poster has some facts to post that substantiate that charge.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)They have THE strongest lobby in EVERY state whose mission is the relaxation of responsible gun ownership.
This is the same level of irresponsible buying of government, which I and others have deemed financial terrorism. These folks, of course are another set of fascists inervating the spinal column of congress. Chief among them is -
United Kingdom HSBC Holdings
United States Bank of America
United States Citigroup Inc
The NRA is nor more represented by IT'S 4 million members than the U.S is by it's 300 million Americans. Just who in the world do you think the NRA is, anyway? Surely, the lobby is in control, not responsible gun owners.
Surely, the lobby is in control of Congress, not the ever dwindling responsible voters who give up more and more each year.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)How does the NRA meet the standards of a terrorist organization?
Are the more than 4 million members therefore terrorists also?
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)This time, read for meaning, because I answered it. Alternately, you could get your eyes checked.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)the NRA is a terrorist organization?
Now, give us a real reason why, by govt. standards, the NRA meets the definition of a terrorist organization.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I am so glad he is the one to decide for all of the USA
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)than it actually is. If they did not make it out to be the boogyman, they would not generate the backlash support the NRA gets. Many NRA members simply do no agree with the legislative portion and the leaders insane comments.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Your icons are cute and over-used in this case. It's easier to cut and past a LOL icon than to actually study the splinter groups who are continually busy at writing legislation at the state level.
Case in point is a law, not penned by our general assembly in PA and other states, but by the NRA that each municipality must respond to as a result of the National Rifle Association and other groups, who would now sue local municipalities, (see Philadelphia, Gov Tom Corbett) that enact ordinances stricter than state firearms laws.
So, because of a bill, approved by a 138-56 vote in PA, each any an municipal government will be sued if they choose to have strong firearm protection laws. This granted legal standing to "membership organizations" to sue over local gun laws, and collect legal fees and other costs if they win.
Now, give me a real reason why this isn't an act of terrorism against local communities who wish to reduce needless deaths by guns. We're not talking duck hunting, GG
we're talking about responsible gun ownership. They take the big lobby and force these laws up our asses by right wing governors and general assemblies
state by state.
As for financial terrorism, how about what happened after Sept 2008, when the banks who were too big to fail held their gun up to the American people's head, insisting that we cough up $700 billion or all hell would break loose for the American economy.
Like I advised you earlier
Read for meaning. Alternately, you could also STFU, because I see right through what you say.
hack89
(39,181 posts)and that legislation does not meet that legal threshold?
You can't just make up your own definitions of terrorism.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)laws do not matter. Most do not even care about nomenclature of firearms parts or how a firearm works.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)laws, laws which almost every state has.
It makes sense for the state, and the state alone, to set firearms laws, why does it make sense to be legal in one area of a state, yet be illegal in another area a state?
So, I guess, by your definition of "terrorism", most of the states in the country are guilty of terrorism.
Your definition of terrorism is ridiculous as is your definition financial terrorism.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I guess in your head he is a terrorist also right?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)simple questions for you
who are the others?
can you link to a source and explain the criteria used to come to that fact?
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)or,
https://www.dollarvigilante.com/blog/2014/9/26/central-banking-is-financial-terrorism.html
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)the one related to Australia works well in the US
But does it meet the legal definition of terrorism, I think not.
hack89
(39,181 posts)there is no way the NRA meets the legal requirements of a terrorist organization. Can you provide actual links to the law with some supporting case law?
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)are guilty of treason.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)the crazy over the top hyperbole that goes against any facts.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Ownership per 10,000 people has grown a little, still not quite 1:1.
I, too, think discussion of the NRA is OK for GD, when it comes from such a good member as kpete. I love her posts.
Graph:

Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Math does not lie, the loss of life in the tens of thousands by the easy squeeze of one trigger finger, so easy a two year old can kill, in a nation teeming with easy to get legally guns and itchy trigger fingers, tens of thousands year after year after year, the "breakdown" always breaks down to too many guns.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)That's more of a mental health crises.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)the mental health issue and limit the use of prescription drugs as a quick fix all, they have some serious side effects.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)makes the numbers higher.
out of 300 million firearms
hack89
(39,181 posts)I also find your comments funny considering that "fuck the NRA", "gun humper" plus endless fascination with gun owners genitalia seem to be the extent of many gun control advocates intellectual contribution to the discussion.
In any case, DU gun owners have little to be concerned or angry about - the president and the Democratic party look out for us and make us feel comfortable. If any side has reason to be angry and frustrated, it would be yours. A 20 year losing streak is hard to swallow.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)hack89
(39,181 posts)it brings out the worst in people like you. Which is good for gun owners.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,764 posts)pocoloco
(3,180 posts)Never to early to get them fired up for 2016.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)the two differing sides and the responses. I think this thread will stand as it is about the NRA and not about 'guns" but I think some will attempt to push the GD envelope again. The one anti-gun group is so slow to be almost dead and even the two hosts have gone away.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)you accuse me of saying things and would not answer a simple question. Instead of an apology you just discreetly edit that part out of your original post.
I figure the sexual references will show up shortly
paleotn
(22,218 posts)...dead 6 year old school kids be damned I suppose.
hack89
(39,181 posts)Not that any of the proposed legislation introduced in Congress post Sandy Hook would have prevented the shooting.
My point is that they recognize that the 2A protects an individual right to own guns and have gone out of their way to defuse the NRA "Obama will take away your guns" rhetoric.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)that would have prevented that, be legal and are in agreement with the 2nd amendment and the democratic platform?
Do tell please
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I will try and find them and link as I am not a great at typing
I would like to know what yours are but I understand if you do not want to post any, but just post things against guns without any suggestions.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Loving the NRA and also hating on Bloomberg kind of gives away your game.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)something I never said, this is getting old. I am not going anywhere and will call him out every time.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)when shown it to be a lie.
Don't hold your breath waiting for an apology.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)it does show his level of discussion. I find it truly sad, I know he is better than that.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Point to a link please, I dare you
Please apologize, it is the only polite thing to do
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)training and safety portion of the NRA that gets support from the legislative lobbying organization that I have seen no support for.
The NRA actually has a safety program for children and guns unlike the so called "gun safety" organizations that seem to condone children picking up guns and stealing them.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)The NRA is just another barely veiled corporate re-composition of the Klan.
NutmegYankee
(16,478 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)The NRA being a thinly veiled offshoot of the modern Klan, who in turn are just another flavor of Nazi.
Oops... I told the truth again.
I 'lose'...
On the other hand, I did mess up on the Mussolini thing.
I meant to say Wayne LaPierre.
NutmegYankee
(16,478 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)There are 'plenty' and 'many' and 'lots' of others to defend GOP moneymakers.
Web Proxies are fundy.
I mean, fun.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)but years ago at the beginning, the training and certification programs they developed were and are still very good programs to teach firearm safety to all ages. This includes age appropriate if you see a gun, do not touch get an adult. This is the direct oposite of the so called 'gun safety" organizations that do nothing of the sort.
The NSSF is a much better organization to support.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)How about "We will stop marketing and ask manufacturers to stop marketing, firearms for children, and will stop the manufacturing of and advertising of weapons specifically made for and to attract children, as guns are not toys."
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)"Should the GOP fight Obama on Gun Control"?
After 7 years they're still making money telling the crazies that Obama's a gun grabber
hack89
(39,181 posts)it is amazing that people actually fall for that ad.
May I say one more item, kpete? The NRA will stop showing its ads on YouTube, especially to one offering a free bag for those who join. These POS interrupt the movies I am trying to watch.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,764 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)This is the pathetic way certain organisms behave.
They simply select a company, challenge them to publicly state their opposition to some gun thing, and then threaten a boycott if they don't comply.
Unbelievable.
June 1, 2014 by NGVAC
National Gun Victims Action Council and Newtown Victims & Clergy for Corporate Responsibility Call for Immediate Boycott of Hallmark
Asked to publicly support universal background checks, Hallmark Chairman Donald Hall, Jr. said, We do not get involved in divisive issues. Of course not taking a stand is taking a standpro guns. Also Hallmark lobbyists work for the divisive issues they do get involved with. Here are examples of alternative cards for June events. NGVAC will continue to offer free cards to send instead of Hallmarks.
Here is the background to the boycott. Friday, 30 May 2014 CHICAGO In response to a letter from the Newtown Victims & Clergy for Corporate Responsibility (NVCCR) and NGVAC asking Hallmark Cards to publicly support universal background checks, Hallmark Chairman Donald Hall, Jr. said, We do not get involved in divisive issues.
In conversations with Steve Dorell, Hallmarks Head of Public Affairs, Elliot Fineman, CEO of NGVAC, pointed out that Hallmark bans guns in its corporate headquarters to protect its CEO and senior management, and yet has deliberately chosen to not require Hallmark Gold Crown® stores to ban guns. Additionally, Hallmark spokeswoman Linda Odell assured the gun lobby when Hallmark mistakenly appeared on the NRAs enemies list, that the card giant has no intention of supporting anti-gun initiatives.
For Hallmark to say it does not get involved in divisive issues is an utter fiction, said Fineman. Clearly Hallmark is involved in this divisive issue because not choosing is a pro-gun choice. Further, Hallmark takes strong stands on other issues and pays its eight lobbyists over $500,000 per year to pass laws related to postage, radio, TV and taxes.
http://gunvictimsaction.org/blog/before-you-buy-that-fathers-day-card-read-this/
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)seems to fit the definition that a poster above thinks should get the NRA banned
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Especially in Texas and other red states, re: voting rights.
Proving that SCOTUS's interpretation of the Second Amendment is bullshit.
kioa
(295 posts)As does the majority of the American people and the text of the Amendment itself.
Right to keep and bear arms is a right. It was even included in the Bill of Rights to clear up any confusion.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)That is... 'how many.'
kioa
(295 posts)"President Obama strongly believes that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms.
That's never been in question."--Offical White House response.
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/response/president-obama-believes-second-amendment-he-also-believes-common-sense
"We recognize that the individual right to bear arms is an important part of the American tradition, and we will preserve Americans' Second Amendment right to own and use firearms."--Democratic Party Platform.
http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/democratic_party_gun_control.htm
Bloomberg's fear-mongering nonsense only works on the ignorant.
Neither guns nor life in the USA is scary.
Get out more. Learn something.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)You couldn't resist.
And in this post, you did it again.
LOL!
Goodbye...
President Obama, the Democratic platform, the vast majority of the American people, and the Bill of Rights all disagree with your extremist authoritarian attitude.
Deal with it.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)kioa
(295 posts)1) "Civil Rights (pl) (n) -
Personal liberties that belong to an individual, owing to his or her status as a citizen or resident of a particular country or community."
A citizen of the USA has a liberty to keep and bear arms. Thus RKBA is a civil right.
2) You mean that criminals will create a black market when faced with prohibition?
Good point, but I have no idea how you think this bolsters the argument for gun control.
3) "Assault Weapons BAN" It's a difficult sell to try to claim that you don't want to ban guns while supporting a gun ban
4) You don't think the US should improve it's abysmal mental health care?
I disagree.
5) Odd accusation. Any supporting links?
6) None of those countries can choose their own Head of State either.
I prefer the greater personal liberties the USA has.
7) Guns when "used as directed" don't commit murder. Thus the law against murder.
If your problem is with mass casualties: the 3 biggest mass killings in US history is 9/11, OKC bombing & Happy Land Fire; none of which used a firearm.
8) CCL holders are less likely to commit crimes than the general public or police officers.
Zimmerman should been found guilty & put in prison; are you going to support doing away with the right of a fair trial as well?
9) The sniper rifles used by the police & military is the Winchester M70 & Remington M700.
Both rifles are Bolt Action hunting rifles.
Tell me again how you aren't going to 'take people's guns away'.
10) People convicted of Domestic Abuse are felons. Felons lose the RKBA
mountain grammy
(29,035 posts)the "laws against murder" are overridden by the NRA inspired "Stand your ground" laws. Anyone can feel threatened at any time by any thing and shoot to kill.
Felons lose their RKBA rights? Ha, that one's a real joke..
like you, a joke.. You ask for links, where are yours?
kioa
(295 posts)I have no idea how you think otherwise.
"Stand your ground" simply means that a victim doesn't have to prove they tried to retreat when confronted with a threat.
29 states, including the state with the lowest murder rate in the nation has stand your fround
Rhode Island has never had the requirement to retreat, do you think that makes murder legal there?
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-your-ground_law
Yes felons lose their 2nd Amendment rights.
http://civil-rights.lawyers.com/civil-liberties/the-second-amendment-and-the-right-to-bear-arms.html
Your ignorance on this subject makes you vulnerable to Bloomberg's fear-mongering.
Neither guns nor life in the USA is scary.
Get out more. Lose the irrational fear.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)murder is still there and can not be overridden by stand your ground that has to meet certain criteria.
Felons do lose the RKBA rights for legal gun possession. I support any felon caught with a gun a he or she is now a prohibited person, being harshly punished.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Bye bye, gun violence apologist.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)to be totally true.
point to the incorrect ones
kioa
(295 posts)have the discussion with you.
Which is almost certainly a better offer than you will get from the Democratic Party after the debacle of you & Bloomberg's authoritarian nonsense.
The more people know about guns, the less they support gun control.
The more people hear about gun control the less they support gun control.
Gun control is a political dinosaur that is going to be relegated to the tar-pit of irrelevancy for a loooong time.
Deal with it.
niyad
(132,446 posts)or even the slightest level of awareness, to make those resolutions.
aikoaiko
(34,214 posts)Please consider posting in one of the gun issues groups.