Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,902 posts)
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 10:36 AM Jan 2015

Suggested New Year's Resolutions For The NRA

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by SYFROYH (a host of the General Discussion forum).


1. We will stop referring to ourselves as a “civil rights” organization that defends “human rights.” It is a sacrilege to people actually killed or harmed by civil and human rights abuses.

2. We will stop pointing at Chicago and saying gun laws don’t work. We will admit the majority of Chicago crime guns are trafficked from states and counties with loose laws.

3. We will stop saying “the government is going to take your guns” to block federal laws. The confiscation we announced 7 years ago never happened.

4. We will stop blaming “mental health” problems for U.S. gun violence. We admit every country in the world has mental health problems but they don’t have Newtowns and Virginia Techs.

5. We admit fighting universal background checks arms criminals and that “armed criminals” sells more guns to “good guys.” Ka-ching.

6. We acknowledge that “outlaws” don’t have guns in the 28 EU countries, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, Japan and other countries with strict gun regulations. We also admit, grudgingly, they are not “tyrannies.”

7. We will stop our insulting comparison of guns to knives, hammers, cars and swimming pools–none of which kill when used as directed. On the same day as the Sandy Hook massacre, 20 Chinese school children were attacked with a knife and none died.

8. We accept responsibility for the armed vigilante movement popularized by George Zimmerman and Michael Dunn. We admit “carry” laws are the biggest revenue infusion since “Obama is going to take your guns.”

9. We will stop defending sales to civilians of non-defensive weapons like TrackingPoint’s “can’t miss” sniper rifle. We admit they are ready-made for insurrectionists, terrorists and hate groups.

10. We regret our work to help suspected domestic abusers keep their guns while under orders of protection. We admit this costs many women’s lives and that our sleazy sales pitch to tell women to arm themselves too just makes things worse.


http://gunvictimsaction.org/blog/new-years-resolutions-for-the-nra-2015/
88 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Suggested New Year's Resolutions For The NRA (Original Post) kpete Jan 2015 OP
kick and recommend samsingh Jan 2015 #1
K&R 99Forever Jan 2015 #2
K&r well done! Takket Jan 2015 #3
Let's hope the hosts allow this to stand Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #4
Very angry? Apoplectic would be more accurate. The NRA is central to the current discussion of Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #6
Crisis stage? Hyperbole much? hack89 Jan 2015 #11
We've only cut it in half??!? Un-frickin-believable that we tolerate that. lastlib Jan 2015 #20
Such as? nt hack89 Jan 2015 #22
Well, we could start by..... lastlib Jan 2015 #24
and how would that cut the rate? Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #32
How does the NRA meet the standards of a terrorist organization? GGJohn Jan 2015 #36
I would like to hear that also Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #44
Are you kidding? MrMickeysMom Jan 2015 #48
That doesn't answer my question. GGJohn Jan 2015 #51
Then, I suggest you read again... MrMickeysMom Jan 2015 #52
You're saying that because YOU and some OTHERS have deemed it to be financial terrorism GGJohn Jan 2015 #56
That is an amazing leap Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #59
It's people like that poster with the extremist views that make the NRA so effective. GGJohn Jan 2015 #60
they tend to make it ten times bigger Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #61
I'd spend a little more time reading... MrMickeysMom Jan 2015 #66
Because terrorism has a specific and well defined meaning in the eyes of the law? hack89 Jan 2015 #68
sure they can Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #74
Local municipalities are forbidden from enacting stricter firearms laws due to state pre-emption GGJohn Jan 2015 #72
Bloomberg spends more than the NRA Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #58
"I and others have deemed financial terrorism" Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #63
Here's one... MrMickeysMom Jan 2015 #69
well I am sure Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #75
Can we get rid of the hyperbole please? hack89 Jan 2015 #37
That post is about as stupid as those saying that certain members of Congress or SCOTUS GGJohn Jan 2015 #40
yep nt Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #45
yes, once again Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #30
The total number of guns has simply grown with the rise in population, Fred. Here's a graph: NYC_SKP Jan 2015 #54
30 to 40000 firearm related deaths per year forever is an acceptable price for the NRA and gun folks Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #62
Of which 2/3 of those are suicides. GGJohn Jan 2015 #64
we sure need to help Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #67
yes ensure you add the suicides Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #65
I think bemusement is a more accurate term hack89 Jan 2015 #8
No one has mentioned any of the things that concern you....you raise it, rather defensively. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #10
I love these threads. I like to encourage them hack89 Jan 2015 #12
~~~ + well a lot discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2015 #14
Excellent for the repugs also! pocoloco Jan 2015 #19
Yes it is amazing to see Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #42
They will show up, they always do Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #33
"the president and the Democratic party look out for us and make us feel comfortable." paleotn Jan 2015 #18
There is a lot we can do to fix that hack89 Jan 2015 #21
So what are your suggestions Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #43
Demanding all this "explaining" from others while explaining nothing yourself is.....boring.... Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #70
I have explained many times before Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #71
I agree with all the points in the OP, what more does one need to know? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #73
And just what game would that be? GGJohn Jan 2015 #76
at least twice now he has accused me of Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #80
He has a bad habit of accusing others of things they never said and then not apologizing GGJohn Jan 2015 #81
I know Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #83
and you would be lying sir Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #79
you have to seperate the Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #29
And Hitler made the 'trains run on time.' onehandle Jan 2015 #46
Other than you losing by Godwin's law, that was actually Benito Mussolini. nt NutmegYankee Jan 2015 #53
Hey, I didn't defend the NRA on a liberal forum. onehandle Jan 2015 #77
Neither have I for that matter. NutmegYankee Jan 2015 #78
Nope. Upstream. onehandle Jan 2015 #82
link to one Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #84
yes today they tend to be nuts Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #55
The NRA is as much a civil rights organization as David Duke is a human rights activist. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #5
When visiting youtube I STILL get the ad, Doctor_J Jan 2015 #7
Obama and the Democratic party have been good to gun owners hack89 Jan 2015 #9
I do too Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #34
K & R Thespian2 Jan 2015 #13
NGVAC, they're very helpful discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2015 #15
Check this out... NYC_SKP Jan 2015 #27
soounds like some kind of terrorism Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #35
K&R. Paladin Jan 2015 #16
Gun ownership gives you more rights in America than regular people. onehandle Jan 2015 #17
The President and the Democratic Party platform agree the 2nd protects an individual right. kioa Jan 2015 #26
It's amazing how many folks come to DU armed with NRA talking points. onehandle Jan 2015 #39
The President's statements & the Democratic Party are "NRA talking points"?! kioa Jan 2015 #47
But you didn't stop at the Democratic platform. onehandle Jan 2015 #50
Sorry, bud. kioa Jan 2015 #57
There's that NRA talking points meme again, right on time. GGJohn Jan 2015 #49
I'm not a member of the NRA, but allow me to respond to this list. kioa Jan 2015 #23
I want to address two points.. mountain grammy Jan 2015 #25
No. Laws against murder are still there. kioa Jan 2015 #28
and you would be wrong on both points Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #38
Same pathetic NRA propaganda, different day. 99Forever Jan 2015 #85
too bad those points appear Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #86
If you manage to come up with something more substantial than "ZOMG NRA!!1!!" I will be happy to kioa Jan 2015 #87
too bad that the cretins who run that organization will never develop the conscience niyad Jan 2015 #31
K&R. nt tblue37 Jan 2015 #41
Locking. aikoaiko Jan 2015 #88

samsingh

(18,426 posts)
1. kick and recommend
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 10:44 AM
Jan 2015

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
2. K&R
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 11:00 AM
Jan 2015

Takket

(23,715 posts)
3. K&r well done!
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 11:03 AM
Jan 2015

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
4. Let's hope the hosts allow this to stand
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 11:08 AM
Jan 2015

The NRA is the one right-wing extremist organization we are not supposed to talk about in GD, there are supporters of this extremist group in our very own gungeon and they get very angry when anyone criticizes guns in GD.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
6. Very angry? Apoplectic would be more accurate. The NRA is central to the current discussion of
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 11:13 AM
Jan 2015

race and violence in America....with 300 million guns in America it has reached a crisis stage...if guns are best for self-defence, what do you use to defend against guns....more guns?

Look out for the thread to be locked also, but I think discussing the agenda of the NRA should be in General Discussion.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
11. Crisis stage? Hyperbole much?
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 11:22 AM
Jan 2015

we have cut our murder rate in half (along with all violent crime) and have experienced 20 years of steadily declining gun deaths.

The crisis stage was 20 years ago at the height of the crack cocaine epidemic.

lastlib

(28,277 posts)
20. We've only cut it in half??!? Un-frickin-believable that we tolerate that.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 12:16 PM
Jan 2015

We could cut it by 95% if we could pass some sensible gun laws.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
22. Such as? nt
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 12:46 PM
Jan 2015

lastlib

(28,277 posts)
24. Well, we could start by.....
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:03 PM
Jan 2015

declaring the NRA a terrorist organization (they meet all the definitions) and just go from there.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
32. and how would that cut the rate?
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:29 PM
Jan 2015

what is your end state, full confiscation of guns?

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
36. How does the NRA meet the standards of a terrorist organization?
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:35 PM
Jan 2015

So in that case, the over 4 million members are terrorists also?

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
44. I would like to hear that also
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:47 PM
Jan 2015

Kind of sounds like some kind of fantasy to me, but maybe the poster has some facts to post that substantiate that charge.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
48. Are you kidding?
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:52 PM
Jan 2015

They have THE strongest lobby in EVERY state whose mission is the relaxation of responsible gun ownership.

This is the same level of irresponsible buying of government, which I and others have deemed financial terrorism. These folks, of course are another set of fascists inervating the spinal column of congress. Chief among them is -

JP Morgan Chase & Co
United Kingdom HSBC Holdings
United States Bank of America
United States Citigroup Inc


The NRA is nor more represented by IT'S 4 million members than the U.S is by it's 300 million Americans. Just who in the world do you think the NRA is, anyway? Surely, the lobby is in control, not responsible gun owners.

Surely, the lobby is in control of Congress, not the ever dwindling responsible voters who give up more and more each year.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
51. That doesn't answer my question.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:53 PM
Jan 2015

How does the NRA meet the standards of a terrorist organization?
Are the more than 4 million members therefore terrorists also?

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
52. Then, I suggest you read again...
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:55 PM
Jan 2015

This time, read for meaning, because I answered it. Alternately, you could get your eyes checked.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
56. You're saying that because YOU and some OTHERS have deemed it to be financial terrorism
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:58 PM
Jan 2015

the NRA is a terrorist organization?
Now, give us a real reason why, by govt. standards, the NRA meets the definition of a terrorist organization.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
59. That is an amazing leap
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:00 PM
Jan 2015

I am so glad he is the one to decide for all of the USA

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
60. It's people like that poster with the extremist views that make the NRA so effective.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:02 PM
Jan 2015
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
61. they tend to make it ten times bigger
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:04 PM
Jan 2015

than it actually is. If they did not make it out to be the boogyman, they would not generate the backlash support the NRA gets. Many NRA members simply do no agree with the legislative portion and the leaders insane comments.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
66. I'd spend a little more time reading...
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:09 PM
Jan 2015

Your icons are cute and over-used in this case. It's easier to cut and past a LOL icon than to actually study the splinter groups who are continually busy at writing legislation at the state level.

Case in point is a law, not penned by our general assembly in PA and other states, but by the NRA that each municipality must respond to as a result of the National Rifle Association and other groups, who would now sue local municipalities, (see Philadelphia, Gov Tom Corbett) that enact ordinances stricter than state firearms laws.

So, because of a bill, approved by a 138-56 vote in PA, each any an municipal government will be sued if they choose to have strong firearm protection laws. This granted legal standing to "membership organizations" to sue over local gun laws, and collect legal fees and other costs if they win.

Now, give me a real reason why this isn't an act of terrorism against local communities who wish to reduce needless deaths by guns. We're not talking duck hunting, GG… we're talking about responsible gun ownership. They take the big lobby and force these laws up our asses by right wing governors and general assemblies… state by state.

As for financial terrorism, how about what happened after Sept 2008, when the banks who were too big to fail held their gun up to the American people's head, insisting that we cough up $700 billion or all hell would break loose for the American economy.

Like I advised you earlier… Read for meaning. Alternately, you could also STFU, because I see right through what you say.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
68. Because terrorism has a specific and well defined meaning in the eyes of the law?
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:12 PM
Jan 2015

and that legislation does not meet that legal threshold?

You can't just make up your own definitions of terrorism.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
74. sure they can
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:24 PM
Jan 2015

laws do not matter. Most do not even care about nomenclature of firearms parts or how a firearm works.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
72. Local municipalities are forbidden from enacting stricter firearms laws due to state pre-emption
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:23 PM
Jan 2015

laws, laws which almost every state has.
It makes sense for the state, and the state alone, to set firearms laws, why does it make sense to be legal in one area of a state, yet be illegal in another area a state?
So, I guess, by your definition of "terrorism", most of the states in the country are guilty of terrorism.

Your definition of terrorism is ridiculous as is your definition financial terrorism.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
58. Bloomberg spends more than the NRA
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:59 PM
Jan 2015

I guess in your head he is a terrorist also right?

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
63. "I and others have deemed financial terrorism"
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:06 PM
Jan 2015

simple questions for you

who are the others?
can you link to a source and explain the criteria used to come to that fact?

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
75. well I am sure
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:27 PM
Jan 2015

the one related to Australia works well in the US

But does it meet the legal definition of terrorism, I think not.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
37. Can we get rid of the hyperbole please?
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:39 PM
Jan 2015

there is no way the NRA meets the legal requirements of a terrorist organization. Can you provide actual links to the law with some supporting case law?

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
40. That post is about as stupid as those saying that certain members of Congress or SCOTUS
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:41 PM
Jan 2015

are guilty of treason.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
45. yep nt
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:48 PM
Jan 2015
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
30. yes, once again
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:28 PM
Jan 2015

the crazy over the top hyperbole that goes against any facts.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
54. The total number of guns has simply grown with the rise in population, Fred. Here's a graph:
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:56 PM
Jan 2015

Ownership per 10,000 people has grown a little, still not quite 1:1.

I, too, think discussion of the NRA is OK for GD, when it comes from such a good member as kpete. I love her posts.

Graph:

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
62. 30 to 40000 firearm related deaths per year forever is an acceptable price for the NRA and gun folks
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:05 PM
Jan 2015

Math does not lie, the loss of life in the tens of thousands by the easy squeeze of one trigger finger, so easy a two year old can kill, in a nation teeming with easy to get legally guns and itchy trigger fingers, tens of thousands year after year after year, the "breakdown" always breaks down to too many guns.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
64. Of which 2/3 of those are suicides.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:07 PM
Jan 2015

That's more of a mental health crises.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
67. we sure need to help
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:10 PM
Jan 2015

the mental health issue and limit the use of prescription drugs as a quick fix all, they have some serious side effects.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
65. yes ensure you add the suicides
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:08 PM
Jan 2015

makes the numbers higher.

out of 300 million firearms

hack89

(39,181 posts)
8. I think bemusement is a more accurate term
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 11:18 AM
Jan 2015

I also find your comments funny considering that "fuck the NRA", "gun humper" plus endless fascination with gun owners genitalia seem to be the extent of many gun control advocates intellectual contribution to the discussion.

In any case, DU gun owners have little to be concerned or angry about - the president and the Democratic party look out for us and make us feel comfortable. If any side has reason to be angry and frustrated, it would be yours. A 20 year losing streak is hard to swallow.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
10. No one has mentioned any of the things that concern you....you raise it, rather defensively.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 11:20 AM
Jan 2015

hack89

(39,181 posts)
12. I love these threads. I like to encourage them
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 11:23 AM
Jan 2015

it brings out the worst in people like you. Which is good for gun owners.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,764 posts)
14. ~~~ + well a lot
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 11:42 AM
Jan 2015
 

pocoloco

(3,180 posts)
19. Excellent for the repugs also!
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 12:12 PM
Jan 2015

Never to early to get them fired up for 2016.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
42. Yes it is amazing to see
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:43 PM
Jan 2015

the two differing sides and the responses. I think this thread will stand as it is about the NRA and not about 'guns" but I think some will attempt to push the GD envelope again. The one anti-gun group is so slow to be almost dead and even the two hosts have gone away.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
33. They will show up, they always do
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:33 PM
Jan 2015

you accuse me of saying things and would not answer a simple question. Instead of an apology you just discreetly edit that part out of your original post.

I figure the sexual references will show up shortly

paleotn

(22,218 posts)
18. "the president and the Democratic party look out for us and make us feel comfortable."
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 12:11 PM
Jan 2015

...dead 6 year old school kids be damned I suppose.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
21. There is a lot we can do to fix that
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 12:45 PM
Jan 2015

Not that any of the proposed legislation introduced in Congress post Sandy Hook would have prevented the shooting.

My point is that they recognize that the 2A protects an individual right to own guns and have gone out of their way to defuse the NRA "Obama will take away your guns" rhetoric.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
43. So what are your suggestions
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:45 PM
Jan 2015

that would have prevented that, be legal and are in agreement with the 2nd amendment and the democratic platform?

Do tell please

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
70. Demanding all this "explaining" from others while explaining nothing yourself is.....boring....
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:16 PM
Jan 2015
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
71. I have explained many times before
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:22 PM
Jan 2015

I will try and find them and link as I am not a great at typing

I would like to know what yours are but I understand if you do not want to post any, but just post things against guns without any suggestions.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
73. I agree with all the points in the OP, what more does one need to know?
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:24 PM
Jan 2015

Loving the NRA and also hating on Bloomberg kind of gives away your game.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
76. And just what game would that be?
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:28 PM
Jan 2015
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
80. at least twice now he has accused me of
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:32 PM
Jan 2015

something I never said, this is getting old. I am not going anywhere and will call him out every time.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
81. He has a bad habit of accusing others of things they never said and then not apologizing
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:33 PM
Jan 2015

when shown it to be a lie.
Don't hold your breath waiting for an apology.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
83. I know
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:35 PM
Jan 2015

it does show his level of discussion. I find it truly sad, I know he is better than that.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
79. and you would be lying sir
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:30 PM
Jan 2015
"Loving the NRA"

Point to a link please, I dare you

Please apologize, it is the only polite thing to do
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
29. you have to seperate the
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:27 PM
Jan 2015

training and safety portion of the NRA that gets support from the legislative lobbying organization that I have seen no support for.

The NRA actually has a safety program for children and guns unlike the so called "gun safety" organizations that seem to condone children picking up guns and stealing them.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
46. And Hitler made the 'trains run on time.'
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:48 PM
Jan 2015

The NRA is just another barely veiled corporate re-composition of the Klan.

NutmegYankee

(16,478 posts)
53. Other than you losing by Godwin's law, that was actually Benito Mussolini. nt
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:56 PM
Jan 2015

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
77. Hey, I didn't defend the NRA on a liberal forum.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:29 PM
Jan 2015

The NRA being a thinly veiled offshoot of the modern Klan, who in turn are just another flavor of Nazi.

Oops... I told the truth again.

I 'lose'...


On the other hand, I did mess up on the Mussolini thing.

I meant to say Wayne LaPierre.

NutmegYankee

(16,478 posts)
78. Neither have I for that matter.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:29 PM
Jan 2015

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
82. Nope. Upstream.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:34 PM
Jan 2015

There are 'plenty' and 'many' and 'lots' of others to defend GOP moneymakers.

Web Proxies are fundy.

I mean, fun.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
84. link to one
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:36 PM
Jan 2015
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
55. yes today they tend to be nuts
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:57 PM
Jan 2015

but years ago at the beginning, the training and certification programs they developed were and are still very good programs to teach firearm safety to all ages. This includes age appropriate if you see a gun, do not touch get an adult. This is the direct oposite of the so called 'gun safety" organizations that do nothing of the sort.

The NSSF is a much better organization to support.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
5. The NRA is as much a civil rights organization as David Duke is a human rights activist.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 11:11 AM
Jan 2015

How about "We will stop marketing and ask manufacturers to stop marketing, firearms for children, and will stop the manufacturing of and advertising of weapons specifically made for and to attract children, as guns are not toys."

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
7. When visiting youtube I STILL get the ad,
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 11:18 AM
Jan 2015

"Should the GOP fight Obama on Gun Control"?

After 7 years they're still making money telling the crazies that Obama's a gun grabber

hack89

(39,181 posts)
9. Obama and the Democratic party have been good to gun owners
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 11:19 AM
Jan 2015

it is amazing that people actually fall for that ad.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
34. I do too
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:33 PM
Jan 2015

Thespian2

(2,741 posts)
13. K & R
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 11:39 AM
Jan 2015

May I say one more item, kpete? The NRA will stop showing its ads on YouTube, especially to one offering a free bag for those who join. These POS interrupt the movies I am trying to watch.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,764 posts)
15. NGVAC, they're very helpful
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 11:49 AM
Jan 2015
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
27. Check this out...
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:20 PM
Jan 2015

This is the pathetic way certain organisms behave.
They simply select a company, challenge them to publicly state their opposition to some gun thing, and then threaten a boycott if they don't comply.
Unbelievable.

Before You Buy That Greeting Card, Read This!
June 1, 2014 by NGVAC

National Gun Victims Action Council and Newtown Victims & Clergy for Corporate Responsibility Call for Immediate Boycott of Hallmark

Asked to publicly support universal background checks, Hallmark Chairman Donald Hall, Jr. said, “We do not get involved in divisive issues.” Of course not taking a stand is taking a stand–pro guns. Also Hallmark lobbyists work for the “divisive issues” they do get involved with. Here are examples of alternative cards for June events. NGVAC will continue to offer free cards to send instead of Hallmark’s.

Here is the background to the boycott. Friday, 30 May 2014 CHICAGO In response to a letter from the Newtown Victims & Clergy for Corporate Responsibility (NVCCR) and NGVAC asking Hallmark Cards to publicly support universal background checks, Hallmark Chairman Donald Hall, Jr. said, “We do not get involved in divisive issues.”

In conversations with Steve Dorell, Hallmark’s Head of Public Affairs, Elliot Fineman, CEO of NGVAC, pointed out that Hallmark bans guns in its corporate headquarters to protect its CEO and senior management, and yet has deliberately chosen to not require Hallmark Gold Crown® stores to ban guns. Additionally, Hallmark spokeswoman Linda Odell assured the gun lobby when Hallmark mistakenly appeared on the NRA’s enemies list, that the card giant has no intention of supporting anti-gun initiatives.

“For Hallmark to say it does not get involved in divisive issues is an utter fiction,” said Fineman. “Clearly Hallmark is involved in this divisive issue because not choosing is a pro-gun choice. Further, Hallmark takes strong stands on other issues and pays its eight lobbyists over $500,000 per year to pass laws related to postage, radio, TV and taxes.”

http://gunvictimsaction.org/blog/before-you-buy-that-fathers-day-card-read-this/
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
35. soounds like some kind of terrorism
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:35 PM
Jan 2015

seems to fit the definition that a poster above thinks should get the NRA banned

 

Paladin

(32,354 posts)
16. K&R.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 12:07 PM
Jan 2015

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
17. Gun ownership gives you more rights in America than regular people.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 12:08 PM
Jan 2015

Especially in Texas and other red states, re: voting rights.

Proving that SCOTUS's interpretation of the Second Amendment is bullshit.

 

kioa

(295 posts)
26. The President and the Democratic Party platform agree the 2nd protects an individual right.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:13 PM
Jan 2015

As does the majority of the American people and the text of the Amendment itself.

Right to keep and bear arms is a right. It was even included in the Bill of Rights to clear up any confusion.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
39. It's amazing how many folks come to DU armed with NRA talking points.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:40 PM
Jan 2015

That is... 'how many.'

 

kioa

(295 posts)
47. The President's statements & the Democratic Party are "NRA talking points"?!
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:50 PM
Jan 2015

"President Obama strongly believes that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms.
That's never been in question."--Offical White House response.
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/response/president-obama-believes-second-amendment-he-also-believes-common-sense

"We recognize that the individual right to bear arms is an important part of the American tradition, and we will preserve Americans' Second Amendment right to own and use firearms."--Democratic Party Platform.
http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/democratic_party_gun_control.htm

Bloomberg's fear-mongering nonsense only works on the ignorant.
Neither guns nor life in the USA is scary.
Get out more. Learn something.


onehandle

(51,122 posts)
50. But you didn't stop at the Democratic platform.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:53 PM
Jan 2015

You couldn't resist.

And in this post, you did it again.

LOL!



Goodbye...

 

kioa

(295 posts)
57. Sorry, bud.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:59 PM
Jan 2015

President Obama, the Democratic platform, the vast majority of the American people, and the Bill of Rights all disagree with your extremist authoritarian attitude.

Deal with it.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
49. There's that NRA talking points meme again, right on time.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:52 PM
Jan 2015
 

kioa

(295 posts)
23. I'm not a member of the NRA, but allow me to respond to this list.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 12:55 PM
Jan 2015

1) "Civil Rights (pl) (n) -
Personal liberties that belong to an individual, owing to his or her status as a citizen or resident of a particular country or community."
A citizen of the USA has a liberty to keep and bear arms. Thus RKBA is a civil right.

2) You mean that criminals will create a black market when faced with prohibition?
Good point, but I have no idea how you think this bolsters the argument for gun control.

3) "Assault Weapons BAN" It's a difficult sell to try to claim that you don't want to ban guns while supporting a gun ban

4) You don't think the US should improve it's abysmal mental health care?
I disagree.

5) Odd accusation. Any supporting links?

6) None of those countries can choose their own Head of State either.
I prefer the greater personal liberties the USA has.

7) Guns when "used as directed" don't commit murder. Thus the law against murder.
If your problem is with mass casualties: the 3 biggest mass killings in US history is 9/11, OKC bombing & Happy Land Fire; none of which used a firearm.

8) CCL holders are less likely to commit crimes than the general public or police officers.
Zimmerman should been found guilty & put in prison; are you going to support doing away with the right of a fair trial as well?

9) The sniper rifles used by the police & military is the Winchester M70 & Remington M700.
Both rifles are Bolt Action hunting rifles.
Tell me again how you aren't going to 'take people's guns away'.

10) People convicted of Domestic Abuse are felons. Felons lose the RKBA

mountain grammy

(29,035 posts)
25. I want to address two points..
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:12 PM
Jan 2015

the "laws against murder" are overridden by the NRA inspired "Stand your ground" laws. Anyone can feel threatened at any time by any thing and shoot to kill.

Felons lose their RKBA rights? Ha, that one's a real joke..

like you, a joke.. You ask for links, where are yours?

 

kioa

(295 posts)
28. No. Laws against murder are still there.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:24 PM
Jan 2015

I have no idea how you think otherwise.

"Stand your ground" simply means that a victim doesn't have to prove they tried to retreat when confronted with a threat.
29 states, including the state with the lowest murder rate in the nation has stand your fround
Rhode Island has never had the requirement to retreat, do you think that makes murder legal there?
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-your-ground_law

Yes felons lose their 2nd Amendment rights.
http://civil-rights.lawyers.com/civil-liberties/the-second-amendment-and-the-right-to-bear-arms.html

Your ignorance on this subject makes you vulnerable to Bloomberg's fear-mongering.
Neither guns nor life in the USA is scary.
Get out more. Lose the irrational fear.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
38. and you would be wrong on both points
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:40 PM
Jan 2015

murder is still there and can not be overridden by stand your ground that has to meet certain criteria.

Felons do lose the RKBA rights for legal gun possession. I support any felon caught with a gun a he or she is now a prohibited person, being harshly punished.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
85. Same pathetic NRA propaganda, different day.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:37 PM
Jan 2015

Bye bye, gun violence apologist.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
86. too bad those points appear
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:43 PM
Jan 2015

to be totally true.

point to the incorrect ones

 

kioa

(295 posts)
87. If you manage to come up with something more substantial than "ZOMG NRA!!1!!" I will be happy to
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:45 PM
Jan 2015

have the discussion with you.

Which is almost certainly a better offer than you will get from the Democratic Party after the debacle of you & Bloomberg's authoritarian nonsense.

The more people know about guns, the less they support gun control.
The more people hear about gun control the less they support gun control.

Gun control is a political dinosaur that is going to be relegated to the tar-pit of irrelevancy for a loooong time.
Deal with it.

niyad

(132,446 posts)
31. too bad that the cretins who run that organization will never develop the conscience
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:29 PM
Jan 2015

or even the slightest level of awareness, to make those resolutions.

tblue37

(68,436 posts)
41. K&R. nt
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 01:42 PM
Jan 2015

aikoaiko

(34,214 posts)
88. Locking.
Sat Jan 3, 2015, 02:46 PM
Jan 2015

Please consider posting in one of the gun issues groups.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Suggested New Year's Reso...