Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What is a "cowardly act?" (Original Post) WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jan 2015 OP
It means it was bad. AngryAmish Jan 2015 #1
Well, in general it would mean "attacking and killing unarmed innocent people" Scootaloo Jan 2015 #2
What^Scootaloo^Said + 100 -nt 99th_Monkey Jan 2015 #4
Yeah, I think this is Obama's "what's the definition of is" moment. WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jan 2015 #5
Is it time to parse sentences mcar Jan 2015 #6
^"Some people" take their cues from Rethugs WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jan 2015 #7
Were you responding to me? mcar Jan 2015 #8
Oh, so for a prepared speech, Obama doesn't choose... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jan 2015 #13
Nailed it... SidDithers Jan 2015 #9
Add in 'purposefully' Bonx Jan 2015 #11
Worry over perceived insults to a man who died in in the year 632. Coventina Jan 2015 #3
"Cowardly" has meanings besides "lacking physical courage" Recursion Jan 2015 #10
But, again, he says "cowardly" rather than "reprehensible" each time to convey... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jan 2015 #15
The President described it perfectly. egduj Jan 2015 #12
I think President Obama was eloquent in his remarks about this terror attack dissentient Jan 2015 #14
Yep. Hard to say their terrorists are "cowards" when we're slaughtering thousands remotely WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jan 2015 #17
Arming yourself with combat weapons to attack people working in an office. tabasco Jan 2015 #16
Thanks Cap'n Obvious. You don't get it. WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jan 2015 #18
WTF!!! Hutzpa Jan 2015 #19
No, you're just hi-jacking another thread!!! WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jan 2015 #20
Please post proceed. Hutzpa Jan 2015 #21
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
2. Well, in general it would mean "attacking and killing unarmed innocent people"
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 10:59 PM
Jan 2015

But in context, it's a pretty good question, since US foreign policy under this administration holds that annihilating Pakistani wedding celebrants is self-defense.

So yeah, where is that distinction, exactly?

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
5. Yeah, I think this is Obama's "what's the definition of is" moment.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 11:09 PM
Jan 2015

Drone bombings instead of boots on the ground clearly not cowardly...right?

mcar

(42,278 posts)
6. Is it time to parse sentences
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 11:16 PM
Jan 2015

so we can somehow slam President Obama already?

I thought it might wait till tomorrow, but this is DU, after all. Obama must be criticized for everything. Definition of is moment - really?

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
7. ^"Some people" take their cues from Rethugs
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 11:25 PM
Jan 2015

Republicans always know when it's the right time to talk about murdering people.

Aside: this isn't an isolated incident of "some people" who took the form of Republicans in Dem clothing shortly after 2008. It was sad to see, to be honest. Then I got pissed and disgusted by "some people." It's the "It's only bad when Republicans do it" attitude. In a word: pathetic.

mcar

(42,278 posts)
8. Were you responding to me?
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 11:54 PM
Jan 2015

I don't understand what you are saying here. I'm saying it is ridiculous to criticize Obama for one phrase in a statement and claim it is his "definition of is" moment. It is a fairly standard way of referring to such attacks.

Or to claim that he has no right to offer condemnation of this attack because of drone strikes. Really?

10 journalists and 2 LEOs are murdered. But, for sure, lets use their deaths to criticize Obama for two words in a statement.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
13. Oh, so for a prepared speech, Obama doesn't choose...
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 09:12 PM
Jan 2015

...His words carefully? Not buying. He chose "cowardly act" this and other times. I'm asking, what's a cowardly act if not slaughtering thousands with drone strikes? Why is that honorable? Oh yeah, because a Democrat is calling the shots.

And having said all of that, I completely understand why you don't have a clue as to what I'm talking about. Nothing is getting through the bubble. That's what we used to say about Republicans.

Coventina

(27,054 posts)
3. Worry over perceived insults to a man who died in in the year 632.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 11:00 PM
Jan 2015


I think that's a level of insecurity that rises to cowardice.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
10. "Cowardly" has meanings besides "lacking physical courage"
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 12:12 AM
Jan 2015

There's also the sense of "reprehensible" and "beneath contempt".

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
15. But, again, he says "cowardly" rather than "reprehensible" each time to convey...
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 09:30 PM
Jan 2015

chicken, chickenhearted, chicken-livered, craven, dastardly, gutless, lily-livered, milk-livered [archaic], poltroon, pusillanimous, recreant, spineless, unheroic, yellow

So my follow-up question is, are drone bombings "cowardly"? If not, how are we to differentiate the "cowardly" acts of "their" terrorists from those of our terrorists, well, in this case, drone bombing.

 

dissentient

(861 posts)
14. I think President Obama was eloquent in his remarks about this terror attack
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 09:17 PM
Jan 2015

It is cowardly to go into a magazines office where people are unarmed and draw cartoons for a living, have yourself equipped with high powered military weapons, and mow them down where they don't stand a chance.

That said, I read the thread, and I agree that it is also cowardly to use drone strikes, especially when so many innocent people are killed by these strikes.

Hutzpa

(11,461 posts)
19. WTF!!!
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 09:51 PM
Jan 2015

are people really trying to defend the actions of these cowards by finding every possible error that was said or have been said about previous encounters just so they can make a point?

If so, I say this is absolutely rediculous.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
20. No, you're just hi-jacking another thread!!!
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 09:55 PM
Jan 2015

OMG!!!

Someone said something about something and you don't like it!!!!!

OMG!!!!!

No other opinions than Hutzpa's!!!

OMG!!!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What is a "cowardly ...