Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 07:08 PM Jan 2015

HALL OF SHAME: 35 Dems Voted Yesterday To ROLL BACK DODD-FRANK Provisions


Oh, come on. Wouldn't you rather get one big fat check than ask all the people you represent?




UPDATE: It was 35 Dems. List has been updated.


From Crew of 42, Lauren Victoria Burke points out that the Congressional Black Caucus, whose members were accused last year of selling out to Wall Street -- had only five defectors on this bill. Meanwhile, there were plenty of white Members who voted to gut Dodd-Frank:



The five CBC members had tons of Democratic caucasian caucus company in the form of 30 House Dems who joined Republicans to roll back Dodd-Frank protections. Why any member of the Democratic party who isn’t representing Greenwich, CT or Manhattan is voting YES would be a fun question to ask each one of them. Is there a hidden group of Wall Streeters living in Iowa or Nebraska? I would tend to doubt that.


Standing with Goldman-Sachs and Wall Street has become the theme for a party that’s basing candidate recruitment on who can raise cash rather than who can actually win elections. Think that’s one and the same? Go see who raised the most money during the 2014 cycle and who won the election.


The Dodd-Frank rollback in the CRomnibus and the one voted on yesterday provide evidence of who’s fundraising from the House floor and who isn’t. Even stranger: If New York members with Wall Streeters in their district as constituents voted NO (See: Carolyn Maloney, Greg Meeks, and Jerold Nadler who all voted NO) — what are Reps. Loebsack (D-Is there a Wall Street in Davenport Iowa?), Suzan DelBene (D-Is there a Goldman Sachs office in Washington?) and freshman Rep. Brad Ashford (Nebraska?) doing voting YES?


Freshman Rep. Gwen Graham (D-FL) is out of the box fast to show she can vote the opposite way of the Democratic party. It took over eight million dollars for Graham to barely win. Let’s see how she does in 2016 in a red district voting for Wall Street. Here are the 35 Democrats who assisted Republicans with their latest effort to scale back Dodd-Frank consumer protections:



Brad Ashford (NE-02)

Ami Bera (CA-07)

Don Beyer (VA-08)

Sanford Bishop (GA-02)

Julia Brownley (CA-26)

Cheri Bustos (IL-17)

John Carney (DE-AL)

Gerry Connolly (VA-11)

Henry Cuellar (TX-28)

John Delaney (MD-06)

Suzan DelBene (WA-01)

Elizabeth Esty (CT-05)

Bill Foster (IL-11)

John Garamendi (CA-03)

Gwen Graham (FL-02)

Jim Himes (CT-04)

Hank Johnson (GA-04)

Derek Kilmer (WA-06)

Ron Kind (WI-03)

Rick Larsen (WA-02)

Dan Lipinski (IL-03)

David Loebsack (IA-02)

Sean Maloney (NY-18)

Patrick Murphy (FL-18)

Scott Peters (CA-52)

Collin Peterson (MN-07)

Jared Polis (CO-02)

Mike Quigley (IL-05)

Raul Ruiz (CA-36)

Bobby Rush (IL-01)

Kurt Schrader (OR-05)

David Scott (GA-13)

Terri Sewell (AL-07)

Kyrsten Sinema (AZ-09)

Albio Sires (NJ-08)





http://crooksandliars.com/2015/01/hall-shame-30-dems-voted-yesterday-roll
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
HALL OF SHAME: 35 Dems Voted Yesterday To ROLL BACK DODD-FRANK Provisions (Original Post) Segami Jan 2015 OP
Very displeased to see my Rep (Esty) on this list. MANative Jan 2015 #1
Me too....(delBene)... Wounded Bear Jan 2015 #2
Yes, I know what you mean. I understand why Esty might... MANative Jan 2015 #4
I thought Clare McCaskell was on that list too...n/t monmouth4 Jan 2015 #3
Ron Kind. Jackpine Radical Jan 2015 #5
I am disgusted to see Maryland's John Delaney on this list LiberalEsto Jan 2015 #6
Gwen Graham probably won't be in that House seat long madville Jan 2015 #7
Yuck. 2 from CT. bigwillq Jan 2015 #8
Shameful. The republicans don't need any help in enacting their agenda to destroy America dissentient Jan 2015 #9
You never saw this many repubs Segami Jan 2015 #11
If Republicans keep getting this much help from so-called Democrats, dissentient Jan 2015 #13
Wow MFrohike Jan 2015 #10
Mines on the list NY-18 WTF Sean???? Historic NY Jan 2015 #12
And yet Ami Bera's biggest contributor seems to be ActBlue.....WTF nt pkdu Jan 2015 #14
Why does wall street want to roll back given it is doing great right now? Johonny Jan 2015 #15
They are just ensuring their financial future. alarimer Jan 2015 #16
Why vote Republican, when you can vote 3rd way? Katashi_itto Jan 2015 #17
Turd way greed grovelers. L0oniX Jan 2015 #18
There isn't a liberal or moderate Democratic party any more. LiberalArkie Jan 2015 #19
Wth.. I recognize Ami Bera as one who we were glad won in close race in Cal.. Cha Jan 2015 #20
Traitors! De-regulating Wall Street is NOT what people who care about Americans do RiverLover Jan 2015 #21
Not surprised to see Ron Kind (DINO - WI) listed. We need to primary this anti-union .... Scuba Jan 2015 #22
Follow the money. marmar Jan 2015 #23
And now the uberprogressives have their new purge list... SidDithers Jan 2015 #24
No we have our list of democrats who consistently onecaliberal Jan 2015 #29
And there won't be substantive discussion. joshcryer Jan 2015 #30
"And I frankly don't care anymore"... SidDithers Jan 2015 #31
They should be forced to wear suits with their sponsors names on them like NASCAR drivers hobbit709 Jan 2015 #25
Very proud of my Puglover Jan 2015 #26
Pathetic. I need to make a call to my representative's office today (Loebsack). bullwinkle428 Jan 2015 #27
Garamendi Finally Gets To Congress... And Immediately Sells Out... WillyT Jan 2015 #28
Of course you mean Jakes Progress Jan 2015 #32

MANative

(4,188 posts)
1. Very displeased to see my Rep (Esty) on this list.
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 07:12 PM
Jan 2015

She'll be getting a call and a letter from me.

Wounded Bear

(64,324 posts)
2. Me too....(delBene)...
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 07:16 PM
Jan 2015

I knew she was a corporate 3rd-wayer, but damn, this is disappointing.

MANative

(4,188 posts)
4. Yes, I know what you mean. I understand why Esty might...
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 07:19 PM
Jan 2015

have felt the need to vote that way (some of Fairfield Cty CT - home to bankers galore - is a big chunk of her district), but that still doesn't make it right.

 

LiberalEsto

(22,845 posts)
6. I am disgusted to see Maryland's John Delaney on this list
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 07:34 PM
Jan 2015

but not surprised. He's a DINO if ever there was one.

madville

(7,847 posts)
7. Gwen Graham probably won't be in that House seat long
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 07:36 PM
Jan 2015

She will have a tough battle to keep that seat in 2016, Southerland was a horrible candidate that she probably won't have the pleasure of running against again.

I would look for her run for the next open Senate seat here in Florida, whether that be Rubio's or Nelson's.

 

dissentient

(861 posts)
9. Shameful. The republicans don't need any help in enacting their agenda to destroy America
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 07:41 PM
Jan 2015

This is not a good sign, this many so-called Democrats jumping ship already to assist the right wing GOP.

 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
11. You never saw this many repubs
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 07:50 PM
Jan 2015

in the last six years jump ship in order to help push forward any Democratic Party positions.





 

dissentient

(861 posts)
13. If Republicans keep getting this much help from so-called Democrats,
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 07:57 PM
Jan 2015

this country is in for a world of hurt.

I agree with you completely.

MFrohike

(1,980 posts)
10. Wow
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 07:47 PM
Jan 2015

Not a single North Carolinian. Either B of A didn't go all out or they grew some spines. Very nice. Now, we just need David Price to stop falling in love with every so-called free trade bill in existence and we might get somewhere.

Johonny

(26,178 posts)
15. Why does wall street want to roll back given it is doing great right now?
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 08:10 PM
Jan 2015

I assume by Wall Street they mean narrow minded rich people that think they understand investing but sound like Ben Stein when talking about the actual stock market.

 

alarimer

(17,146 posts)
16. They are just ensuring their financial future.
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 08:16 PM
Jan 2015

They sell us out so they can make mega bucks.

LiberalArkie

(19,804 posts)
19. There isn't a liberal or moderate Democratic party any more.
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 08:22 PM
Jan 2015

I actually think the Republican will (at some point) go back to moderate/liberal like Eisenhower, Rockefeller etc, the R's of the 50's and 60's before the Democratic party can be thought of Liberal again.

Cha

(319,067 posts)
20. Wth.. I recognize Ami Bera as one who we were glad won in close race in Cal..
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 08:30 PM
Jan 2015

What are they thinking?!

thanks for the names Segami.. I was looking yesterday for them.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
21. Traitors! De-regulating Wall Street is NOT what people who care about Americans do
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 09:03 PM
Jan 2015

So it isn't what Democrats do.

We Stand Up for People. We didn't elect anyone to Stand Up for Wall Street corruption or to put Our Economy at risk Again.

Thanks for posting Segami! We need to OUT these wolves in sheeps clothing.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
22. Not surprised to see Ron Kind (DINO - WI) listed. We need to primary this anti-union ....
Fri Jan 9, 2015, 10:00 AM
Jan 2015

... pro-Wall Street wolf who wears sheep's clothing.

SidDithers

(44,333 posts)
24. And now the uberprogressives have their new purge list...
Fri Jan 9, 2015, 10:05 AM
Jan 2015

Get rid of 'em!! Replace with Republicans!!

Sid

 

onecaliberal

(36,594 posts)
29. No we have our list of democrats who consistently
Fri Jan 9, 2015, 11:24 AM
Jan 2015

Vote as if they are republicans to screw over the poor so the wealthy can have even more. Give me a break.

joshcryer

(62,536 posts)
30. And there won't be substantive discussion.
Fri Jan 9, 2015, 11:26 AM
Jan 2015

We won't discuss why they chose to vote that way, no one will make efforts to get a statement, they won't be able to explain what happened behind the scenes, or if they voted for it for other circumstances.

Basically there's no analysis here at all. And I frankly don't care anymore.

It is what it is.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
25. They should be forced to wear suits with their sponsors names on them like NASCAR drivers
Fri Jan 9, 2015, 10:12 AM
Jan 2015

So we would know right away who owns them.

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
28. Garamendi Finally Gets To Congress... And Immediately Sells Out...
Fri Jan 9, 2015, 10:27 AM
Jan 2015

And I voted for the fucker.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»HALL OF SHAME: 35 Dems Vo...