Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riqster

(13,986 posts)
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 05:10 PM Jan 2015

Obama didn’t march in Paris. He did, however, decimate al-Quaida, get Bin Laden, and bomb ISIS.

Beats the hell out of wasting taxpayer money on a transatlantic photo op.

67 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama didn’t march in Paris. He did, however, decimate al-Quaida, get Bin Laden, and bomb ISIS. (Original Post) riqster Jan 2015 OP
Uh, Thank you! nt Ilsa Jan 2015 #1
So why are we still allies with the governments of Saudi Arabia JonLP24 Jan 2015 #2
Drone attacks Killed a bunch of bystanders and were excellent recruiting tools for terrorists n2doc Jan 2015 #3
Ditto. nt cwydro Jan 2015 #15
who did go? anyone? roguevalley Jan 2015 #18
2014 The Year in Drones Octafish Jan 2015 #27
I believe the proper term for a bystander killed in a drone strike is "suspected militant". n/t hughee99 Jan 2015 #28
Try human being. Elmer S. E. Dump Jan 2015 #36
That would seem like a more accurate term, but it doesn't seem to be the one that IS used. n/t hughee99 Jan 2015 #37
We need to dehumanize our victims. Works every time! Elmer S. E. Dump Jan 2015 #40
...^ that 840high Jan 2015 #41
Somebody needed to say it LordGlenconner Jan 2015 #4
Exactly, it is much more important TBF Jan 2015 #5
He also destroyed social security, invaded Syria, and pushed thru Keystone. zappaman Jan 2015 #6
Pushed thru Keystone sounds like a misrepresentation JonLP24 Jan 2015 #9
How does the President open up a procedural vote geek tragedy Jan 2015 #20
Got me?????? Iliyah Jan 2015 #23
I'm going based on things that were posted here JonLP24 Jan 2015 #25
Frank Underwood could do it. AngryAmish Jan 2015 #64
Nope, nope, and nope (unless you were being sarcastic?) George II Jan 2015 #10
yes I think he was joking uhnope Jan 2015 #16
These and other manufactured outrages brought to you by ... JoePhilly Jan 2015 #13
Made me laugh Hekate Jan 2015 #29
I'm not just the Combustible Hair Club president... riqster Jan 2015 #39
Nope, no Rogaine ... more like Propane. JoePhilly Jan 2015 #52
Touché..... Toupee.... Hekate Jan 2015 #58
Torchee I think. JoePhilly Jan 2015 #59
LOL bettyellen Jan 2015 #42
What's so funny? zappaman Jan 2015 #44
you killed it! bettyellen Jan 2015 #46
EXACTLY. + 1000 n/t MBS Jan 2015 #7
Yes, he did all that and MORE, but....but....but.... George II Jan 2015 #8
Got it. DeSwiss Jan 2015 #11
K & R SunSeeker Jan 2015 #12
and by "decimate" we suddenly mean "fund," right (or have we forgotten Libya and Syria already?) MisterP Jan 2015 #14
Yeah... Roy Rolling Jan 2015 #17
im sure there is a legitimate argument but nothing said in the op comes close xiamiam Jan 2015 #19
yeah, thank god there is no more al -Quaida or Isis. m-lekktor Jan 2015 #21
Doesn't matter. Turbineguy Jan 2015 #22
Thanks Gman Jan 2015 #24
Yeah, it started as my FB response to the Foxbots. riqster Jan 2015 #38
Obama is going to be ridiculed by the righties no matter what he does. livingonearth Jan 2015 #26
...and the lefties... Hekate Jan 2015 #30
Pass the bottle. Bobbie Jo Jan 2015 #31
I recommend Naproxen. Stronger. riqster Jan 2015 #35
I hear you! freshwest Jan 2015 #47
A lefty ripped him for not going to Paris? Really? JonLP24 Jan 2015 #33
He got Alwhacki too!! Oklahoma_Liberal Jan 2015 #32
Thank the heavens we got a war president. TM99 Jan 2015 #34
We have a President who deals with the shite coming down the PIKE. If you know what he's Cha Jan 2015 #49
Oh I am well aware. TM99 Jan 2015 #55
But but but.. he didn't FAKE MARCH in solidarity with the other FAKE MARCHERS!!! tabasco Jan 2015 #43
And said we "tortured some folks" grahamhgreen Jan 2015 #45
because what's important is that we kill more muslims. ND-Dem Jan 2015 #48
No. "What's important" is the US is on top of taking out Terrorists who Blow People UP just 'cause. Cha Jan 2015 #50
Bollocks. Not all moslems are terrorists. Nor are all terrorists moslems. riqster Jan 2015 #51
yet that seems to be mainly who we're killing. and a lot of them. sure are a lot of ND-Dem Jan 2015 #57
Isn't Al Qaeda in Yemen claiming responsibilty for the Paris murders? Link... 1bigdude Jan 2015 #53
Yeah, which is interesting given that one person involved in the attack seems to be from ISIS. riqster Jan 2015 #54
lol . . . I think "wasting taxpayer money" is debatable DrDan Jan 2015 #56
The administration is smart to ... JoePhilly Jan 2015 #60
ah . . . ye olde multidimensional chess once again DrDan Jan 2015 #61
If that's the best you could come up with ... JoePhilly Jan 2015 #62
I admit I am no match for your creativity DrDan Jan 2015 #63
Christ that is so depressing. I really mean that. Do you have any idea why? Bonobo Jan 2015 #65
"Decimate" means "reduce by one-tenth" REP Jan 2015 #66
Funny but not complete. riqster Jan 2015 #67

JonLP24

(29,929 posts)
2. So why are we still allies with the governments of Saudi Arabia
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 05:19 PM
Jan 2015

Kuwait, UAB, and Qatar? Al-Qaeda, Bin Laden, and ISIS. They all have a link in common. What is it?

I couldn't care less if he was in Paris. That even isn't even in the same galaxy as to where my concerns lie.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
3. Drone attacks Killed a bunch of bystanders and were excellent recruiting tools for terrorists
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 05:32 PM
Jan 2015

I'd rather see him waste money, not lives, thank you very much.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
27. 2014 The Year in Drones
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 07:28 PM
Jan 2015

EXCERPT...

None of the figures on the number of dead are official US government figures. The Obama Administration isn’t saying how many people US drones have killed. Obama officials have gone no further than issuing bland assurances that drones are precision weapons which produce very few civilian casualties. US Secretary of State John Kerry claimed on May 26, 2013 that “The only people we fire at are confirmed terror targets, at the highest level. We don’t just fire a drone at somebody we think is a terrorist.” Oh, but we do. The New York Times reported on May 29, 2012 that the Obama White House employs a peculiar calculus of death which “counts all military-age males in a strike zone as combatants.”

CONTINUED...

http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/01/07/the-year-in-drones/

Continuing wars based on lies is about the lowest thing I can think of.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
28. I believe the proper term for a bystander killed in a drone strike is "suspected militant". n/t
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 07:32 PM
Jan 2015

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
37. That would seem like a more accurate term, but it doesn't seem to be the one that IS used. n/t
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 08:19 PM
Jan 2015

TBF

(36,669 posts)
5. Exactly, it is much more important
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 05:48 PM
Jan 2015

to feed the war machine! I'm glad we have our priorities straight here.

zappaman

(20,627 posts)
6. He also destroyed social security, invaded Syria, and pushed thru Keystone.
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 05:51 PM
Jan 2015

Guess you forgot about those.
A quick search on DU will direct you to the evidence!

JonLP24

(29,929 posts)
9. Pushed thru Keystone sounds like a misrepresentation
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 05:55 PM
Jan 2015

I do know he opened up a vote to save Landrieu's Senate seat for the recall which ironically the Keystone was put on hold until after the midterms months ago to give Senate Democrats on both sides of the issue an opportunity to bash him for delaying the vote & the other side to rip him for the proposal. (Gutless H Chickenshit gambit)

After that he announced he'd veto it but that is all the information I'm aware, you're chance.

JonLP24

(29,929 posts)
25. I'm going based on things that were posted here
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 07:14 PM
Jan 2015

The Louisiana Democrat faces a Senate runoff next month against Republican Rep. Bill Cassidy, and, lo, Majority Leader Harry Reid has suddenly allowed a vote on legislation she proposed with North Dakota Republican John Hoeven earlier this year that Mr. Reid blocked. The idea is to give her a show of political independence from Mr. Obama, who is about as popular in the Pelican State as BP .

http://www.wsj.com/articles/mary-landrieus-keystone-lifeline-1415923975

I guess in that case it was Reid allowed it. Maybe open was the wrong word since I probably met allow since Landrieu ripped Obama for the delay semantics issues aside, this is what I meant

I'm going based on memory but the above and now below is what I was referring to when I made my statements so now take it up with them
Stewart said red-state Democrats got President Barack Obama to delay action on major issues, such as immigration and the Keystone XL pipeline. The Democrats then wouldn't have to take an unpopular stand that might cost them votes, or in some cases, could even score points by criticizing the president for delaying action.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/07/jon-stewart-democrats_n_6119480.html

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
13. These and other manufactured outrages brought to you by ...
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 06:16 PM
Jan 2015

... DU's Combustible Hair Club.

The outrage won't just make itself!!

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
11. Got it.
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 05:59 PM
Jan 2015

Destruction, assassination, and bombing are what he's best at, not peace.

- Thanks for clearing that up.....

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
14. and by "decimate" we suddenly mean "fund," right (or have we forgotten Libya and Syria already?)
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 06:31 PM
Jan 2015

xiamiam

(4,906 posts)
19. im sure there is a legitimate argument but nothing said in the op comes close
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 06:54 PM
Jan 2015

one of the most ridiculous posts ive seen here for a while..

Turbineguy

(40,076 posts)
22. Doesn't matter.
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 06:59 PM
Jan 2015

In the republican world you have to been seen to be doing something, not actually doing something.

Your economic policy, for example, has to be based on fiction. Then you pretend it works.



riqster

(13,986 posts)
38. Yeah, it started as my FB response to the Foxbots.
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 08:20 PM
Jan 2015

None of them have responded. Funny thing, that.

livingonearth

(728 posts)
26. Obama is going to be ridiculed by the righties no matter what he does.
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 07:24 PM
Jan 2015

If he had gone to Paris they would most likely find some reason to complain about that as well.

JonLP24

(29,929 posts)
33. A lefty ripped him for not going to Paris? Really?
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 07:47 PM
Jan 2015

The only reason why I'm aware of the issue is DUers posting threads about someone on the 24/7 news ripping him for the issue which wouldn't be an issue if it wasn't 24/7 news ripping him for it (things you notice when you don't watch 24/7 news)

So I admit my knowledge of his Paris controversy is threads like this one, otherwise I wouldn't have ever had a clue this was an issue. It really nails the never watch 24/7 news case shut. I encourage everyone to do the same because the Paris controversy wouldn't an exist to us, it only exists because of the 24/7 news which is why the controversy exists here.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
34. Thank the heavens we got a war president.
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 07:57 PM
Jan 2015

I thought that Nobel prize was for peace, but up is down and war is peace these days.

Yay Obama!

Cha

(319,079 posts)
49. We have a President who deals with the shite coming down the PIKE. If you know what he's
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 02:55 AM
Jan 2015

done to promote Peace instead of War you might not be so quick with your silly labeling and chuckling, cheap pot shots..yuk yuk.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
55. Oh I am well aware.
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 11:29 AM
Jan 2015

Let's see:

1) Seven countries with our troops on the ground or military strikes under his watch
2) Increase in drone strikes in multiple countries
3) Restarting war games in Iraq due to ISIL now
4) Prosecuting more whistle-blowers than any other administration in recent history
5) CIA torturing was and is A-OK
6) Expanded the NSA spying program beyond Bush's initial setup

Yes, such silly labeling and chuckling.

I mocked the OP's hawkishness as well. He might as well have come in with a photo of Obama in a flight suit with a sock down his pants.

Yay team America, we gots ourselves a badd ass fucking Prezident!

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
43. But but but.. he didn't FAKE MARCH in solidarity with the other FAKE MARCHERS!!!
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 09:31 PM
Jan 2015

Sevveral posters on DU were VERY CONCERNED!!!

Cha

(319,079 posts)
50. No. "What's important" is the US is on top of taking out Terrorists who Blow People UP just 'cause.
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 03:10 AM
Jan 2015
 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
57. yet that seems to be mainly who we're killing. and a lot of them. sure are a lot of
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 12:36 PM
Jan 2015

terrorists in middle eastern countries. young ones too.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
54. Yeah, which is interesting given that one person involved in the attack seems to be from ISIS.
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 11:16 AM
Jan 2015

But to your point, I didn't say "eliminated", I said "decimated".

Cornered rats are still dangerous.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
56. lol . . . I think "wasting taxpayer money" is debatable
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 11:31 AM
Jan 2015

solidarity with the rest of the world is a worthwhile effort and worth the expense . . . as confirmed by the WH itself

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
60. The administration is smart to ...
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 07:18 PM
Jan 2015

... say "sorry" to this non-issue.

The ranters are going to rant regardless, and as usual, they've taken this rant so over the top, it's easy for the administration to say sorry, and then jump past the RW nonsense into the substance of the administrations efforts, on which, the RW has nothing relevant to contribute anyway.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
62. If that's the best you could come up with ...
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 07:28 PM
Jan 2015

... stick to checkers, chess is clearly over your head.

Btw ... don't feel bad about that ... most of those referring to chess analogies on the internet could not win an actual chess game against anyone who has played the game for more than a few months.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
65. Christ that is so depressing. I really mean that. Do you have any idea why?
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 10:42 PM
Jan 2015

Because it is exactly - EXACTLY - the kind of pumped up, rah-rah military rightwing crap that I would expect to hear from the Republicans any given year.

It makes me feel the long fight to promote Progressive ideas has really lost.

The whole process of stealing THEIR issues, starting with Clinton, succeeded. It has been totally inverted.

Wall Street success? Check. Military success? Check. Weakened unions? Check. Strengthened pharmaceutical companies, corporate influence, lobbyists, 1%, etc. Check, check, check, check, check.

This OP sucks...the soul from me.

REP

(21,691 posts)
66. "Decimate" means "reduce by one-tenth"
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 10:54 PM
Jan 2015

It's from the Roman practice of killing every tenth man to enforce discipline.

Is that what you meant?

riqster

(13,986 posts)
67. Funny but not complete.
Thu Jan 15, 2015, 06:36 AM
Jan 2015
http://i.word.com/idictionary/decimate
dec·i·mate
\ˈde-sə-ˌmāt\
verb
: to destroy a large number of (plants, animals, people, etc.)
: to severely damage or destroy a large part of (something)
Full Definition
dec·i·mat·eddec·i·mat·ing
transitive verb
1 :to select by lot and kill every tenth man of
2 :to exact a tax of 10 percent from <poor as a decimated Cavalier — John Dryden>
3 a :to reduce drastically especially in number <cholera decimated the population>
b :to cause great destruction or harm to <firebombs decimated the city> <an industry decimated by recession>
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama didn’t march in Par...