General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumslonestarnot
(77,097 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)In this case I would love to see this lady change her mind but I can see why she says no
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)"Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) gave her most definitive answer to date about her 2016 plans in an interview with Fortune published Tuesday.
Former FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair sat down with Warren for the interview and asked her directly about her future plans for a potential White House bid:
So are you going to run for President?
No.
In the past, Warren has denied that she's running for president, always speaking in the present tense."
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)The good news is she can serve in the Senate for longer than she could as President and she will make a great difference for our country for the better
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)elias49
(4,259 posts)It's kind of like bad bait. You can't fish with bad bait.
fishwax
(29,346 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)So is it ok to want some one to rethink NO.
trumad
(41,692 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)fishwax
(29,346 posts)but at least it confirms you knew what you were doing.
awake
(3,226 posts)Give the post right after regarding a Draft Warren movement it seemed that it is a good question, should we let the No be No and just move on or should we push for a reconsideration?
fishwax
(29,346 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)nt