Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
  Post removed Tue Jan 13, 2015, 09:12 PM Jan 2015

Post removed

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

awake

(3,226 posts)
2. Did you go to the link?
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 09:21 PM
Jan 2015

In this case I would love to see this lady change her mind but I can see why she says no

awake

(3,226 posts)
10. Here is the hart of the story that the link goes to
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 09:41 PM
Jan 2015

"Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) gave her most definitive answer to date about her 2016 plans in an interview with Fortune published Tuesday.

Former FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair sat down with Warren for the interview and asked her directly about her future plans for a potential White House bid:

So are you going to run for President?
No.
In the past, Warren has denied that she's running for president, always speaking in the present tense."

awake

(3,226 posts)
13. Seem to be so
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 09:56 PM
Jan 2015

The good news is she can serve in the Senate for longer than she could as President and she will make a great difference for our country for the better

awake

(3,226 posts)
9. Because I believe that No means No but in this case I am a bit hart broken
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 09:33 PM
Jan 2015

So is it ok to want some one to rethink NO.

fishwax

(29,346 posts)
14. well, that doesn't really answer the question
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 09:58 PM
Jan 2015

but at least it confirms you knew what you were doing.

awake

(3,226 posts)
18. the point of my subject line's invocation was to draw attention to the link
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 10:10 PM
Jan 2015

Give the post right after regarding a Draft Warren movement it seemed that it is a good question, should we let the No be No and just move on or should we push for a reconsideration?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed