= new reply since forum marked as read
There are mysteries and there are wonders, for atheists and believers and scientists and scholars, and these sometimes have "scientific" explanations.
But these explanations often are developed to satisfy some urgent need to "explain", as if the unexplainable is uncomfortable for them.
So, they pour hours and hours writing treatises about how observable evidence exists to explain every phenomenon that can be named.
Now am I talking about science, or could it be something else?
What is it with people that everything needs an explanation?
(note to self)
Both are based on human curiosity and, sometimes, an obsessive compulsion to "understand" or to "explain", but in both cases relying upon a great deal of faith.
I'm more of the mind that not every thing can be known, or should be known, and I become skeptical of any who profess certainty about a thing, whether it be a scientific matter or a matter of faith.
There are scientific and religious explanations for practically every thing from dinosaurs to gravity, occasionally they agree and at other times they diverge.
But the brightest people I know from either camp will be happy to answer a question with, "I don't know the answer; I'm not sure about that".
That takes courage, and courage is in short supply.
So, here's to a few things that defy scientific or religious explanation:
Love at first sight!
Gravity!
The afterlife!
Magnets!
Snooki!
do gravity and magnetism defy scientific explanation? 
How do we really know what's at the center of the Earth, of the Sun, and how are we so sure that nothing can travel faster than light?
Seriously, our very existence is largely based on speculation.
There's your answer, it's all creative speculation.
FUCK I LOVE SCIENCE
Your reply helps make my point.
The physical evidence you cite required to reach your conclusions are not based in fact, they are accepted as fact through a particular Western set of requirements but many or most of the constituent assumptions are, in fact, open to debate.
The fact that science has to continually self-correct is evidence of it's fallibility.
Every scientific statement, if honest, would start with the following caveat, "if our assumptions are true", or "based on current understanding of".
Don't toss me into a group with creationists, I am not one.
And there are several reasons that you might not have a poop in the next 24 hours, but each have only a small chance of happening in this particular 24 hour period.
Science and religion, both based on assumptions and faith a fair amount of the time.
.
I'm in a happy place, happy with science AND with religion, and fully aware of the shortcomings and limitations of each.
I don't want to burst your balloon, but muddy shoe prints as a proof is not an example that can be expanded with any confidence to heliophysics, IMO.
I might ask my friends at the UC Berkeley Space Sciences Lab what their level of confidence is as to the composition of the sun's core.
They are nice people. They gave me a part of a spacecraft as cool thing for my mantle.
Your binary thinking, either this or that; both cannot be true thinking is at once simplistic AND absurdly complicated.
Simplistic because it's lazy and requires no imagination, and complicated because it ties you up in knots trying to defend your exclusive viewpoint while attacking the one you oppose.
Embrace possibilities, it's the only way we ever progress.
It can, if you define orange angels as "something that isnt actually there by any objective standard"
I suspect I'm more open-minded than you think, Skip. (I also suspect you're not entirely serious, here...) But I'm also skeptical AND precise about the limitations of semantic concepts and maps... And there is almost no muddier, ill-defined, malleable, all purpose- and as such fundamentally meaningless- concept, than "God".
"I don't know what it is, I refuse to even define it, but I know it exists!"
Why hang on so tightly to a word that can mean whatever someone wants it to? 
Maybe we can get some cheeky bumper-sticker style aphorisms in there, too. Something pithy about how "I dont understand electricity, either, but I turn on the light switch and it's there!"
Leaving aside, of course, the fact that magical gnomes didnt wire the house, trained electricians did.
... Fuckin magnets! How do they work! You can practically smell the excitement. It'll be just like a 12 step meeting. 
