General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBlacks Are The Most Religious Americans
Of all the major racial and ethnic groups in America, blacks are the most likely to report a formal religious affiliation, and even among black adults who are unaffiliated (12%), more than two-thirds (70%) say that religion is somewhat or very important in their lives.
Only 1% of blacks identify as atheist or agnostic.
About six-in-ten (59%) black adults are affiliated with historically black Protestant churches; however, only about two-in-ten are members of predominantly white evangelical (15%) and mainline (4%) Protestant churches.
Asians are the ethnic group most likely to be unaffiliated. Roughly a quarter (23%) of Asians have no religious affiliation, and more than three-in-four of these are either secular (11% overall), atheist (3% overall) or agnostic (4% overall).
http://www.pewresearch.org/daily-number/blacks-are-the-most-religious-americans/
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Interesting.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Cha
(297,137 posts)sakabatou
(42,146 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Oppressed groups are generally more religious as it keeps hope in one's heart.
JI7
(89,247 posts)The church was where people gathered and organized for things. And many other places were closed off to blacks before civil rights.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)It's a safe haven.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)But virtually all places, public and private, were were closed off to Black people. Overly religious is one of the unintended consequences of segregation.
It was a way of getting out messages during the underground railroad era, as well as keeping hope in ones heart. And it's still alive today.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)The california bill that banned gay marriage.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/03/26/how-proposition-8-passed-in-california-and-why-it-wouldnt-today/
Hispanics of Mexican or central american origin are also from conservative catholic or pentecostal traditions. It's unwise to assume they are natural allies on progressive social issues.
Response to Jesus Malverde (Reply #4)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)A Church was the only organization Blacks were allowed to participate in for centuries. All the holy roller mumbo jumbo was just one of the unintended consequences.
Response to ZX86 (Reply #15)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)Preempts a lot of storming of the palaces.
Response to ZX86 (Reply #30)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)and much more active on issues like social justice and equality than white churches. Heaven is the ultimate goal but never the earthly goal.
For the oppressed and poor the church gave them strength to continue on. Without it there is nothing because both blacks and the poor know better than to believe that a government of and for the whites is going to be reliable. The 60s was the exception not the rule.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)former9thward
(31,978 posts)thucythucy
(8,045 posts)Talk about condescension!
ZX86
(1,428 posts)Yes, I know.
former9thward
(31,978 posts)No one else. Real world.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)In the real world people observe others behaviors and form conclusions. It's done everyday by everybody. Including you.
former9thward
(31,978 posts)had no interest in seeking a savior. Yeah, you are really observant.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)You end up getting a hair cut.
Response to ZX86 (Reply #66)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
Number23
(24,544 posts)predominantly white states refused.
But thanks for dusting that old bit of tired, divisive BS off. Alot of folks around here got off on using that a few years ago and judging by some of the posts around here lately, I'm not the slightest bit surprised to see it coming back up again.
dsc
(52,155 posts)In DC the public didn't pass it the legislature did. In Maryland both the legislature and the public passed it.
Number23
(24,544 posts)onenote
(42,693 posts)The council was divided 4-4 by race. The four white council members and two black members voted to legalize same sex marriage; two black city council members (including Marion Berry) voted against, citing the views of their constituents (both were from wards that are 90+% African American).
Overall, it should be noted, the African American population of the District Columbia dropped from 65 percent of the population of DC in 1990 to just over 50 percent in 2000.
That doesn't mean that African-Americans who opposed the same sex marriage bill on religious grounds will suddenly become supporters of republican candidates. It does mean that the Democratic party flourishes by being a big tent where those who opposed same sex marriage on religious grounds were not driven from the party.
Number23
(24,544 posts)reinforce the foregone conclusion that every black person in America is opposed to gay marriage but so much of your post is just flat out wrong or absolutely needless.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/16/us/16marriage.html?_r=0
And why did you feel the need to jump up and state that the black population of DC is now over 50%? What do you think that contributes to the conversation? Do you think that your statistic bolsters or refutes my comment that DC is one of the blackest regions in the United States? Do you think that there are many other areas where black people are over 50% of the population?
onenote
(42,693 posts)is your problem. It certainly wasn't my intent.
As for "jumping" in to present a more factually accurate description than what you presented, the better question is why you are so bothered by factual accuracy? I can ask you a variation of what you asked me: Did you think that making the factually incorrect assertion that there were "a hell of a lot of brown faces" on the city council when in fact there were the same number of black faces as white faces and only two of the African American council members supported the bill was important to the point you were making?
My comment was designed to make sure people weren't misinformed by your comment.
Oh, and since you asked, there are quite a few places (cities, just like DC) where African Americans are over 50 percent of the population, starting with Detroit Michigan.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._communities_with_African-American_majority_populations_in_2000
Number23
(24,544 posts)including a "list" of other majority black places as if AGAIN that in any way refutes my point that DC is one of the blackest places in America is just unncessary. Very telling that you feel that your inacurate and pointless post was some sort of refutation of mine.
Here's your first hint. You jumped into to say that the Council vote was split 4-4 and my NY Times link clearly says that the vote went 11-2. 4+4 and 11+2 are different numbers. And just from what I know of the DC City Council, my initial comment that there were a lot of brown faces on it, a point that you seemed EXTREMELY interested in "correcting" for some unknown reason, still stands as does everything else that I initially wrote.
But if you need to pretend that my post was incorrect and that it's a fact that all black people are opposed to gay marriage, knock yourself out. Literally.
onenote
(42,693 posts)You are correct that I did not account for the "at large" members of the DC City Council. Including those members, the DC Council had 7 African American members and 6 white members at the time it voted to approve same sex marriage. Whether that constitutes a "hell of a lot" of "brown faces" is a point that can go either way. But you are correct that I was wrong in my characterization of the council at the time of the vote.
However, my amazement with your post comes from the rather strange criticism you level at me for pointing out that there are indeed a lot of places with majority African American populations, many of which are, to use your terminology, "blacker" than DC. You asked if I thought there were such places but now criticize me for answering your question. That's weird.
Also weird is your assertion that I in any way suggested that "it's a fact that all black people are opposed to gay marriage" when, even with my mistaken characterization of the council's make up, I was pointing out that two of the four African American members voted FOR same sex marriage.
But how you reach your conclusions is your problem, not mine.
Number23
(24,544 posts)that your arguing about absolutely nothing is a waste of your own time as well as mine but considering that you are now pivoting to "discussing" if the fact that 7 out of 13 council members were black is a "hell of alot" as I initially noted and how black other parts of America is as though that has absolutely anything to do with my point that DC is ONE of the blackest places in America, it appears that may be way too much to ask.
But as long as your acknowledgement that you were wrong brings to an end this utterly pointless and unncessary "discussion," I'm good.
onenote
(42,693 posts)I'm as happy to be done discussing this with you as you are with me.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)dsc
(52,155 posts)that makes them a legislature. My point was that it was not an electorate but a set of representatives which made the law.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)hesitant to speak about it publicly or admit it to family and associates.
elleng
(130,865 posts)by African American DC pastors, as I recall.
JI7
(89,247 posts)Likely to do to what church leaders want. Especially on social issues.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)more complex than that and a shit ton of white Obama voters also voted for Prop 8 and it was mostly about religion not about race and CA is chock full of people who are very white and very religious all at the same time including such superstars of Anti Gay Crap as Rick Warren and his congregation of Casper like bigots.
To buy that you have to be less than aware of realities in CA not to mention in various faith communities.
In CA, the anti gay bigotry is a White owned and operated enterprise.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)It passed because of older religious people and Mormon money bombs.
JI7
(89,247 posts)For democrats. Asian vote for obama was higher percentage than Hispanics.
Number23
(24,544 posts)I was wondering if this was going to turn into "how can those who say that religion is bad crouch their language now that I've just revealed how many black people are religious" or a "religion is bad and if black people are so religious then they must be bad too" party.
Really could not be more obvious.
JI7
(89,247 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)for those who maintain that religious people are deluded idiots.
Of course, the trick is not to maintain that religious people are deluded idiots. Then it's not awkward at all.
MattBaggins
(7,903 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts). . American Indians?
Don't they count?
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)voting patterns for both Asians and American Indians have been under-discussed in the media, for sure. All people ever talk about (when it comes to the voting patterns of minorities) is Hispanics, and sometimes Blacks. I wonder if the reason why is because there's not enough of those 2 groups, or if the pundits are purposefully not mentioning them (particularly Asians) in order to strengthen the narrative that only groups with high unemployment/low income rates tend to vote for Dems.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)I have yet to meet an American Indian who was not religious, and who was not a Democrat as a result of his belief system.
dissentient
(861 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Since that didn't get much traction looks like he's going at it from a different angle.
Doesn't seem to be working.
dissentient
(861 posts)Autumn
(45,055 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
zappaman
(20,606 posts)FSogol
(45,473 posts)FSogol
(45,473 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Took me long enough.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)with the exception of a couple funerals. Church is boring.
I have never been in a predominately black church. But if they really are as they are portrayed on TV and in the movies, than oh yeah, sign me up. I would go for the music alone.
Please forgive me if I'm wrong, or offended in anyway. I am just a white, suburbanite.
Peace
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)RandiFan1290
(6,229 posts)Stellar
(5,644 posts)I guess, LOL!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)You really should think twice about mocking others for behavior you yourself are guilty of.
Perhaps a break from DU is in order?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)You should try it and you might like it.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)You're gonna mock and ridicule another for the same behavior you engage in?
There's a word for that. Can't remember just what it is....Starts with an "H"......
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)And as someone who sat on mirt posting over 500 posts in a week peaks my curiosity.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Your permission isn't required. I'll give my opinion when I choose to.
And it's "piques", not "peaks".
And who are you to judge others' posting habits?
As a Christian, I'd think that a verse from Matthew would be running through your head right about now.
No go on and have the last word. You know you need to. You've got to have it. It'll bug you all day if you don't
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)How will I ever pick up the pieces of my shattered life?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Technically the Rainbow E series has more airflow, but the Dyson's make better use of what they have, and they get the really itty bitty pieces really well.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)The Hoover wind tunnel tech loses suction as the canister fills with debris. The Dyson's cyclone tech maintains full airflow even at max capacity.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)mr blur
(7,753 posts)If he has Faith in the Hoover then who are you to mock it?
The question you should be asking yourself is, "How would Jesus vacuum?".
You know...Love the cleaner, hate the dirt.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)It was a good joke and I enjoyed it.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I laughed pretty hard.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)You just gotta have it, don't ya?
benz380
(534 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)benz380
(534 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)That's a rhetorical question, Justin.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)ridiculous for daring to respond back.
If you make a comment to me you shoukd be able to handle me responding back, and if you can't that is jusy kind of sad.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Gonna respond again? Do you really, really, REALLY need to? Haven't you made your point by now?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Are you going to respond back with a ?
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Good to know most still understand hypocrisy when they see it.
rug
(82,333 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)My guess it is hard for many to tell their families they don't believe anymore.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)religiosity in the black family?
which is partly the claim under discussion. are you saying there's a generational divide?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I find it difficult to believe only one percent of the African American community are atheists.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)results don't support our own beliefs, and offer polls in evidence when they do.
great white snark
(2,646 posts)Oy.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)WestCoastLib
(442 posts)My grandfather was a minister in the south and there are many who are ordained in my extended family. I'm an atheist.
But here's the thing...They had no choice.
Particularly in the south, they had no rights and no protection from the law. And on top of all of that, they weren't even allowed to gather in mass out of fear they would "rise up". They had exactly one choice if they wanted to have a place to gather without suspicion. A (christian) church.
It was a place to meet, a place to talk, and a place to come for safety when, again they couldn't go to the police.
The communities were built around the church because they had to be.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Mr bmus' best friend -C- is black, he takes his momma to church and enjoys it because he says it's the one place where he doesn't have to hear racist bullshit about Obama.
C couldn't even celebrate with coworkers after Obama was elected because of his racist supervisor, no high fives, no smiling, nothing.
It was bad here pre-Obama but since his election the bigots have come crawling out of the woodwork and it's impossible to get away from them.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)Black people go to church, and the preacher says, "You're a bad, flawed person because you're a sinner." This is basic foundational Christian doctrine, original sin and substitutionary atonement.
Now if a white person, outside that black church, says, "You're a bad person because you're black and I'm white and superior to you" the white person can use the curse of Ham (again Biblical doctrine) or just believe that because of racism. And then the black people are offended and up in arms. But if they hear a preacher tell them they're bad in a black church, that is culturally acceptable.
Why is this acceptable in the black church context but not in the white racist context?
I am white and used to belong to a Missionary Baptist church. I walked out and left because I couldn't take it. I had to get the strength to leave, because I got sick of EVERYBODY being told that we were horrible sinners, no matter what color we were. In fact, I had a hissy fit at the preachers one day after church and told the preachers that their sermons made me want to crawl in a hole and die. Whereupon a lady grabbed me by the hand and told me there were two parts to the bible and explained something or other that was supposed to make me feel better. It didn't. I left. It was either stay there depressed or leave. I voted with my feet.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"white person can use the curse of Ham (again Biblical doctrine)..."
You're confusing doctrine with interpretation.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)Yeah, that's a doctrine. Original sin is a doctrine too.
MindPilot
(12,693 posts)if many of non-believer's go-to philosophers, i.e. Thomas Jefferson, didn't also happen to have been cool with slavery.