General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOne more time, Packers/Seahawks game
In the interests of full disclosure, I am a lifelong Green Bay Packers fan, and I am still grieving about the Packers snatching defeat from the jaws of victory two days ago.
But . . .
Russell Wilson got hit HARD by Clay Matthews, and didn't seem to recover well. He looked woozy. Any other player in any other game probably would have had a sideline concussion test. The Seattle coaching staff didn't do one, knowing that if he failed, he would have been out of the game, and without him, the outcome would probably have been competely different.
Here is video of the hit: http://www.nj.com/giants/index.ssf/2015/01/watch_seattle_seahawks_russell_wilson_takes_huge_i.html
Yes, he stayed in the game, the Seahawks won, they are going to the Super Bowl, and Seattle fans are happy.
But in the long run, they did Wilson no favors. Chances are that even if he begins drooling uncontrollably and doesn't know his own game he won't have a test or treatment until after the Super Bowl. The long term consequences could be dire.
Maybe the NFL should require concussion tests after any hard hit to the head. What does everyone else think?
House of Roberts
(6,516 posts)I'm not sure if that is technically feasible. Any impact above a regulated threshold would require the player undergo the test.
benz380
(534 posts)YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)should have triggered some kind of response by the officials--besides penalizing GB for what was an illegal hit. I think they should have at least as much concern for the well-being of the players as they do for the rules of the game.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)I don't think it would be difficult to fit one onto or into a helmet. The issues, I think, would be 1) cost, and 2) anatomical variations between players would make it difficult to pin down a minimum impact threshold.
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)I don't think the cost would be an issue--at least not at the NFL level. And probably not for the big-name college teams.
If it became a requirement, it would eliminate most high school teams.
Maybe the better option is to throw a player out of a game for the kind of hit Clay Matthews did.
jmowreader
(53,177 posts)Delicate freight is shipped with a "Shockwatch label" attached to the box. It contains a little glass tube designed to break when a predetermined force is applied to it. When they break, they show red. These are inexpensive.
Get one of our fine American medical universities to determine a level of impact that demands the player be removed from the field and sent through a brain scanner, then get Shockwatch to produce a shitload of those labels - enough to put one on every helmet in service. Anyone who activates his label is disqualified from the game in progress.
fishwax
(29,346 posts)Giving teams a guaranteed way to get a valuable opponent out of the game.
jmowreader
(53,177 posts)You have to hit those things REALLY hard to break them.
The problem of the other team intentionally breaking the tube is solvable in two ways.
First, put the tube (they're maybe half an inch long and 1mm in diameter) next to one of the player's ear pads, inside the face mask. You can't just reach inside a guy's facemask to crush something without getting thrown out of the game.
Second, automatic expulsion of all the offender's team's quarterbacks.
Depaysement
(1,835 posts)In the AFCCG, the Patriots used the concussion protocol, employing six trainers/doctors, almost immediately after Darrell Revis banged his head on the turf in the first quarter.
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)At the same time, I wonder if they would have done the same if it had been Brady.
Depaysement
(1,835 posts)Revis is almost as important.
Nyc72dem
(63 posts)The story has come out that Indy did in fact complain about the football. Sore losers! It's on the Comcast website.
I saw in an earlier thread someone here saying Indy never brought it up. It was just the NFL refs. Wrong.
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)each team, and can't they be individualized for each quarterback's taste?
Haven't followed that controversy--too busy crying over the Packers.
Nyc72dem
(63 posts)I'd be embarrassed to even say it.
"Yeah I lost 45 to 7 and it's the balls fault!!"
Indy is a disgrace.
CincyDem
(7,391 posts)jmowreader
(53,177 posts)The rule says 12.5 to 13.5 psi is required. All of them are supplied by the home team.
In theory the team's ball manager could go to each QB, get the pressure he likes and blow up half the balls to each QB's liking, then put a little colored dot on each one. The refs might go for "the balls with the silver dots are inflated to 12.8 pounds and they all go to the Panthers; the ones with the blue dots are inflated to 13.5 pounds and they go to the Seahawks." Or they might not.
madinmaryland
(65,728 posts)sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)Sundays victory over the Colts in the AFC Championship gave Patriots coach Bill Belichick the NFL record for playoff coaching victories with 21.
Belichick now has an opportunity to tie Chuck Noll for the NFL record for Super Bowl victories by a coach.
Belichick holds the NFL lead for Super Bowl appearances as a coach with nine, including appearances as an assistant coach.
Belichick is tied for the NFL lead for Super Bowl appearances as a head coach with Don Shula at 6.
Under Belichick, the Patriots have gone 171620 in 12 seasons.
Belichick-Brady tandem, won three Super Bowls in four seasons.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)
dilby
(2,273 posts)He got up immediately and ran off the field and appeared completely fine so he probably was just fine.
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)His playing didn't reflect that, at least until well into the 2nd half.
dilby
(2,273 posts)I believe that he had not even thrown a completion before that hit.
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)It's still a mystery to me how they pulled off that win.
Everyone in my house agrees that it would have been easier to handle if the Pack had gotten blown out.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)The decision should be made by the team doctor. The "concern" I've seen from Packers and Niners fans seem more out of bitterness with the outcome than concern for Russ.
He got up and was fine the rest of the game. Poor play doesn't indicate a concussion. Rodgers also struggled with the wind and the rain. In the final minutes, Russ looked great. So no, I disagree.
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)the Packers' loss had a lot more to do with the Packers than with anything Seattle did. Still can't believe all the stupid decisions that led to that loss, what's-his-name trying (and failing) to recover the on-side kick, when Jordy Nelson was right there, etc., etc., etc.
It's just that with all the concern for players' health, and with all the publicity about concussions (at all levels) just seems that no game should be more important than the long-term consequences of a head injury.
Besides, Aaron Rodgers has had to sit out a few games with a concussion, which did not work out well for the Packers, so why shouldn't the same apply to the Seahawks?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...he doesn't have a concussion. Wilson gets hit all the time and doesn't get hurt. Nice try.
Face it, the Seahawks win had a mystical quality to it. On a good day, it's hard to pull off a fake field goal for a touchdown, or a two point conversion, or an onside kick. Seattle did all three and would have lost had any one of them failed.
It was a game for the ages, can't take nothin' away from them.
It was, dare I say, DIVINE INTERVENTION!!
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)in his post-game statements. Who knows?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)I was more worried about him turning his ankle than his head
http://streamable.com/7f4
GusBob
(8,246 posts)although the King Davick research sounds interesting ( a test of eye saccades which can be affected by a concussion)
I mean, there is nothing that would show up on a cat scan or MRI or any objective medical test unless there was serious damage. The CTE slides you see of former players brain cells are from autopsy after death, it does not show up on imaging. Mostly it seems a concussion is diagnosed by the symptoms the player would report. I reckon if a player really wanted to play and didn't care about permanent damage, he would just say "I'm fine"
Otherwise the player does not play until he is cleared by a Dr. I think the general rule of thumb is one week of no contact and if there are no symptoms, in the game ya go.
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)asked a series of questions, and if they couldn't respond correctly, they are out of the game until they can. Sometimes it takes a couple of weeks.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)...and having worked on last year's Super Bowl, I feel I've done my penance.
WolverineDG
(22,298 posts)I have to admit that, while I kept watching the game, I was resigned to a Green Bay win & saying "bye bye" to my Hawks for the season.
I think what happened was the Seahawks got incredibly lucky at the same time the Packers had mentally chalked up a "win" & quit playing for reals.
R B Garr
(17,984 posts)That's Pete Carroll's will for his team and how he leads -- always compete. Leave no doubt. Those sort of sayings are more than sayings for him. Even in practice, the players are competing amongst themselves and even for their own starting position. Always compete. It has paid off for Carroll's teams.
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)The fans know it, too. The Pack wasn't supposed to win this one. After the first few plays, we dared to hope, and by the second half, we were thinking about ordering our new Super Bowl shirts. And, then . . .
As I said somewhere up-thread, it would have been easier to handle if they had gotten blown out.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)While that hit looks bad, and should have resulted in a sideline test, hits that often occur away from the quarterback are much harder to see. Numerous players in that game alone probably took shots to the head that could result in a concussion. With what the NFL is paying out in settlements it would be wise of them to upgrade helmet technology that instantly records and disseminates g-shock over a certain level. This information should immediately go to representatives of the team and procedures should be very clear about how they are to be handled. If the NFL requires test when big hit to the head is visually witnessed, they would be setting themselves up for even more lawsuits. That being said, each team should be doing it for moral and ethical reasons.
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)I've watched that hit a number of times, and I can't believe Wilson was able to get up afterward. Football has always been a game of big plays and hard hits. The trouble is that the better the protective equipment has gotten, the harder the players hit. If they still had to wear leather helmets, I bet we'd see far fewer of those hits.
nilesobek
(1,423 posts)If Brady took that hit from Matthews then people would be calling for his head on a platter.
Rodgers and the Packers stunk up the joint in the second half. Rodgers had only 60 yards passing and was 0-7 on third down. Its no mystery why the Packers lost. They didn't have the staying power.
LordGlenconner
(1,348 posts)It was a clean hit.
nilesobek
(1,423 posts)YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)Packers wouldn't have been penalized.
LordGlenconner
(1,348 posts)That when they call a penalty, 100 percent of the time, it is the right call, simply because they called it.
Obviously that's fantasyland stuff.
I do concede it wasn't very nice of Matthews to do what he did, however.
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)If the league came down really, really hard on those kind of dirty plays, they would end quickly.
Oh, and if Rodgers had been 100%, they wouldn't have lost that game. Just sayin'.
nilesobek
(1,423 posts)or an injury to Aaron Rodgers. And you might be right, Rodgers at full strength was unstoppable this year.
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)We got over Brett Favre real quick!
(Good game, and congrats, BTW!)
nilesobek
(1,423 posts)If Russell Wilson is one and done then it will be a lot harder for us to get over it than for Green Bay getting over Favre. You guys always have the tradition and the next title to look forward to.
I'd like to say that I think Aaron Rodgers is a better QB than Favre. If you just look at the interception vs. TD ratios.
Thank you for being so gracious. In all these struggling years being a Seattle fan I had my day last year and its all gravy from here on. Its time for me to be gracious.
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)I can remember my dad turning off the TV and sighing unhappily, "It's going to be a loooooong season." I can remember college players choosing not to play rather than being drafted by GB. I feel your pain.
I do have a soft spot for Russell Wilson, since we followed him when he played for Wisconsin. He is a class act. Hopefully, he will have a long, healthy career.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,996 posts)nilesobek
(1,423 posts)I make mistakes all the time.
Whiskeytide
(4,655 posts)... the opposing QB on interceptions and hunt them to deliver a big hit as a "block".
nilesobek
(1,423 posts)Except this time the ref decided it was a dirty, targeted hit and flagged them for 15 yards.
Whiskeytide
(4,655 posts)... target the head. I'm not sure which Mathews was flagged for because I wasn't watching it. My Steelers are out of it at the hands of the "team who's name shall not be spoken in my house", and I'm still depressed.
nilesobek
(1,423 posts)Its just that he speared Wilson right in the back. I thought my comments about the chance this happening to Brady and the response that would generate were the most pertinent things I commented on. A double standard of enforcement and media hysteria would have ensued.
By saying that Russell Wilson might have had a concussion and should have been removed from the game just gives total credit to Russell Wilson for the victory and I think its a lot more complicated than that.
PS. (The Steelers were the only team we really feared this year.)
Whiskeytide
(4,655 posts)...really get it. There has been nothing but cheating scandal after cheating scandal.
A Seahawks/Steelers SB would have been interesting in my house because I grew up in Pittsburgh, and my son (8) is a HUGE Seahawks fan. Santa hooked him up with a RW jersey for Christmas, and it's hard to get him to take it off.
But it's worked out. I dislike the Pats only slightly less than the "team who's name shall not be mentioned in my house", so my son and I can pull together.
nilesobek
(1,423 posts)My youngest son who is living here is amused at my contortions over the Seahawks. Sometimes he has to come and check me when I get a little loud or rowdy over it. He's into skateboarding and music.
Ghost of Tom Joad
(1,443 posts)of touchdowns is never a good thing
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)it could have been worse.