General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow FDR Saved Capitalism (Lipset and Marks)
In Washington and Oregon, the Commonwealth Federations, patterning themselves after the social democratic Cooperative Commonwealth Federation of Canada, won a number of state and congressional posts and controlled the state Democratic Parties for several years. In North Dakota, the revived radical Nonpartisan League, still operating within the Republican Party, won the governorship, a U.S. Senate seat, and both congressional seats in 1932 and continued to win other elections throughout the decade. In Minnesota, the Farmer-Labor Party captured the governorship and five house seats. Wisconsin, too, witnessed an electorally powerful Progressive Party backed by the Socialists.
The Socialist and Communist Parties grew substantially as well. In 1932 the Socialist Party had 15,000 members. Its electoral support, however, was much broader, as indicated by the 1932 presidential election, in which Norman Thomas received close to 900,000 votes, up from 267,000 in 1928. The Socialist Partys membership had increased to 25,000 by 1935. As a result of leftist enthusiasm for President Roosevelt, however, its presidential vote declined to 188,000 in 1936, fewer votes than the party had attained in any presidential contest since 1900. The Communist Party, on the other hand, backed President Roosevelt from 1936 on, and its membership grew steadily, numbering between 80,000 and 90,000 at its high point in 1939. Communists played a role in left center, winning electoral coalitions in several states, notably California, Minnesota, New York, and Washington.
Conclusion:
Adapted from the book It Didnt Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States, by Seymour Martin Lipset and Gary Marks, published by W. W. Norton. Used by permission of W. W. Norton and Company.
http://www.hoover.org/research/how-fdr-saved-capitalism
jwirr
(39,215 posts)had the capitalists on the run. I live in NE MN and have met some of those older people who supported some of his opposition. Some of them were union supporters who help unionize the mines up here and some were Socialists who were in contact with other socialists in the Scandinavian countries that bordered the USSR. In fact some of them had relatives who had gone to the USSR to help fight for the cause. If he had not liberalized his message they would not have eagerly turned to support him in the mid 30s.
Us Democrats were the lesser of two evils in the minds of the capitalists.
In the 1980s we were remodeling and found old Socialist newspapers hidden in the wall. I also saw many artifacts when I worked at a museum on the North Shore.
I am going to try to read this book.
To bad our left leaning parties cannot combine efforts again.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)wyldwolf
(43,891 posts)part of his reasoning for co-opting the left was to prevent more liberal candidates from challenging him. The article mentions it:
The book goes into much more detail on the tension between FDR and the Progressive movement.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)still revere Floyd B. Olson.