Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
HRC is even MORE inevitable than she was in 2008. (Original Post) Oklahoma_Liberal Jan 2015 OP
Warren is not running. hrmjustin Jan 2015 #1
Neither is Hillary. GeorgeGist Jan 2015 #25
Hillary will run. hrmjustin Jan 2015 #27
yeah and??? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #2
Actually, she is OKNancy Jan 2015 #3
Hillary is simply the most talked about. She nor Liz are running at this time. Autumn Jan 2015 #4
thread winner. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2015 #5
yeah cuz there's a really really good chance that hillary's not running. unblock Jan 2015 #6
There certainly is a chance. And of course we can always have hope Autumn Jan 2015 #7
Given the choice btw finding a candidate who wants to run, and dreaming about Warren, your choice is brooklynite Jan 2015 #8
My choice is Bernie, who says he may run. We know yours. Autumn Jan 2015 #9
I really like Senator Sanders, but he doesn't have a snowball's chance in Hades to win. BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #10
Does that mean Democrats wouldn't vote for him in the general election? HappyMe Jan 2015 #11
A handful on the conservative edge might not (think "Reagan Democrats")..... brooklynite Jan 2015 #13
On the off-chance that he would win the Democratic primaries? Of course we will! But BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #17
I would rather get the country back on the right track where the poor and working class Autumn Jan 2015 #16
I would rather stand with the Party that has brought this country back on track for the poor and BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #18
Well see here's the problem, I'm just not a teabgger, because I can see the long picture. Autumn Jan 2015 #23
+1. n/t winter is coming Jan 2015 #21
I don't believe people realize what a phenomenal candidate Barack Obama was in 2008... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2015 #12
And he had the most important characteristic of a candidate--he wanted the job. geek tragedy Jan 2015 #22
In retrospect she lost to a great candidate. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2015 #24
everyone misunderstood the kind of race 2008 was dsc Jan 2015 #14
Maybe. But, because earthquakes and hurricanes are inevitable doesn't mean we have to like them. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2015 #15
"Its Her Turn"..TM Ramses Jan 2015 #19
Does anyone else want the Democratic nomination besides Hillary and Jim Webb? nt geek tragedy Jan 2015 #20
Actually, she is Renew Deal Jan 2015 #26
Are you a troll throwing flamebait? WhiteTara Jan 2015 #28

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
3. Actually, she is
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 11:46 AM
Jan 2015

However, neither of our votes will count in the general except as a matter of pride.

At least for me it will make me proud to vote for the first female President of the USA.

Autumn

(48,869 posts)
7. There certainly is a chance. And of course we can always have hope
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 12:08 PM
Jan 2015

that she doesn't run. Fingers crossed here.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
10. I really like Senator Sanders, but he doesn't have a snowball's chance in Hades to win.
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 12:54 PM
Jan 2015

My desire to have another Democrat in the White House trumps my personal wants and needs, and above all else, I want a WINNER. As a Liberal and a Democrat, I want to WIN. I hope to see another Democrat in the White House for eight more years after Obama departs from it. And I don't see Senator Sanders as the one to do it. I just don't.

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
13. A handful on the conservative edge might not (think "Reagan Democrats").....
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 02:34 PM
Jan 2015

...but the boot line is that you can't win with just Democrats. You need some independents and moderate Republicans, and I don't see Sanders appealing to them.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
17. On the off-chance that he would win the Democratic primaries? Of course we will! But
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 10:00 PM
Jan 2015

Democrats alone can't get enough votes to win from the Republicans, mainly because many are pretty anti-Party-of-any-kind a la Occupy Wall Street-types, and will "vote their conscience" which could mean, they won't vote at all.

Independents win elections. We need Independents, and the majority of Independents are not liberal. Together with moderate Democrats, it's my opinion that these two groups will not vote for Senator Sanders.

Autumn

(48,869 posts)
16. I would rather get the country back on the right track where the poor and working class
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 04:44 PM
Jan 2015

get an even break. That's the win I'm looking for. I don't see how more of the same is a win.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
18. I would rather stand with the Party that has brought this country back on track for the poor and
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 10:04 PM
Jan 2015

working class. Voting third-Party or for a fringe candidate in the general is giving your vote to the Republicans.

The Teabaggers, too, want their version of getting this country back on track, but they'll rush out to vote for the establishment members because they'd rather hold their noses and "pull the lever" than allow a godless, minority-lovin', gun-hatin' Democrat to win. Maybe voters like you should take a page out of their playbook and do the same for the Party that's actually closest to the Left's ideals?

Autumn

(48,869 posts)
23. Well see here's the problem, I'm just not a teabgger, because I can see the long picture.
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 10:10 PM
Jan 2015

You go right on ahead and take a page out of their book, I'm gonna pass. Sometimes you gotta start at the bottom and work your way up. Now you go look up how much of the wealth in this country is concentrated at the top and how well they have done since the democrats have shifted to the center and come back and tell me just how you figure this country is back on track for the poor and the working class. Cause guess what? A lot of the poor and the working class just ain't feeling it. Maybe that why your little slogans and threats about losing to republicans just aren't working anymore.

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,707 posts)
12. I don't believe people realize what a phenomenal candidate Barack Obama was in 2008...
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 12:59 PM
Jan 2015

I don't believe people realize what a phenomenal candidate Barack Obama was in 2008 and the zeitgeist he tapped into.


 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
22. And he had the most important characteristic of a candidate--he wanted the job.
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 10:08 PM
Jan 2015

Candidates who have to be pushed into running . . . Fred Dalton Thompson was probably the most successful.

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,707 posts)
24. In retrospect she lost to a great candidate.
Mon Jan 26, 2015, 01:56 AM
Jan 2015

I don't think you can infer much more from that primary season other than if there's a once in a millennium candidate he or she has a chance of upsetting Clinton.

dsc

(53,340 posts)
14. everyone misunderstood the kind of race 2008 was
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 03:07 PM
Jan 2015

Usually in a primary someone in the mid 40's, which is where she was, is in a very strong position. Once other candidates drop out they go to other candidates usually including the one with the mid 40's. Instead she was in Landrieu's position with no one knowing it. Now, she is well above 50 and the primary won't be as 'partisan' as the one in 08. The Democrats were divided into two parties in 08 so that pretty much no one who wasn't for Hilary at the start joined her later (she also didn't lose any of her supporters). Thus she started and ended in the 40's just like Landrieu did. Frankly, she is in way better position this time. Could she lose? Yes, she could. But I frankly have never heard of any well known candidate have a lead like this and be over 50 in a multi candidate race lose.

Renew Deal

(84,765 posts)
26. Actually, she is
Mon Jan 26, 2015, 09:06 AM
Jan 2015

The prospect of Obama loomed large in 2008. There's no competition like that this time around. Biden is the next one up after her and I don't think he's polling above 15%. I don't think there is even a Democrat not previously mentioned that has a decent chance. Barring a major surprise like a moral/criminal issue, she will cruise.

WhiteTara

(31,216 posts)
28. Are you a troll throwing flamebait?
Mon Jan 26, 2015, 09:34 AM
Jan 2015

And She is more inevitable than in 2008. What do you have against a powerful woman running the country. Warren will be a great Senate leader and between the 2, we shall have a fine government.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»HRC is even MORE inevitab...