General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHOW Will Obama PUNISH Netanyahu?
How far does Bibi Netanyahu think he can push Barack Obama before the president says enough? Think back to 2010, when Israel announced plans to build new settlements while Joe Biden was visiting the country. Even Hillary Clinton called that one insulting. There were other little digs, but then the WTF moment came when Netanyahu basically endorsed Mitt Romney in 2012, you will recall, inviting Romney and Sheldon Adelson over to Israel that summer. After Obama won, both sides assured their publics that all was still smelling of roses. We all knew those assurances were false, but at least they bothered to make them. But now, in the wake of the prime ministers scandalous acceptance of Speaker John Boehners scandalous invitation to speak before Congress without even giving the White House notification, the false assurances are fewer and even more half-hearted. And into the mix were getting background statements like this one, from an Obama official last Friday: We thought weve seen everything. But Bibi managed to surprise even us. There are things you simply dont do. He spat in our face publicly and thats no way to behave. Netanyahu ought to remember that President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price. The administration isnt the only party here thats steamed. As Josh Marshall noted Sunday, no less a figure than Michael Orenthe former Israeli ambassador to the United States, who was appointed by Netanyahuthinks the speech should be canceled. Dianne Feinstein, one of the AIPAC-iest senators in Washington for many long years, says the speechabout Irans nuclear ambitionsis actually having the effect of making congressional Democrats lean against a new, tougher Iran-sanctions bill. Obama has said hed veto it. Most Democrats, like most Republicans but to a lesser degree, side with Israel over Obama. But maybe not now.
Yes, yes, its not as if Obama is totally blameless hereright after he was first elected, he tried to pressure Netanyahu hard on settlements, and he quickly learned that on the issue of Israel, he wasnt going to be bringing much change to Washington at all. But thats now six years ago. Bibi has been kicking sand in the administrations face ever since. So maybe change is finally coming to Washington on this issuebut its Netanyahu who is forcing the change, through his obnoxious behavior. But the question remains: What price can the administration make Netanyahu pay? Thats less clear, alas. It does, however, have some options. First, as pertains to the upcoming Israeli election: Obviously, Obama wants Netanyahu to lose. But equally obviously, he and his administration cant do or say anything that appears to meddle directly in the election. A) that would be as bad as what Netanyahu did in 2012, and B) it would almost surely invite a pro-Bibi backlash among swing voters in Israel and help him coast to reelection. But if this controversy builds, as its sure to, and if Netanyahu stands pat and delivers the address, as he vowed Sunday he would, maybe the main thing the administration has to do is stay out of the way. A few more rebukes from a few more Feinstein types will certainly send the message to voters in Israel that their sitting prime minister has placed in grave jeopardy the one global relationship that keeps their country alive. Administration officials can, of course, privately prod such types to criticize Bibi, provided news of their efforts doesnt leak.
If the winds are blowing in an anti-Bibi direction as the March 17 vote approaches (the polls right now are close and somewhat contradictory), then it will be up to administration spokesman Josh Earnest to let himself be asked about the election and to choose his words very carefully as he somehow conveys the message that if Israeli voters will be doing their country a big favor if they dump Netanyahu. There are ways. Hillary Clinton could play a pivotal role here if she chooses to. To my knowledge she hasnt spoken publicly thus far on the Bibi speech. If she were to go public and say something, anything, even one of those understated-isnt-the-word-for-it adjectives of which shes so fond, she would be reminding Israelis: Oh yeah, shes likely to be the next president, so its not just Obamas remaining two years we need to worry about, but maybe the next ten, and if shes had it with Bibi, maybe we really should switch gears. Its worth remembering here that her husband helped knock Netanyahu out in 1999, when Clintonista James Carville advised Ehud Baraks winning campaign. There are other pressure points beyond the election. Europe is stiffening sanctions against Israel, as Haaretz reported last November. The normal role of the United States here would be to talk quietly to its European allies and say, go easy here and there. Maybe wed be less inclined to do that now. Down the road, theres the questionnever discussed here in the States, but mentioned several times to me when I was in Israel last fallof the UN veto. Forty-plus times since 1972, the United States has blocked UN measures that would have either sanctioned Israel or expressed support for the Palestinian statehood cause. For the United States to stop that practice would be, as a well-informed friend of mine put it, the nuclear button. I wouldnt look for that anytime soon, but if Netanyahu is reelected and the obstreperous behavior continues, some kind of change in our Middle East posture at the UN seems hardly out of the question.
cont'
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/01/26/how-will-obama-punish-netanyahu.html
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)perhaps Israel?
Israel has strong support from both parties in Congress and while President Obama may not be up for election in November 2016, much of Congress is, just how willing is Congress to alienate a large swath of influential people and lose the financial support of the Jewish voters?
procon
(15,805 posts)Boehner made a unconscionable decision in inviting Netanyahu and countermanding US foreign policy without talking to Obama. Netanyahu knows exactly which side his bread is buttered on and no matter what he decides to do in relation to Iran, he's going to need the full approval of America's president.
What were these dolts thinking?
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)is no more "Israel" than the Teaparty is America.
excerpted:
One would think.. but I don't think I will live to see the day.. unfortunately.
Segami
(14,923 posts).... if Hillary makes a statement regarding Bibi's protocol breach.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font][hr]