General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAndrew Sullivan to quit blogging
andrewsullivan.comWhy? Two reasons. The first is one I hope anyone can understand: although it has been the most rewarding experience in my writing career, Ive now been blogging daily for fifteen years straight (well kinda straight). Thats long enough to do any single job. In some ways, its as simple as that. There comes a time when you have to move on to new things, shake your world up, or recognize before you crash that burn-out does happen.
The second is that I am saturated in digital life and I want to return to the actual world again. Im a human being before I am a writer; and a writer before I am a blogger, and although its been a joy and a privilege to have helped pioneer a genuinely new form of writing, I yearn for other, older forms. I want to read again, slowly, carefully. I want to absorb a difficult book and walk around in my own thoughts with it for a while. I want to have an idea and let it slowly take shape, rather than be instantly blogged. I want to write long essays that can answer more deeply and subtly the many questions that the Dish years have presented to me. I want to write a book.
I want to spend some real time with my parents, while I still have them, with my husband, who is too often a blog-widow, my sister and brother, my niece and nephews, and rekindle the friendships that I have simply had to let wither because Im always tied to the blog. And I want to stay healthy. Ive had increasing health challenges these past few years. Theyre not HIV-related; my doctor tells me theyre simply a result of fifteen years of daily, hourly, always-on-deadline stress. These past few weeks were particularly rough and finally forced me to get real.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,330 posts)Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,501 posts)Paladin
(28,262 posts)Yeah, I think so.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)all my fellow gay friends on facebook who can't stand him will be rejoicing over this one! I never paid much attention to him unless he said something vile and got everyone riled up.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)The funny thing about blogging is that anyone can do it.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)You have 26K + posts on DU and you never heard of Andrew Sullivan?
Sullivan's Burkean conservativism is rooted in his British Catholic background and in the political philosophy of his mentor, Michael Oakeshott.
Born and raised in England, he has lived in the United States since 1984 and currently resides in Washington and Provincetown, Massachusetts. He is openly gay and a practicing Roman Catholic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Sullivan
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)I have seen the name here before but didn't know too much about him and didn't read him.
I didn't know if he had a slant or a special niche. I have a couple of people who I would read, but in the past few years I have pulled way back on my political wonkery. I used to be in it up to my elbows but now I stay in the shallow end. Life's too short to get bogged down in the minutia of things that I have no control over.
You mention he's a practicing Roman Catholic, so if I ever caught wind of that in a piece, I'd probably stop reading at that point. I've become very anti-religious (and atheist) as I approach 40 years of age, after having grown up and going to Baptist school.
I wasn't trying to insult the retiring blogger or any of his fans but was unaware of him.
Hekate
(90,708 posts)... during Obama's first presidential run. While we at DU were losing our minds over possibly losing that election, Sullivan was the one who identified Obama's cool demeanor and engaging smile with the Road Runner versus Wile E. Coyote. He gave several examples. And he was right.
Years later I found that some other writer, in the print media, had picked up on that very idea. It really was a significant insight on Sullivan's part.
Read his entire farewell blog, if you will. It's been an interesting 15 years for all of us.
kpete
(71,994 posts).
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Reflection might be good for him.
Behind the Aegis
(53,959 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)I can never forgive him for that, so I really don't give a shit.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)Dang!
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)and for his utterly misguided war mongering and promotion of Cheney and Bush as highly ethical people. This religious twerp allowed himself to smear anyone who objected to that invasion as treasonous and 'stuck in Vietnam era thinking'.
For context, Clint freaking Eastwood was opposed to the invasion of Iraq. Andy Sullivan was all for it, aggressively.
Response to brooklynite (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed