Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ian David

(69,059 posts)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 10:37 PM Apr 2012

Adam Kind, ‘Castle Doctrine’ Killer of Bo Morrison Caught Saying ‘F*cken N*gger’ Right After Murder

Adam Kind, ‘Castle Doctrine’ Killer of Bo Morrison Caught Saying ‘F*cken N*gger’ Right After Murder

The date was March 3, 2012 in the wee hours of the morning. The town was Slinger, a small town, almost all Caucasian. A group of people gathered to have drinks and share stories, celebrating the life of a friend they had recently lost. In that group was Bo Morrison, 20 years old. Bo was well liked by many, he had high hopes for the world. Bo believed, as I have heard so many times from people who were close to him, that he could help change the world, that everyone could. He has been said to have been in the process of joining the Marines and he was a college graduate in Carpentry. He was a soft, gentle man, a cuddler as many of his friends have said and as is evident looking through his Facebook profile. Bo was under 21 and when the police came to break up the party. He hid on the neighbor’s porch.

The media seems to highlight the fact that he was drinking underage and hiding from police. But this all becomes irrelevant quick as the story continues. The truly relevant portions are enough to sicken even the tamest of souls. Adam Kind, the neighbor had previously gone to confront the party goers. He banged on their window and yelled to turn the music down. He left his doors unlocked for this. Another fact that the media seems to ignore is that he is reported to have told the people in the car “You’re gonna pay” or something to that effect. He went back home and later in the night was called by police. They stated there was a party but that all should be good and it had been broken up. The police remained right across the street as, in less than five minutes, he went to bed, talked to his wife, got his gun from a case in the closet, loaded it, checked the front, checked the kitchen, went into the porch, confronted Bo Morrison, and shot him dead.



The timeline alone doesn’t make sense and I am in the middle of compiling a story with even more inconsistencies. Despite all of this, the highly partisan and clearly incompetent Washington County DA continues to stall justice and insist that this was self defense and “Castle Doctrine” despite the fact that Bo was not armed and self-defense REQUIRES equal or lesser force. He continues to spit on the family and name of transparency, refusing to release tapes from the officer’s car (who called Adam Kind from his car before the killing) and until almost two months later, refused to release the unedited 911 call. Finally the call was released. But what was hidden speaks volumes as to the extent the DA is willing to go to sweep this case under the rug.

Originally, the call was edited and today one of the portions edited out is released.

Here’s the audio, which I have tweaked the audio so you can hear better but need to listen close:



More:
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/04/26/adam-kind-castle-doctrine-killer-of-bo-morrison-caught-saying-fcken-ngger-right-after-murder/unknown-2-27/
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Adam Kind, ‘Castle Doctrine’ Killer of Bo Morrison Caught Saying ‘F*cken N*gger’ Right After Murder (Original Post) Ian David Apr 2012 OP
The quoted material misstates the law and the standards ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2012 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author SlipperySlope Apr 2012 #2
Read some articles and none were really clear or were overly biased... AmazingSchnitzel Apr 2012 #3
It would certainly have bearing in the civil lawsuit madville Apr 2012 #4

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
1. The quoted material misstates the law and the standards
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 12:21 AM
Apr 2012

Castle Doctrine does not require the intruder be armed. Presence alone constitutes adequate cause. What the occupant said afterwards has no bearing. That doors were not secured has no bearing either.

Equal or lesser/minimum required force has not been the standard in the US for many years in most states.

Response to Ian David (Original post)

 

AmazingSchnitzel

(55 posts)
3. Read some articles and none were really clear or were overly biased...
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 05:22 AM
Apr 2012

... Why was he in Mr. Kind's garage? How did he get there?

madville

(7,412 posts)
4. It would certainly have bearing in the civil lawsuit
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 08:23 AM
Apr 2012

But the law doesn't make exceptions for the race of the participants, if they are nice, joining the military, racists, bigots, etc, etc. It has to apply equally to all and I agree with the castle doctrine idea, an intruder is a deadly threat, doesn't matter if they are armed/unarmed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Adam Kind, ‘Castle Doctri...