Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 12:29 AM Apr 2012

Poll: Should there be an age limit on sheriffs in positions where they can abuse their power?


Sheriff Joe Arpaio is 79 years old
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Arpaio

A Guide To The Many Investigations Into Sheriff Joe Arpaio
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/04/sheriff_joe_arpaio_investigations_guide.php?ref=fpb


If Sheriff Joe is eventually found 'guilty' of abuse of power and/or violating the civil rights of Latinos and others - considering his age it would mean that he would NOT spend very many years in prison. Whereas if a 'younger' person were to be found guilty would service out more years of a long sentence.

So, the question is: Should there be an age limit (to retire) imposed upon sheriffs (and other folks) in positions where they could abuse their power - because they might not be able to be fully punished if found guilty of a crime due to their age?
3 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Yes
0 (0%)
No
3 (100%)
Maybe
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Poll: Should there be an age limit on sheriffs in positions where they can abuse their power? (Original Post) Tx4obama Apr 2012 OP
That's ridiculous. bluedigger Apr 2012 #1
Artificial restrictions on elected positions are IMHO not worthwhile jberryhill Apr 2012 #2
How do YOU spell "punish", Tx4obama? I know, you spell it R-E-V-E-N-G-E. Towlie Apr 2012 #3
Huh? n/t Tx4obama Apr 2012 #4
Ageism won't stop power abusers. BlueIris Apr 2012 #5
No DonCoquixote Apr 2012 #6
Just because he's an asshole..... MrSlayer Apr 2012 #7
Age has nothing to do with abuse of power. HappyMe Apr 2012 #8

bluedigger

(17,087 posts)
1. That's ridiculous.
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 12:50 AM
Apr 2012

If one must be capable of serving out a possible complete term of life imprisonment to hold elective office, the only eligible candidates for office would be our newly pre-conceived citizens of the Great State of Arizona.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
2. Artificial restrictions on elected positions are IMHO not worthwhile
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 12:51 AM
Apr 2012

You could say that about any elected official.

Arpaio is a major asshole, but they keep electing him.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
6. No
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 01:41 AM
Apr 2012

There are plenty of gray old liberals I trust more than a 20 something (Jerry Brown and Jimmy Carter come to mind.)

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
7. Just because he's an asshole.....
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 04:25 AM
Apr 2012

And you know the rest. No. Sheriff is a political position now. I might object to a rickety eighty year old dude patrolling the mean streets like Seth Bullock but I don't see why a person of age couldn't be effective in the position as it is. In many cases age brings wisdom. You can't use an imbecile like "Sheriff Joe" as a reason to impose age limits on an occupation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Poll: Should there be an ...