General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJeff Bezos wants to privatize schools and get rid of teachers unions. (Surprised, Amazon-lovers?)
Lee Fang, brilliant investigative journalist for The Nation, has looked closely at Jeff Bezos interest in education, and the news is bad...
Bezos is throughly smitten with the idea that the way to improve education is to privatize public schools and to eliminate teachers unions.
The Bezos Foundation has donated to Education Reform Now, a nonprofit organization that funds attack advertisements against teachers unions and other advocacy efforts to promote test-based evaluations of teachers. Education Reform Now also sponsors Democrats for Education Reform.
The Bezos Foundation provided $500,000 to NBC Universal to sponsor the Education Nation, a media series devoted to debating high-stakes testing, charter schools, and other education reforms.
The Bezos Foundation provided over $100,000 worth of Amazon stock to the League of Education Voters Foundation to help pass the education reform in Washington State. Last year, the group helped pass I-1240, a ballot measure that created a charter school system in Washington State. In many states, charter schools open the door for privatization by inviting for-profit charter management companies to take over public schools that are ostensibly run by non-profits.
Other education philanthropy supported by the Bezos Foundation include KIPP, Teach for America, and many individual charter schools, including privately funded math and science programs across the country...
http://dianeravitch.net/2013/08/06/jeff-bezos-worse-than-we-thought/
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)- and so have a lot of capitalists. doesn't make them "of the left".
2. He's been described as a libertarian.
- Libertarians aren't leftists, especially the types who fund Reason magazine.
3. He's mostly given to Democratic candidates.
- that's becoming more meaningless every day, since the Party has moved so far to the right since the 60s.
4. His mother and stepfather were big supporters of charter schools.
Libertarian/capitalist/"free market" policy; nothing to do with "the left". The left opposes it. But I'm not surprised Bezos' wealthy parents like the idea.
5. Amazon's PAC gives to both parties.
As does big capital generally. Because it wants total control.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I said..."Left Leaning Libertarian".....
and I provided evidence to back it up.....
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)My wife wanted to re-read it before the new Harper Lee novel is released.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)Questions I Have About The Harper Lee Editor Interview
You have probably heard, by this point, the news that Harper Lee is finally releasing a companion novel for To Kill A Mockingbird after over 50 years. Pretty exciting news, right? Her publisher has probably had a lot of time to figure out their publicity rollout and has also definitely made sure that she wants them to publish said companion novel, yes?
Especially since Harper Lee has always made it very clear that she would not release another book, and since Harper Lee is currently in a nursing home, and since her sister and lawyer died last year, and several third parties have begun suing one another for the right to use Harper Lees name
you would definitely think they would be sure to have all their ducks appropriately rowed before making such a significant announcement, right?
At the very least, they would have talked to Harper Lee about it, right? To get her, you know, permission?
Read more at http://the-toast.net/2015/02/04/questions-harper-lee-editor-interview/#4JaFTdmugsxEsAT8.99
No doubt Amazon will take a cut of the action.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)But I read legitimate news sources and don't take blog posts as gospel, sorta like the blog post in the OP in this thread.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)I'd say you haven't followed what's been happening with harper lee at all, in the news or anywhere else.
Here, is the LA Times legit enough for your sensibilities?
But soon voices were raised in concern. Lee, who suffered a stroke in 2007, now resides in an assisted-living facility in Monroeville, the Alabama town that inspired Maycomb. Her elder sister, Alice, who for most of their lives served as Harper's attorney, died in November at age 103. Was Harper Lee really a full participant in the decision to publish the book?
A new statement released Thursday says she is. "Im alive and kicking and happy as hell with the reactions of 'Watchman'," Lee said in a statement provided by her publisher, Harper, an imprint of HarperCollins.
That statement stands in contrast to the community around her. "Multiple residents of Monroeville who have known Harper Lee for years said Wednesday that they believe the 88-year-old author does not possess sufficient mental faculties to make informed decisions about her literary career," AL.com reports.
Lee has always ducked interviews with the media, but now a security guard is posted at the facility where she lives, warning off would-be interviewers. The facility staff are not allowed to speak to the media without first going through Lee's attorney, Sonja Carter.
Her editor, Hugh Van Dusen, told New York Magazine that even he doesn't speak to Lee directly. "She's getting progressively deafer and more blind, and thats where things stand. I dont hear from her.... I think we do all our dealing through her lawyer, Tonja. Its easier for the lawyer to go see her in the nursing home and say 'HarperCollins would like to do this and do that' and get her permission. Thats the only reason nobodys in touch with her. Im told its very difficult to talk to her."
That distance has caused people to question the publication of this book now. "Theres cause for some skepticism about whether Lee, reportedly in poor physical health herself, really wanted this book published," Scott Martelle writes in the L.A. Times' Opinion pages. "After all, she had six decades to find it in her files if she was interested in having the public read it."
http://www.latimes.com/books/jacketcopy/la-et-jc-harper-lee-is-she-really-happy-as-hell-20150205-story.html
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Sorta like your OP.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)Read more at http://the-toast.net/2015/02/04/questions-harper-lee-editor-interview/#4JaFTdmugsxEsAT8.99
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)I don't click links edited into posts.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)violations don't exist if you don't look.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Can you keep it to three threads per day?
I promise I won't post in any if you promise to keep it to three threads per day.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)far mostly consisted of "But I like it! I don't mind sweated labor, intellectual property or labor theft! Cause it's convenient for my life!"
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)convince any Amazon customers to change their habits with your hardon threads.
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)In fact, just because of these Amazon/Jeff Bezos hatefest threads, I'm going to use Amazon even more. And recommend it to friends and relatives.
In fact, earlier today I used it to send a birthday gift to my daughter-in-law.
Her birthday is the 15th, and even though I nearly forgot, I could still order today and get free two day shipping, so it will get to her by the 13th.
PS...I also bought "To Kill a Mockingbird" for my Kindle last week
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)of her, please post it. Otherwise you are simply attacking a source, when there are dozens of sources saying the same thing. But providing nothing to back up your claims.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Many classics that Amazon sells for profit are available.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Cost was $3.99. That's a bargain, IMO.
We have nearly 2000 books in our Amazon library.
I buy a few on my wish list every month.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)Amazon charges Kindle users for free Project Gutenberg e-books
By Rob Pegoraro
Kindle readers, take note: You may have been paying for books you could legally download for free--in nearly identical editions--elsewhere.
The titles in question aren't just public-domain books that have long been freely available at such sites as Project Gutenberg. They appear to be the exact Gutenberg files, save only for minor formatting adjustments and the removal of that volunteer-run site's license information.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fasterforward/2010/11/amazon_charges_kindle_users_fo.html
Response to ND-Dem (Reply #20)
Post removed
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)The titles in question aren't just public-domain books that have long been freely available at such sites as Project Gutenberg. They appear to be the exact Gutenberg files, save only for minor formatting adjustments and the removal of that volunteer-run site's license information.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fasterforward/2010/11/amazon_charges_kindle_users_fo.html
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Take a fucking cold shower already!
I told you, I download the titles from http://www.gutenberg.org/ and email it to my Amazon account.
Totally free. Totally Gutenberg. I even fucking utilize Amazon resources at no charge to me to make sure the titles are available to all account devices.
The titles from http://www.gutenberg.org/ are BETTER than what's available for free on Amazon. Why wouldn't I do this shit.
I'd think you'd like this because it costs Amazon a few pennies to let me have those hundreds of http://www.gutenberg.org/ titles associated with my Amazon Kindle account.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)and files and charge for them.
The titles in question aren't just public-domain books that have long been freely available at such sites as Project Gutenberg. They appear to be the exact Gutenberg files, save only for minor formatting adjustments and the removal of that volunteer-run site's license information.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fasterforward/2010/11/amazon_charges_kindle_users_fo.html
Response to ND-Dem (Reply #26)
MohRokTah This message was self-deleted by its author.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Last edited Fri Feb 6, 2015, 01:41 AM - Edit history (1)
Great, I get it.
Chill out.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Finishing the job that the Waltons started.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)Management always hates unions. All the big money for educational "reform" comes from the uber-rich, and much from the tech sector.
They want compliant workers with good math and science skills.
appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)Education Plunder and Profit would be more honest.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)So what do we do about that? Boycott them?
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)those actors, however and making damaging facts known.
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)Amazon.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)I expressed an opinion as did you.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)rpannier
(24,328 posts)right and privilege.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)I despise greedy, anti-democracy Corps. Sorry I ever was a member. And their service is awful anyhow, so I won't miss them. We moved from CA back to NY a couple of years ago. We ordered something from them, gave them the new address, and never got it. Called, was told it was sent out. Still didn't get it.
Then we received a call from friends in Ca. I had been sent there, was left on the side of the street and could have disappeared except that a neighbor noticed it and realized who it was for.
I called them again, told them what happened. TRIED to get them to change the address, that took days. They finally picked it up and we got it, weeks later.
I'd rather shop at our local stores. Food is great from the farmers, and we get great service from the local merchants. If I want a book, I'll buy it at our local bookstore, or go to the library.
Haven't bought anything from Amazon for two years anyhow.
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)of shopping in a store. I had a stroke and the only places I go are therapy and doctor's offices. Amazon has been a life saver for me.
greatlaurel
(2,004 posts)It is almost like someone is paying them to say great things about Amazon on a regular basis or in the face of more bad news about their labor practices or their attacks on teachers, unions or other bastions of the American middle class.
The tech sector has sold about as many computers and other gadgets that people can afford or need. Replacements for broken gadgets just are not going to sell enough to maintain their bloated profit margins.The new software like Microsoft Windows 8 is not an improvement, but just an attempt to strong arm people into buying the so-called up grade. The industry knows the only way to keep making themselves richer is to start stealing from the public sector and the best way to do that is to force the privatization of public schools and universities. Kasich and Walker are already trying to dismantle the public university systems in their respective states. Both the Democratic and Republican parties are in full blown bribe mode to get the payoffs from the billionaires to privatize K-12 public schools. The billionaires little snowflakes will get quality educations with real live teachers, but all us proles will have to pay out the nose for privatized and computerized education for our kids. Just look at what is being done to Ohio's public schools to the benefit of the for profit charter schools here in Ohio. The charter schools do not even have to make sure the kids show up to get their money.
Great post ND-Dem. Keep posting the truth. We need posts like this to open people's eyes.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)surprised, at least one of them, is still here.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)informed so we don't enable these anti-Public School morons.
sunnystarr
(2,638 posts)Like I'm soooooooo surprised to see that a business owner in the top 1% is a right wing Repug. I wouldn't be able to purchase much if I had to clear it through that lens. And then we have to include all distribution. I prefer to spend my energies more productively.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Hi Hannah!!!!
mackerel
(4,412 posts)from Goodwill Industries. I buy my new books from the Book Depository.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)What do I do now?
appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)the Sherman Anti-Trust Act? That's right, Reagan lowered the bar.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)since Raygun and neither Clinton nor Obama did one goddamn thing to revive it. Which tells you all you need to know about their corporatist priorities.
appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)hunter
(38,302 posts)Put your kid in a box, UPS picks them up, and a few weeks later redelivers them to you all educated.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)vaccines.
Damn do-gooders.....
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)And the OP has an interesting history wrt LGBT issues.
Maybe a coincidence. Maybe not.
Sid
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)I'm really out of the loop on Jeff Bezos, so when I saw your post I thought you might be pulling our legs
But it's true.
Not only does he support it with words, he supports it financially.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/27/amazons-founder-pledges-2-5-million-in-support-of-same-sex-marriage/
So. Just like most everything else in life, there is no clear cut either/or boundary line here.
Are we supposed to hate Jeff Bezos for allegedly mistreating employees who don't HAVE to work at Amazon at the same time he supports people who have no control over their sexuality?
If, indeed, the OP has had LGBT issues in the past, that would explain the sustained Bezos hatefest, I suppose.
PS...Not knowing the OPs history regarding LGBT issues, I did a search but didn't find anything, so I will have to reserve judgement on motive. But that doesn't negate the fact that Jeff Bezos has pledged a whole lot of money in support of gay marriage. So he can't be a total asshole...
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)dilby
(2,273 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Not sure why you think I would be. Then again, I only use Amazon. Never been in love with it. Not sure how that could happen. Must not have fit into your narrative without hyperbole. Is there a rash of people putting I Heart Amazon on their bumpers?
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)If I have to buy something at Amazon I try to buy it from their partners rather than Amazon itself. Many of their partners are bricks and mortar.