Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 01:21 AM Feb 2015

Oxfam: 80 people control more wealth than 3.5 billion; global top 1% more than the 99%

Global wealth is becoming increasing concentrated among a small wealthy elite.
Data from Credit Suisse shows that since 2010, the richest 1% of adults in the
world have been increasing their share of total global wealth. Figure 1 shows that
2010 marks an inflection point in the share of global wealth going to this group.

In 2014, the richest 1% of people in the world owned 48% of global wealth,
leaving just 52% to be shared between the other 99% of adults on the planet
.1

Almost all of that 52% is owned by those included in the richest 20%, leaving just
5.5% for the remaining 80% of people in the world.


If this trend continues of an increasing wealth share to the richest, the top 1% will have more wealth than the remaining 99% of people in just two years, as shown on Figure 2, with the wealth share of the top 1% exceeding 50% by 2016...

The wealth of these 80 individuals is now the same as that owned by the bottom
50% of the global population,
such that 3.5 billion people share between them the
same amount of wealth as that of these extremely wealthy 80 people.

http://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/ib-wealth-having-all-wanting-more-190115-en.pdf




21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oxfam: 80 people control more wealth than 3.5 billion; global top 1% more than the 99% (Original Post) ND-Dem Feb 2015 OP
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2015 #1
There is no "moral right" to take more than your due. Bonobo Feb 2015 #2
the 'strong' have a different idea of what they are due than the 'weak'. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #5
I agree with your premise but am not so sure "THAT is an invention of the modern age" as applied pampango Feb 2015 #8
You are right of course. Bonobo Feb 2015 #9
This will not end well newfie11 Feb 2015 #3
I hope to god it will end. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #4
We're not going to ''FIX'' this by dicking around with these wankers. DeSwiss Feb 2015 #6
The 1% has more because they are working hard. The 99% are hardly working. Enthusiast Feb 2015 #7
lol. i don't think people are going to buy that too much longer. at least, not the bottom 90%. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #10
But why isn't this on the top of EVERY news show EVERY DAY????? a kennedy Feb 2015 #11
why would it be on the news? who owns the news? 'they' do. the only way it gets ND-Dem Feb 2015 #12
its lie your bunny wrote Feb 2015 #13
i think the poster was being sarcastic ND-Dem Feb 2015 #17
ah , really . your bunny wrote Feb 2015 #18
Wonder if the names of these 80 individuals is available? jwirr Feb 2015 #14
Meet The 80 People Who Are As Rich As Half The World ND-Dem Feb 2015 #15
Thank you. Interesting and not all from the USA. jwirr Feb 2015 #16
kick woo me with science Feb 2015 #19
Pure theft Ramses Feb 2015 #20
+1000000 Murderous greed. woo me with science Feb 2015 #21

Response to ND-Dem (Original post)

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
2. There is no "moral right" to take more than your due.
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 03:58 AM
Feb 2015

THAT is an invention of the modern age.

Throughout history, such matters were dealt with differently.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
8. I agree with your premise but am not so sure "THAT is an invention of the modern age" as applied
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 08:34 AM
Feb 2015

to the strong taking more than their due, is accurate. Kings, emperors and others have taken have exercised a 'moral right' to take more than their share.

Some here argue that it is still acceptable, not so much that the financially rich have that right, but that the militarily 'rich' have more rights than the militarily 'poor'.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
9. You are right of course.
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 08:52 AM
Feb 2015

What I meant to say and should have said is that it is only fairly recently that the upper class had such overwhelming military power that they could maintain this inequity.

For the longest time, 100 people with axe handles and torches could have gotten a lot done. I think you know what I mean. Look at the Shay's Rebellion for example. Decide that the taxes are unfair, a mob takes some clubs and torches and they burn the tax records and strong arm the magistrate. Not possible now.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
6. We're not going to ''FIX'' this by dicking around with these wankers.
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 05:48 AM
Feb 2015

This modernized system of feudalism must go!

No one owns shit!

Least of all these poor excuses for human-DNA repositories, called 1%ers.

How the hell can we elect our way out of this shit in a system they own and control?

Not possible.

- The only thing you have to fear is fear itself.



K&R

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
7. The 1% has more because they are working hard. The 99% are hardly working.
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 07:37 AM
Feb 2015

Very simple.

Don't start with the politics of envy.

a kennedy

(29,644 posts)
11. But why isn't this on the top of EVERY news show EVERY DAY?????
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 01:32 PM
Feb 2015

Why isn't this being talked about over and over until it sinks in that they ARE OUT TO GET US, or at least get all of our money.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
12. why would it be on the news? who owns the news? 'they' do. the only way it gets
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 01:34 PM
Feb 2015

talked about on the news is if one faction is fighting another. once one wins, 'they' roll up the sideshow again.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oxfam: 80 people control ...