General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStates Consider Requiring Shareholder Approval for Political Gifts.
Lawmakers in at least four states are considering a back-door way to dampen corporate political spending: Require shareholders to approve it.
State legislators in Maine, Maryland, New York and New Jersey have introduced bills that demand that a majority of shareholders approve corporate gifts to political committees or candidates.
Marylands bill is set to get a hearing from lawmakers this week. And more legislative buzz may be coming: The sponsor of the Maryland bill said hes heard from about a dozen legislators from different states who are interested in the idea.
Supporters see the bills as a way to limit the influence of the landmark 2010 Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which ruled corporations had a right to spend unlimited amounts of money calling for the election or defeat of candidates. The decision affected laws in about half the states. . .
The whole thesis of Citizens United is that the companies are just speaking for the shareholders, said state Sen. Jamie Raskin, a Democrat who is sponsoring the bill in Maryland. If this is going to be anything more than a cynical fiction, then state legislatures need to act to make it real.
Raskins bill would require corporations to get shareholders approval for an annual political budget and a slate of candidates or committees the money would support. It would only apply to businesses incorporated in Maryland.
http://billmoyers.com/2015/02/22/states-consider-requiring-shareholder-approval-political-gifts/
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,771 posts)rurallib
(62,465 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,839 posts)A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Triana
(22,666 posts)Takket
(21,641 posts)How about we require employees to approve it? And dice it comes out of the company rolls if should be deducted from their paycheck. That will put and end to that lol