Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 08:48 PM Feb 2015

Bill introduced to require congressional approval of any diplomatic agreement with Iran

Obama vows veto of new Senate legislation ensuring vote on Iran deal\

Four senators have introduced a bill that would grant Congress the opportunity to approve, or disapprove, of a comprehensive nuclear deal with Iran negotiated by the Obama administration. The Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015 was introduced on Friday by Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Bob Corker (R-Tennessee) and ranking member Robert Menendez (D-New Jersey), as well as Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and Tim Kaine (D-Virginia).

Their move was immediately criticized by the White House. US President Barack Obama will veto all legislation on Iran so long as negotiations are under way, one spokesman told The Jerusalem Post.

The bill would require Obama submit to Congress the text of a final agreement as well as evidence of Iran's compliance to the deal, and prohibits him from "suspending, waiving or otherwise reducing" congressional sanctions for sixty days. At that point in time, Congress would vote on a joint resolution of approval or disapproval of the deal. Should Congress vote against the agreement, and should the president veto that resolution, the legislature would vote a second time with the potential to override his veto with a two-thirds majority.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which is preparing to open its annual conference on Sunday and to host Netanyahu the following day, will fight for the bill, one official said.

http://www.jpost.com/International/Obama-to-veto-new-Senate-legislation-ensuring-vote-on-Iran-deal-392509
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bill introduced to require congressional approval of any diplomatic agreement with Iran (Original Post) pampango Feb 2015 OP
Perhaps republicans should ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #1
Yep. Same section that makes their KXL approval bill unconstitutional Panich52 Feb 2015 #8
Menendez is such a snake pscot Feb 2015 #2
Bibi's American media buddies and his political pals are strewing Bib's re-election approaches with flowers..... Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #3
Woot yet another dumb bill from this congress. Egnever Feb 2015 #4
The Senate already ratifies a treaty GuntherGebelWilliams Feb 2015 #5
The Democrats supporting the bill are doing so because....??? Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2015 #6
"The Democrats supporting the bill are doing so because....???" malokvale77 Feb 2015 #7
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
1. Perhaps republicans should ...
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 08:56 PM
Feb 2015

re-read that constitution that they claim to love ...I'm pretty certain there is a section that addresses this.

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
8. Yep. Same section that makes their KXL approval bill unconstitutional
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 11:39 PM
Feb 2015

And required Boehner to follow protocol in inviting Bibi.

And the Repubs claim to so favor separation of powers...

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
3. Bibi's American media buddies and his political pals are strewing Bib's re-election approaches with flowers.....
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 09:49 PM
Feb 2015
 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
4. Woot yet another dumb bill from this congress.
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 09:53 PM
Feb 2015

Like the president would ever sign that. No president would ever sign that bill as it would weaken the power of the administrative branch and presidents never do that.

 
5. The Senate already ratifies a treaty
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 10:14 PM
Feb 2015
The Constitution provides that the president "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur" (Article II, section 2).


Which is precisely why Obama is going for a diplomatic agreement, He can do that on his own without getting all tangled up with the Senate.

You know damned well the GOoPers wouldn't say a thing if it was one of their own doing a bit of an end around.

malokvale77

(4,879 posts)
7. "The Democrats supporting the bill are doing so because....???"
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 10:56 PM
Feb 2015

The fucking Reaganites have taken over our Party.

That is my opinion anyway.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bill introduced to requir...