Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Booster

(10,021 posts)
3. That really would be interesting to know. I can understand when she first started her show that she
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 09:42 PM
Apr 2012

would be making less than the men, but since she's been such a hit she should now be making as much or more. Wonder how we could find out.

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
9. I'm not sure about the woman part because there are millions of women in America.
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 11:30 PM
Apr 2012

But she's definitely among our most valuable journalists. I respect her because she seems to have a little bit of credibility even among people who are not liberals. She can allow guests of different political persuasions to share their opinions and still win the argument without interrupting them and shouting over them. And on each of her shows, Rachel can thoroughly discuss a given topic in detail and really show how things work.

Another admirable aspect of her journalism is that she isn't afraid to shed light on politicians who work against the interests of everyday people and equality, even if the person has a "D" besides their name.

The Left is very lucky to have someone as brilliant as her on our side against the likes of Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
10. the good part of this is that i can think of quite a few more valuable women in america
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 11:33 PM
Apr 2012

to rival her.

i think that's good because it's good to have an increasing number of women in powerful positions

pscot

(21,024 posts)
11. Agreed
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 11:53 PM
Apr 2012

But I watched her this evening and I was just so impressed by what she does and the way she does it. I had to express my admiration. And yesterday on the network she was just at the top of her game.

longship

(40,416 posts)
13. Poor Oprah!
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:30 AM
May 2012
The Secret, Dr. Fucking Oz, Dr. (I was the worst psychologist until I meant Oprah) Phil, Jenny (I was a Plyboy Playmate, I picked my boogers on MTV and, by the way, I also know all about the evils of vaccines) McCarthy. Who is next? Somebody like John Edward (No, not the former senator), the fraudulent, cold reading asshole. He is the biggest douche in the universe, according to the highest authority in the universe, South Park.

Unfortunately for Rachel, it's Oprah "I've never heard of any woo-woo I won't support" Winfrey.

Oprah does exactly what Fox News does, she makes people stupid.

Rachel makes people smart. Kudos to Rachel, fuck you Oprah.

nolabear

(41,936 posts)
14. I was saying the same thing tonight. She's a BRILLIANT commentator/journalist.
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:41 AM
May 2012

That turn this weekend and her double down tonight were wonderful to behold. She's not snarky, she doesn't engage with bullshit, she has research to back up what she says and she has a great habit of starting her arguments with a point she and her opponent agree on and leading them right into her lair. Love it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rachel Maddow may be the ...