Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBorowitz reports on Poll: New Scandal Not up to Clintons’ Usual Standards
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)A new poll indicates that the American people are deeply disappointed in Hillary Clintons State Department e-mail flap because it does not live up to the high standards of sordidness set by Clinton scandals of the past.
Davis Logsdon, who supervised the poll for the University of Minnesotas Opinion Research Institute, said that those surveyed were receptive and even intrigued by the idea of a new Clinton scandal, but then were deflated when they learned what the scandal actually involved.
When people hear the words Clinton scandal, they expect a certain amount of sex and sleaze, Logsdon said. But once they find out that this one is about State Department e-mail regulations which may or may not have been disobeyed, they feel very let down.
In a sense, the Clintons have created this problem for themselves, Logsdon added. They set an extremely high bar with some very memorable scandals in the past, and for a lot of people, this one just doesnt live up to the hype.
The current scandal could be salvaged in the publics eye if some of Hillary Clintons e-mails turn out to have sexual content, but Logsdon called that a long shot.
The poll results show that theres a genuine appetite out there for a juicy Clinton scandal, he said. But, sadly, theres also a sense that maybe they did their best work in the nineties.
www.borowitzreport.com
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1348 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Borowitz reports on Poll: New Scandal Not up to Clintons’ Usual Standards (Original Post)
Mira
Mar 2015
OP
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)1. Wow.....he nailed it! nt
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)2. I think they missed a good chance to use the word 'banal'.
I just don't think it gets used enough these days.
Mira
(22,380 posts)4. In the German there is an expression for this:
"Würmer aus der Nase ziehen"
translation: Pulling worms out of your nose.
That's what I think of when I watch the banalities they blow up into huge controversies in order to avoid looking at their own inability to govern and to be effective leaders. They are like playground bullies who try to trip others because they can't think of any other way to make themselves be important.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)6. I was thinking more of
'the banality of evil'. That much of what is wrong in government is petty, everyday banality, not 'juicy' scandals. People in office who see a problem, and 'solve' it for themselves, while leaving the larger problem intact for everyone else, even if it should be something they fix for everyone.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)9. We need Dieter to come back ...
"I see genius. By seemingly embracing the cliches of the West, he is underscoring its excruciating banality."
still_one
(92,122 posts)5. I am not sure, reading some of the posts here this is worse than Watergate
Gothmog
(145,119 posts)7. I love good satire