Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:19 AM May 2012

Obama should also boast about killing more Afghanis and Pakistanis

The "bad ones" I mean.

You see there are good people and bad people.

There were bad people in Iraq too.

We would still be there but all the bad ones were already killed, so we stopped.

Bush was right for getting the bad guys, but got too many not-so-bad guys.

Like Saddam. He was bad. Bush should have just got him. Oh, and maybe a few other bad Iraqis. Like that liar guy and the chemical guy. Oh and Saddam's kids. They were pretty bad.

But Obama is better. He didn't just get Qaddafi, he managed to get Europe to pay for most of it. And he killed less of the not-so-bad guys too. I think so anyway.

And don't forget, he got Osama Bin Laden who was the baddest guy of all. Yup. He got him and dumped his body in the ocean. Ha ha, he probably got eaten by fish. He deserved it.

Yeah, we're still in Afghanistan, I know. But now we're killing bad guys without too much damage to our own kids. Oh, Pakistan too. Same difference. Yemen too? Oh well, that's pretty much the same thing too.

Soon there won't be any bad guys left too threaten us. Then we can turn our attention back to being Progressives and anti-war. Unless the Republicans are anti-war, that is. Then we'll be pro-war.

He would probably look better in a Navy flight suit too.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama should also boast about killing more Afghanis and Pakistanis (Original Post) Bonobo May 2012 OP
That's why they say WAR IS HELL. aquart May 2012 #1
That's deep. Robb May 2012 #2
Obama = Bush nonsense... SidDithers May 2012 #3
One of the disadvantages of being 100% correct gratuitous May 2012 #4
! KG May 2012 #5
No. That's divisive. There are too many Dems who like killing to risk getting them riled up. saras May 2012 #6
Did you forget something? pintobean May 2012 #7

aquart

(69,014 posts)
1. That's why they say WAR IS HELL.
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:59 AM
May 2012

And I THINK that the only thing wrong with killing bin Ladin is that we didn't make him jump off a 103-story building and record his screams on the way down. THAT's what he deserved. I don't waste my time weeping over feeding fish with dead meat. Healthier for them than the radioactive crap from Fukishima or the oil poison from the Gulf.

Someone unwilling to act as Commander in Chief and COMMAND our armies will NEVER be elected president of this country.

That said, I want out of Afghanistan and Pakistan. Let Russia invade them. Let India. Let China. And if foreign powers aren't murdering their women and children, they will happily do it themselves. I'd just prefer it not to be us.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
4. One of the disadvantages of being 100% correct
Tue May 1, 2012, 11:21 AM
May 2012

Is that the stone-brained nincompoops will do their best to misunderstand or mischaracterize it. It's been that way for a long time, though. John 1 : 5.

 

saras

(6,670 posts)
6. No. That's divisive. There are too many Dems who like killing to risk getting them riled up.
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:13 PM
May 2012

It's just bad timing. The last thing we need is the pro-killing Dems to ally with what's left of the Republicans and fuck up what looks like certain failure on the public relations side of the pro-war faction. It's already hard enough to hold the DLC-progressive coalition together.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama should also boast a...