Of course it's Fox News

[Ratty]

Do you ever play that game where you see a headline on a news aggregation site and try to guess the source? I have a Top Stories section on my Google home page and whenever I guess Fox News, 99.9% of the time I am correct.

This is the one I guessed correctly from this morning:

"Obama facing broad criticism for 'politicizing' bin Laden raid"

No I never actually click the link and read them but I have to wonder how they define "broad." Also I haven't seen their headlines concerning the recent put down of Jimmy Carter. I'm sure they'll get to it.

[zbdent]

1. I'm sure that the Fox News headlines for any event during 2004

read something like this:

good news: "Bush does/says ..."

bad news: "Kerry responsible for votes/legislation affecting ..."

Oh, wait ... they "never politicized" anything ...

[BumRushDaShow]

2. They are trying to manufacture a talking point for the M$M. n/t

[Jackpine Radical]

3. Exactly.

And, given their general misogyny, they probably mean they found some "broad" who opposes Obama's ad. Maybe it was Ann Coulter.

[groundloop]

4. Are you referring to Ann Coulter as a "broad"?

That's kind of sexist isn't it, what has Ann Coulter ever done to deserve that?

, , and more

[lpbk2713]

6. In some minds Coultergeist fits the broad description of 'human being'

But that is being generous IMO.

[Ratty]

5. Heh

Also in the Top Stories section was this headline:

"Rupert Murdoch not fit to run a major company, says a British panel"

I guessed not Fox News. Who thinks I got it right?

[JohnnyRingo]

7. Obama should have been more subtle

Something tasteful like flying onto an aircraft carrier with a banner that says "Mission Accomplished" would be more to the appeal of the broad masses of republicans.