Message auto-removed

[Name removed]

[Tommy_Carcetti]

1. 52. nt

[arcane1]

8. .

[Spazito]

16. Yep, at the very least, could be up to 60+ by now...

[uppityperson]

17. yup, about that. Today wasn't as bad but still too many.

[Spazito]

22. My hat's off to volunteer DUers!

Still too many indeed.

[Tommy_Carcetti]

23. "Nuked. On principle. Not a nice DU player."

One of the funnier PPR epitaphs in a while.

[pinboy3niner]

19. *evilgrin*

[Scuba]

2. Threatening to hang someone seems a reasonable reason to get kicked out of school.

[Scuba]

3. Still curious about your user name.

[Iggo]

7. Not me.

[TBF]

35. I'm not curious about it -

just wondering why others haven't noticed. Taking a nap this afternoon I guess, or in the hot tub ...

[android fan]

4. Actually it's not... U of O has rules of conduct for their students and rules of conduct for the

fraternity.

[android fan]

10. For what reasons? Got a precedent?

Inquiring minds would like to know...

[uppityperson]

12. hi, I am curious about your username. What does it mean? Thanks

Mine is obvious, I am in uppity person. Sandyboomboom however has lots of interpretations, wondering what it means to you?

[arcane1]

21. We'll see what happens if/when these dickless losers decide to sue.

[Rex]

55. I'm sure you have no link to prove that.

Proof?

[gordianot]

9. The National Fraternity also kicked them out.

The two students expelled from the University received notice on how to file an appeal.

[Iggo]

5. Welcome to DU.

[SidDithers]

11. Welcome to DU...

Sid

[TBF]

39. Thank you.

Sometimes I think I'm seeing things.

[DeSwiss]

14. They are: ''A clear and present danger.''

Schenck - ''The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.''

Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., 1919

K&R

[NutmegYankee]

32. That is no longer the legal standard.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

That said, an organization may set conduct rules. These guys violated it.

[geek tragedy]

15. Enjoy your brief (repeat) stay at DU nt

[ColesCountyDem]

18. I smell pizza. n/t

[pinboy3niner]

24. ...

[greatauntoftriplets]

33. Ka-BOOM!

[uppityperson]

27. you guys need a new hobby. There are lots of books and internet info available to help

you choose a productive one.

[arcane1]

28. Two people who say it "may" infringe.

We'll need more than just that. Obviously.

[NutmegYankee]

47. "Some experts".

That's funny, I keep reading that "some experts" also deny Climate Change. May even be the same people.

[gollygee]

51. I'm sure even the KKK has a legal team

it isn't hard to find two legal experts to say anything.

[samsingh]

25. racist experts?

[NutmegYankee]

26. Organizations may set conduct rules for their members. NT.

[NutmegYankee]

37. Nope.

[gollygee]

29. They can't be put in jail for it

But schools can have behavior standards.

[gollygee]

34. Good to see we have someone who will stand up for their right

to threaten African American students with lynching.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

38. Welcome To DU/NT

[arcane1]

50. In this case, there was both speech and conduct.

[cwydro]

36. Too late.

They've been expelled.

As was right.

[cwydro]

45. OK.

I'm betting Boren had legal experts looking into this from the first.

I hope those cretins never get into another college.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

46. Have you thought of setting up a fund for their legal fees?/NT

[cwydro]

48. ...

[DemocratSinceBirth]

54. They will have a hard time getting in another college.

I know students can be home schooled but can they be home colleged?

[pinboy3niner]

52. LOL!

[arcane1]

53. Perhaps we need a person with knowledge of the First Amendment

[DemocratSinceBirth]

44. The original poster or the racist crooners

[TBF]

40. You're barking up the wrong tree Comrade,

but it's always worth a try I guess.

[A-Schwarzenegger]

42. ibtp

[Rex]

49. LOL! Keep trying!

I knew the racists would come out swinging over this. When you join a group and agree to abide by their RULES, you give up your free speech rights.

Like this site has RULES, if I type certain words in a certain order I will violate those rules and can get kicked off.

But you probably already knew this the last million times you were here.

Seriously, enjoy your stay over and over and over...

[awoke_in_2003]

57. Here is the 1st Amendment

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"


How is congress, or governmental authorities, involved here exactly?

on edit: We need the "Unrec" feature back.