General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Hard Left simply doesn't realize how damned difficult it is
to carry two cell phones.
Let's get real for a moment: because the Hard Left doesn't know enough to do pragmatic favors for Jamie, Lloyd, and the other shrewd businessmen who love their country, they're usually broke and could never afford two cell phones.
Well, as a person who can afford two cell phones, let me tell you: carrying two cell phones is damned difficult work. (No, having your assistant carry them doesn't make it any easier, nice try.)
So, Moonbats, until you've walked a mile in another woman's (beautifully-crafted!) shoes, stop being Republicans. Just pipe down and let the pros handle this.
Regards,
Third-Way Manny
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Skidmore
(37,364 posts)that people elect to spin their tires in.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Skidmore
(37,364 posts)And I meant it too.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)boston bean
(36,931 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)boston bean
(36,931 posts)Satiring people who don't want Hillary to run and want Elizabeth warren to run instead?
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Sid
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)administrator here or something?
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)zappaman
(20,627 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Jeff Rosenzweig
(121 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)I'd imagine with all that traffic it must have been pretty high? And, how did they work out which calls were "personal" and which "business"?
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Iran.
Homelessness, etc.
Those emails and Benghazi are so important...
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)but my privately managed account costs $5 a month.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)Petty Cash.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Quit demanding other people do things according to your way and not theirs! Do your own thing!
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)complaining IS doing their own thing.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,852 posts)NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)it.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)so you know what they do with their other than the time they spend here? There are a few people here who, like you, seem to be able to follow DUers around somehow?
Or is that just one of those old and long outdated, attempts to try to discredit other people you actually know nothing about? That's why it became outdated, btw.
How would YOU know what Manny or anyone else does with their time?
By your logic, that's all you do also, no?
snooper2
(30,151 posts)and your kitchen window is cracked about an inch open....just FYI
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,852 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Or at least that seems to be the theory at work here.
Just how many threads does Elizabeth demand?
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... she's unaware of the strategy at work here.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Do you know? I never thought of that until this moment.
Did Hillary get the costs reimbursed from an expense account?
Did she pay the bills herself out of her salary and other income?
Or did Goldman Sachs or some third party pay them?
Same for Jeb Bush.
Who paid for the e-mail account that he did not turn in until after the law required?
DanTex
(20,709 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I'm yearning for them to all go away.
Regards,
First- and Third-Way Mannies
pscot
(21,044 posts)and you'll be able to turn the double play.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Oh, well, I guess and the punditry at the Sunday talk shows.
But we can root for the Republicans to subpoena her databases, no?
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)This is pretty weak sauce. Oh, well...
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Autumn
(48,962 posts)Last edited Sun Mar 15, 2015, 07:39 PM - Edit history (1)
with plum sauce but...oh, well...
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)Really? How sad.
Autumn
(48,962 posts)MineralMan
(151,269 posts)I also really like watching that pair of mallards who have come to my yard for eleven years. I don't see that as a conflict in any way. Perhaps I have a broader view of things. But thanks for mentioning my duck thread.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)all come in a row or are they all scattered about?
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)So, it's hard to tell if they're in a row. Usually, one eats while the other watches.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)or just using you for food subsidies?
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)They recognize us as the creatures who put food out for them. More than that, I can't say.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)If they are a mated pair, love would be in the air so why not like?
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)this thread is the one where I mentioned the pair of ducks that returns to my yard each year:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026367284
I won't respond in this thread any further on that subject. Hijacking threads is not a great thing to do.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)#102 and #105 (eating ducks) be considered hijacking too?
Would you eat your pair of ducks?
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)When you're using USAID to put pressure on the Haitian government to keep slave wages for the benefit of the big money donors to your own foundation, who decides what emails are personal and business?
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Hence the brouhaha and resulting secret courts.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Since due process does not mean judicial process, I can expect to be put on the Terror Tuesday kill list for drone assassination.
840high
(17,196 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)joshcryer
(62,536 posts)USAID made a study, the factory owners successfully bribe their minimum wage exemption into existence, and USAID gets blamed for "bolstering" the factory owners.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)TexasProgresive
(12,730 posts)My company Z-10 Blackberry which they had to pry out of my hands when I retired had a personal and a work space. My emails from the company came on the secure work space. Had I so wanted I could've had personal email on the personal space.
But I really don't care that much about Ms. Clinton's emails as long as they have been released. This is really a non-issue to me because whatever goes in an email is likely not very secure no matter who owns the server. When I was in the Air Force we were warned not to discuss sensitive material much less secret and top secret over the telephone and today people talk, Skype, Facebook, twitter et all everything. My grandson was putting stuff on Facebook when he was serving in Afghanistan. A friend of my who served in Iraq said that the soldiers were constantly letting family and friends know where they were and what they were doing.
Jim Beard
(2,535 posts)I farm and I co-mingle my farm accounts and personal banking accounts. It isn't a big operation so it is easier to just carry one check book.
Oh and for those who will jump up and say "Use a credit or debit card". Sorry not all of the people I trade with are set up to take credit cards and bill paying is bet done by check.
There are times when it is best to do separate but equal.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Ive been.audited 3x. I also have a horse training and boarding operation which is a bigger target but I will tell you co-mingling personal and business funds is a bad idea...
bemildred
(90,061 posts)I mean what's this "hard left" bullshit, are we supposed to be wimps or something, reasonable? Like the conservatives are reasonable?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)are somehow more left wing and dedicated to progressive principles than people like Bernie Sanders are.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)And the term "hard left" is supposed to be used by third-wayers to describe us "progressives". Or that was how I read it.
Edit: I was getting at the fact that the Clinton's pride themselves on being hard nosed and cold-blooded, so calling us hard is sort of a compliment.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)in treating Clinton's email stuff as the crime of the century, because "true progressives" will always line up against the she-Devil known as Hillary Clinton whereas it's the evil beltway sellouts who are refusing to chime in their abject horror at hillary clinton using one email address for all of her correspondence.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)But then I think the idea of secure email is horseshit. If you want it secure, write a real letter, put it in an envelope and seal it, and mail it first class. That won't work either, but you will make them go to a lot more trouble to read it.
The web is a public place, all of it. People need to stop treating it like it was their livingroom or a private space, it's not.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)intermediaries to keep their fingerprints off it, or just use the telephone.
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)In California you can't get lifeline on both a landline and a cellphone, and my housemate insists on the landline.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Is this Trey Gowdy Manny?
It's Republicans and their allies, not the left, that care about this shit.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)would stop the rightwing talking points?
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Geez don't bring up THAT assistant!
merrily
(45,251 posts)you might be only pretending to love Third Way.
I'm going to keep my eye on you. My third eye, too.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,852 posts)
"Why am I asked about Hillary Clinton every other day, about her emails? he asks. Do you know what I cant swear to you on this last I checked, here in Washington, do you know how many calls I got from Vermont on Hillary Clintons emails? Zero. Yet I cant walk down the hallways here without hearing about Hillary Clintons emailsgeek tragedy
(68,868 posts)due to his apostasy on Hillary Hate.
Andy823
(11,555 posts)Seems like those emails only bother the right wingers, and the anti everything group here on DU. Seems like of they should be taking examples from Bernie, and stop the stupidity and get to discussing real issues. or better yet promoting the "candidate" that they think fits their way of thinking the best.
As for me I am still waiting to find out how is and who isn't running since we really don't know right now.
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)look what the loony left has done, they've forced Hillary to drag her dead mother into it as a defense.
Respecting women. Yeah, sure. You go girl.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Don't think partisan Democrats have failed to notice who has joined forces with John Boehner over this.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,852 posts)whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)fashioned. Like the Bill of Rights.
Hillary planted the seeds of this mess. Her handling thus far has only made things worse.
So fuck me if I demand that the the golden girl Democrats are demanding for President have at least a shred of ethical conviction and think farther than her own self-interests.
Once again a Clinton has stepped out of bounds and the Democratic Party is forced to spin and twist a bunch of bullshit that the even the most political detached American can tell is pure bullshit.
She stepped in it and now she's trying to clean her shoe by rubbing it all over the place.
This is the problem with 3rd way putting all their eggs in Clintons basket.
Her fuck ups are likely to set us back another decade.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Your personal hatred for the woman is not make you any more progressive or moral than those who care about shit that actually matters.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,852 posts)The most pusillanimous thing to do on a liberal or conservative bulletin board is to stake out the most liberal or conservative position as possible.
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)himself and that's who told her to run state dept. business on a computer system in her basement.
Oh look, I think she has a call coming in now...
(Hail to the Chief Ring Tone)
"Hello, Rahm? Larry Summers says fuck the non-rich. What would Goldman say?"
11 Bravo
(24,310 posts)level of contempt and disdain in which you hold one of the more prominent members of the Democratic party?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)There are at least two prominent Democrats whom he holds in much greater contempt than he does any Republican. You forgot about the President.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Tell me, why did Lincoln scold and fire his losing generals? After all, it was the Confederacy that was the problem, right?
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)zappaman
(20,627 posts)If you could reverse ONE election outcome, which would it be?
Of all the presidential elections since Watergate, if you could go back and reverse the outcome of just ONE of them (knowing that would have changed history and subsequent elections most likely would have featured different candidates debating very different issues, which election would you change and why?
1976: Carter d. Ford
1980: Reagan d. Carter
1984: Reagan d. Mondale
1988: Bush d. Dukakis
1992: Clinton d. Bush
1996: Clinton d. Dole
2000: Bush d(?). Gore
2004: Bush d. Kerry
2008: Obama d. McCain
MannyGoldstein
16. 2008.
Edited on Mon Mar-28-11 08:18 PM by MannyGoldstein
In the prior elections, people got what they wanted, whether it was good or bad, perhaps with the exception of the stolen 2004 election (which was close, anyway). So, no matter who won, things would have generally gone the way they did. For example, Al Gore was an active participant in Clinton's development of the outsourced-torture "extraordinary rendition" program.
In 2008, people voted overwhelmingly for hope and change, but we got much other, for examples:
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-june-15-2010/resp...
This is an enormous problem. We've had almost 20% real unemployment for years, and more shoveling of worker's cash to the wealthiest. So now the Democratic brand is badly damaged, and the people have returned even-crazier Republicans to office in a desperate attempt for actual, helpful change. It's like the poor souls who leaped from the Twin Towers on 9/11 to avoid the fire. Awful, awful choices.
Would McCain's policies be much different? I don't see how. In addition, at least we'd have a chance for bringing in people with Democratic ideals in 2010 and 2012 - 2010 was a disaster, and 2012 is unlikely to see a good outcome at the Presidential level.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Sometimes I still feel that way.
Certainly, Obama's (lack of?) efforts have done tremendous damage to the belief of Americans that we can have real change: witness how young Americans are staying away from the ballot box since Obama came to office.
zappaman
(20,627 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Shoot, let alone mentioning any accountability for starting illegal, immoral, unnecessary and disastrous ones for profit.
democrank
(12,598 posts)You just want a Republican to win, but let me tell you....those people, those Hard Left people....believe in unicorns and unions. We simply can`t have that.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)For both Republicans and Democrats, neither side will hold their own side to account for slippery practices and so have no standing to even complain about the other side.
Might as well bury transparency at the crossroads at midnight with a stake through its heart, it's dead Jim.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)via a state.gov account had she had one, or that she would have (a) sent them using her private account anyways or (b) picked up the phone like people normally do when they don't want a paper trail?
This is not some 28-year old testosterone-fueled investment banker firing off stuff from a blackberry. This is one of the more cautious politicians in the modern era who knows better than anyone that any paper trail will be picked up. If she were really hiding something, we wouldn't know about it.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)And you're going to have to convince me that Hillary's IWR vote was cast out of an abundance of caution.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Remember that in 2004 the conventional wisdom was that those who opposed Operation Desert Storm had revealed themselves to be pro-Saddam cowards who were afraid to let American military supremacy transform the planet into a paradise of freedom.
And ex post 9/11, one certainly didn't want to be painted as that lest one lose their Very Serious card. No other potential rivals for leadership of the party were raising their opposition to it--Kerry, Edwards, Biden, Dodd--every single Senate Democrat who wound up running in either 2004 or 2008 voted for the damn thing, because they didn't perceive any political downside to it. Because, who would call them on it--Dennis Kucinich?
As for the mistake, Clinton's mindset is probably very much: "they are going to have a fit about some stupid bullshit no matter what I do."
Had she just used a state.gov email address, and even one email had gone to the spam box or had failed to be saved, we'd be hearing about how Clinton's state department was scrubbing her emails of anything incriminating, with comparisons to Nixon erasing his tapes, etc.
Process driven stories like this tend to be about the unknowable and people's imaginations.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)maybe the best is that she would claim she was suffering from 911itis.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Huzzah!
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)cooperation is still possible, provided there is a common enemy.
Who says our political system is broken?
Too bad Bernie Sanders isn't your kind of Third Way.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)are you OK with NSA spying? So's Louis Gohmert!
Congratulations, Louis-Gohmert enabler!
(Or maybe you just love sophomoric arguments. Even worse, maybe you believe them, eew.)
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)media hacks.
And, also, I'm not 'okay' with NSA spying on Americans.
Whining about Clinton's email server etc is substance-free hack stuff, not something genuine progressives who care about the issues tend to do.
But maybe there's something that you, Trey Gowdy, Fox News, and John Boehner know that Bernie Sanders, Martin O'Malley and Elizabeth Warren don't know.
But then, when one posts exclusively with the intent to attack Democrats, without attacking Republicans or pushing actual ideas, conclusions will be drawn.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)The Democratic Wing of the Republican Party.
Oh boy!
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)A: Probably. Depends on who else is running.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I pledge to support the nominee. I could never vote third party.
Rex
(65,616 posts)I'm all for freedom of choice and if someone wants to waste a vote for a party that cannot ever win in a 100 years...
OTOH, I guess it still beats not voting or voting republican imo.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I will support the nominee.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)pros handle it. We have seen already
how well they have done that.
Rex
(65,616 posts)
Two phones Manny!? TWO!? Rabblerabblerabblerabble!
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Must. Try. Harder.
Rex
(65,616 posts)However, after careful review - I'll give this thread a few more days so they can show up and 'rabblerabblerabblerabble' at you. I am a fair man.
TerrapinFlyer
(277 posts)Democrats attacking other Democrats... same shit over and over.
Martin Eden
(15,628 posts)... so I guess this OP is about me, at least on an interim basis.
But there's something I don't understand. I have personal email and also work email, and I use them both with one smartphone. Am I the only one who has this technology?
Stellar
(5,644 posts)"But there's something I don't understand. I have personal email and also work email, and I use them both with one smartphone. Am I the only one who has this technology?"
MY grandson bought me a cellphone for Christmas (I wished he has saved his change, I'm not a big cellphone person). It will allow you to use two different 'numbers' at once. I don't have a work email anymore, I'm retired.
http://www.evine.com/offer/?offercode=451-483&track=-10102&ciid=11281
JI7
(93,616 posts)but i guess it satisfies the need for attention
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Perhaps "annoying" is the word you're looking for.
If you think it is "convenient" to have two devices, one for personal, one for government, that's fine.