Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAustin Landlords Demolish Piñata Store For SXSW, Call Mexican Tenants ‘Roaches'
http://www.latina.com/lifestyle/our-issues/austin-landlords-demolish-pinata-store-jumpolin-sxsw-partyThe morning of February 12, 2015, Austinite Sergio Lejarazu was driving past his small business, a piñata and bouncy house store called Jumpolin at 1401 E. Cesar Chavez Street, on his way to drop his daughter off at school. Thats when he noticed something strange. Jumpolin wasnt there anymore. He pulled over and quickly learned that his new landlords, Jordan French and Darius Fisher, two 2007 Vanderbilt University grads operating as F&F Real Estate Ventures, had demolished the building that Jumpolin occupied for eight years. The building still had all the inventory, cash registers and some personal property inside. Sergio and his wife Monica say they were given no prior warning and were up-to-date on their rent with a lease good until 2017.
Turns out, F&F were in such a hurry to demolish the building, because they had rented out an adjacent building that shared a lot with Jumpolin for a tech entrepreneur party scheduled to coincide with SXSW on the night of March 14. But F&F couldnt get a variance from the city allowing them to skip the parking for their guests, so F&Fs agent ACI Design Build Contractors withdrew the request for a variance and applied, instead, for a permit to demolish the building in which Jumpolin was housed. I guess thats one way to make room for a parking lot. No one from the city verified the building was vacant because, apparently, thats not part of the protocol.
"Making sure if someone is living in a building or has property stored in the building seems to me much more between the owner of the building and the tenant, City of Austin Historic Preservation Officer Steve Sadowsky told the Austin Chronicle. And that's not the city's concern."
While F&Fs most ardent rationalization for demolishing the Lejarazus business is that the couple didnt pay their February rent, the application to demolish was made on January 22 and approved on January 23. Theres also the little matter of a video of Sergio Lejarazu paying the February rent. The couple made the video, because F&F claimed they werent receiving the Lejarazus rent checks as soon as they acquired the property in October.
Turns out, F&F were in such a hurry to demolish the building, because they had rented out an adjacent building that shared a lot with Jumpolin for a tech entrepreneur party scheduled to coincide with SXSW on the night of March 14. But F&F couldnt get a variance from the city allowing them to skip the parking for their guests, so F&Fs agent ACI Design Build Contractors withdrew the request for a variance and applied, instead, for a permit to demolish the building in which Jumpolin was housed. I guess thats one way to make room for a parking lot. No one from the city verified the building was vacant because, apparently, thats not part of the protocol.
"Making sure if someone is living in a building or has property stored in the building seems to me much more between the owner of the building and the tenant, City of Austin Historic Preservation Officer Steve Sadowsky told the Austin Chronicle. And that's not the city's concern."
While F&Fs most ardent rationalization for demolishing the Lejarazus business is that the couple didnt pay their February rent, the application to demolish was made on January 22 and approved on January 23. Theres also the little matter of a video of Sergio Lejarazu paying the February rent. The couple made the video, because F&F claimed they werent receiving the Lejarazus rent checks as soon as they acquired the property in October.
Why is Austin trying to outdo SF?!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 1211 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Austin Landlords Demolish Piñata Store For SXSW, Call Mexican Tenants ‘Roaches' (Original Post)
KamaAina
Mar 2015
OP
virgogal
(10,178 posts)1. I read the entire article and there was NO mention of "roaches". Latina.com
obviously isn't a fan of truth in journalism.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)2. Did you make it to page 2?
French defended the move in an interview with Austin Culture Map by referring to the Lejarazus as roaches, a word that has been levied against people of Mexican descent throughout this countrys history.
Say you have a house that was infested by roaches, French said. You have to clean that up.
Say you have a house that was infested by roaches, French said. You have to clean that up.
virgogal
(10,178 posts)8. My apologies--I was not aware of Page 2.
herding cats
(19,567 posts)3. The article was a bit lacking in formatting
Here's a better one and the offending quote.
<>
They had paid their rent in full; the default was cured even though they were not in default, Peters said. The bottom line is, [the owners] have plans to build on that piece of property, and my clients contractual right to have possession of the premises just was getting in the way of that.
French, however, said that he believes the piñata and party business was only a front for the real dealings of the store. He points to an arrest record in May 2014 that shows Sergio was arrested for buying two stolen bicycles from a police informant. Its unclear whether he knew the bikes were stolen when he bought them; in any case Peters maintains that the arrest is completely irrelevant to this case.
Probably their livelihood was selling helium and stolen bicycles, French said. They werent making a living selling piñatas; they were selling something else. I dont want to speculate what that is. However, he went on to suggest that it was likely uncontrolled substances. Thats just my opinion, though, French stated.
When asked why he would demolish the building with the inventory and property inside, he said, You're assuming we knew something was inside. Sergio was not selling piñatas at the location he had piñatas at a neighboring location in the weeks leading up to the demo.
French also pointed out that the situation is not over a residential lease. The Lejarazus werent living there. This is a totally different ballgame. That building isnt even conducive as a retail space to be selling piñatas, he added.
But the Lejarazus have been running their business at the property for eight years, and another three years before that in a different location. They sold moonwalks that Sergio built himself and piñatas imported from Mexico as well as those that Monica hand-made in the store. Customers would come in and say, I want a piñata like that one, only can you change this or that, she said. Sometimes they would bring their children to see their piñatas being made.
Peters filed a lawsuit on the Lejarazus behalf on Friday at 3 pm. This type of situation with evictions happens in gentrification all over town, Peters said. But Ive never seen a situation like this, where they just demolished someones building or house without due process of law. They were indecent about the whole thing; they lacked any sort of compassion or empathy in this.
<>
Say you have a house that was infested by roaches, French described it. You have to clean that up.
http://austin.culturemap.com/news/city-life/02-15-15-east-austin-pinata-store-jumpolin-demolition-property-owner/
They had paid their rent in full; the default was cured even though they were not in default, Peters said. The bottom line is, [the owners] have plans to build on that piece of property, and my clients contractual right to have possession of the premises just was getting in the way of that.
French, however, said that he believes the piñata and party business was only a front for the real dealings of the store. He points to an arrest record in May 2014 that shows Sergio was arrested for buying two stolen bicycles from a police informant. Its unclear whether he knew the bikes were stolen when he bought them; in any case Peters maintains that the arrest is completely irrelevant to this case.
Probably their livelihood was selling helium and stolen bicycles, French said. They werent making a living selling piñatas; they were selling something else. I dont want to speculate what that is. However, he went on to suggest that it was likely uncontrolled substances. Thats just my opinion, though, French stated.
When asked why he would demolish the building with the inventory and property inside, he said, You're assuming we knew something was inside. Sergio was not selling piñatas at the location he had piñatas at a neighboring location in the weeks leading up to the demo.
French also pointed out that the situation is not over a residential lease. The Lejarazus werent living there. This is a totally different ballgame. That building isnt even conducive as a retail space to be selling piñatas, he added.
But the Lejarazus have been running their business at the property for eight years, and another three years before that in a different location. They sold moonwalks that Sergio built himself and piñatas imported from Mexico as well as those that Monica hand-made in the store. Customers would come in and say, I want a piñata like that one, only can you change this or that, she said. Sometimes they would bring their children to see their piñatas being made.
Peters filed a lawsuit on the Lejarazus behalf on Friday at 3 pm. This type of situation with evictions happens in gentrification all over town, Peters said. But Ive never seen a situation like this, where they just demolished someones building or house without due process of law. They were indecent about the whole thing; they lacked any sort of compassion or empathy in this.
<>
Say you have a house that was infested by roaches, French described it. You have to clean that up.
http://austin.culturemap.com/news/city-life/02-15-15-east-austin-pinata-store-jumpolin-demolition-property-owner/
cali
(114,904 posts)4. sue the everloving shit out of the punk fucks.
herding cats
(19,567 posts)5. There's some good news of a sort in this story.
In their rush to tear down the store they hit a gas main, which is bad I realize, but it will cost the greedy owners extra money.
Also, they cancelled the SXSW event which was going to be held at the location, so that's even more money out of the new owners pockets. Add in the lawsuit and this is going to be one expensive move on the property owners part.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)7. It sure helps
that they are a company that literally makes " sock puppets" people who are paid to lie on Wikipedia. Lot like we have not seen a few things on DU that might be their handiwork.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)9. omg
UTUSN
(70,740 posts)10. Austin?!1 Really?!1 Liberal Austin?!1 Austintaceous?!1 Hollywood Austin?!1 CAN'T be!1 n/t
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)11. Keep Austin weird
For fuck's sake