General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJohn Edwards' daughter leaves courtroom crying
Excerpt:
She testified that Elizabeth Edwards had known about her husband's affair with Rielle Hunter before The National Enquirer made it public in October 2007. Hers was the most stirring testimony of the day at Edwards' trial on corruption charges, as prosecutors worked to build a timeline of the affair and efforts to cover it up.
Shortly before Reynolds began her account of what happened that day at the Raleigh airport, Edwards turned to his daughter Cate, who has been seated in the front row for much of her father's trial.
"I don't know what's coming," Edwards was heard saying. "Do you want to leave?"
She responded to him in a whisper, grabbed her purse and walked out, wiping away tears. Edwards was heard saying, "Cate, Cate" as she left. She returned to court about a half hour later, after a brief recess.
http://news.yahoo.com/john-edwards-daughter-leaves-courtroom-crying-192617246.html
Feel really sorry for her.
CaliforniaPeggy
(156,620 posts)I feel sorry for her too.
What a mess.
calimary
(90,021 posts)What could be more horrible to have to endure, hearing all this about your own dad. Having already endured the rigors of a presidential campaign, JUST ANYWAY, without all the other messy stuff the Edwards family had to deal with. The mom suffering from cancer in a long and exhausting battle, and then finally killed by it - imagine what a toll THAT took on her kids, no matter their age. And then this.
Amazed the poise she's shown up til now. That's a crushing load to have to carry on your still-young shoulders.
CaliforniaPeggy
(156,620 posts)loyalsister
(13,390 posts)What Edwards has put his family through is completely indefensible. I haven't followed the trial and can't evaluate his guilt or innocence there. But, in terms of the damage he has done to his family if there were a hell, I would hope there would be a special spot reserved.
This man disrespected thousands if not millions of people who supported him politically and betrayed his wife and children. I would have no sympathy if they totally discarded him.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)of the grueling battle for a decent administration in D.C. in 2008.
It's a lot of trouble and disappointment to ask a man to bear all alone. And Elizabeth Edwards was ill.
How much strength would it have taken to reject what may have appeared to him to be an opportunity for escape from the pressure?
I hope that those who judge Edwards harshly never have to face the problems he was facing.
Hermes Daughter
(157 posts)... is as humane and kind as it is intelligent. Rare.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)He is entirely responsible for inflicting pain on top of what they had experienced that was beyond anyone's control.
I'm sure he was experiencing his own pain. But, he is not a naive person. There's no way in the world that he didn't know press was on him 24\7 because he was on the campaign trail.
He disregarded the fact that his family would be hurt, not only personally but publicly, in the likely event of being discovered. No need to escape, self-pity, or loneliness can justify that imo.
DLevine
(1,791 posts)Edwards had the love and support of his wife and children. He threw all that away. Instead of the family being able to pull together during difficult times, he ripped them apart. No sympathy from me.
cali
(114,904 posts)and I say that as someone who's been through at least as much as he has.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Your post shows a compassion and reason that are all too rare in discussions about this very sad situation - and evidences the kind of empathy that Democrats love to claim sets us apart from Republicans, yet is nowhere to be found when actually dealing with people we don't like (which is exactly when it should be displayed since that's the only time it really matters).
You are exactly right. John Edwards made some terrible mistakes, but his failings were human. And we are all on the outside looking in, judging him and Elizabeth and their marriage without any real idea of what was actually going on in their world.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)This is why I always cringe a little when I see people running for office when they have young kids. It always gets ugly, and I can never understand how people can put their families through this....especially when they have skeletons that they KNOW will be trotted out for all to see..
Every parent withholds "some things" from their kids, and even though eventually they always find out, it's usually when they are old enough to process it.
In Cate's case, she also knows down deep that SHE will be the one that will be responsible for raising those two younger siblings, if and when Daddy goes to jail. I'm sure she loves them, but it's a lot to dump onto a new marriage.
I have always thought that the marriage was not all that great, and having those two little ones and then two brutal campaigns could not have made it better. Wade's death probably brought them together and might have made them want to re-create a new family...to hold it all together. The cancer combined with two very small kids, may have made it impossible for him to leave her without ruining any political possibilities for him, so maybe he thought he could just have affairs, and then play the grieving (and eligible) Dad.
It's a mess no matter how you look at it, and Cate is bearing the brunt of it. shame on him..
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)babylonsister
(172,759 posts)cynatnite
(31,011 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Cate is the LAST person who should have to shoulder this gut-wrenching ordeal.
Mass
(27,315 posts)They cannot miss this trial as it is everywhere, on the TV, on the Internet, in the papers, ...
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)being hurt.
i really have little patience for this.
TBMASE
(769 posts)that led to what she had to go through today.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)to give ME, the PARENT, support allowing her to experience this. i dont care how much she would want. i dont care how much i may need. there is no way in hell AS A PARENT i would allow a child, even an adult child, to be sittin in that courtroom.
inevitably, always, he fails.... IMO
But, it doesn't look like he thinks about other people
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)He's a giant narcissist.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)regardless of if she wants it or not, but it effect older daughters in a different way than younger kids. her hubby can be a perfectly good hubby, nad it will be something she struggles with and a part of his marriage even unwarranted.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Because my husband is not my dad.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Of course, I did raise my daughter to question and challenge authority. Even my authority. At age 22, she is wicked smart and sometimes I AM wrong. She loves and respects me enough to have those discussions and challenge me. Ultimately, I guided her to adulthood which included giving her the fortitude to make and stand by her own decisions and I am comfortable with those decisions even if they are contrary to my own desires. Elizabeth Edwards appeared to be a strong individual. It looks like she raised one, as well.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i often say, and tell boys regularly. they are making the choices. it is their pat on the back when they do right, cause i am certainly not gonna own when they do wrong.
i dont know edwards, or his daughter, or his wife. "John Edwards Attacks Mistress: Calls Rielle Hunter A Crazy Slut" it doesnt seem as if the man takes ownership for his choices. i dont admire that. from my perception, having made a stupid choice, i would then do what needed to be done to rectify. this does not seem like it jives with that.
we dont know that young woman
insists on being there or pressured to be there. leaving the courtroom to cry, makes me feel that maybe it wasnt healthy adn the right thing for her. was she pressured? we dont know. i feel edwards can easily be labeled a narcissist. his needs first. that is my feel.
it doesnt make it right.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)to fraud and illegal election practices. He did not decide that Elizabeth Edwards should get cancer.
Is it any wonder that he chose to seek comfort from someone who pretended to be understanding and offered what appeared to be joy and fun?
I think we should be careful about judging him.
He was under a lot of pressure.
Some DUers like to argue that he was insincere when he spoke of Two Americas. I don't think he was. I think he saw what was happening in the economic life of our country and that he wanted to at least make our economy a campaign issue. Now we have the Occupy movement which is taking the message of Two Americas -- that of the 1% versus that of the 99% to the streets.
There are a lot of people who would like to silence the message that Edwards brought. And face it, when he ran in 2008, Edwards was very popular on DU. And for good reason. He was right about the economy. Shame about Rielle Hunter (if that is her real name. I'm not sure it is.) But, considering all the disappointment and burdens he carried, I do not want to judge Edwards that harshly.
Hermes Daughter
(157 posts)... was Lisa Druck. Druck was from Florida where he father had been indited in a grisley racket electrocuting horses for the insurance money. She spent time in NYC and is known as the model for Jay McInerney's character, Alison Poole, in "Story of My Life." Alison Poole also appeared briefly in Bret Easton Ellis' novels "American Psycho" and "Glamorama." Poole/Druck later married Kip Hunter, son of Patsy Ramsey's prosecutor and lived in Beverly Hills, wrote and, in one instance, pitched a reality show on "how to break up a bad marriage by sleeping with the husband." Poole/Druck/Hunter then went back to NYC and formed a production company with friend, Mimi Hochman. Hochman was an event planner with a website that listed her main client as VC firm Kelso & Co. and its CEO, Frank Nickell. All but one of the principals of Kelso & Co were graduates of UVA, UNC, Duke, Clemson, Wake Forest, and other colleges in Virginia and the Carolinas. Most were lawyers.
Druck was drinking with friends at the Regency Hotel in NY the night Edwards was staying there. When he returned from an event late that night, she was waiting outside for him. As he approached, she walked up to him and said, "You're so hot," or words to that effect.
Edwards was disliked by the legal crowd in NC and Virginia for two reasons. His stand on Tort Reform and the credit he was given for defending Bill Clinton from impeachment. The main opponent of tort reform is the Council for National Policy located in Fairfax, Virginia.
These are the main connections and motives I know of surrounding Edwards take down but I surmise, like you do, that...
...he chose to seek comfort from someone who pretended to be understanding and offered what appeared to be joy and fun?
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I guess this is the way Democrats thank him (and Republicans avenge him -- they really wanted to remove Clinton).
Thanks for this.
I had forgotten that Edwards defended Clinton.
Where are the Clintons now. All grateful and showing it, I'm sure.
The Clintons -- a pair of grifters in my opinion.
Hermes Daughter
(157 posts)Everyone but you and I seem to have forgotten.
Thanks.
ellisonz
(27,776 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)And I think that people who are reminded of the difficult things that Edwards went through and then who show so little compassion for him are the real sociopaths.
Edwards' affair was wrong, stupid, etc. But it wasn't criminal.
I've heard of so many worse things such as pandering to bankers on Walls Street who cheat.
Edwards was speaking out against predatory lending way before the others were. The economy was the least of Obama's concerns.
Edwards was a strong candidate. There was massive support for him here on DU, and rightfully so.
Obama has not prosecuted a single of the really big bankers -- of the derivatives experts who caused the economic crisis.
We don't know what Edwards would have done. But I have observed as have others that when a couple loses a child, they have to be very lucky and work very hard to maintain their relationship. It is extremely difficult.
I wish Edwards had not done what he did, but look at Newt Gingrich. He did precisely the same thing, and has spent far more than he took in during his recent campaign. But there aren't any criminal actions against him. Maybe they just haven't looked hard enough.
Edwards made a stupid, tragically stupid mistake, but his worst mistake was running against Barack Obama as a Democrat. Had he run on the Republican ticket, he would be sitting rich and pretty and enjoying a prime time slot on Fox.
eridani
(51,907 posts)Most of the other stuff he's done since then, not so much.
cali
(114,904 posts)believe for one nanosecond that he was EVER sincere about poverty. and there is a mass of evidence against him on that score.
Oh, and I always knew he never really gave a shit about poverty and posted all the reasons he was a piece of shit phony here in 2007-
including Fortress, his ridiculous house and the clearcutting he did and his avid support for Yucca Mountain.
I'm poor. I don't like fuckwads who use those of us in poverty for political gain.
I judge him harshly. He deserves the hell he's in. He put himself there.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)I fell for it in 2004, I supported him after the MSM forced Dean out.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Poor widdle John,
Raine
(31,179 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)was and how painful it must be to you.
I hate to tell you this, but the percentage of men (and women) who have affairs during their marriages is very high -- 28% of married men and 18% of married women admit to having them. I think that is high, especially in this day and age when a lot of couples don't marry until they are quite mature and have been living together for awhile.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17951664/ns/health-sexual_health/t/many-cheat-thrill-more-stay-true-love/#.T6ILM1K2ySo
To be honest, I agree with those who think the numbers are actually higher and that a lot of people do not admit to having or having had affairs when in fact they do or did.
I assure you. Edwards' affair while a very, very bad idea is not an aberration.
Raine
(31,179 posts)private but obviously more painful when it's made public for all the world. That's what happens though when you're a public figure whether a politician or a celebrity.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)don't use protection, father a child with their mistress, lie about it, and cheat an old lady out of millions of dollars in a futile attempt to cover it up?
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)There are lots of reasons for that. If you think about it and live a little you will understand.
Grief can crush a relationship. It's just the way it is.
It may be more difficult to express and explore your grief with the person you love most and with whom you most share the grief than with someone who is not so important to you.
And grief can definitely hurt a couple's physical relationship. Sorry to get so personal, but a lot of DUers don't seem to understand what grief does.
It's interesting how people identify Elizabeth Edwards as the victim here. I see both of them as victimized in this situation.
Edwards defended Clinton in the Senate impeachment trial. Where is Clinton (also an adulterer) now that Edwards could use a little emotional and visual support? Shame on Bill Clinton for his silence.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)while she was in the hospital with cancer, but now I see that his behavior is entirely understandable and excusable. Thanks.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)BootinUp
(51,323 posts)way before any of this came out imho.
Beacool
(30,518 posts)Just thinking what Edwards put his dying wife and children through makes me want to personally kick his ass. Why are some people so selfish? His stupid indiscretion with some nutty woman destroyed his marriage and caused much pain to his children, particularly Cate who was the oldest. Elizabeth didn't deserve to have to spend the last year on earth contending with the pain of a collapsing marriage.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Beacool
(30,518 posts)of using money that was designated for his campaign to cover-up said affair.
Nedsdag
(2,437 posts)I saw a picture of her and her father walking into the courtroom and she looked 10 years older than she actually is.
How sad.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)now putting his kids through this. He could have plea-bargained and spared his daughter this ordeal.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)kids through this. And why should he plea-bargain if he feels he did nothing wrong and is innocent?
A plea-bargain could be worse for his family than this trial.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)polichick
(37,626 posts)She's been very strong through it all.
vaberella
(24,634 posts)JI7
(93,617 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)The children - regardless of their age - are the ones that did not do anything but have to endure this horrendous pain.
And in the case of the Edward's children, it had to hurt even worse because their mother was fighting for her life.
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)This aroma is familiar ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starr_Report ...
I am not speaking to Edward's culpability here, but there is a familiar, somewhat titillating quality that has little to do with justice and everything to do with making each scandalous detail as public as possible. Would you care for a cigar?
Hermes Daughter
(157 posts)A close friend of mine was part of the team that worked for a year to bring Spitzer down. I know all about it. I imagine the same game-plan was applied to Wiener. And Clinton. Lots of planning. It takes a lot of money, too. The key is to find a weakness and use it. (Wellstone didn't have any. The others did.) And every lawyer in NC knew about Edwards. His ways with women weren't anything new. He was no different that JFK, RFK, MLK, ETC, and so forth.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Hermes Daughter
(157 posts)... on this board? Right.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Poor Eliot.
Hermes Daughter
(157 posts)They didn't have to hypnotize him. What? People here don't know that. His mistake was prosecuting the oldest profession AND using. Poor Eliot, indeed.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)witch hunt!
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)lots of crocodile tears for the family, but not much support for edwards. like he's the only democratic pol who ever had an affair. right.
i think it's interesting that edwards, spitzer and weiner represented the left of the party & all got discredited by scandal, with little to no support from the party.
clinton, otoh, got lots, & that attack clearly was orchestrated by the right-wing of the republican party.
Hermes Daughter
(157 posts)came from the fact that his downfall was so openly orchestrated. It was pretty glaring. But remember: many on the left were furious with him.
The others were handled better. The boys seem to have gotten a hang for it over time and their handiwork is more subtle. They prey on the inherent "disloyalty" of the left to their icons. Individualism and all that (whereas the Right can see no wrong in anyone RW, preverts included).
And as to Clinton, he is "Mr Magic" -- an amazing survivor. I don't think they expected him to survive the disgrace and are furious for their failure with him.
Note that the three later reprobates all had known "flaws" that the boys in the backroom could work with. Ergo... they are bad, bad, bad...
McCain dumped his wife while she was in the hospital undergoing chemo. I forget what Newt did. Something similar. Someone should make a laundry list of public Republican perverts. OH-- I forget: we're liberals here. We don't cast stones.
HA! Look at yourselves. Take a good look in the DU mirror.
Is your self-righteous vitriol about Dems ever going to stop?
Beacool
(30,518 posts)I'm not excusing Clinton. I was pretty angry at him at the time. What he did was equally stupid, but Edwards went beyond a garden variety affair. First of all, Hillary was healthy. Clinton only received a certain service from Monica, he didn't sleep with her. Let alone do so without using protection. Bill didn't have a child with her. Bill also didn't enlist other people to assume paternity of his child. Neither did he reach out to large donors to finance the cover-up of his indiscretion.
There are plenty of men who are womanizers, and then there's Edwards. He's in a category of his own.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Or is this just the usual circus surrounding an attractive celebrity's affairs?
JI7
(93,617 posts)i hope she was finally able to accept and be happy with the good things in her life towards the end.
but we know overall her final years , months were horrible for her. that it should end this way. i wonder if she could have lived longer if she wasn't dealing with the personal crap.
Botany
(77,324 posts).... but why is this in court?
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)RZM
(8,556 posts)He's accused of violating campaign finance laws.
Let's get real here. If the shoe was on the other foot and this were a Republican, DU would be happy about all of this.
I'm neither happy nor sad that Edwards is in court. I trust the system to work here. If he's not guilty, hopefully the jury will find him not guilty. If he is guilty, well then . . . tough.
What I'm wondering is why would a man with such a vast personal fortune use campaign cash for this? Couldn't he have just set up Hunter using his own dough?
Javaman
(65,711 posts)kskiska
(27,165 posts)I don't think he's ever commented. Edwards could have screwed him big time.
JI7
(93,617 posts)mate.