Record % of unemployed workers without benefits (> 75% don't get UE)

[ND-Dem]

With no federal unemployment insurance and rapidly disappearing state coverage, the percentage of people benefiting from unemployment insurance is at its lowest level in more than three decades, according to a report by According to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), a Washington, D.C.-based think tank focused on low- and middle-income families.

EPI said the unemployment insurance recipiency rate tumbled to 23.1 percent in December 2014, beating the previous record low of 25 percent set in September 1984.

State lawmakers continue to slash jobless benefits, enacting policies that make it harder for the programs to work effectively. The policies have a disproportionate impact on unemployed Blacks who often face greater challenges than Whites, as they struggle to stay connected to the labor market and make ends meet while they search for jobs.

“Many critics of UI programs wrongly assume that the lion’s share of jobless workers get benefits,” stated the report. “This is plainly wrong over the history of UI and especially in the more restrictive states. The U.S. short-term recipiency rate was 34.7 percent in 2014, meaning that over 65 percent of short-term jobless workers did not get state UI benefits...”

Even though unemployment rates are higher for Blacks than Whites, Blacks are less likely to receive unemployment benefits even when compared to workers with similar characteristics.
“One in 4 unemployed non-Hispanic White workers with less than a high school education receive UI, while 1 in 8 unemployed non-Hispanic Black workers with less than a high school education receive UI,” the Urban Institute report explained. “This means many low-wage unemployed African American workers are likely suffering more economic hardship than their White counterparts—an especially adverse outcome given that African Americans likely have fewer assets to fall back on.”

http://newpittsburghcourieronline.com/2015/03/22/record-number-of-former-workers-without-benefits/

[Erich Bloodaxe BSN]

1. Clearly written.

And explains exactly why economic issues ARE minority issues, and why economic and labour issues shouldn't simply be shoved aside as unimportant to minorities when choosing a candidate. A candidate who speaks out for minorities in one way, while undercutting them by continuing status quo economic inequalities that take wealth from the poor and hand it to the rich is NOT a friend to minorities or anyone else who isn't a member of the capitalist oligarchy.

[ND-Dem]

2. +1,000,000

[whatthehey]

3. Hopefully there is one silver lining to this cloud

And that would be fewer idiots trying to pretend that people not receiving benefits are no longer counted as unemployed as a way to cook the books.

Only stopping looking for work means you stop being counted as unemployed. Benefits, which should certainly be extended as a matter of course, have nothing to do with inclusion as unemployed, as these sad data clearly show.

[ND-Dem]

4. kick

[Hestia]

5. The unintended (or intended) consequences of this is crime - who cares if you are starving?

I know armed robbery of people in grocery parking lots has risen here, along with following people home from the store and then robbing them when they get home is happening a lot too. (No, no stats, just in reading the crime reports) They are generally robbing the elderly too, which is disturbing.

[ND-Dem]

6. yes; it would be expected, if not strictly 'intended'.