Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,056 posts)
Thu May 3, 2012, 07:55 PM May 2012

Whoa. "Colin Powell's Blot"

Props to him for admitting this.

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/05/03/colin_powells_blot.html

May 03, 2012

Colin Powell's Blot


Former Secretary of State Colin Powell writes in his new book, It Worked for Me, that his "erroneous address to the United Nations about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction provides a lesson to business leaders on the importance of staying skeptical and following their intuition," Bloomberg reports.

Writes Powell: "Yes, a blot, a failure will always be attached to me and my UN presentation. I am mad mostly at myself for not having smelled the problem. My instincts failed me."

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Whoa. "Colin Powell's Blot" (Original Post) babylonsister May 2012 OP
No props. He forgot the troops. He allowed his ambitions to come ahead of the troops. peacebird May 2012 #1
Bullshit. He didnt throw anything under the bus. "fealty"?! forget his endorsement in 2008? pasto76 May 2012 #11
colin powell was the young army officer who was charged with iemitsu May 2012 #15
Powell has been a career lying sack of sh!t. His endorsement of Obama EFerrari May 2012 #26
Powell is lying when he says he was fooled by the information given to him. Much has been written sabrina 1 May 2012 #23
Fair enough, but what has been his response to the people who lied to him... JHB May 2012 #34
ambitions?? grasswire May 2012 #29
piss on Colin Powell KG May 2012 #2
Its like not smelling shit when you're in the outhouse. undeterred May 2012 #3
+1 Canuckistanian May 2012 #8
Great analogy lunatica May 2012 #33
millions of others had better instincts than Powell on this one. Whisp May 2012 #4
Erroneous? Iggo May 2012 #5
Dang. I wonder what happened at Mai Lia hootinholler May 2012 #6
Three strikes Colin .. underpants May 2012 #7
Man, I didn't know about the Guernica thing. That, along with covering the Statue of Lady Justice TrollBuster9090 May 2012 #10
Are you sure about that third item? Sanity Claws May 2012 #14
there is a tapestry reproduction at the UN justabob May 2012 #19
What is #2 a reference to? I share your assessment of Powell, but I'm coalition_unwilling May 2012 #24
Iran-Contra underpants May 2012 #32
Yeah, the point is, they sent Powell to the UN *BECAUSE* the world community believed him to be TrollBuster9090 May 2012 #9
Powell Can't Get Away With This DallasNE May 2012 #12
A "blot"? I'd say that's just a little bit of an understatement. Crunchy Frog May 2012 #13
It's like the Powell Doctrine never existed.. Fumesucker May 2012 #16
it was a terminal blot on the lives of how many thousand soldiers? spanone May 2012 #17
A blot? "Oh my, I appear to have gotten a drop of spaghetti sauce on my tie." tclambert May 2012 #18
"Before the smoking gun becomes a mushroom cloud." jerseyjack May 2012 #20
A blot? What about the blood on your hands, mr. powell? Skip Intro May 2012 #21
Eight years and 11 months later gratuitous May 2012 #22
Before he answers for those crimes, there's the little matter of survivors coalition_unwilling May 2012 #25
He's talking like he's on trial lutefisk May 2012 #27
He is a coward and a liar JFN1 May 2012 #28
Boy, did you ever open yourself up to a hailstorm for expressing a simple opinion...While I didn't Rowdyboy May 2012 #30
Really! Good thing I've developed a thick skin... babylonsister May 2012 #31
That's quite a blot given that it helped destroy thousands of American families ... GOTV May 2012 #35
"It worked for Me". GeorgeGist May 2012 #36

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
1. No props. He forgot the troops. He allowed his ambitions to come ahead of the troops.
Thu May 3, 2012, 08:51 PM
May 2012

He should not be forgiven for throwing "the Powell doctrine" under the bus for his ambitions or his fealty to the R party.

Countless thousands died for his "blot".

pasto76

(1,589 posts)
11. Bullshit. He didnt throw anything under the bus. "fealty"?! forget his endorsement in 2008?
Thu May 3, 2012, 09:28 PM
May 2012

I doubt you hate republicons more than I do. Some of those thousands were my friends.

As Secretery of State, most of this Iraq thing was out of his control. And if you've ever read one thing about how Rummy did numerous end runs around him - unless you are as bad as they are - you wouldnt have this opinion. Hell just watch the Frontline episode "Rumsfeld's war" and you will get a pretty clear picture.

Ive always liked General Powell. Making statements like these are what people with Integrity do. He was lied to, just like the rest of us. He was trying to be a good soldier and gave that speech at the UN. It is the Chief reason he resigned, and his endorsment of President Obama was not something a lifelong Republican does lightly.

iemitsu

(3,888 posts)
15. colin powell was the young army officer who was charged with
Thu May 3, 2012, 09:49 PM
May 2012

investigating the My Lai massacre.
he was accused of whitewashing the role of US soldiers.
"Colin Powell, then a 31-year-old Army major, was charged with investigating the letter, which did not specifically reference Mỹ Lai (Glen had limited knowledge of the events there). In his report, Powell wrote, "In direct refutation of this portrayal is the fact that relations between Americal Division[33] soldiers and the Vietnamese people are excellent." Powell's handling of the assignment was later characterized by some observers as "whitewashing" the atrocities of Mỹ Lai.[34] In May 2004, Powell, then United States Secretary of State, told CNN's Larry King, "I mean, I was in a unit that was responsible for My Lai. I got there after My Lai happened. So, in war, these sorts of horrible things happen every now and again, but they are still to be deplored."[35]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Lai_Massacre#Reporting.2C_cover-up_and_investigations

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
23. Powell is lying when he says he was fooled by the information given to him. Much has been written
Thu May 3, 2012, 11:27 PM
May 2012

already about how he had refused to present as he did not trust the information, but compromised when a few things were removed. He should have quit when asked to lie to the UN, that's what a person of honor would have done, but instead he went ahead, despite his own questions, and sealed the deal for the Bush/Cheney gang and their fellow war criminals. Many died as a result of that presentation. He gets no props from me.

JHB

(37,158 posts)
34. Fair enough, but what has been his response to the people who lied to him...
Fri May 4, 2012, 07:05 AM
May 2012

Last edited Fri May 4, 2012, 07:55 AM - Edit history (4)

...and used his reputation to advance their war plans?

Powell was seen as the reasonable respectable guy on the Bush team, the one who was a linchpin in convincing people to acquiesce to their push to invade. The career military man who wouldn't support putting troops in harm's way unless it was necessary. The man whose "Powell doctrine" would keep it short and avoid a decade-long quagmire. They needed to convince people that there was a compelling reason to go on the offensive right away, when the best outside information saw no compelling connection between Saddam and al Queda (and plenty of hostility), nor any convincing evidence that Saddam was planning any attacks himself, nor that he had any capability to carry anything out.

Colin Powell was Mr. Integrity, and his testimony conviced some and sewed enough doubt in enough other quarters that few were willing to dig in their heels and oppose the Bushites push for war. Without getting into what Powell did or didn't know to be true at the time, it was his ass and his reputation left hanging out and twisting in the wind when the truth finally got its boots on, caught up, and revealed what a pile of horseshit it was.

Powell resigned and endorsed Obama. Well, that's better than going the other way, it still falls miles short. Cheney, Rummy, and Bush* used him to take this country on a half-assed neoconservative joyride that killed thousands of the soldiers that had once been under his command, wounded tens of thousands, wasted over a trillion dollars (and the Iraqis we were supposed to be liberating from a dictator got far worse).

And that's the best case, that he'd been duped. The alternative was that he was on board with the plan.

A resignation after the damage is done and a quiet cross-party endorsement don't quite balance that out. If he wants his "blot" removed, he's going to have to be more active in expunging the factors that put it there. He didn't lose his reputation, it is exactly where he sent it.

On edit: The very same neocons who wanted the invasion of Iraq -- with their colossal underestimates of the human, material, and political costs to the country -- are now pushing for attacks on Iran, and if anything are low-balling the possible consequences to an even greater degree. Where is Powell on this? Is he just going to quietly meander the lecture circuit while they try to do it again?

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
29. ambitions??
Fri May 4, 2012, 01:20 AM
May 2012

Colin Powell didn't have any ambitions that were paramount. He was essentially working below his potential for Bush, and had no desire for higher office.

The man could have walked into the White House at any time, with bipartisan support and -- probably -- a landslide. He chose not to pursue that.

Yes, he has a blot. But it has nothing to do with any "ambitions."

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
4. millions of others had better instincts than Powell on this one.
Thu May 3, 2012, 08:58 PM
May 2012

he knew what he was doing, no way he was flummoxed into it like he's pretending.

Iggo

(47,549 posts)
5. Erroneous?
Thu May 3, 2012, 09:03 PM
May 2012

He lied through his fucking teeth!

Fuck you, Colin Powell, you goddam piece of shit lying murdering war criminal.

underpants

(182,769 posts)
7. Three strikes Colin ..
Thu May 3, 2012, 09:08 PM
May 2012

1. His Mai Lai "investigation" and coverup. That got him into the seat of power at the Pentagon
2. He signed for the missiles and spare parts to be flown out of Germany. "No tickie no laundry" a lowly supply Sgt. famously said. Gen. Powell signed the order
3. The embarassment at the UN - where W&Co. demanded that the Picasso “Guernica” mural be covered when Powell spoke.

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
10. Man, I didn't know about the Guernica thing. That, along with covering the Statue of Lady Justice
Thu May 3, 2012, 09:22 PM
May 2012

are the two metaphors that pretty much sum up the Bush Jr. Administration.

1. Let's cover up the statue of Lady Justice because our wingnut base thinks nipples are obscene, while ignoring the fact that the curtain is made out of copies of The Patriot Act.

2. Let's cover up the mural of Guernica because it might remind somebody that we're proposing bombing the shit out of Baghdad, while ignoring the symbolism of us becoming the Nazis.

Sanity Claws

(21,846 posts)
14. Are you sure about that third item?
Thu May 3, 2012, 09:39 PM
May 2012

That mural is in Madrid, if I recall properly. It was in NY's Museum of Modern Art for decades but finally went back to Spain after Franco's death

justabob

(3,069 posts)
19. there is a tapestry reproduction at the UN
Thu May 3, 2012, 10:00 PM
May 2012

Earlier this week, U.N. officials hung a blue curtain over a tapestry reproduction of Picasso's Guernica at the entrance of the Security Council. The spot is where diplomats and others make statements to the press, and ostensibly officials thought it would be inappropriate for Colin Powell to speak about war in Iraq with the 20th century's most iconic protest against the inhumanity of war as his backdrop.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_gist/2003/02/hidden_treasures.html

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
24. What is #2 a reference to? I share your assessment of Powell, but I'm
Thu May 3, 2012, 11:31 PM
May 2012

drawing a blank on 'missiles and spare parts'. Is that an Iran-Contra reference?

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
9. Yeah, the point is, they sent Powell to the UN *BECAUSE* the world community believed him to be
Thu May 3, 2012, 09:15 PM
May 2012

honest and reliable, and he would not make the case UNLESS he was sure it was TRUE and ACCURATE.

The BLOT STANDS, and it's all he will (and should) be remembered for. Colin Powell: the guy who gave CREDIBILITY to a big snow job that killed thousands of Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, displaced millions, and bankrupted the country. America didn't go to war because Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney said so. America went to war because POWELL, one of the heroes of Gulf War I said Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney were telling the truth.

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
12. Powell Can't Get Away With This
Thu May 3, 2012, 09:31 PM
May 2012

Agreed, it is a blot, but keep in mind that Powell took the intelligence report and threw it on the floor calling it bullshit. He then turned around and dutifully presented that same intelligence at the UN. It wasn't his instincts that failed Powell, it was his ambition so business leaders will go over that same cliff and for the same reason. Power corrupts absolutely. Always has, always will.

Crunchy Frog

(26,579 posts)
13. A "blot"? I'd say that's just a little bit of an understatement.
Thu May 3, 2012, 09:34 PM
May 2012

And how come I knew he was lying in front of the UN, and he didn't? I honestly don't believe that he's that stupid.

tclambert

(11,085 posts)
18. A blot? "Oh my, I appear to have gotten a drop of spaghetti sauce on my tie."
Thu May 3, 2012, 09:58 PM
May 2012

"Oops, no, I am actually completely drenched in blood. My mistake."

 

jerseyjack

(1,361 posts)
20. "Before the smoking gun becomes a mushroom cloud."
Thu May 3, 2012, 10:47 PM
May 2012

Bullshit.

Many of us on this site knew it was bullshit.

Condi, George Tenant, they all knew too.

Maybe the only one of them who didn't know was Bush himself because he was too stupid.

Skip Intro

(19,768 posts)
21. A blot? What about the blood on your hands, mr. powell?
Thu May 3, 2012, 10:53 PM
May 2012

You're no better than bush, cheney, rummy or condi.

You helped perpetrate a lie for which countless hundreds of thousands have died.

And we're supposed to feel sorry for you because you have a "blot" on your record.

It is a disgrace that you and that gang aren't rotting in some dark cell somewhere.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
22. Eight years and 11 months later
Thu May 3, 2012, 11:23 PM
May 2012

Powell finally gets around to saying in public what he said at the time. Naturally, it wasn't reported stateside. You had to go to England to find out what Powell really thought about his Prevaricating Powerpoint Presentation:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/jun/02/usa.iraq

Much of the initial information for Mr Powell's speech to the UN was provided by the Pentagon, where Paul Wolfowitz, the US deputy defence secretary, set up a special unit, the Office of Special Plans, to counter the uncertainty of the CIA's intelligence on Iraq.

Mr Powell's team removed dozens of pages of alleged evidence about Iraq's banned weapons and ties to terrorists from a draft of his speech, US News and World Report says today. At one point, he became so angry at the lack of adequate sourcing to intelligence claims that he declared: "I'm not reading this. This is bullshit," according to the magazine.

Presented with a script for his speech, Mr Powell suspected that Washington hawks were "cherry picking", the US magazine Newsweek also reports today. Greg Theilmann, a recently retired state department intelligence analyst directly involved in assessing the Iraqi threat, says that inside the Bush administration "there is a lot of sorrow and anger at the way intelligence was misused".


So yeah, Colin. You thought it was bullshit in 2003, but you played the good soldier and read every last word. That makes you a war criminal, and in a slightly more just world, you'd be answering for your crimes instead of cashing fat blood-stained consulting checks.
 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
25. Before he answers for those crimes, there's the little matter of survivors
Thu May 3, 2012, 11:33 PM
May 2012

and surviving family members of the My Lai massacre who might also like some answers.

lutefisk

(3,974 posts)
27. He's talking like he's on trial
Thu May 3, 2012, 11:43 PM
May 2012

Those treasonous bastards got away with it, so he's safe. But if there ever were (in some alternate reality) war crimes charges and a trial- saying, "I am mad mostly at myself for not having smelled the problem. My instincts failed me" won't save him. He can never lie his way out of what he did. Seriously, he can go to Hell.

JFN1

(2,033 posts)
28. He is a coward and a liar
Thu May 3, 2012, 11:47 PM
May 2012

trying to faux pas away the true depth of his responsibility. His "failed instincts" still equate to complicity in the massive lie that is the Iraq invasion and occupation.

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
30. Boy, did you ever open yourself up to a hailstorm for expressing a simple opinion...While I didn't
Fri May 4, 2012, 01:51 AM
May 2012

think his explanation was nearly enough, I automatically tend to be somewhat surprised on the rare occasions any Republican admits being wrong. I would have given him props too, but, seeing the response you've received, I'll just go away now....

GOTV

(3,759 posts)
35. That's quite a blot given that it helped destroy thousands of American families ...
Fri May 4, 2012, 02:25 PM
May 2012

... I hope he's not losing sleep over his blot.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Whoa. "Colin Powell...