General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStudy links autism with circumcision
The circumcision of boys is controversial and hotly debated in many countries.
Advocates of circumcision point to cultural, religious, hygiene-related and medical reasons for the procedure, while opponents argue that it infringes on bodily rights and is a severe, painful assault on the individual which can lead to life-long physical and mental damage, with no relevant advantages to health.
A study now pours a little more oil on the flames.
According to the new study, which included 340,000 Danish boys, it looks as though circumcision increases the risk of developing autism.
http://sciencenordic.com/study-links-autism-circumcision
olddots
(10,237 posts)AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)It will bring all the boys to the yard.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)elleng
(130,902 posts)"The burning question is wether there is a causal relationship. In my opinion, there could easily be some other explanations for the connection found by the study," says Obel.
The professor points out that people who have their baby boys circumcised may differ from those who do not, and that these differences could relate to a predisposition to autism.
RKP5637
(67,108 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)RKP5637
(67,108 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)jmowreader
(50,557 posts)You don't have enough. Trust me on this.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)circumcision is not common in Denmark....except among certain religious communities (Jews and Muslims). These tend to be religious communities which are traditionally not exogamous--there are high rates of cousin marriage between Muslims in many countries; Ashkenazi Jews, due to endogamous marriage and a historically small population, are all as genetically related as fourth or fifth cousins. So this hypothetical link of autism with circumcision is probably a proxy for something genetic in the Danish populations likely to practise circumcision.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)On the simple 2x2 question of relating autism presence to circumcision presence that seems like an awfully large sample.
Having too much sensitivity leads to false positive associations.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)altering development at a very young age.
Hekate
(90,683 posts)Good Lord.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Hekate
(90,683 posts)It is a sign of the covenant with God.
In the early Christian church, there was a heated argument over whether new Christians should first convert to Judaism and all its laws. Because Jesus was Jewish.
However, it was decided that since Christianity represented a new covenant with God, conversion to the old covenant should not be required. Thus, not coincidentally, allowing the new religion to spread much more easily.
Nonetheless, to this day, every newborn Jewish boy is circumcised on his 8th day. Catholics still celebrate the Feast of the Circumcision as a holy day in Jesus' life.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Not sure what you meant by that. Thanks.
Hekate
(90,683 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)AnnieBW
(10,426 posts)As the wife of an Aspie, I'd better not.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)and we'll have the_longest_and_most_contentious_thread_in_DU_history!
On a serious note, correlation anyone ?
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)EVER top the moon-bombing thread.
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)Quackers
(2,256 posts)If circumcision caused autism, then why has autism rates increased while circumcision rates have decreased?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/07/circumcision-rate-drops_n_5107637.html
http://www.webmd.com/brain/autism/searching-for-answers/autism-rise
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)A majority of parents ate pickles in the year before they conceived children with autism.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)Let's just get that out there in the open, shall we?
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)You definitely raise a significant point.
oregonjen
(3,337 posts)The use of acetaminophen as a pain killer in infants during circumcision, has shown an increase in autism.
Chemisse
(30,811 posts)And makes this study more comprehensible.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)old and that is very young to withstand the effects of any kind of medication IMO.
dgibby
(9,474 posts)At least no medicine was being used when I was still in nursing (late '90's). Theoretically, it doesn't hurt(infants). Of course, that doesn't explain why they screamed through the entire procedure. If there's a correlation, it's probably pain induced (just my opinion).
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)being used then.
Igel
(35,307 posts)I mean, this is the kind of thing where you start to wonder, "Gee, perhaps there's a confound!"
Maybe the drive to publish for fun and profit is so high that people figure it doesn't matter. "If it's bullshit, caveat emptor as long as my CV has another few lines."
madinmaryland
(64,933 posts)Laffy Kat
(16,378 posts)So glad I didn't put my sons through it. I've always told them that if they wanted to be circumcised as adults, I would pay for it, but I'd rather the choice be theirs. They seem to like themselves the way they were born. Whew!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)O Sacred Head Sore wounded.
dembotoz
(16,804 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)rate of autism was back then. That was back in the 70s.
The trauma of being circumcised may have some effect but I don't believe it is actually circumcision.
Chemisse
(30,811 posts)Especially since they claimed that babies didn't feel pain like we do. And if they had, it would have been aspirin, which is not used now in children.
Autism rates were low then (although it had barely been recognized back then, and many children were probably diagnosed with other disorders or not diagnosed at all in those days).
I'm certainly not buying into this link (between circumcision and autism). Studies correlating things to autism are all over the place. But at least the pain medicine suggestion makes some sense.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)and asked the nurse what was happening. She told me it was JUST a boy getting circumcised. I remember it as horrible. In that case I don't think they gave him anything before. But yes some kind of pain med makes more sense.
Hekate
(90,683 posts)It was considered good hygiene and modern up to date practice at one time in the US. My husband was born in Europe after the War, and as far as he is concerned in Europe it was and is still considered the ineradicable mark of the Jewish male and no one else. He's Jewish -- my family is not.
hunter
(38,311 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)pnwmom
(108,978 posts)make a correction between those two things.