Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Fri May 4, 2012, 12:36 PM May 2012

bye bye Senator Lugar. Hello batshit crazy Senator Teabag

Indiana U.S. Senator Richard Lugar, a six-term incumbent and a leading voice on foreign policy in Congress, trails his Tea Party-backed challenger by double-digits ahead of Tuesday's Republican primary, a poll showed on Friday.

Indiana Treasurer Richard Mourdock, who draws support from the conservative Tea Party movement, leads Lugar by 10 percentage points for the May 8 primary contest, the Howey/Depauw Indiana Battleground Poll showed.

If defeated, Lugar, the senior Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and a leading voice on stemming the spread of nuclear weapons, would be first Senate incumbent to lose his seat this election year.

The poll conducted this week showed Mourdock with 48 percent support among likely Republican primary voters compared to Lugar's 38 percent. This was a sharp swing from a poll taken in late March by the same group in which Lugar led 42 percent to 35 percent.

"It certainly looks as if the momentum has shifted toward Richard Mourdock," Republican pollster Christine Matthews wrote of the poll she conducted with Democratic pollster Fred Yang, political analyst Brian Howey, and Depauw University.

<snip>

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/04/us-usa-campaign-lugar-poll-idUSTRE84317720120504

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
bye bye Senator Lugar. Hello batshit crazy Senator Teabag (Original Post) cali May 2012 OP
Could Donnelly win if Mourdock beats Lugar? Arkana May 2012 #1
Yes Proud Liberal Dem May 2012 #5
Worth the risk corkhead May 2012 #9
You have a good point Proud Liberal Dem May 2012 #18
When all the Repubs vote in lockstep, their relative sanity or insanity doesn't really matter. LonePirate May 2012 #22
But can we count on a new Democratic Senator from Indiana Pab Sungenis May 2012 #37
Donnoly is rather blue dog. Guessing he would be sort of like Bayh. salin May 2012 #39
I dunno Proud Liberal Dem May 2012 #53
You're not considering one thing. caseymoz May 2012 #30
This is what Lugar deserves Carolina May 2012 #36
it's not just the stupidity of the teabaggers; newspeak May 2012 #55
Most of the Polls Showing a Close Race Have a Tie to the one of the Campaigns or their PACs n/t Indykatie May 2012 #11
Are you talking about the polling (re: Donnelly vs. the two candidates) Proud Liberal Dem May 2012 #19
Yes. He has to run a smart campaign and hope that Obama is competitive with Romney bluestate10 May 2012 #28
No. AngryOldDem May 2012 #42
Do you think the women's health issue is going to change anyones perspective? kristopher May 2012 #48
Overall, no. AngryOldDem May 2012 #56
Reliable? elleng May 2012 #2
I don't know ellen, but I've thought for some cali May 2012 #3
Probably not, but DefenseLawyer May 2012 #4
is it an open primary or just repubs? cali May 2012 #6
Open primary n/t DefenseLawyer May 2012 #8
This is scary y'all. ananda May 2012 #7
I'm in Indiana Indykatie May 2012 #10
Please please please don't vote Mourdock caraher May 2012 #26
Lugar enabled Bush and Cheney's crimes against humanity. He deserves coalition_unwilling May 2012 #32
am I really supposed to miss Lugar? hfojvt May 2012 #12
I don't believe that I said anything of the sort. cali May 2012 #13
re "missing Lugar" SCantiGOP May 2012 #14
Well at the end of the day Horse with no Name May 2012 #15
but there's a shitload of evidence that Snowe and Palin would not vote even remotely the same cali May 2012 #16
Is that a relevant analogy? hfojvt May 2012 #20
Bat shit crazy Mourdock penndragon69 May 2012 #17
Dan Coats Honest_Abe May 2012 #44
Coates took advantage of the 2010 mood. bluestate10 May 2012 #58
Just what we need Flatpicker May 2012 #21
who cares? wwytchwood May 2012 #23
You can add PA to that list. DocMac May 2012 #24
I'm in Indiana....and I agree Namvet67 May 2012 #25
Good news, if under Dean's 50 state strategy, the Dems are also running someone. Bat crap crazy, davidwparker May 2012 #27
We won in Indiana in 2008, even though just by one point mahina May 2012 #29
The NRA wants Lugar out. . . B Calm May 2012 #31
NRA rates Lugar an F and wants him out, he is done. Donnelly is basically a rebublican also... IamK May 2012 #33
Doesn't matter OKNancy May 2012 #35
A majority does you no good Pab Sungenis May 2012 #38
A Pub is a Pub is a Pub BitaMig May 2012 #34
actually it does matter. cali May 2012 #40
that was yesterday this is today BitaMig May 2012 #43
gawd forbid the wingnuts have a voice of reason representing them spanone May 2012 #41
Defending Senator Richard Lugar Hubert Flottz May 2012 #45
Democrats could gain if Indiana's Lugar loses U.S. Senate seat Judi Lynn May 2012 #46
Vote for MOURDOCK ! penndragon69 May 2012 #47
Perhaps Indiana will manage to do a "Recall?" n/t KoKo May 2012 #49
Perhaps Lugar should have done his job: Looking out for his constituents and the "American LoisB May 2012 #50
I really though that............. thoreau54 May 2012 #51
Lugar is a right-wing extremist nutjob. Mourdock is worse. provis99 May 2012 #52
In an intelligent, civilized nation edhopper May 2012 #54
Good malaise May 2012 #57

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
5. Yes
Fri May 4, 2012, 12:46 PM
May 2012

Polls show him running roughly neck-and-neck with Mourdock. Lugar would, according to polling, be more likely to hold onto his seat if he wins the primary though he will have been damaged by this primary. I would be sad to see Lugar be replaced by this teabaggin' idiot (Mourdock).


corkhead

(6,119 posts)
9. Worth the risk
Fri May 4, 2012, 12:59 PM
May 2012

Lugar votes in lockstep with the rest of the republicons, I don't think there would be a whole lot of difference when it is all said and done. The Democrat stands a much better chance against the crazy teabagger than he would against a 6 term incumbent.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
18. You have a good point
Fri May 4, 2012, 02:40 PM
May 2012

Lugar though is not batshit insane crazy like Mourdock would be. I've been disappointed that he's been voting along with the rest of the GOP for filibusters but he did vote for a few Democratic bills so he's not all that bad for a Republican IMHO. However, OTOH it would be lovely to have a Democratic US Senator from Indiana again!

LonePirate

(13,420 posts)
22. When all the Repubs vote in lockstep, their relative sanity or insanity doesn't really matter.
Fri May 4, 2012, 03:57 PM
May 2012

If Lugar losing gives the Dem a better chance, then I hope he goes down in flames.

 

Pab Sungenis

(9,612 posts)
37. But can we count on a new Democratic Senator from Indiana
Sat May 5, 2012, 07:56 AM
May 2012

to actually vote like a Democrat? The last one didn't that often.

salin

(48,955 posts)
39. Donnoly is rather blue dog. Guessing he would be sort of like Bayh.
Sat May 5, 2012, 08:35 AM
May 2012

better than the teabagger, but not necessarily a party line voter for the dems.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
53. I dunno
Sun May 6, 2012, 10:51 AM
May 2012

I'm not crazy about "Blue Dog" Dems but they still (mostly) vote for Democratic policies. I don't know much about Donnelly's stances but him swiping a seat here in Indiana would still be better than Mourdock winning IMHO.

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
30. You're not considering one thing.
Sat May 5, 2012, 02:07 AM
May 2012

It isn't just the voting record. It's the laws the tea-nut introduces, and as you can see, the fact that they can hang up common sense things like the raising of the debt ceiling.

Yet, I think it might be worth the risk, too.

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
36. This is what Lugar deserves
Sat May 5, 2012, 07:09 AM
May 2012

Sorry for Indiana, though.

But when Republicans like Lugar don't stand up to the intractable right wing, to the stupidity of the teabaggers, to their obstructionist colleagues... then they deserve to lose!

Republicans are the problem and they are becoming their own worst enemy. Serves them right. Too bad for the rest of us, however.

newspeak

(4,847 posts)
55. it's not just the stupidity of the teabaggers;
Sun May 6, 2012, 11:54 AM
May 2012

it's the outright bigotry and meanness. It's like a bunch of randian sociopaths.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
19. Are you talking about the polling (re: Donnelly vs. the two candidates)
Fri May 4, 2012, 02:41 PM
May 2012

or the polling for Lugar vs. Mourdock?

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
42. No.
Sat May 5, 2012, 09:49 AM
May 2012

As much as I would like to agree with the posters here who think otherwise, I think if Lugar loses on Tuesday, Mourdock has a clear shot through to the Senate. It upsets me, because Mourdock is about as sleazy as they come, but that makes no difference to a vast majority of Hoosiers who believe every single outrageous claim against Obama and the Democrats. The theme of the primary ads this year is "Obama is a Socialist," and I think it's resonating.

And, face it, the residency flap that Lugar found himself in this spring didn't help him much either.

It's sad that in most places in Indiana -- especially in the county I'm in (one of the reddest in the U.S.) -- the GOP has such a stranglehold that any other vote is virtually meaningless except on local and state issues.

If indeed Mourdock wins on Tuesday, Donnelly needs to start hitting it hard come Wednesday, and not let up until November.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
48. Do you think the women's health issue is going to change anyones perspective?
Sat May 5, 2012, 05:55 PM
May 2012

If you haven't seen this it is worth watching. You might even want to share it with others.

http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/87be7156f5/republicans- get-in-my-vagina

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
56. Overall, no.
Sun May 6, 2012, 12:16 PM
May 2012

Are you from Indiana? This state is about as conservative as they come, and a true hotbed of Teabagger politics.

Although last weekend a small group of people rallied in front of the Statehouse for women's health issues, overall it's pretty much God, gays, guns, and saving the baybees here. Every ad -- and I mean EVERY ad -- for primary candidates makes the point that they are conservative and pro-life. Damn whatever else, those are the two prerequisites for running for office here. Got a piece of campaign literature in the mail from another 'bagger running for Congress -- David McIntosh -- that actually said you would have to go back to 1620 to find anyone more conservative. I didn't know whether to laugh or cry when I read that.

So, while some here do care about women's health and women's issues in general, I don't think that it will be much of a factor in Tuesday's vote. Our march backward continues...

Again, as I said, I do hope I'm wrong and that Lugar pulls it out. But I also don't have any illusions about this state, either.

Oh, and did I mention Mike Pence is running for governor?

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
4. Probably not, but
Fri May 4, 2012, 12:45 PM
May 2012

It's turnout that matters. If there is low turnout the zealot always wins. Normal turnout the normal person wins. With no meaningful presidential primary you have to think turnout will be low and the goofball will win. I do think Donnelly could beat Mourdock, but I'm not sure enough of it to actually hope Mourdock wins the primary.

Indykatie

(3,696 posts)
10. I'm in Indiana
Fri May 4, 2012, 01:03 PM
May 2012

I think Dems have a decent shot at winning if Mourdock is the candidate. The Dems have a good candidate in Donnelly. Lugar has enjoyed wide support among Dems and Independents over his career. None (hopefully) of the Dems and a much smaller number of the Independents will support Moudock if he is the candidate. It's an open primary so there will be some number of Dems voting for Mourdock (me included) to create a little hilarity as DKos calls it. Even without that factor the sense here is that Lugar is going down to defeat.

caraher

(6,278 posts)
26. Please please please don't vote Mourdock
Fri May 4, 2012, 07:25 PM
May 2012

It's just not worth the risk of putting yet another tea party nitwit in office. The problem is, this is Indiana, the state where, in the same year Obama carried the state, we still had enough voters who will cast a ballot for anything with an (R) after its name that admitted election law-flouter Charlie White won Secretary of State. Even the Indy Star endorsed the Democrat, but whatever coattails Obama may have had were far too short to keep White from crushing him.

This poll definitely reflects the lawn sign activity where I am (Greencastle, home of DePauw).

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
32. Lugar enabled Bush and Cheney's crimes against humanity. He deserves
Sat May 5, 2012, 04:56 AM
May 2012

to be defeated ignominiously.

I mean you can't get much worse than Operation Shocking and Awful.

SCantiGOP

(13,870 posts)
14. re "missing Lugar"
Fri May 4, 2012, 02:14 PM
May 2012

it would be like replacing Republican Olympia Snowe with Republican Sarah Palin.

Horse with no Name

(33,956 posts)
15. Well at the end of the day
Fri May 4, 2012, 02:17 PM
May 2012

If Snowe and Palin vote the same way...then it really doesn't make any difference that one is actually batshit crazy and one only votes batshit crazy.

However....the crazy bagger should be easier for the sane Democrat to beat.

That is what I am looking at.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
16. but there's a shitload of evidence that Snowe and Palin would not vote even remotely the same
Fri May 4, 2012, 02:19 PM
May 2012

way.

And Indiana, despite Obama winning it by a hair in '08 is pretty darn red.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
20. Is that a relevant analogy?
Fri May 4, 2012, 02:49 PM
May 2012

Is Lugar as "good" as Snowe (who was one of the only ones to vote for the stimulus, for example) or is she more like Jerry Moran of Kansas? Better than Tiahrt (who he beat in the primary) but so far not seeming to vote all that much differently than Tiahrt would have.

 

penndragon69

(788 posts)
17. Bat shit crazy Mourdock
Fri May 4, 2012, 02:36 PM
May 2012

I hope Mourdock does win over Lugar because Lugar is completely out of touch
with hoosier voters, plus he's old and getting senile.

It's been virtually impossible to challenge Lugar over the years,
but with the BAT SHIT CRAZY tea-bagger Mourdock, And the growing
disgust for reich wingers, it will be a lot easier for SANITY to return to Indiana.

From another hoosier Democrat in the the RED zone.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
58. Coates took advantage of the 2010 mood.
Sun May 6, 2012, 12:32 PM
May 2012

Democratic voters sitting at home in large numbers and republicans claiming that they would focus on job creation. Fast forward to 2012. Republicans have obstructed job creation in the hope of defeating Obama. Republicans in the House and across the country have invaded lives by approving invasive social legislation. After being slapped up side the head since the 2010 elections, democrats and independents have gotten the message that most republicans are vile. The fact that Coates was elected and then became part of the republican assault on the middleclass and families makes ity more likely that Donnelly can be elected if he runs a strong campaign.

 

wwytchwood

(31 posts)
23. who cares?
Fri May 4, 2012, 05:21 PM
May 2012

Indiana will join the NEW SOUTH, the states of MI, OH, WI, MN and IA, in being asshole centrals.

DocMac

(1,628 posts)
24. You can add PA to that list.
Fri May 4, 2012, 06:11 PM
May 2012

At least they are starting to see what Republicans do.

I don't know what happened to WI. I guess these states that voted for these R Govenors are gonna have to learn the hard way. The sad thing is that it will take a decade to fix the damage done.

davidwparker

(5,397 posts)
27. Good news, if under Dean's 50 state strategy, the Dems are also running someone. Bat crap crazy,
Fri May 4, 2012, 10:08 PM
May 2012

meet someone of reason.

Bad news if the Dems did not run someone according to Dean's 50 state strategy.

mahina

(17,653 posts)
29. We won in Indiana in 2008, even though just by one point
Fri May 4, 2012, 10:39 PM
May 2012
http://www.electoral-vote.com/

I remember being blown away by that.

You Indiana folks, can do!

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
31. The NRA wants Lugar out. . .
Sat May 5, 2012, 04:46 AM
May 2012

I live behind the Hoosier Iron Curtain. Trust me, the Tea Bag nut case will win with the NRA supporting him. I never seen so many gun loonies in one state.

 

IamK

(956 posts)
33. NRA rates Lugar an F and wants him out, he is done. Donnelly is basically a rebublican also...
Sat May 5, 2012, 06:17 AM
May 2012



From donnelly's web page...

Congressman Donnelly Rated 8th Most Conservative Democrat in U.S. House of Representatives

http://donnelly.house.gov/2010/02/congressman-donnelly-rated-8th-most-conservative-democrat-in-us-house-of-representatives.shtml

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
35. Doesn't matter
Sat May 5, 2012, 07:00 AM
May 2012

It's better to have someone vote with the Dems 50% of the time than a Republican who votes 0%.
Even if the Dem never votes our way, it is better for numbers and retaining committee chairs and retaining the Majority.

 

Pab Sungenis

(9,612 posts)
38. A majority does you no good
Sat May 5, 2012, 08:00 AM
May 2012

if your majority doesn't back you when the time comes to vote. Witness: the Senate 2009-2010.

 

BitaMig

(10 posts)
34. A Pub is a Pub is a Pub
Sat May 5, 2012, 06:45 AM
May 2012

it does not matter if they are a moderate pub or a bagger pub, they ALL need to be voted out of office.

The thing we need to look out for is what Dems become friends with Mourdock.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
40. actually it does matter.
Sat May 5, 2012, 08:56 AM
May 2012

Much as I'd like to see all pubs voted out of office, that aint' gonna happen. And no, a pub is a pub is a pub is not true.

I voted happily for a repub senator for years against all dem comers. I never regretted it for one second. His name is Jim Jeffords; he became an independent in his last term, but as a republican he was still a very good rep.

 

BitaMig

(10 posts)
43. that was yesterday this is today
Sat May 5, 2012, 10:16 AM
May 2012

please list all the "Moderate" Republicans currently in Congress.

Please list all the "Moderate" Republicans currently running for national office

Last time I looked I could not find one single sane moderate Republican in congress, even the 2 so-called moderates from Maine did not even sign on to the ACA in the end even though accommodations were made to them.

Hubert Flottz

(37,726 posts)
45. Defending Senator Richard Lugar
Sat May 5, 2012, 11:38 AM
May 2012

I have watched Senator Richard Lugar go right along with every lie the GOP has thrown out there for as long as I can remember seeing him on my TV screen. He was one of Bush's go to pimps in congress for 8 years of war crimes and looting of America. I lave no respect for the "Man"...

Judi Lynn

(160,530 posts)
46. Democrats could gain if Indiana's Lugar loses U.S. Senate seat
Sat May 5, 2012, 02:16 PM
May 2012

Democrats could gain if Indiana's Lugar loses U.S. Senate seat
By Nick Carey
Sat May 5, 2012 1:23pm EDT

(Reuters) - The last time Republican Senate veteran Richard Lugar stood for election, in 2006, he was so respected that the Democrats did not bother to run against him and he won his Indiana seat with 87 percent of the vote.

But now Lugar, 80, is faltering under a conservative challenge from within his own party in Tuesday's Indiana Republican primary. That is giving Democrats, struggling to keep control of the U.S. Senate in November's elections, a glimmer of hope of winning the U.S. Senate seat Lugar has held for 36 years.

Accused of worrying as much about India as Indiana, foreign policy expert Lugar is trailing his Tea Party movement opponent Richard Mourdock in polls in the state, by as much as 10 points in one survey.

Although traditionally Republican, Indiana has become more of a swing state in recent years. If small-government advocate Mourdock wins on Tuesday, Democratic candidate Joe Donnelly is seen as having a better chance of winning in the November general election than if the more moderate Lugar is the Republican candidate.

More:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/05/us-usa-campaign-lugar-idUSBRE8440A020120505?rpc=401&feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&rpc=401

 

penndragon69

(788 posts)
47. Vote for MOURDOCK !
Sat May 5, 2012, 04:26 PM
May 2012

He's easy to beat.

AS treasury sec:
Lost or misplaced almost $400 MILLION dollars of state funds.
This caused draconian cuts in education and fast tracking
of school vouchers.

Then....Surprise, he finds almost $400 million hidden to obscure accounts
that apparently NOBODY knew about.

But once this money was back in the till, did it go to restore public education...wait for it,

HELL NO !

It's being used to prop up other failures of the daniels Mis-administration.
He's a tea bagger crack pot who worships the Rand /Norquist doctrine.
GO MOURDOCK !

LoisB

(7,206 posts)
50. Perhaps Lugar should have done his job: Looking out for his constituents and the "American
Sat May 5, 2012, 07:45 PM
May 2012

People" rather than walking lockstep with Mitch "NO" McConnell.

thoreau54

(2 posts)
51. I really though that.............
Sat May 5, 2012, 11:01 PM
May 2012

the tea party was becoming a non-sequiter, if not already. it's up to us libs and progressives to extinguish these dopes in november----NATIONWIDE!!! (although it would be in our interest to keep some of them around, just for yuks).

we fell asleep in 2010, so never again.


my only observation re: tea party members is this:

i never thought anyone could be so gullible AND stupid. to quote Disraeli "All leaning against each other, and all together upon nothing".

 

provis99

(13,062 posts)
52. Lugar is a right-wing extremist nutjob. Mourdock is worse.
Sun May 6, 2012, 01:39 AM
May 2012

Indiana politics is a lot more like Southern politics than Midwestern politics; bigots, religious fanatics, and racists abound aplenty.

edhopper

(33,579 posts)
54. In an intelligent, civilized nation
Sun May 6, 2012, 11:51 AM
May 2012

this bagger would have no chance of being elected. That his odds are even 50/50 is staggering and speaks to the sorry state of our country.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»bye bye Senator Lugar. H...